Page 1 of 2

SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:19 pm
by Carson
Nick Marshall has gotten his fumble out of the way for this game.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:32 pm
by Carson
Fukkin' MALZAHN MAGIC!!!!

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:37 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
My god, Mizzou WRs are going to destroy those midget DBs.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:40 pm
by Dinsdale
The winner will be whichever team that decides to start playing defense first. Neither has so far.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:47 pm
by Carson
Fuck defense, this is a track meet.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:49 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Onside? Ballsy.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:03 pm
by Dinsdale
I would say the lack of defense resembles a B12 game, but flipping to the other game, the B12 aren't playing any offense -- to busy bitching about the cold or something.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:05 pm
by War Wagon
Mizzou has to figure out this read/option, just getting ripped.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:10 pm
by War Wagon
Carson wrote:Nick Marshall has gotten his fumble out of the way for this game.
Not quite. :grin: :grin:

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:11 pm
by War Wagon
M2 wrote:I'd say, the PAC 12's... 8th place team wins this game by at least a TD.
STFU, idiot.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:11 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Somebody should tell Auburn that while their rushing game is very good, the forward pass is actually a legal play. Gotta keep that Mizzou front honest.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:18 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Well, that works too. :lol:

That was like rushing against the wind.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:20 pm
by Dinsdale
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Gotta keep that Mizzou front honest.

I believe they "honestly" forgot what the phrase "gap assignments" means.

shutyomouth could run through those holes with a KFC bucket in hand.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:24 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Does #24 have money on Mizzou? WTF kind of tackle was that?

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:33 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Nevermind. Scrap the forward pass.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:35 pm
by Carson
War Wagon wrote:Mizzou has to figure out this read/option, just getting ripped.
Nobody's done it yet.

Pinkel's ass has gotta hurt from having the ball stuffed up it this much.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:35 pm
by Carson
.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:40 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Snap the damn ball, Mizzou. Dumbasses.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:50 pm
by The Seer
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Snap the damn ball, Mizzou. Dumbasses.

Brain crampage at it's most obvious....it was like they were waiting and asking the refs if they would like the opportunity to review the call prior to snapping it....

D.U.M.B.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:52 pm
by The Seer
Dinsdale wrote:The winner will be whichever team that decides to start playing defense first. Neither has so far.
Shhhh. You're taking away their Pac 12 mocking over scores like 41-31.....

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:11 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Foolio, you're not gonna troll the game threads tonight.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:12 pm
by War Wagon
Watching that 1st half wore me the fuck out. Mizzou better make some big adjustments to slow that run game, it seems unstoppable. Thing is, nobody has run the ball like that on them all year. They've held everyone under their season average, every game. Just unreal.

I think it's time to start drinking, heavily.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:24 pm
by Carson
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Foolio, you're not gonna troll the game threads tonight.
Thank you.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:14 am
by Dinsdale
The "vaunted" defense of Mizzou looks fucking horrid when they finally played a team that runs the ball.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:20 am
by Cross Traffic
Great place to put the cart guys. Auburn defender should have been ejected IMO.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:22 am
by Carson
Mizzou dude grabbed a facemask and paid for it.

This last quarter may be epoch.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:24 am
by The Seer
Your gonna need a bigger adding machine.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:24 am
by Dinsdale
Cross Traffic wrote:Great place to put the cart guys. Auburn defender should have been ejected IMO.

And Missouri receiver should have been flagged for the face mask. Stiffarming doesn't include putting fingers through the facemask and twisting the defender's head.

Should have been an offensive penalty, with the defense docked 15 afterwards for the unnecessary.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:25 am
by War Wagon
Dinsdale wrote:The "vaunted" defense of Mizzou looks fucking horrid when they finally played a team that runs the ball.
I said early in the season their defense was weak. It has gotten better, but they've never seen a running game like this.

What a shoot-out, what a game.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:26 am
by Left Seater
Is anyone going to play defense in this game? The story will be the amazing offenses though. :meds:


The rules do not really allow for an ejection for the late hit out of bounds. The face mask was missed, but it does not excuse the shove that was beyond the media restraining line.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:29 am
by Dinsdale
And the winner will still cry about being "snubbed" for the MNC game.

Several teams would kill either of these squads. Stanford would put on a clinic.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:30 am
by Dinsdale
Left Seater wrote:The face mask was missed, but it does not excuse the shove that was beyond the media restraining line.
Hence me thinking the play should have been called back, then advanced 15 after that (I think that's how that works, not sure).

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:34 am
by Left Seater
Dinsdale wrote:
Left Seater wrote:The face mask was missed, but it does not excuse the shove that was beyond the media restraining line.
Hence me thinking the play should have been called back, then advanced 15 after that (I think that's how that works, not sure).
The foul for the offensive face mask is enforced from the spot of the foul. So 15 from where ever it occurred. The late hit was a dead ball foul and would therefore be administered after the face mask foul. It too is 15 yards, but if the ball was inside the 30 then it would be 1/2 the distance to the goal.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:38 am
by Dinsdale
Left Seater wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:
Left Seater wrote:The face mask was missed, but it does not excuse the shove that was beyond the media restraining line.
Hence me thinking the play should have been called back, then advanced 15 after that (I think that's how that works, not sure).
The foul for the offensive face mask is enforced from the spot of the foul. So 15 from where ever it occurred. The late hit was a dead ball foul and would therefore be administered after the face mask foul. It too is 15 yards, but if the ball was inside the 30 then it would be 1/2 the distance to the goal.

Thanks. For some reason, I thought the facemask brought the play back.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:44 am
by Dinsdale
If there's an area where Mizzou really needs an upgrade in talent, it's at the cheerleading position.

Is that a cheer squad, or a WNBA team?

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:54 am
by Dinsdale
At least we don't have to listen to KC Dave rehashing what some whack callers to a radio show rambled about for another few years.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:56 am
by Carson
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:20 am
by War Wagon
Props to Auburn. The better team won.
Dinsdale wrote:If there's an area where Mizzou really needs an upgrade in talent, it's at the cheerleading position.

Is that a cheer squad, or a WNBA team?
You never seen the Golden Girls?

In other news, the now 9-0 Mizzou hoops team beat #18 UCLA 80-71.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:22 am
by kcdave
Dinsdale wrote:At least we don't have to listen to KC Dave rehashing what some whack callers to a radio show rambled about for another few years.
Fuck off dim. My team lost today and I will eat plenty of crow for that. You on the other hand have tried to ride my nut sack for over 3 weeks to no avail. I predicted then that Mizzou could make a run
at the mnc and you said there would be no way that they could do a, b, c, d or e. I was right with a, b, c, and d. They failed at e, but they gave it a good run. My fucking team played in a conference championship game today.
Your team is out in the woods hugging trees and analyzing owl shit.

Re: SEC CCG Thread

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:45 am
by The Seer
War Wagon wrote:Props to Auburn. The better team won.
Dinsdale wrote:If there's an area where Mizzou really needs an upgrade in talent, it's at the cheerleading position.

Is that a cheer squad, or a WNBA team?
You never seen the Golden Girls?

Tell the cheerleading squad not to ignore the calls from Adrian Klemm.

In other news, the now 9-0 Mizzou hoops team beat #18 UCLA 80-71.
http://youtu.be/5hdWdvsQE9w