I don't know about Dins, but I do. Since when should people be given a break for breeding?DrDetroit wrote:How is a tax break considered stealing??Dinsdale wrote:There's someone who doesn't understand, but it's not the car manufacturers, it's you.BSmack wrote:They also don't understand that when the price of gas went skyrocketing in 2001, they should have been changing their strategy to account for the changes in the car buying marketplace.
An SUV is more profitable to sell than an econobox. An SUV is more profitable to the oil industry. Yet, the price of gas is skyrocketing. So, how do we resolve this? Why, we call up our buddy in the White House, and have him give everyone who buys a SUV a tax break. Easy solution. Steal from the poor, give to the rich....because goodness knows, the oil companies need those indirect tax dollars to turn a profit.
It's the American Way.
I can only assume then that you also consider the child income tax credit as thievery??
Are tax credits stealing?
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
-
BSmack
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29342
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
Seperate issue, but....
Why yes -- giving tax breaks for having children IS "reverse Robin Hood" econimics. You "conservatives" bitch about paying taxes for welfare children, since the parents couldn't afford to have the child in the first place, obviously. Yet, you expect childless people to pay more tax, even though they don't use schools, and being a smaller family unit, use less public services. The people who cost the community/country the least, are expected to pay the most. You're actually trying to charge ME money for YOUR child.
Live by YOUR OWN rules -- if you can't afford the child, DON'T HAVE IT! Don't expect ME to pick up the tab for your kid, you socialist bastards. Straight-up socialism.
Oh, wait....it's different when it comes to tax subsidies for your kids.....I forgot.
Why yes -- giving tax breaks for having children IS "reverse Robin Hood" econimics. You "conservatives" bitch about paying taxes for welfare children, since the parents couldn't afford to have the child in the first place, obviously. Yet, you expect childless people to pay more tax, even though they don't use schools, and being a smaller family unit, use less public services. The people who cost the community/country the least, are expected to pay the most. You're actually trying to charge ME money for YOUR child.
Live by YOUR OWN rules -- if you can't afford the child, DON'T HAVE IT! Don't expect ME to pick up the tab for your kid, you socialist bastards. Straight-up socialism.
Oh, wait....it's different when it comes to tax subsidies for your kids.....I forgot.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
-
BSmack
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29342
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
You still take a deduction for you kids. Right?mvscal wrote:Not my kids. The EIC is means tested.Dinsdale wrote:Oh, wait....it's different when it comes to tax subsidies for your kids.....I forgot.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
Stealing?? Bueller?BSmack wrote:I don't know about Dins, but I do. Since when should people be given a break for breeding?DrDetroit wrote:How is a tax break considered stealing??Dinsdale wrote: There's someone who doesn't understand, but it's not the car manufacturers, it's you.
An SUV is more profitable to sell than an econobox. An SUV is more profitable to the oil industry. Yet, the price of gas is skyrocketing. So, how do we resolve this? Why, we call up our buddy in the White House, and have him give everyone who buys a SUV a tax break. Easy solution. Steal from the poor, give to the rich....because goodness knows, the oil companies need those indirect tax dollars to turn a profit.
It's the American Way.
I can only assume then that you also consider the child income tax credit as thievery??
Wrong. Property taxes are not based on size of household. Police and Fire staffing are not contingent on the size of the household. Many states rely on sales taxes as the primary revenue source for school funding. Size of household doesn't matter when it comes to staffing ordinance or code enforcement functions, either.Dinsdale wrote:Seperate issue, but....
Why yes -- giving tax breaks for having children IS "reverse Robin Hood" econimics. You "conservatives" bitch about paying taxes for welfare children, since the parents couldn't afford to have the child in the first place, obviously. Yet, you expect childless people to pay more tax, even though they don't use schools, and being a smaller family unit, use less public services.
We are??The people who cost the community/country the least, are expected to pay the most. You're actually trying to charge ME money for YOUR child.
I split this into it's own thread.
My favorite b.s. explanation for this is when they say that non-parents still benefit from paying taxes towards public schools because they're less likely to be robbed by an educated child.Seperate issue, but....
Why yes -- giving tax breaks for having children IS "reverse Robin Hood" econimics. You "conservatives" bitch about paying taxes for welfare children, since the parents couldn't afford to have the child in the first place, obviously. Yet, you expect childless people to pay more tax, even though they don't use schools...
-
BSmack
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29342
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
No you retard. I was just asking him a question. Christ, not EVERYTHING is a matter of "liberal v conservative". :roll:DrDetroit wrote:Is this a "conservative" idea?BSmack wrote:You still take a deduction for you kids. Right?mvscal wrote: Not my kids. The EIC is means tested.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
Um, it was more directed at Dins than you, though I suspected you'd have input.BSmack wrote:No you retard. I was just asking him a question. Christ, not EVERYTHING is a matter of "liberal v conservative". :roll:DrDetroit wrote:Is this a "conservative" idea?BSmack wrote: You still take a deduction for you kids. Right?