Conference Bowl Records

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Dinsdale »

Just now, the local radio guys had the "best conference this season, top-to-bottom" discussion. I think the one dude nailed it with "the Power 5 are all a lot closer than we ever give them credit for in these discussions we have every year. The PAC12 bottom-feeders would crush the B1G or SEC bottom feeders, and the middle B1G and SEC teams would crush the PAC12 middle of the road teams... all evens out."
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29814
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Mikey »

This kind of stuff makes great food for thought between January and September for deep thinkers who don't have a good book to read.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Left Seater »

9-3 post season record for the ACC. Below .500 for the SEC.

Props to the ACC.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Left Seater »

That works as well. Plenty of ways to skin this cat.

The eyeball test also works. For example, the ACC had wins over three of the top four teams in the B1G including the conf champ.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Bowl games are the results of specific individual match ups and varying motivational levels, and not accurate assessments of overall conference strength.
User avatar
L45B
Commanche Hero
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 4:01 am
Location: NYC - born and raised!!!

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by L45B »

Not necessarily related to the topic at hand, but what do these teams all have in common?

Virginia Tech
Pittsburgh
Ole Miss
“My dentist, that’s another beauty, my dentist, you kiddin’ me. It cost me five thousand dollars to have all new teeth put in. Now he tells me I need braces!” —Rodney Dangerfield
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Left Seater »

Unrealized potential?
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Papa Willie wrote:If you break it down by conference size, Pac 12 plays less OOC games than the other conferences.
Uhh that's because they play 9 conference games.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

The Big Ten also plays 9 conference games, you idiot. So of course they're going to play fewer OOC games, Power 5 or otherwise. Are you really this bad at basic reasoning?
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Dinsdale »

The guy who won the contest picking against the spread doesn't know what "ATS" means... awesome.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Papa Willie wrote:How many times have some of you cried about SEC OOC games? Please don't make me go back and do this. Looks to me (quick glance) that Auburn's playing 8 conference games this year. Mizzou is playing 7. 'Bama is playing 9. I'm just pointing it out, because so much has been made of it in the past.
What are you babbling about? Every SEC team plays 8 conference regular season games.

Nobody is crying about anything. Just pointing out that it doesn't make a lot of sense to brag about playing a higher volume of non-conference P5 teams when your league plays 14 more non-conference games.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Dinsdale »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
What are you babbling about? Every SEC team plays 8 conference regular season games.
I think a certain rotund one might have had a nice buzz on when he looked at the schedules.

Then again, I have to get mighty plastered to forget how to count to 8, but it could happen, I suppose. But I think I might question myself if I came to the conclusion that "The SEC just told every member, 'go ahead and schedule however many OOCs you want, and we'll fill in the conference schedule later. Dang, I hope you guys don't come up with too many odd numbers.' "

In his defense, Mercer appears on SEC schedules so often, I can see how he'd confuse them for a member.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Left Seater »

schmick wrote:
That Ped State was a 7.5 point under dog proves that either the odds makers or the football pollsters dont know what they are talking about

Ped State was ranked higher than USC
Ped State was Big 10 Conf Champ
USC finished 4th in the Pac 12
And that statement proves that Schmick doesn't know what the point spread is about.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Dinsdale »

Yup, Schmick is a dumbass. But maybe we can help(good luck with that, right?).


Let's look at our own Pickem game. There were 20 entries (a couple of repeats,but that doesn't matter). Of those 20, 11 took USC at - 7.5. Pretty close, although maybe if it was -8.5, it could have been 10/10.

OK, Schmick, read slowly... Vegas doesn't make their money by trying to "fool" bettors. The opening line is where they think they can get an equal amount of money on each team, which guarantees them a 2.5% profit. If there's uneven money, they're at financial risk if the win goes to the team with more money on it. When it gets out of balance, they move the line, and keep doing so until the money evens out.

The "moving line" strategey didn't work for Bama vs UDub, since the evening before, they said there was 6 times the amount of money on Washington than Bama. Fortunately for them, it worked in their favor. If Washington scored a garbage-time TD, they would have incurred huge losses.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29814
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Mikey »

The thing that's really hard to grasp (at least for Schmick, I guess) is that there's a degree of uncertainty in the results.
Two teams could play each other on different days and end up with a different score. Shocking, I know, but what happens on the field has a certain randomness to it and a definite bearing on the final score.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Left Seater »

^^^^^^^^^^
This.

Show me a one score game and I will show you one play that could have changed the outcome.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
King Crimson
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 8972
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by King Crimson »

schmick just wants someone to "love him" on this constant "4th place in the Pac" thing he's pounding badly. Trojans played in the Rose Bowl.

and they beat both UW and Colorado. hooray. i'll do it. no, it wasn't a GREAT Trojan team. hooray. a not-great Sooner team won the Sugar Bowl. cry on it.

then, he wants to bitch on Helton some.....and some little league scores in la cabra mesa. and the catholic private school league that is cheating. and somehow it all adds up that some top flight so cal prospects WANT to leave the state to leave the insanity masters that are running it.

weird, huh?
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29814
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Mikey »

Stanford has 12 commits for 2017. Eight are from outside CA.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Dinsdale »

Mikey wrote:Stanford has 12 commits for 2017. Eight are from outside CA.
There might be something to the "get out of California" thing. For instance, Antioch is pretty shitty, from the little I know about it (I do have friends who have lived there, and hated it). Might just make a kid want to leave California.

Other side of the coin, Palo Alto, and the South Bay area in general is pretty nice. Find a kid from Fallon, Nevada, or Boise or some shit, and they might well see it as edenic.

But I'll tell you what -- Taggart was shocked that the previous staff(s) let so much as one decent in-state recruit leave (which Stanford has benefited from in recent years), and said that ends now. Not that Orgon cranks out that many big-stars guys (save it, Schmick), but the ones we have are getting first priority. I think Taggart sees the big picture better than his predecessors.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conference Bowl Records

Post by Dinsdale »

I assume schmick is outraged about Marlon Tuipulotu committing to USC.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Post Reply