Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

It's the 17th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Rooster »

So the news media was all over these children protesting our natural rights to self defense yesterday. The numbers were off the charts, they gushed, but finally CBS coughed up the reality:

http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/25/repor ... count-low/

It was supposed to be the largest rally evah with 600,000, but it ended up being well below expected attendance numbers at 200,000. Cue the sad trombones. I guess when you pick one of the most annoying spokeman in recent memory to be the face of your “revolution” it stands to reason that you’ll turn off most of your target audience.

Image
Image
Cock o' the walk, baby!
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

I wonder if these "radicals" will march on the palaces of the billionaires that peddle psychotropic drugs and opiates that are dissolving the essence of American youth...

Probably not.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

You don't need guns. You need sodomy...some dank herb...and Netflix.

you are getting sleepy
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29858
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Mikey »

About 10x more than Trump’s inauguration though.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Dinsdale »

TDS rears its ugly head again.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Dinsdale wrote:TDS rears its ugly head again.

Together, we can find a cure.
:(
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29858
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Mikey »

Dinsdale wrote:TDS rears its ugly head again.
The Daily Show?

Image
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Let's set aside the lunacy of allowing a bunch of kids to lecture the world about guns without once mentioning the factor of criminals. As for the suddenly Woke student leaders, they seemed possessed of a self-absorption that would glaze the eyes of Narcissus. But what really rankled me about the March (and who paid for that, by the way?), how the fuck can bald chick wear these pants?

It's like something a beggar would wear--but only in desperate times.
Image
Last edited by LTS TRN 2 on Thu Mar 29, 2018 7:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Before God was, I am
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Rooster »

Nice Cuban flag on that jacket too. Fidel much, Emma?
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Goober McTuber »

Rooster wrote:Nice Cuban flag on that jacket too. Fidel much, Emma?
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/emma- ... h-10208255
Of course, anyone who's ever walked through Little Havana even once understands that simply waving a Cuban flag does not make one a communist: If anything, the opposite seems to be true in America. Cuban right-wingers love the Cuban flag — to them, it represents the hope that the nation will one day be liberated from the Castro family. The Bay of Pigs Veterans Association, the ultraconservative group of counterrevolutionaries the CIA paid to attack Castro in 1961, currently sells T-shirts, hats, mugs, and key chains emblazoned with the Cuban flag. The Bay of Pigs Veterans Association endorsed Donald Trump in 2016.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29858
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Mikey »

Goober McTuber wrote:
Rooster wrote:Nice Cuban flag on that jacket too. Fidel much, Emma?
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/emma- ... h-10208255
Of course, anyone who's ever walked through Little Havana even once understands that simply waving a Cuban flag does not make one a communist: If anything, the opposite seems to be true in America. Cuban right-wingers love the Cuban flag — to them, it represents the hope that the nation will one day be liberated from the Castro family. The Bay of Pigs Veterans Association, the ultraconservative group of counterrevolutionaries the CIA paid to attack Castro in 1961, currently sells T-shirts, hats, mugs, and key chains emblazoned with the Cuban flag. The Bay of Pigs Veterans Association endorsed Donald Trump in 2016.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


But...but...but...Obaaaaaaaammmmmmaaaaaa!

Whatever the numbers were (who cares besides Trump and his legions of fellatistas), and I'm sure if you add up DC, LA, Seattle, Denver, NYC, Boston, etc. they were pretty substantial, the fact that so many dickwad morons are out there trying to run them down, and demonizing the organizers with any lame-ass bullshit they can come up with, shows that the whole thing was pretty much a complete success.
User avatar
L45B
Commanche Hero
Posts: 4018
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 4:01 am
Location: NYC - born and raised!!!

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by L45B »

Mikey wrote:...shows that the whole thing was pretty much a complete success.
We agree.

/s/

NRA New Membership Services Dept.
“My dentist, that’s another beauty, my dentist, you kiddin’ me. It cost me five thousand dollars to have all new teeth put in. Now he tells me I need braces!” —Rodney Dangerfield
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Goober McTuber »

L45B wrote:
Mikey wrote:...shows that the whole thing was pretty much a complete success.
We agree.

/s/

NRA New Membership Services Dept.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/won ... 55c94ca5dc
Given its high profile, it's easy to assume that the NRA represents the voice of American gun owners. But in fact, the organization's membership numbers and survey data point a different picture. Only a small fraction of the nation's gun owners are NRA members. Even among NRA members, there is widespread dissent from some key points of the organization's orthodoxy. And on many gun control issues, the majority of gun owners who aren't affiliated with the NRA hold opinions closer to those of non-gun owners than to those of NRA members.

Let's start with the membership numbers. In recent years the NRA has said it has 5 million dues-paying members. There's some reason to be skeptical of this figure, but let's assume 5 million is right. Those 5 million members only comprise somewhere between 6 and 7 percent of American gun owners. That would imply that the overwhelming majority of American gun owners -- over 90 percent of them -- do not belong to the NRA.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29342
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by BSmack »

Let's not forget that many gun clubs mandate that their members be members in good standing in the NRA. They do this because the NRA throws some goodies, no doubt purchased with laundered Russian money, to the club.

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reute ... 8320130203
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8927
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Diego in Seattle »

On top of that only 13 people ever used the NRA discount offered by Delta Airlines.

5 million, my ass.....
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Bucmonkey
2011 CFB Bowl Pic Champ
Posts: 2828
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: ...

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Bucmonkey »

:lol:
Go Bucs, Gators
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Left Seater »

So the number of NRA members is at least 5 times the size of the best estimate of these silly marches.

But just because 83,000,000 gun owners aren't all members of the NRA, doesn't mean those gun owners don't support the 2nd Amendment.

Why do so many of you hate the Constitution?


As for Delta, they are just a hot mess. They pulled the NRA convention discount because they claimed they didn't want to take sides in a divisive discussion. What they really meant is no one was using it so we will put out some corporate communication BS saying we don't take sides. But at the same time they were happy to operate charter flights that filled their pockets from South Florida to DC for the supporters of the march. So they do want to take sides with those who spend money with them. See also their fight against the Middle East Airlines while claiming they get no government subsidies.
Last edited by Left Seater on Tue Mar 27, 2018 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Wolfman
Dumpater Artist
Posts: 7188
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: SW FL

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Wolfman »

The United States is not the UK, Canada, or any other nation. Thank God.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan

Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.

"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Goober McTuber »

Left Seater wrote:But just because 83,000,000 gun owners aren't all members of the NRA, doesn't mean those gun owners don't support the 2nd Amendment.
Well, duh. I'm willing to bet that at least 99.99% of the 83,000,000 support the 2nd Amendment (I am one of them). And about 94% aren't supporting the NRA. And none of us hate the Constitution, you silly twat.
And on many gun control issues, the majority of gun owners who aren't affiliated with the NRA hold opinions closer to those of non-gun owners than to those of NRA members.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Rooster »

Now the latest news is that the March for Life, which was supposedly a teenager event, was only marginally attended by young people. The average age of an attendee was just under 49 and whose attendance percentages were 90% of the protesters.

I guess the young people who were supposed to be there must have partied too late to get up in time to protest?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03 ... crowd.html
Cock o' the walk, baby!
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29858
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Mikey »

Rooster wrote:Now the latest news is that the March for Life, which was supposedly a teenager event, was only marginally attended by young people. The average age of an attendee was just under 49 and whose attendance percentages were 90% of the protesters.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03 ... crowd.html
So what?

That shows that it's not just teenagers who think it's an important issue. Was everybody else supposed to stay home?
You really do have your head up FAUX New's ass, don't you?
Mikey wrote:

Whatever the numbers were (who cares besides Trump and his legions of fellatistas), and I'm sure if you add up DC, LA, Seattle, Denver, NYC, Boston, etc. they were pretty substantial, the fact that so many dickwad morons are out there trying to run them down, and demonizing the organizers with any lame-ass bullshit they can come up with, shows that the whole thing was pretty much a complete success.
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Rooster »

Oh, and one of the entertainers selected to piously rap his suppprt for the movement was arrested on gun charges in California a year ago. Hmmm.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/vic ... un-charge/
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Rooster »

Mikey wrote:
Rooster wrote:Now the latest news is that the March for Life, which was supposedly a teenager event, was only marginally attended by young people. The average age of an attendee was just under 49 and whose attendance percentages were 90% of the protesters.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03 ... crowd.html
So what?

That shows that it's not just teenagers who think it's an important issue. Was everybody else supposed to stay home?
You really do have your head up FAUX New's ass, don't you?
Mikey wrote:



Whatever the numbers were (who cares besides Trump and his legions of fellatistas), and I'm sure if you add up DC, LA, Seattle, Denver, NYC, Boston, etc. they were pretty substantial, the fact that so many dickwad morons are out there trying to run them down, and demonizing the organizers with any lame-ass bullshit they can come up with, shows that the whole thing was pretty much a complete success.
:lol: I thought this was supposed to be a child’s revolution where the young and wise were instructing the foolish and intransigent elderly how national movements are done right. Instead, a mere one in ten shows up to protest the thing which— in theory at least —is killing them by the bushel basketful. I’d go so far as to make the unsubstantiated claim that there were a significant number of pussy hats in the audience and that if you could, you’d see the same old tired faces in all the marches covering those issues so near and dear to the Left’s oily black hearts. After all, armed protection for me, but not for thee, comrade. (You can hear the faint echo of that refrain coming from Socialismigrad, Vermont where Commisar Bernie Sanders rails against income disparity. “A dacha for me, but not for thee, comrade!”)
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Goober McTuber »

Rooster wrote:Oh, and one of the entertainers selected to piously rap his suppprt for the movement was arrested on gun charges in California a year ago. Hmmm.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/vic ... un-charge/
He had a concealed carry permit. It was just from a different state. He just might not even be affected by a number of gun control measures being debated. Yet another Rooster fail.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Goober McTuber »

Rooster wrote:
Mikey wrote:
Rooster wrote:Now the latest news is that the March for Life, which was supposedly a teenager event, was only marginally attended by young people. The average age of an attendee was just under 49 and whose attendance percentages were 90% of the protesters.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03 ... crowd.html
So what?

That shows that it's not just teenagers who think it's an important issue. Was everybody else supposed to stay home?
You really do have your head up FAUX New's ass, don't you?
Mikey wrote:



Whatever the numbers were (who cares besides Trump and his legions of fellatistas), and I'm sure if you add up DC, LA, Seattle, Denver, NYC, Boston, etc. they were pretty substantial, the fact that so many dickwad morons are out there trying to run them down, and demonizing the organizers with any lame-ass bullshit they can come up with, shows that the whole thing was pretty much a complete success.
:lol: I thought this was supposed to be a child’s revolution where the young and wise were instructing the foolish and intransigent elderly how national movements are done right. Instead, a mere one in ten shows up to protest the thing which— in theory at least —is killing them by the bushel basketful.
Her "random" sample size was 256 people in one location. How many tens of thousands marched nationally? The news coverage I've seen does not reflect her numbers.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Rooster »

Goober McTuber wrote:
Rooster wrote:Oh, and one of the entertainers selected to piously rap his suppprt for the movement was arrested on gun charges in California a year ago. Hmmm.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/vic ... un-charge/
He had a concealed carry permit. It was just from a different state. He just might not even be affected by a number of gun control measures being debated. Yet another Rooster fail.
But, but, but... no one needs a gun— or a CCW permit to carry one!. After all, those are wicked devices that only those weird red staters like to masturbate to. We don’t need those in the great Republik of Kalifornia! Besides, those blue staters are supposed to be more intelligent than those dumb hillbillies in the flyover States, yet he didn’t bother to check reciprocity laws before he went there? I wonder if he owns a flintlock pistol or if the gun is a semiautomatic— you know, like one of those David Hogg wants to ban? After all, who needs more than a smoothbore single shot hand cannon for self defense?
Cock o' the walk, baby!
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29858
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Mikey »

Seems like they've got you pretty scared.
Need a safe space?


Go ahead...jump right in.

Image
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Goober McTuber »

Rooster wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
Rooster wrote:Oh, and one of the entertainers selected to piously rap his suppprt for the movement was arrested on gun charges in California a year ago. Hmmm.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/vic ... un-charge/
He had a concealed carry permit. It was just from a different state. He just might not even be affected by a number of gun control measures being debated. Yet another Rooster fail.
But, but, but... no one needs a gun— or a CCW permit to carry one!. After all, those are wicked devices that only those weird red staters like to masturbate to. We don’t need those in the great Republik of Kalifornia! Besides, those blue staters are supposed to be more intelligent than those dumb hillbillies in the flyover States, yet he didn’t bother to check reciprocity laws before he went there? I wonder if he owns a flintlock pistol or if the gun is a semiautomatic— you know, like one of those David Hogg wants to ban? After all, who needs more than a smoothbore single shot hand cannon for self defense?
Listen up, you sky-is-falling, braindead, shrieking harpy. Sensible gun control legislation does not mandate that everyone should turn in their guns. Even Emma Gonzalez specifically stated that. And that was not a reciprocity issue. Some states recognize other states conceal carry permits. Some don't.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Left Seater »

What is sensible to you isn’t sensible to someone else.

Here is my issue. If we are going to limit the size of clips then put the same limit on Police. You want to ban “assault” rifles, then keep the Police from having any as well. What is good for the citizens should be good for the government.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Goober McTuber »

Left Seater wrote:What is sensible to you isn’t sensible to someone else.

Here is my issue. If we are going to limit the size of clips then put the same limit on Police. You want to ban “assault” rifles, then keep the Police from having any as well. What is good for the citizens should be good for the government.
Now that's not sensible at all. It's the job of the police to protect us. It's not the job of some CCW wingnut. And please link us up to the last school mass shooting perpetrated by a police officer.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29858
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Mikey »

LS doesn't think the police should be able to outgun criminals. Wouldn't be a fair fight or anything.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Joe in PB »

Goober McTuber wrote:
Now that's not sensible at all. It's the job of the police to protect us.
That simply isn't true. The main job of police is to maintain order, and of course to help others when feasible. The reality is it's up to individuals to protect themselves.

After Katrina struck many NO police officers vacated the city, leaving residents to help themselves until the National Guard and Feebl...ah FEMA arrived days/weeks later.

The same thing happened after the Rodney King verdict was announced, police vacated the areas in LA where most of the violence was occurring.




Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Last edited by Joe in PB on Wed Mar 28, 2018 10:24 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Dinsdale »

Goober McTuber wrote:It's the job of the police to protect us.

Yeah, we should totally leave that to the government.

Sin,
Those Four Stiffs At Kent State

And please link us up to the last school mass shooting perpetrated by a police officer.
The last time one was a factor, he was too scared to shoot anyone, and cowered behind some bushes.


Because when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Rooster is clearly jealous of the size of David Hogg's penis.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Mikey wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:


But...but...but...Obaaaaaaaammmmmmaaaaaa!

Whatever the numbers were (who cares besides Trump and his legions of fellatistas), and I'm sure if you add up DC, LA, Seattle, Denver, NYC, Boston, etc. they were pretty substantial, the fact that so many dickwad morons are out there trying to run them down, and demonizing the organizers with any lame-ass bullshit they can come up with, shows that the whole thing was pretty much a complete success.
Pretty much

Anyone who believes these Parkland kids deserve to be smeared with Hitler photos are sick fucking losers beyond help. Which is of course why they voted for Trump.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Dinsdale »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Anyone who believes these Parkland kids are sick fucking losers beyond help.
FTFY

Their feeeelings are more important to them than my constitutional rights.

Fuck them and all of their ilk.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Joe in PB »

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ....and who paid for that, by the way?

The “March For Our Lives” rally wasn’t an organic movement of teens holding signs.

It was a coordinated effort by anti-gun activists who have a visceral hate for the Second Amendment, and other leftist groups like “Move On” who hate President Trump, and everything he stands for.

Even worse, Planned Parenthood, an organization who actively seeks to slaughter millions of innocent babies without a blink of an eye, is suddenly interested in protecting life?

In typical leftist fashion, liberals only support the policies they want, their “truth” is relative.
http://mommyunderground.com/heres-what- ... s-protest/
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Derron »

Rooster wrote: After all, who needs more than a smoothbore single shot hand cannon for self defense?
You would have to understand that all these Constitution hating limp wristed liberal faggots are not capable of defending themselves against a fucking spider. They will just roll up in a fetal ball and beg for mercy while waiting for the police to get there 20 minutes later to write a report on how they were robbed, their wife was fucked in the ass, and how their daughter had to suck off three of those felony gangsters in those 20 minutes. Enjoy watching that show.
Last edited by Derron on Thu Mar 29, 2018 4:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by Derron »

Screw_Michigan wrote:Rooster is clearly jealous of the size of David Hogg's penis.
At least he has a penis and not some bleeding gash flowing out menstrual bullshit like the stuff that comes out of your pie hole every post.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Despite the fawning coverage, the March had low numbers

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Mikey wrote:LS doesn't think the police should be able to outgun criminals. Wouldn't be a fair fight or anything.
"LS," if you haven't noticed, is a total fraud, a slimy slithering troll in every sense of the word.
Before God was, I am
Post Reply