Trump supporter calls Mexican landscapers rapists

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:17 pm

Gee, wonder where she got this language from? Watch the video, how revolting. Props to these guys for keeping their cool, this woman deserved to have the shutyomouth kicked out of her.

Rooster and Schmickety will be by any time now to defend this worthless piece of shit.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... story.html

A 27-year-old California man and his mother were called "rapists" and "animals" by a Trump supporter while trying to do landscaping work — and video of the exchange has been viewed millions of times online.

Video shows the unidentified woman confronting Esteban Guzman and his mom and saying she hated them because they are "Mexican."

"We're honest people right here," Guzman, who was born in California, can be heard saying in the video, which was recorded Saturday.

"You’re rapists, and animals," she said. “Drug dealers, rapists and animals."

The woman mentioned President Trump during her racist tantrum, which was recorded by Guzman's mother and went viral on Twitter.

Trump used similar wording when he announced he was running for president in 2015. He said Mexico is "not sending" their best people, and alluded to them as "rapists."

"I don't like to play the blame game," Guzman told the Daily News on Monday. "Just because the President of the United States says something, it does not give you the right to act like him."

Guzman said he and his mother were simply trying to do their jobs when they were confronted.

"This lady comes from the other side of the street and starts yelling at my mom, 'Go back to Mexico,'" Guzman said.

He said he stepped in to defend his mother when the offensive exchange took place.

"She was not going to listen to me," he said. "She was trying to get me to react."

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 4:47 am

And you think I’d jump to this woman’s defense why?

That being said, it needs being pointed out that illegal aliens are more likely to have a criminal background or have engaged in criminal activity than a US citizen statistically speaking— despite Leftist talking points to the contrary. The myth they’d like you to believe is that illegals are somehow more law abiding than real ‘Muricans, just like their attempt to make concealed carry States seem more dangerous than places like Noo Yawk et al.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:47 am

Rooster wrote:it needs being pointed out that illegal aliens are more likely to have a criminal background or have engaged in criminal activity than a US citizen statistically speaking

Wrong

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 4:43 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Rooster wrote:it needs being pointed out that illegal aliens are more likely to have a criminal background or have engaged in criminal activity than a US citizen statistically speaking
Wrong

Lol, keep chanting that mantra, Screwy. If you repeat it often enough maybe it'll become a factoid that others will assume is an actual fact. Sometimes it helps to singsong it to give a little extra umph!

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:18 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Rooster wrote:it needs being pointed out that illegal aliens are more likely to have a criminal background or have engaged in criminal activity than a US citizen statistically speaking
Wrong

Wow, there's no leftist talking point you won't spout obediently, is there?

Let me help you out, since you truly are a fucking moron...

The number of illegal aliens in this country with a criminal background is...

wait for it...

All of them. 100.00%

Feeling stupid yet? You should.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:17 pm

Actually, you don't have a "criminal background" unless you've been convicted of a crime.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:19 pm

Since crossing the border illegally is a misdemeanor, if you've ever broken a traffic law without being caught you have as much of a "criminal background" as any illegal that hasn't been convicted.

I'm not saying that they're equivalent crimes but, if you want to get all technical, they pretty much are.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 8:47 pm

Mikey wrote:Since crossing the border illegally is a misdemeanor, if you've ever broken a traffic law without being caught you have as much of a "criminal background" as any illegal that hasn't been convicted.

I'm not saying that they're equivalent crimes but, if you want to get all technical, they pretty much are.

Most traffic crimes do not rise to the level of misdemeanor, until you get real serious. So every day you speed on the 405 or whatever the fuck you call it is a traffic infraction, and would be a local county level crime.

Illegal immigration on the other hand is a misdemeanor, a Federal one at that, and will go unprosecuted pretty much forever. In the current environment, the Feds love these illegals getting jobs, so they can extract more social security graft payments from the employees and employers, and never have a bit of down stream payout on them. Perfect taxing system.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 9:02 pm

So I've been wrong twice today.

I think that's some kind of record.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Jun 27, 2018 9:27 pm

Derron wrote: a misdemeanor, a Federal one at that

Moron

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 12:30 am

Mikey wrote:Actually, you don't have a "criminal background" unless you've been convicted of a crime.

Semantics. If I’ve known you since you were a kid and you started off shoplifting and graduated to the Mafia, yet somehow eluded the justice system, I’d be quite comfortable describing you as having a criminal background despite a lily white record.

A significant number or percentage of these illegal aliens do have an honest-to-goodness criminal record in the form of multiple felonies such as Garcia Zarate, Kate Steinle’s killer, who himself had seven felonies. Seven. And should have had eight except the bleeding hearts in San Francisco decided to use him as poster boy for their compassion and sense of social justice.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 12:46 am

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Derron wrote: a misdemeanor, a Federal one at that
Moron

Wait, wha-what-what?

OK, everyone who has ever read any post you've ever made agrees that you're an idiot on a scale the world has rarely seen, but...

see if I've got this right...

It's your contention that crossing the US border... and I'm trying to wrap my head around this...

But, you're claiming an illegal border crossing isn't a misdemeanor?

That's what you seem to be implying.

Choose your next words very carefully, you unmitigated dipshit.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 2:02 am

Here's the difference between your side and our's, screwball, be can call an asshole an asshole, even if they are, allegedly, on our political side. She looks like an ignorant old bitter ignorant cunt.

Is she a Trump supporter?

Maybe, maybe not. Wouldn't surprise me a bit if this is a staged clip made in a clumsy attempt to make Trump look bad.

Best thing to do with this miserable old cunt is to ignore her.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 2:37 am

One side probably knows how to spell ours, and it’s definitely not your’s.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 1:17 pm

Once again I am foiled by possessive pronoun spelling.

Can I just assume that all possessive pronouns don't bother with an apostrophe?

Arch Angel · Post by **Arch Angel** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:02 pm

Grammar smack?

Really, wtf? On a message board?

Have we really sunk that far of finding something to throw at someone or some party you don't like?

oh vey!!

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:35 pm

Arch Angel wrote:Grammar smack?

Really, wtf? On a message board?

Have we really sunk that far of finding something to throw at someone or some party you don't like?

oh vey!!

Apostrophe smack has always been accepted here.
Just ask Dins. Its all good.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 10:38 pm

Arch Angel wrote:Grammar smack?

Really, wtf? On a message board?

Have we really sunk that far of finding something to throw at someone or some party you don't like?

oh vey!!

It’s what you do when you can’t address the topic at hand.

The libs don’t want a billion filthy brown people here any more than the rest of us, but they understand it is their only ticket to power.

They’ll prolly build the damn wall themselves once they have Texas flipped and they are firmly in control.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Thu Jun 28, 2018 10:47 pm

smackaholic wrote: The libs don’t want a billion filthy brown people here any more than the rest of us, but they understand it is their only ticket to power.

Unless the Dem party leadership finally wises up, and finds a moderate candidate with a moderate agenda. If that happens, Trump's days are over. If not.....

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Jun 29, 2018 11:20 pm

I think it's too late for that. They have sold their soul to the socialist devil. They have abandoned the fake moderate model that Bill Clinton played to perfection in '92.

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:17 pm

Yet another example of how there is a criminal mindset in illegal aliens entering our country:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/15/il ... s-say.html

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:30 pm

Rooster wrote:Yet another example of how there is a criminal mindset in illegal aliens entering our country:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/15/il ... s-say.html

Yes, because the majority of them have attacked their spouses with chainsaws. Idiot.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:41 pm

Yet some illegal immigrants are criminals hence the reason they are not documented. Yet California Democrats have no interest in protecting the state and communities by working with Federal authorities. Because these same illegal immigrants are likely to vote Democrat.

It appears there are no longer moderate Democrat leadership, only those who put the party before country & constituents.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 8:44 pm

Are the majority of illegal immigrants violent criminals?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:08 pm

Joe in PB wrote: Because these same illegal immigrants are likely to vote Democrat.

You really are this stupid / gullible, aren't you?

not -

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:30 pm

Mikey please explain the reason the Democrats are basically rolling out the red carpet for illegal aliens?

This from a state approaching a 200 billion deficit.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:42 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:Are the majority of illegal immigrants violent criminals?

The number is likely 100's of criminals coming into the state illegally. Do you want 10, 20, or 100 illegal immigrant criminals coming into your town and have your state not working with Federal authorities to take these thugs off the street?

That doesn't make sense, and most middle class citizens don't agree with that policy.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:45 pm

Joe in PB wrote:Mikey please explain the reason the Democrats are basically rolling out the red carpet for illegal aliens?

This from a state approaching a 200 billion deficit.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe, please explain to me how illegal aliens vote?
And don't just tell me that "people are saying." Show some statistics or other proof.
I'll wait for an answer off line.

Also, you might want to look up the difference between debt and deficit.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:00 pm

They become legal immigrants moron. By stepping if possible using DACA as the precedent.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:05 pm

Joe in PB wrote:They become legal immigrants moron. By stepping if possible using DACA as the precedent.

Please translate that second sentence into English, if you can. Do you speak English?
Can you actually become a legal immigrant just by stepping? On what? And what is DACA a precedent for?

And BTW, "legal immigrant" status doesn't give you the right to vote, and DACA doesn't provide a pathway to citizenship, moron, no matter what "people are saying."

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:06 pm

Joe in PB wrote:They become legal immigrants moron. By stepping if possible using DACA as the precedent.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

They'd be prime candidates to be GOPtard voters if you didn't call them rapists and murderers who deserve to have their families destroyed. But that's what you do so who can blame 'em?

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:41 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:Are the majority of illegal immigrants violent criminals?

Probably not, but they are 100% criminals.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:48 pm

Left Seater wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Are the majority of illegal immigrants violent criminals?
Probably not, but they are 100% criminals.

You're using a pretty broad definition, which would probably apply to the majority of people in this country whether here legally or not.

From https://dictionary.law.com/

criminal
1) n. a popular term for anyone who has committed a crime, whether convicted of the offense or not. More properly it should apply only to those actually convicted of a crime. Repeat offenders are sometimes called habitual criminals.

crime
n. a violation of a law in which there is injury to the public or a member of the public and a term in jail or prison, and/or a fine as possible penalties. There is some sentiment for excluding from the "crime" category crimes without victims, such as consensual acts, or violations in which only the perpetrator is hurt or involved such as personal use of illegal drugs.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:57 pm

Mikey wrote: And BTW, "legal immigrant" status doesn't give you the right to vote

Who cares if you live in San Francisco? They are going to let illegals vote in School Board elections.

Further, here’s what the California secretary of state’s website says about identification needed to register: “The voter registration application asks for your driver license or California identification card number, or you can use the last four numbers on your Social Security card. If you do not have a driver license, California identification card or Social Security card, you may leave that space blank. Your county elections official will assign a number to you that will be used to identify you as a voter.”

In short, no one really needs to prove citizenship to vote for any office, in San Francisco or anywhere else in California.

Drivers licenses, check. Immigrant children, even the undocumented, eligible for state-paid medical insurance under Medi-Cal, check. In-state college tuition, check that, too. Non-citizens, even if they’re not here legally, can also practice law under a 2015 bill signed by Gov. Jerry Brown.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 11:07 pm

Mikey there really is no reason for California not to cooperate with Federal authorities in regards to illegal immigration.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 11:24 pm

Joe in PB wrote:Mikey there really is no reason for California not to cooperate with Federal authorities in regards to illegal immigration.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

There are one mission reasons for California not to cooperate. Stop trolling.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sun Jul 15, 2018 11:55 pm

Ok, let’s hear the mission where it makes sense not to cooperate on Illegal aliens?

Then you can give us 10 reasons why it isn’t good for CA to cooperate with the Feds on illegal aliens.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:08 am

Joe in PB wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Are the majority of illegal immigrants violent criminals?
The number is likely 100's of criminals coming into the state illegally. Do you want 10, 20, or 100 illegal immigrant criminals coming into your town and have your state not working with Federal authorities to take these thugs off the street?

That doesn't make sense, and most middle class citizens don't agree with that policy.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tardtalk

I don't either, but this all started with dumbfuck Rooster suggesting that all illegal aliens are violent criminals.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Jul 16, 2018 3:21 am

Left Seater wrote:
Mikey wrote: And BTW, "legal immigrant" status doesn't give you the right to vote
Who cares if you live in San Francisco? They are going to let illegals vote in School Board elections.

I don't GARA what they're doing in the San Francisco School Board elections. Do you really think it's that easy to vote in California?

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Mon Jul 16, 2018 3:54 am

Illegal Immigration Costs California $30.3 Billion A Year—17.7 Percent Of State Budget

1. Education for Illegal Immigrants & Anchor Babies: $15.63 Billion
2. Healthcare For Illegal Immigrants: $4.02 Billion
3. Remittance Payments: $3.86 Billion
4. Crimes Committed By Illegal Immigrants: $4.4 Billion
5. Government Administration & Services: $1.6 Billion