Looks like Trev's GOP fantasy boy toy is in hot water

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:27 pm

what a tempest in a teapot this story is. BFD, 48-1/2 of 50 states don't give a shit what happens in Jersey or about Christie.

the real story is the liberal media feeding frenzy, momentarily distracted from defending Obama's latest clusterfuck and zeroed in on this like it was the biggest scoop since Watergate.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:58 pm

War Wagon wrote:
the real story is the liberal media feeding frenzy, momentarily distracted from defending Obama's latest clusterfuck and zeroed in on this like it was the biggest scoop since Watergate.

And the liberal media is in fact pimping Christie big time as the " Republican front runner". If they can convince the voting lemmings that Christie is the R's boy, no matter who the Demorats put up. they will be elected big time. Republicans will not say jack shit about Christie, the media wants to crown his ass as the conservatives boy.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:05 am

Sudden Sam wrote:To heck with his politics, personality, whatever. We must do whatever it takes to keep this woman from becoming the next First Lady.

She's certainly no less horrid than the sasquatch currently fouling the White House with the stench of cocoa butter and ass.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:23 am

War Wagon wrote:what a tempest in a teapot this story is. BFD, 48-1/2 of 50 states don't give a shit what happens in Jersey or about Christie.

the real story is the liberal media feeding frenzy, momentarily distracted from defending Obama's latest clusterfuck and zeroed in on this like it was the biggest scoop since Watergate.

Oh of course it is, not the fact it's big gov't run amok, as you social conservatives love to cry about.

Don't you ever tire of being so fucking stupid?

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:45 am

Stick an apple in the pig's mouth....this porker's presidential hopes are DONE.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:18 am

Why should any of us care if Christy is DONE as a Presidential hopeful or not?

Really, why??

And beyond that, it's not as if he is THE savior of the GOP, or anything remotely close to that.

He's just another power-hungry lard ass.

Believe me, they can easily find someone else just like him to prop up before 2016.

Hello, Jeb!!

Flush him.
Don't flush him.
WGF?

Any importance assigned to him is fueled by the media, who are to be laffed at.

I personally couldn't give half a shit about him -- and laff some more at anyone dull enough to actually place a vote for him.

Terry in Crapchester · Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:23 pm

mvscal wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:To heck with his politics, personality, whatever. We must do whatever it takes to keep this woman from becoming the next First Lady.
She's certainly no less horrid than the sasquatch currently fouling the White House with the stench of cocoa butter and ass.

Or the Joker-in-drag who was her immediate predecessor.

Or her mother-in-law, who bears an uncanny resemblance to Wilford Brimley.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sun Jan 19, 2014 7:46 pm

I would like to know if the traffic on 95 was any better with 11 toll lanes instead of 9, did people adapt to different routes and if so where did they go? Palisades parkway? Fort lee drive to the park?

missjo · Post by **missjo** » Mon Jan 20, 2014 4:54 am

A politician who is a lying scheming scumbag.......
Colour me shocked

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:34 pm

Papa Willie wrote:You ever noticed how if a Republican is a dumbass - conservatives will (in a lot of cases) call him/her out for being one?

In this thread? I'm seeing comments more along the lines of, "At least he's taking responsibility," and "He's not a real Republican, anyway."

Color me unimpressed.

You ever noticed how if a Democrat fucks up, that lieberals will suck their dicks - even if they'd killed their own families?

I can't speak for anyone else, but on this board, I see my role as being equal time. No need to jump onboard the right wing echo chamber -- you guys do a bang-up job of covering that.

And if there's ever been a politically prominent Democrat who killed his/her own family, I must've missed that.

Carson · Post by **Carson** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:46 am

Well, maybe not family, but:

trev · Post by **trev** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 2:49 am

Chris Christie for President!

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 2:54 am

trev wrote:Chris Christie for President!

Sorry, but his presidential aspirations just crossed the bridge to nowhere...

trev · Post by **trev** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:17 am

Diego in Seattle wrote:
trev wrote:Chris Christie for President!
Sorry, but his presidential aspirations just crossed the bridge to nowhere...

Why? He's just another dirty politician. He can play with the big guys. (Hilary)

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:12 am

She had a decade to gear up to win in '08 and she got worked by a junior senator who doesn't even have papers.

Face it, she is shit.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:52 pm

poptart wrote:She had a decade to gear up to win in '08 and she got worked by a junior senator who doesn't even have papers.

Face it, she is shit.

While it wasn't quite that simplistic, she still should have won.

But as bad as that makes her look, it makes the repugnanticans look even more pathetic in that they can't field a candidate to beat her. Instead of calling out how crappy the democratic side looks they should be looking in the mirror & at the wants/needs of the American people.

But instead of doing just that repugnantcans will continue to see how much further to the right they can go than their own party's candidates. Which makes their canonization of Reagan all that much more hilarious. Reagan would never get a sniff at being nominated these days, and no repugnantcan candidates will ever find a sliver of popularity among American voters near the size of what Reagan enjoyed.

By all means, repugnantcans...continue your self-destruction.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 2:20 pm

Diego wrote:But instead of doing just that repugnantcans will continue to see how much further to the right they can go than their own party's candidates.

Since Reagan, all the GOP has trotted out is squishy moderates.

GH Bush
Bob Dole
GW Bush
John McCain
Mitt Romney

I have no idea where this "The GOP keeps getting more conservative" jive comes from.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:29 pm

poptart wrote:
Diego wrote:But instead of doing just that repugnantcans will continue to see how much further to the right they can go than their own party's candidates.
Since Reagan, all the GOP has trotted out is squishy moderates.

GH Bush
Bob Dole
GW Bush
John McCain
Mitt Romney

I have no idea

On the last part we can agree.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 2:45 am

What's known at this point is that America is sick to death of a huge government teacher's lounge asshat.

Seen approval ratings lately?

Liberalism fail.

A turn in the opposite direction would probably sell pretty good right about now.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:09 am

poptart wrote:What's known at this point is that America is sick to death of a huge government teacher's lounge asshat.

Seen approval ratings lately?

Liberalism fail.

A turn in the opposite direction would probably sell pretty good right about now.

Only if one totally ignores the approval ratings of Congress, which was at 13% last month. But by all means, campaign for an extremist right-wing platform again.

You do know what the definition of insanity is, don't you?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:17 am

Congress is full of liberals and moderates.
Very few genuine conservatives there.

Not going along with Barry hardly make one an extreme conservative.
It merely means that one is not suffering from psychosis.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 4:10 am

poptart wrote:Congress is full of liberals and moderates.

Of course it is. That's why a conservative republican is Speaker of the House.

Way to commit seppuku, dumbshit.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 4:23 am

That's why a ~~conservative~~ republican is Speaker of the House.

socal · Post by **socal** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:10 am

Poptart, rub one out and escape that 50's timewarp for fuck sake.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:25 am

socal wrote:Poptart, rub one out and escape that 50's timewarp for fuck sake.

Talk about a shit take.

How was the country doing in the '50s?

How is it doing now?

Liberals and "moderates" have run us into the ground.

Thank you sir, may I have another?

Sorry, no sale.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:37 am

poptart wrote:
socal wrote:Poptart, rub one out and escape that 50's timewarp for fuck sake.
Talk about a shit take.

How was the country doing in the '50s?

How is it doing now?

Liberals and "moderates" have run us into the ground.

Thank you sir, may I have another?

Sorry, no sale.

What was the tax rate back in the 50's, and how does it compare to today?

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:38 am

And while you're at it, what was the percentage of workers who were unionized compared to today as well.

TIA

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:58 am

I'm not going off on some wild goose chase you want to set up.

If you want to articulate how and why the country is better off now as compared to the '50s, you may.

GO...

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:37 pm

Papa Willie wrote:Weird. Hitlery is going to be about the same age that Reagan was when he got into office. Anybody remember what a fit the liberals threw about his age? And at that point, he hadn't had any strokes (which is what she had), nor had menopause kicked his ass.

She's a fucked up mess.

- "Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can't f**k her here!" From the book Inside The White House by Ronald Kessler, p. 243. – Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spotted him talking with an attractive female at an Arkansas political rally.

- Where is the G-damn f**king flag? I want the G-damn f**king flag up every f**king morning at f**king sunrise." From the book Inside The White House by Ronald Kessler, p. 244. – Hillary to the staff at the Arkansas Governor's mansion on Labor Day, 1991.

- "You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!" From the book Inside by Joseph Califano, p. 213. – Hillary yelling at a Democrat lawyer.

- "F**k off! It's enough that I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I'm not going to talk to you too! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut." From the book American Evita by Christopher Anderson, p. 90. – Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with "Good morning."

- "Son of a bitch." From the book American Evita by Christopher Anderson, p. 259. – Hillary's opinion of President George W. Bush when she found out he secretly visited Iraq just days before her highly publicized trip to Iraq.

- "You f**king idiot." From the book Crossfire, p. 84. – Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event.

- "If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!" From the book The First Partner, p. 259. – Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.

- "Get f**ked! Get the f**k out of my way!!! Get out of my face!!!" From the book Hillary's Scheme, p. 89. – Hillary's various comments to her Secret Service detail agents.

- "Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k away from me! Don't come within ten yards of me, or else! Just f**king do as I say, Okay!!!?" From the book Unlimited Access, by Clinton FBI Agent in Charge, Gary Aldrige, p. 139. – Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail.

- "Where's the miserable c*ck sucker?" From the book The Truth About Hillary by Edward Klein, p. 5. – Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer.

She's not quite right.

She should really be posting here on a regular basis.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:43 pm

Perhaps now we know why he took a helicopter to his son's baseball game...

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:46 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote:
What was the tax rate back in the 50's, and how does it compare to today?

You aren't this dumb, so stop pretending to be.

How does it compare to today? It doesn't.

Back then, the highest bracket was over 90%... and you could deduct every last penny you spent on anything.

But keeping rolling out those apples in an orange crate.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:49 pm

And BTW -- if the D's run Hillary (they won't), the R's could prop up Saddam Hussein's dead body behind the podium and win in a landslide.

The GOP is licking their chops at a Hillary proposition. Believe it.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 2:28 am

Dinsdale wrote:R's could prop up Saddam Hussein's dead body behind the podium and win in a landslide.

Rick Santorum, much? Fuck off, cunt.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 2:45 am

The American People, to Hillary Clinton, wrote:Fuck off, cunt.

FTFY

"What difference does it make" while in mid-lie ain't gonna fly.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:44 am

Hillary is unelectable. Hell, she quit her job when the going got tough (as it should have). And that whole being caught in an outright lie thing (then quitting her job to avoid the consequences) will remove any chance she has.

The D's have been pretty wise about candidates in recent years, so I don't see them making an error of that caliber. If they do, it guarantees that any R will win.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:48 am

I'd have to agree that the majority of Americans don't want Hilary. But the republicans are remaining their delusional selves if they think they can just prop up a warm body to win. As much as Americans don't want her, they certainly don't want to a return to the republicans' march towards feudalism. The need to find someone moderate, but the GOP will never nominate a moderate (recent history proves this).

Unfortunately it looks like we're stuck with Hilary in 2016.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:50 am

Diego in Seattle wrote:but the GOP will never nominate a moderate (recent history proves this).

Bush and Romney saywhat?

EXTREME "moderates."

And again, the D's are smart enough to not nominate Hillary. Guaranteed loss.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 4:05 am

Diego wrote:The need to find someone moderate, but the GOP will never nominate a moderate (recent history proves this).

They clearly have no problem finding moderates.

Romney and McCain.

Losers.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:10 pm

poptart wrote:
Diego wrote:The need to find someone moderate, but the GOP will never nominate a moderate (recent history proves this).
They clearly have no problem finding moderates.

Romney and McCain.

Losers.

Who else with a decent head on their shoulders would want the shit sandwich known as the GOP nomination? You are either so far right you're unelectable or you're moderate enough to attract undecided voters and blue dog democrats and you're slandered as a RINO. Maybe when the GOP decides it would rather focus on winning elections than purity tests will they find a candidate who can win the White House.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:44 pm

SM wrote:Who else with a decent head on their shoulders would want the shit sandwich known as the GOP nomination? You are either so far right you're unelectable or you're moderate enough to attract undecided voters and blue dog democrats and you're slandered as a RINO. Maybe when the GOP decides it would rather focus on winning elections than purity tests will they find a candidate who can win the White House.

I really have no idea where you guys are coming up with this silliness.

For a couple decades, the GOP strategy has been to nominate candidates who are moderate.
Candidates who they think are "moderate enough to win a general election."

Romney and McCain being the latest losers.

I happen to think success is popular.

Reagan was further right than a lot of the country was comfortable with, and especially further right than the media was comfortable with, but on the heels of liberal Carter debacle, voters opted to give the righty a shot at it.

As it went along, Reagan gained respect among the left and even saw his average approval rating rise higher in his 2nd four years than in his first four years -- because he found SUCCESS, and the people of the nation could not deny it.

Liberalism is a fairy tale.
A children's story.
That is painfully obvious now, isn't it?

Twice the Kenyan was voted in?

The people of America fully deserve what they are getting.

I like sitting over here and laffing. :wink: