Bonds is a freak

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:01 am

Dude hasn't played ball in 15 months and hasn't seemed to skip a beat. Unbelievable.

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:06 am

Web Page Name

insert here

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:09 am

Adelpiero wrote:Web Page Name

insert here

Because this has nothing to do with baseball or anything, slurper.

FaTaL · Post by **FaTaL** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:37 am

simply amazed what he can do

doesnt face live pitching for 11 months

NO PROBLEM!

Degenerate · Post by **Degenerate** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:42 pm

Rack Fu wrote:
Adelpiero wrote:Web Page Name

insert here
Because this has nothing to do with baseball or anything, slurper.

Bringing up excellence in sports is the surest way to confuse Mizzou fan.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:51 pm

Degenerate wrote:Bringing up excellence in sports is the surest way to confuse Mizzou fan.

Gayhawk fan chirping?

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:24 pm

Oh yeah, he is great....really amazing.

In fact, if we gave 10 other major leaguers steroids for 6 years and about 10 months off to get healthy, I am sure they wouldn't do near as well.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:26 pm

Sky wrote:Oh yeah, he is great....really amazing.

In fact, if we gave 10 other major leaguers steroids for 6 years and about 10 months off to get healthy, I am sure they wouldn't do near as well.

it is possible for a major leaguer to do steroids and still suck.

sin

Jermey Giambi

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 7:28 pm

A freak, indeed...a cheater, too.

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:18 pm

DrDetroit wrote:A freak, indeed...a cheater, too.

He isn't cheatin' now.

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:26 pm

Rack Fu wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:A freak, indeed...a cheater, too.
He isn't cheatin' now.

Once a cheater, always a cheater. I will have no respect for that big headed freak ever again

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Fri Sep 23, 2005 2:30 pm

Cheers to that.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:17 pm

Rack Fu wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:A freak, indeed...a cheater, too.
He isn't cheatin' now.

So you're able to guarantee that Bonds doesn't have access to a steroid that cannot be tested for? Perhaps some human growth hormones?

I'd love to see the proof.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:38 pm

I see.

For people you find distasteful the rule is guilty until proven innocent.

That works.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:15 pm

Mikey wrote:I see.

For people you find distasteful the rule is guilty until proven innocent.

That works.

How about people who have already confessed?

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:50 pm

BSmack wrote:
it is possible for a major leaguer to do steroids and still suck.

sin

Jermey Giambi

"With four more home runs in the past two days, Giambi now has 25 this season after hitting only five in the first three months. Though he started to come around in June, hitting .310 with a .474 on-base average, the left-handed slugger really caught fire in July: 14 homers, 24 RBI, .355 BA, and an eye-popping .524 OBP and .974 SLG. Needless to say, Giambi's turnaround has been critical as the Yankees pursue the Red Sox in another tumultuous season in the Bronx."

The only time he was below average was when MLB started cracking down on roids and he was the poster child.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:58 pm

Sky wrote:
BSmack wrote:
it is possible for a major leaguer to do steroids and still suck.

sin

Jermey Giambi
"With four more home runs in the past two days, Giambi now has 25 this season after hitting only five in the first three months. Though he started to come around in June, hitting .310 with a .474 on-base average, the left-handed slugger really caught fire in July: 14 homers, 24 RBI, .355 BA, and an eye-popping .524 OBP and .974 SLG. Needless to say, Giambi's turnaround has been critical as the Yankees pursue the Red Sox in another tumultuous season in the Bronx."

The only time he was below average was when MLB started cracking down on roids and he was the poster child.

You might want to eject NOW.

sin

Jason Giambi
1st baseman NY Yankees and brother of JEREMY Giambi

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:11 pm

Ahhh, I am an idiot

Good point.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:50 am

Bonds is a machine. His swing is picture perfect w/ no holes.

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:12 pm

So you are saying there isn't a difference between 1990 Barry and 2000 Barry? I understand maturing and growing older but his changes are unreal.

Yes he has a great eye and a great swing but would all of those hits left the park without some help?

Would he even be in the hunt for the all time HR leader?

Would his BA and OBP be so high if some of those fly balls landed in the outfield instead of McCovey Cove?

Loganfan · Post by **Loganfan** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:04 pm

Vote for Pedro
Rack the Padres

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:08 pm

Loganfan wrote:Rack the Padres

Sorry about your pending playoffs dissection.

Cards are going to take that loser team off some sweet jumps. Cards are basically the only team that has a moustache. They will ruin the PAdres lives and eat all their steak.

Loganfan · Post by **Loganfan** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:04 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
Loganfan wrote:Rack the Padres
Sorry about your pending playoffs dissection.

Cards are going to take that loser team off some sweet jumps. Cards are basically the only team that has a moustache. They will ruin the PAdres lives and eat all their steak.

ya.....well, since the Padres were 5-2 against them this year, and it's a short series, I'll take my chances.
Padres in 4.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:14 pm

Loganfan wrote:ya.....well, since the Padres were 5-2 against them this year, and it's a short series, I'll take my chances.
Padres in 4.

When was that series again?

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:15 pm

loganfag

the padres were 4-3 against the cards Short series? YOu mean short bus, no matter how shitty the cardinals are playing, they won;t lose to the Padres.

cardinals have owned the shitstains from San Diego in the playoffs. they swept the cunts to boot.

rack you for smoking so much dope, that your fried your fucking gord.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:55 am

Loganfan wrote: Padres in 4.

I laughed. Hard.

Seriously, there isnt a fucking team from the NL Worst that deserves to be in the playoffs.

Selig should see if there is some loophole in the rulebook so he can just call the series overwith after the Tardres get outscored 29-2 after 2 games. This series wont be fucking close.