mvscal

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:33 am

I'd like to fuck you until another emotion is created to commemorate the illegal acts I'd like to commit with you.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:35 am

It's "new emotion," not "new emoticon," you...WHORE!

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:36 am

Van wrote:It's "new emotion," not "new emoticon," you...WHORE!

Oh yeah. Sorry, don't mess with my mojo here. I'm trying to get my slut on.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:21 am

I'm trying to get my slut on.
Looks like you found the right place.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:39 pm

What's going on here?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:11 pm

War Wagon wrote:What's going on here?

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:34 pm

War Wagon wrote:What's going on here?

Need to hang out in chat radio to find out. Good times, good times. If chats could be archived, last night's definitely would.

I'll play you some Foghat or Zep or anything else you want, so c'mon in next weekend.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:21 pm

Yeah, he won't fall for that. But there are other ways, I'm quite sure.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:23 pm

trev wrote:Meow.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:25 pm

Moving Sale wrote:..............

Yes, that is the proper place to keep it.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:30 pm

Smackie Chan wrote:
War Wagon wrote:What's going on here?
Need to hang out in chat radio to find out. Good times, good times. If chats could be archived, last night's definitely would.

I'll play you some Foghat or Zep or anything else you want, so c'mon in next weekend.

Foghat? For realz?

If Katy can be persuaded to perform a virtual pole dance, count me in. Or was that last night and now shit I'm outta' luck?

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:28 pm

Virtual pole dances? Hell, she blew right past that, going straight to her penchant for swallowing and otherwise taking loads over various portions of her anatomy.

In other words, she was chatting!

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:38 pm

Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches; at one point, the room was evenly divided between dudes and cunts. Pole dancing woulda been a step backward, as Van implied.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:39 pm

Katy's Bukake Hour?

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:44 pm

Mikey wrote:Katy's Bukake Hour?

She was glazed like a Christmas ham.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:17 pm

Smackie Chan wrote:Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches;

Other bitches?

Now this getting really interesting. Were they like trying to outdo each other competing for the title of raunchiest slut?

I'm sure Katy blew the competition away.

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:56 pm

War Wagon wrote:Other bitches?

Now this getting really interesting. Were they like trying to outdo each other competing for the title of raunchiest slut?

I'm sure Katy blew the competition away.

There were 3 or 4 twats in there last night; sometimes others show up. A few don't post here, but just drop in for the chat & music. All are raunchy, but Katy is usually at the top of the leaderboard.

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:10 am

mvscal wrote:
Katy wrote:I'd like to fuck you until another emotion is created to commemorate the illegal acts I'd like to commit with you.
You're just trying to trick me again. It's not going to work.

I've changed, mvscal. Can you give me one more chance?

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:15 am

War Wagon wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches;
Other bitches?

Now this getting really interesting. Were they like trying to outdo each other competing for the title of raunchiest slut?

I'm sure Katy blew the competition away.

You should definitely come by the chats. I blame it on Smackie. It's all his fault.

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:16 am

Smackie Chan wrote:Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches; at one point, the room was evenly divided between dudes and cunts. Pole dancing woulda been a step backward, as Van implied.

Yeah, the new slunts you brought aboard are very cool. We need to convince them to start posting in this bitch.

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:20 am

trev wrote:Yeah, he won't fall for that. But there are other ways, I'm quite sure.

Step aside, woman. mvscal's carnal needs are a priority. You're the cotton underwear to my rubber crotchless panties. :P

eddie munster · Post by **eddie munster** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:21 am

"I'm trying to get my slut on"

woaaaa!! pssst pssst hey Katy!!

fix · Post by **fix** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:28 am

Katy wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches; at one point, the room was evenly divided between dudes and cunts. Pole dancing woulda been a step backward, as Van implied.

Yeah, the new slunts you brought aboard are very cool. We need to convince them to start posting in this bitch.

That happens and someone had better page spunkrag to get its ass over and posting on this sordid clam bake.

Pronto..

trev · Post by **trev** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:30 am

Katy wrote:
trev wrote:Yeah, he won't fall for that. But there are other ways, I'm quite sure.
Step aside, woman. mvscal's carnal needs are a priority. You're the cotton underwear to my rubber crotchless panties. :P

You go girl. Whatever you are doing is working. I felt the earth shake in So Cal this afternoon.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:37 am

Smackie wrote:There were 3 or 4 twats in there last night

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:45 am

Van wrote:
Smackie wrote:There were 3 or 4 twats in there last night

Does Shrubber count for having a twat?

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:48 am

Van wrote:
Smackie wrote:There were 3 or 4 twats in there last night

I've found that most women find "twat" to be second only to "cunt" on the offensiveness scale. Of course, the bitches who frequent our little cyberparties aren't like most women. They tend to wear those terms as badges of honor.

Gotta love our little slunts.

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:51 am

Katy wrote:Does Shrubber count for having a twat?

I'll be honest, I didn't check his package when we were in NOLA. But I'll go out on a limb and say he doesn't, if for no other reason than to avoid having him creep into thoughts during jerk sessions.

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:57 am

Smackie Chan wrote:
Katy wrote:Does Shrubber count for having a twat?
I'll be honest, I didn't check his package when we were in NOLA. But I'll go out on a limb and say he doesn't, if for no other reason than to avoid having him creep into thoughts during jerk sessions.

^^^

Rack.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:16 am

Smackie, the problem you're doubtless encountering with your use of the term 'cunt' is that you keep applying it to women in general terms, as a rather awkward term of endearment. If you'd just limit it to its proper application, you'd be aces.

All the very best women have and quite enjoy their cunts, up to and including screaming it out in ecstasy.

It's kind of like an endzone celebration.

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:24 am

Van wrote:Smackie, the problem you're doubtless encountering with your use of the term 'cunt' is that you keep applying it to women in general terms, as a rather awkward term of endearment.

I go further than that. I also apply it to Sacramento Steve Vai wannabes.

How's that endzone celebration goin'?

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:20 am

Lotta disturb going on here.

fix · Post by **fix** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:28 am

IndyFrisco wrote:Lotta disturb going on here.

You expected differently from this place?

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:30 am

Otis wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:Lotta disturb going on here.
You expected differently from this place?

Nope. Just less confirmation.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:39 am

I foresee a spike in T1B Radio Ratings in the Immediate Future.

Deciders - How can we profit from this?

fix · Post by **fix** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:04 am

KC Scott wrote:I foresee a spike in T1B Radio Ratings in the Immediate Future.

Deciders - How can we profit from this?

More of last night repeated.

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:18 am

mvscal, what sexual favor do I have to perform to get you in chat one night?

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:54 am

I think an enthusiastic rusty trombone should do the trick.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:52 am

Katy wrote:mvscal, what sexual favor do I have to perform to get you in chat one night?

He likes black cock.

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:30 am

Moving Sale wrote:
Katy wrote:mvscal, what sexual favor do I have to perform to get you in chat one night?
He likes black cock.

I know I probably should be embarrassed for starting this thread. But right now I'm more embarrassed for you.

Is that wrong?