Mueller Report--it's that bad

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:52 pm

You have orange jizz on your face comrade.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:55 pm

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Apr 18, 2019 6:02 pm

The Mueller report paints a clear picture of a lying administration that thinks it is above the law and willfully tried to cheat to get elected with the help of a foreign adversary. We’ve never had this happen in American history.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Thu Apr 18, 2019 6:58 pm

We get it Screwy. Since the investigation didn’t prove he was completely innocent, he is therefore guilty.

However, as the report states it leaves us in this weird middle ground. There are signs he did some things but not enough evidence to say he committed a crime.

As for the quotes, sure they look bad, but if you think Bubba didn’t say something similar in private when that SP was announced, I have ocean front property in AZ to sell you.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:03 pm

Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 6:58 pm BUT BUT BUT BILL CLINTON!!!!!!!!!

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:12 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:03 pm
Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 6:58 pm BUT BUT BUT BILL CLINTON!!!!!!!!!

Typical that you didn’t read or comprehend most of the post.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:45 am

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 1:21 am The entire Russian collusion accusation was a red herring which most people knew when nothing came about before the 2018 elections after almost two years of investigations.

Now Democrats want Trump's tax returns. I don't blame him for giving them the bird. Besides Donald has bee around for decades and I'm sure the IRS has looked into him more than a time or two.

You might want to take another crack at this, sport. The collusion was overwhelming. Russia actively interfered in our election, saw the Trumps as easy marks and the Trumps were more than willing to accept Russia's help. You traitorous hero deserves to be incarcerated and so do you for aiding and abedding him.

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:18 am

88traitor
Brokentraitor
Roostertraitor
Meltytraitor
PBtraitor
Shedicktraitor
Duhrontraitor
Sirfindatraitor
Holictraitor

Did I forget a traitor?

The penalty for traitors is a shotgun to the face.

Law and order.

Bitch Hunt.

Sad.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:46 am

Lefty wrote:However, as the report states it leaves us in this weird middle ground.

Which means Donald is unfit to hold office.

Collusion: Donald (and team Donald) sought to collude with a foreign power. He wanted it. He and his team pursued collusion. Mueller did not feel actions rose to a level to which he would be confident of conviction, so he chose not to charge a crime.

Obstruction: Donald sought to obstruct. He wanted to obstruct. He actively pursued obstruction. As SM posted, Mueller states that if the president clearly did not obstruct justice, he would have stated it in the report. Mueller passed this judgement on to someone(s) else to make. That someone(s) is congress.

Congress needs to get the full, un-redacted report asap. They should have had it WEEKS AGO.

William Barr is a shitbag of the highest order.

Donald Trump remains a national disgrace.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:27 am

SucksQueercockland wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:18 am

The penalty for traitors is a shotgun to the face.

Well it certainly will not be you holding the shotgun up and pulling the trigger. Runty little bitch ass like you could not even pick it up, much less get those deformed sausage midget fingers of your around the trigger.

You might need to try something like this, but there is that sausage fat finger thing of yours to deal with. Cunt.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:42 am

SM wrote:the Trumps were more than willing to accept Russia's help

Yep.

Don't these right wingers like to pass themselves as... patriots?

And you're really willing to continue to defend this administration?

You freaking losers are -----> OUTED.

Total frauds, man.

LMAO!

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:09 am

I predicted Don would not finish his first term.

What is the date?

You f@t, ignorant, babbling hillbilly,

FiatLux · Post by **FiatLux** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:48 am

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:15 am

Relax old fella - I’m just trolling 24 hours a day on message boards... because I live on welfare, in a trailer in rural Georgia, provided by people in San Francisco... that actually work for a living.

That'll Rack !

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:06 am

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:09 am I predicted Don would not finish his first term.

What is the date?

You f@t, ignorant, babbling hillbilly,

Yeah, you also predicted the stock market crash of early this year, the economic meltdown etc. But keep slinging crap out there, something is bound to be correct at some point. If/when it is you will broadcast it and let us all know what a genius you are for your Epcot prediction.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:17 am

LS wrote:Yeah, you also predicted the stock market crash of early this year

Oh really?

What date did I give?

Link?

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:30 am

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:17 am Oh really?

What date did I give?

Link?

Oh so it was an open ended prediction, no date given? Even more chicken shot on your part then.

Yeah so I prefect the market will crash at some time at some point in the future. It could be a month, a week, two years, maybe after a terror attack, hell who knows. But make my words, it will happen at some undetermined future point.

FiatLux · Post by **FiatLux** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:41 am

Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:30 am

Oh so it was an open ended prediction, no date given? Even more chicken shot on your part then.

English Sisterfucker... unreal.

Southern white trash... at its finest.

atmdad · Post by **atmdad** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:04 am

Bunch of predictable wankers y'all are.

When you have a chance to come up for a breath of fresh air maybe some of you will realize that Russia and China are kicking our collective asses by creating such a polar divide of the two party system.

Trump and/or Pelosi are not the enemy - the bogey man is not under your bed as much as you may think it is. It is in plain daylight.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:20 am

atmdad wrote:Russia

I understand where you are coming from a'dad.

But isn't it sort of hard to move past the fact that the U.S. leader was vigorously attempting to collude with... Russia?

The report is hundreds of pages of the U.S. leader trying to break the law (if he didn't actually do so).

The only reason Mueller didn't have Donald totally dead-to-rights is because some people refused to carry out his orders.

Slap · Post by **Slap** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:25 am

The most striking thing about this report is how it shows the president's life to be so boring. You dig for two years into the personal details of the most powerful man in the world and yet not one page in a 400 page report talks about the president getting his dick sucked in the oval office? How can it be that way? Is Donald Trump a faggot or does his dick just not work any more?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:39 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:42 am
SM wrote:the Trumps were more than willing to accept Russia's help
Yep.

Don't these right wingers like to pass themselves as... patriots?

And you're really willing to continue to defend this administration?

You freaking losers are -----> OUTED.

Total frauds, man.

LMAO!

Isn't it outrageous that Trump kneepad wearers like Joe Blow are the ones calling US traitors? This is the most criminal presidential administration we've ever had, seeking to sell us out at every opportunity and partner with adversary nations to cement their power. Yet they're the ones calling other traitors.

Make no mistake--the Trump organized crime family are the traitors and so are their supporters, who aid and abet this administration at every opportunity.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:59 pm

SM wrote:Isn't it outrageous that Trump kneepad wearers like Joe Blow are the ones calling US traitors?

Joe is very confused.

But I'm sure he'll soon post a few yootoob videos that will set me straight.

rotf...

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:34 pm

I sorta agree with Adad, there is a push to continue to divide the country further, mostly I believe by big corporate money, much of it international.

This investigation was never going to exonerate Trump, so I wasn't expecting that. I thought it would end up like it did, without enough evidence to convict or even produce a vote for impeachment.

It was the FBI who outed Hillary for her security clearance violations, and it was Obama who directed the DOJ not to look into it further. Hillary also lied a few days before the election about it on National TV. But Democrats don't consider any of that as having an effect on the election.

My contention is neither party is more honest or compassionate than the other, and our country desperately needs amendments to the Constitution on campaign finance reform to realign the prioities of our representatives on Capitol Hill and the executive office.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:14 pm

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:34 pm I sorta agree with Adad, there is a push to continue to divide the country further, mostly I believe by big corporate money, much of it international.

This investigation was never going to exonerate Trump, so I wasn't expecting that. I thought it would end up like it did, without enough evidence to convict or even produce a vote for impeachment.

There's a fucking boatload of evidence. Certainly far more evidence than that which the GOP used to go after Bill Clinton for his bj.

It was the FBI who outed Hillary for her security clearance violations, and it was Obama who directed the DOJ not to look into it further. Hillary also lied a few days before the election about it on National TV. But Democrats don't consider any of that as having an effect on the election.

What security violations?

My contention is neither party is more honest or compassionate than the other, and our country desperately needs amendments to the Constitution on campaign finance reform to realign the prioities of our representatives on Capitol Hill and the executive office.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
The only campaign finance reform bill that McConnell would ever allow a vote on is one that simply restricts donations from unions.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:15 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:14 pm
Joe in PB wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:34 pm I sorta agree with Adad, there is a push to continue to divide the country further, mostly I believe by big corporate money, much of it international.

This investigation was never going to exonerate Trump, so I wasn't expecting that. I thought it would end up like it did, without enough evidence to convict or even produce a vote for impeachment.
There's a fucking boatload of evidence. Certainly far more evidence than that which the GOP used to go after Bill Clinton for his bj.

It was the FBI who outed Hillary for her security clearance violations, and it was Obama who directed the DOJ not to look into it further. Hillary also lied a few days before the election about it on National TV. But Democrats don't consider any of that as having an effect on the election.
What security violations?

My contention is neither party is more honest or compassionate than the other, and our country desperately needs amendments to the Constitution on campaign finance reform to realign the prioities of our representatives on Capitol Hill and the executive office.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
The only campaign finance reform bill that McConnell would ever allow a vote on is one that simply restricts donations from unions.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:09 pm

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:34 pm ...by big corporate money...

...much of it international.

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:19 pm

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:34 pm ...by big corporate money...

...much of it international.

I really don’t get why 88BrokenPBracists are backing this turd given what anti American Constitution hating fuck he is. I mean I hate Her, but to throw America under a bus for it just seems extreme.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:18 pm

So the Mueller report says Russia started meddling in 2014. Why didn’t our government know about this or attempt to stop it? This is before The Orange One was a serious candidate. Where was the Obama admin while the Russians were meddling?

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:37 pm

Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:18 pm So the Mueller report says Russia started meddling in 2014. Why didn’t our government know about this or attempt to stop it? This is before The Orange One was a serious candidate. Where was the Obama admin while the Russians were meddling?

They tried to take some action, but Mitch was looking for a payout.

WTF happened to being able to post pictures here?

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:49 pm

Screw_America wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:45 amYou might want to take another crack at this, sport. The collusion was overwhelming. Russia actively interfered in our election, saw the Trumps as easy marks and the Trumps were more than willing to accept Russia's help. You traitorous hero deserves to be incarcerated and so do you for aiding and abedding him.

Care to take another run at this, Spanky?

Page 2 of the Mueller Report wrote:The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election of interference activities.

Simple question, Simpleton: So how, exactly, was justice obstructed when no crime had been committed? Take your time...

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:02 am

That line of reasoning is preposterous, Truman.

What if someone obstructs so well that their crime cannot be seen (or proven)?

Of course someone can be guilty of obstruction even though there is not a charge for another crime.

Donald obstructed over and over because he knew that his behavior was totally out of line, if not completely illegal.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:24 am

Truman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:49 pmSimple question, Simpleton: So how, exactly, was justice obstructed when no crime had been committed? Take your time...

From Congressman (& former prosecutor) Ted Lieu:

http://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1118891719330631680

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:34 am

Mueller stated that he needed to prove the intent of obstruction to bring forward charges, and concluded the Trump's real intent was not being conscious of wrong doing, but brought about by frustration and emotion because he was limited in foreign negotiations by the investigation and its questionable outcome.

So Mueller concluded Trump didn't collude with Russia, nor did Trump obstruct justice.

I know Trump is not a nice guy, and that's not what Democrats wanted to hear, but its really time to move on and get to work making the country better for most citizens.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:49 am

Joe wrote:So Mueller concluded Trump didn't collude with Russia, nor did Trump obstruct justice.

Why do you lie?

Or are you just completely ignorant?

Mueller specifically stated in his report that if he had been able to clear Trump of obstruction, he would have so stated in the report.

He could NOT clear Trump of obstruction, and so he left it for congress, which he also specifically stated in the report.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:36 am

.088 wrote:the deep state

Who are they?

List of names?

.088 wrote:The entire weight of the U.S. government was unleashed on Trump

lol

No.

Dude, virtually the entire Republican Party backs Trump mo matter how outlandish, inappropriate, and dangerous he is.

Are they not part of the U.S. government?

You've read 158 pages and all you choose to comment on are Hillary, the "deep state," and "the entire weight of the government" unleashed on this poor man?

Nothing to say about Donald's completely unacceptable behavior?

Yeah, you're another hack.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:40 am

So Mueller concluded Trump didn't collude with Russia, and he didn't have the evidence to prove Trump obstructed justice.

Correction noted.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 3:04 am

"Collusion" is something Donald and his lapdog Barr have been chirping about.

Mueller said...

But all of the evidence tying the Trump campaign to Russian operatives was not “sufficient to establish or sustain” criminal conspiracy.

Trump (and team Trump) definitely colluded with Russia.
Mueller did not have confidence that he could prove in a courtroom that it rose to the level of... criminal conspiracy.

So no charges.

It doesn't mean that Donald's behavior wasn't completely out of line and completely unacceptable.

Mueller's report shows an abundance of evidence that Donald committed obstruction, and hence he made the point that if he could have cleared Donald of that crime he would have done so.

He couldn't clear Donald on obstruction (because there is evidence of it), as he did on criminal conspiracy, so he punted it over to congress to handle it.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Apr 20, 2019 3:15 am

Owen Benjamin lays it down:

:|

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:07 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:37 pm
Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:18 pm So the Mueller report says Russia started meddling in 2014. Why didn’t our government know about this or attempt to stop it? This is before The Orange One was a serious candidate. Where was the Obama admin while the Russians were meddling?
They tried to take some action, but Mitch was looking for a payout.

WTF happened to being able to post pictures here?

So the previous administration was incompetent? That’s what you are going with? Same as yourself and posting photos?

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:22 am

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 3:15 am Owen Benjamin lays it down:

:|

He's speaking to Gen Z & Millenials?

Is that why he's yelling instead of just speaking?

0:35 - 0:42 -- Looking at the Mueller Report makes people think, "Wow, he's way cleaner than I ever would have imagined, and the only collusion was him and Israel."

:?

Am I really supposed to listen to 18 more minutes of this guy?