I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Dinsdale »

Man, that really is food-for-thought. I think we need to take a week off and think about this.

Sin,
SEC
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Dinsdale »

88 wrote:what if the SEC meat grinder ends up hanging at least 2 losses on every team in the conference

SunCoastSooner wrote:Remember 2007?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Left Seater »

If, if that were to happen I would hope the committee would use head to head non conf games as a decision point.

Take MSU and Oregon. Oregon in MSU out.

FSU and ND. FSU in and ND is out.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Dinsdale »

Left Seater wrote:If, if that were to happen I would hope the committee would use head to head non conf games as a decision point.

Take MSU and Oregon. Oregon in MSU out.

FSU and ND. FSU in and ND is out.
I agree.

And we can apply it to the SEC... uhm...

One of them played KSU, I guess.

Maybe if the committee does the right thing, the SEC might actually start playing someone.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

The likelihood of all those teams running the table is so low that it's really not worth worrying about at this point. Upsets are on the horizon. It happens every year in November.

I think a 2-loss SEC champ is a lock to get into the playoff, assuming said team comes out of the West. I don't think the committee is as enamored with straight W/L record as the fans are. They have already laid their cards out on the table and said SOS and conference championships are the main criteria.

If Mizzou ended up winning the SEC, I would laugh by balls off. Now THAT would throw a wrench into things.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Dinsdale »

Papa Willie wrote: Even Pac-loving Sagarin has finally admitted it this year in his SOS ratings.
Oh. Then you wouldn't mind citing the date when Sagarin changed his formula?

Yeah, thought so.

And ASU played Utah, UCLA played Zona, and Oregon played Stanford...


what were you saying about "elimination games"?

You pulled to idiotic takes in one post -- congrats.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

According to his Wiki page, Sagarin grew up in New York and Indiana, and attended MIT. By all accounts he has zero ties to the west coast. So maybe someone can explain where his "love" for the Pac comes into play? Is he accepting cash payments from Larry Scott to fudge the numbers or something?

Seems to me when you play 9 conference games (one less OOC creampuff), 5 or 6 road games a year, and play a better non-con schedule than most, you're going to have solid SOS numbers. This isn't rocket science.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Papa Willie wrote:In years past, he has always had the Pac up higher in the SOS schedules.
And I just laid out the logical reasons why.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Dinsdale »

Papa Willie wrote:In years past, he has always had the Pac up higher in the SOS schedules.
Uhmmm... take a guess why?

Hint: Citadel, NorthwesternEast State South, et al


How to suck SEC balls

1) Pump chest about your greatness while ducking every other non-SEC team

2) When the ridiculous nature of step 1 is pointed out, play the victim
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20505
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Screw_Michigan »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:So maybe someone can explain where his "love" for the Pac comes into play? Is he accepting cash payments from Larry Scott to fudge the numbers or something?
It's just like Spray's conspiracy theory that ESPN is in the tank for the NE Corridor teams and schools because they're located near ESPN. Pure, unadulterated stupidity.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
Carson
2012 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 4638
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: NOT in The Gump

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Carson »

User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Dinsdale »

Sudden Sam wrote:And we've lost our left tackle (isn't that Oregon's excuse for losing to Arizona?) Could be a disaster.
Of the 4 guys on the 2-deep at tackle starting the season, 3 of them were out for that game. And I believe a guard, too.

But losing your starting LT is never a good thing.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Python
Elwood
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:04 pm

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Python »

Sam, LSU isn't that good. Relax. It seems like I have to tell you this every year.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Goober McTuber »

Dinsdale wrote:
Papa Willie wrote: Even Pac-loving Sagarin has finally admitted it this year in his SOS ratings.
Oh. Then you wouldn't mind citing the date when Sagarin changed his formula?

Yeah, thought so.

And ASU played Utah, UCLA played Zona, and Oregon played Stanford...


what were you saying about "elimination games"?

You pulled to idiotic takes in one post -- congrats.
Were you looking for the word "two"? Might want to be a little more careful when calling someone else idiotic.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Dinsdale »

Fuck, I got dinsdaled.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
SunCoastSooner
Reported Bible Thumper
Posts: 6318
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:07 am
Location: Destin, Florida

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by SunCoastSooner »

Dinsdale wrote:
88 wrote:what if the SEC meat grinder ends up hanging at least 2 losses on every team in the conference

SunCoastSooner wrote:Remember 2007?
Rinse and repeat.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
User avatar
L45B
Commanche Hero
Posts: 4009
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 4:01 am
Location: NYC - born and raised!!!

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by L45B »

^ Even if it's Missouri. :shock:
“My dentist, that’s another beauty, my dentist, you kiddin’ me. It cost me five thousand dollars to have all new teeth put in. Now he tells me I need braces!” —Rodney Dangerfield
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by Left Seater »

Sudden Sam wrote:
88 wrote:what if the SEC meat grinder ends up hanging at least 2 losses on every team in the conference
They want the best 4 teams, right?

An SEC champ with two losses will be one of the 4.

While I agree you are likely correct, they would be included, there is no way you can say they would be one of the 4 best at this point in the season.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
buckeye_in_sc
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3257
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:25 pm

Re: I hate the water cooler stuff, but...

Post by buckeye_in_sc »

if MIZZOU gets in does that mean Indiana gets a sniff?? You know transitive property and such?
Post Reply