Page 2 of 2
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:30 am
by Bizzarofelice
M2 wrote:
<<<<<<<<<<<<WHAT IS GOING ON OVER THERE<<<<<<<<<<<
My sister Wendy has a photo where she is looking slightly to the left. As though something is going on over there! I guess something happened over to the left that made everybody happy! Except my sister is cross-eyed, so she can’t quite pull it off. One eye is right-on
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:35 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
titlover wrote:those things are perfect
Minor nit, but I suppose they could be a little bigger. When it comes to women's tits, there's no such thing as too big.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:46 pm
by Van
Yes, there most definitely is.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:34 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Not for me, there isn't.
Mind you, I'm talking strictly about tits. Now, there might be other parts on the woman's body that are a little too big.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:19 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Terry in Crapchester wrote:Mind you, I'm talking strictly about tits.
Thanks for clearing that up, bro. I wasn't sure what you meant here:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:When it comes to women's tits, there's no such thing as too big.
I thought you were talking about labias.
:?
So -- Chelsea Charms... not too big? Cindy Fulsom... could be bigger?
Really?
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:33 pm
by Atomic Punk
"Workout guy" actually knows the screen names of porn stars? One would think you could attract women if you're all buffed like KC Scott says. haha
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:43 pm
by pron
Atomic Punk wrote:"Workout guy" actually knows the screen names of porn stars?
WTF is wrong with that? :?
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:57 pm
by Imus
Atomic Punk wrote:"Workout guy" actually knows the screen names of porn stars?
Which is a normal hetro thing. Much unlike you, who posts pics of your gay bleeding ass in dyke undies.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:34 pm
by Van
"gaylord"?
Holy crap, Alec is Samurai Gangbang?! Or, even more disturbing...his sister?
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:04 pm
by Van
Terry in Crapchester wrote:When it comes to women's tits, there's no such thing as too big.
Nonsense. Even you would gag at the unveiling of these nasty, oversized udders...
And don't
make me dredge up pics of "BBW" black chicks with areolas the size of Roundtables' "Big Vinnie" pizza.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:29 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Van wrote:And don't make me dredge up pics of "BBW" black chicks with areolas the size of Roundtables' "Big Vinnie" pizza.
IB's tits are that big, eh?
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:52 pm
by Goober McTuber
Here you go, Terry...
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:13 pm
by Van
Checkmate.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:26 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Not so fast, VAN. They could be just a llllllllliiiiitttttlllllllllleeeee bit bigger.
Sin,
TiC
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:17 am
by mvscal
Van wrote:Terry in Crapchester wrote:When it comes to women's tits, there's no such thing as too big.
Nonsense. Even you would gag at the unveiling of these nasty, oversized udders...
I believe in Terry's case it's more a matter of self-defense. If his enraged gorilla wife's arms were shorter than her tits, he might not get beaten quite as badly.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:23 am
by titlover
Van wrote:Terry in Crapchester wrote:When it comes to women's tits, there's no such thing as too big.
Nonsense. Even you would gag at the unveiling of these nasty, oversized udders...
And don't
make me dredge up pics of "BBW" black chicks with areolas the size of Roundtables' "Big Vinnie" pizza.
once we delve into the realm of those size tits, then we must fuck them because of the sheer novelty of it....it's our duty as men.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:17 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Nope, still haven't convinced me.
And my wife's arms are shorter than her tits . . . well, almost.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:19 pm
by Van
Terry, c'mon. This...
...didn't convince you?
No wonder you root for Notre Dame.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:25 pm
by Dinsdale
I'm not sure I could even jack off onto those knockers without bursting into alternating fits of laughter and revulsion.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:36 am
by Derron
Surprised that thin fabric holds them udders up..seems to me that 1/4 inch cable would be required for that weight.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:48 am
by Invictus
Terry in Crapchester wrote:Not for me, there isn't.
Mind you, I'm talking strictly about tits. Now, there might be other parts on the woman's body that are a little too big.
IVO?
You married a blacvk woman right? You realize that usually the ratio of tit to booty is the opposite of what you just typed.
Dins, I'm curious. You hog so I'm thinking that many times you've been with a pig who has huge breasts. Does your revulsion stop you from fucking her or do you just do the deed and worry about personal preferences another time?
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:50 am
by Dinsdale
Invictus wrote:Does your revulsion stop you from fucking her or do you just do the deed and worry about personal preferences another time?
Standards are for guys who don't get laid.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:51 am
by Invictus
mvscal wrote:Van wrote:Terry in Crapchester wrote:When it comes to women's tits, there's no such thing as too big.
Nonsense. Even you would gag at the unveiling of these nasty, oversized udders...
I believe in Terry's case it's more a matter of self-defense. If his enraged gorilla wife's arms were shorter than her tits, he might not get beaten quite as badly.
mvs, I stumbled across a site recently that I think you might like: chimpout.com. I've been reading it for a few weeks and it has been very engrossing.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:12 am
by Invictus
Dinsdale wrote:Invictus wrote:Does your revulsion stop you from fucking her or do you just do the deed and worry about personal preferences another time?
Standards are for guys who don't get laid.
Outstanding! I value your insight into these things. Now, the below woman:
is she beyond penile redemption?
Recently, a woman who has gone through a gastric bypass has told someone that she is interested in me. While the thought of easy, insecure pussy intrigues me, the thought of the horrors that await me when she removes her clothes makes my penis cry and yell at me. Fat is one thing but how do you deal with post surgery scars/bodies? I'd rather jerk off personally but she lives almost an hour and a half away and is as country as a chicken coup (thank you Ordell Robey) so I'm tempted to buy two 40s and reach out to her.
Your advice?
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:16 am
by mvscal
Invictus wrote:mvs, I stumbled across a site recently that I think you might like: chimpout.com. I've been reading it for a few weeks and it has been very engrossing.
Yes, I am familiar with their work charting important social trends.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:07 pm
by Dinsdale
While standards are indeed for guys who don't get laid, the above example pushes the bounds of hogging.
I'll occasionally throw my hat in the ring with the standard-bearing celebates, on special occasions.
As far as your surgically altered doughgirl, I say "go for it." While the scars may not be the most appealing attribute... that's where the booze comes into play... it allows you to think outside the box... turn that liability iunto an asset -- push the sides of that scar into a trench/furrow, slap the hogging stick in there, and hack away til you splatter that sheeeot.
Just my humble opinion.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:35 pm
by Derron
Dinsdale wrote:While standards are indeed for guys who don't get laid, the above example pushes the bounds of hogging.
I'll occasionally throw my hat in the ring with the standard-bearing celebates, on special occasions.
As far as your surgically altered doughgirl, I say "go for it." While the scars may not be the most appealing attribute... that's where the booze comes into play... it allows you to think outside the box... turn that liability iunto an asset -- push the sides of that scar into a trench/furrow, slap the hogging stick in there, and hack away til you splatter that sheeeot.
Just my humble opinion.
Surely a self proclaimed cocksman like yourself has some standards...? No ?
Nothing wrong with laying it to some gal who is a bit over weight, as long as she don't do no head trips, you know, you fucked me therefore you love me
pure and simple, jump on and blast a load or two and be gone.
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:43 pm
by Go Coogs'
Dinsdale wrote:As far as your surgically altered doughgirl, I say "go for it." While the scars may not be the most appealing attribute... that's where the booze comes into play... it allows you to think outside the box... turn that liability iunto an asset -- push the sides of that scar into a trench/furrow, slap the hogging stick in there, and hack away til you splatter that sheeeot.
Just my humble opinion.
Have you been to my house?
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:47 pm
by Dinsdale
Go Coogs' wrote:
Have you been to my house?
Which one was yours?
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:07 pm
by jiminphilly
Dinsdale wrote:Go Coogs' wrote:
Have you been to my house?
Which one was yours?
Sig worthy
Re: Would you hit it ... ?
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:29 am
by Moby Dick
M2 wrote: