NPR Planning Genocide!!!!!

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:18 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xd9OYJMX ... r_embedded

Here's the lame sting operation by the same lil' punk who doctored a similar hidden vid in an attack on ACORN.

But here we see the NPR official clearly stating the noble and righteous principles of his institution, while the fake Muslims attempt to draw him out on the "Jew dominated media." This fails and so the fake donors are left with accusing Schiller of...calling Tea Baggers racist? Is this a joke? Schiller is 100% right in his assessments and his forced resignation is a disgrace. Good comedy, though.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:41 pm

May Cokie Roberts catch you catch you in a dark alley, throw you on the ground and fandango on your lower lumbar.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:59 am

for once, I have to take LTS TRD 2's side. The NPR guy was a fundraiser. Some fuck wants to give you a fuck-pot of $$$, you fucking TAKE it. You don't ask any tough questions because, well FUCK him; he's giving you money NOW, fucking TAKE it. He wants something more down the line, well, let's see how it looks then, but right now, take the money and FUCK him.

As for the "donor": That's the fucking chance you take when you're fucking offering some asshole FREE MONEY; you just might take one up the ass

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:05 am

Well the official word is that he had another job lined up anyway.

Is NPR lying ?

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:08 am

Tom In VA wrote: Is NPR lying ?

Is water wet?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:12 am

Cuda wrote:
Tom In VA wrote: Is NPR lying ?
Is water wet?

Is Cooter a babbling fucktard?

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:24 am

No, the question is: was he completely accurate in his assessment of the Tea Baggers? Well..??... :wink:

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:27 am

LTS TRN 2 wrote:No, the question is: was he completely accurate in his assessment of the Tea Baggers? Well..??... :wink:

No he was not.

Your turn. Was NPR lying ?

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:23 am

Well..yes, he was accurate. The evidence is pretty plain. But racist doesn't quite capture the dire subsumation of the Tea Bagger--the vibrating fear frying the circuits of normal logic...the religious blanket...all cozy and Norman Rockwell...no need for spellin' and science fools...

a little further...why not?

Yes, the fallen lizards were loved by Him...but they were libtards...

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:23 am

Great work. I'll have to study to state each propaganda tactic you just used. Need to watch that video again.

Nice cherry picking though.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:46 pm

No, Tom, it's not "propaganda" at all. It's perfectly real. That yokel with the misspelled "moran" sign is REAL. He's an example of the average Tea Bagger.

And the ludicrous creationist theme park--asserting that dinosaurs and humans--Noah--all lived at same time. It's a real part of fundamentalist baptist belief. That park--and others like it in the bible belt--are real.

As to whether the baby dinosaur being comforted by Our Savior was in fact a libtard, who knows? They were both offed in short order.

So...show us some evidence of a reasonably intelligent Tea Bagger? Rand Paul? Hmmm, seems intelligent. He a doctor. But....his bizarre embrace of Ayn Rand as well as his fervent religiosity mixed with his drastic and rigid conflicts with his own party renders him a basic inconsequential nut job. How about Michele Bachmann? Gee, she wants to be president

Hey, Michelle...we're over here!

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:33 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:No, Tom, it's not "propaganda" at all. It's perfectly real. That yokel with the misspelled "moran" sign is REAL. He's an example of the average Tea Bagger.

Well, the mullet wearing Cardinal fan part might be real, but you wouldn't know reality if it stained your blue dress.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:11 am

What, wags, you don't think those creationist theme parks are real? Or that they don't in fact reflect a disturbing increase in a simplistic yet insistent strain of the Christer cult? You know, folks that are fired up about moranic assalts on Americus' Christian-based Exceptionelism!!

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:20 am

Another day, another hapless, lying hypocrite is forced to resign from NPR in disgrace.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/201 ... er-resigns

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:08 am

And....what was the problem with what he said?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:10 am

<

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:37 am

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:42 am

S_M wrote:And....what was the problem with what he said?

Believing that the federal government should operate within the confines outlined in the constitution does not make a person racist.

Nor does believing in fiscal responsibility.

The guy's comments show him to be a ridiculous @sshole.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:03 am

poptart wrote:The guy's comments show him to be a ridiculous @sshole.

Not only that, it made his boss look like the stupid, lying cunt that she is when she claimed the day before that there was no liberal bias at NPR.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:42 am

poptart wrote:
S_M wrote:And....what was the problem with what he said?
Believing that the federal government should operate within the confines outlined in the constitution does not make a person racist.

Nor does believing in fiscal responsibility.

The guy's comments show him to be a ridiculous @sshole.

Oh shut the fuck up already. Birthers are racist. Do the math.

mvscal wrote:Not only that, it made his boss look like the stupid, lying cunt that she is when she claimed the day before that there was no liberal bias at NPR.

Newsflash, dumb fuck. Williams got shitcanned because NPR told him to stop talking shit about his employer on competing networks. He failed to do as his superiors told him.

It's not like the male Schiller did anything like telling a subordinate to lie to federal investigators.

Make sure to change your diapers, kids.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:47 am

S_M wrote:Birthers are racist. Do the math

2 + 2 = You're Fucked

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:49 am

Still waiting for one simple explanation about an item in the Tea Party's agenda, that's racist.

I know black members of the Tea Party, they might like to know.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:54 am

1) tea party's agenda? so the tea party has organized itself?

2) did they mention the tea party's agenda is racist?

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:57 am

Bizzarofelice wrote:1 tea party's agenda? so the tea party has organized itself?

Loosely, under the guise of Republicans.

Seems to have worked, a handful got elected and they sure have the libs shitting themselves trying to discredit them.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:59 am

Bizzarofelice wrote:1) tea party's agenda? so the tea party has organized itself?

2) did they mention the tea party's agenda is racist?

Go ahead. Pick an issue the Tea Party has an opinion on, and lay out how it's racist.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:09 am

Tom In VA wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:1) tea party's agenda? so the tea party has organized itself?

2) did they mention the tea party's agenda is racist?
Go ahead. Pick an issue the Tea Party has an opinion on, and lay out how it's racist.

I'm not in this debate. I merely pointed out the flaw in your questions.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:10 am

Bizzarofelice wrote:
Tom In VA wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:1) tea party's agenda? so the tea party has organized itself?

2) did they mention the tea party's agenda is racist?
Go ahead. Pick an issue the Tea Party has an opinion on, and lay out how it's racist.

I'm not in this debate. I merely pointed out the flaw in your questions.

I'm not in this debate either, there is no debate. The Tea Party isn't racist.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:12 am

War Wagon wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:1 tea party's agenda? so the tea party has organized itself?
Loosely, under the guise of Republicans.

but I think the GOP has the experience and political wisdom, and the tea partiers have the energy and zeitgeist. the two aspects aren't always on the same page.

if another issue suddenly becomes more pressing than the deficit, will the tea partiers be able to change course or will they fade into the background?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:22 am

Bace wrote:if another issue suddenly becomes more pressing than the deficit, will the tea partiers be able to change course or will they fade into the background?

Most "tea partiers" recognize (beyond the obvious - that dark-skinned people are inferior) that the deficit is merely a symptom.

The illness is a federal government that is ape shit out of it's constitutional boundary.

There is nothing more pressing than the people needing to get their government back.

Unless and until that happens, symptoms, like a COMPLETELY out of control deficit, will continue to seriously plague us - or DOOM us.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:30 am

poptart wrote: Most "tea partiers" recognize (beyond the obvious - that dark-skinned people are inferior) that the deficit is merely a symptom.

The deficit is a symptom of the inferiority of dark-skinned people? :?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:32 am

poptart wrote: There is nothing more pressing than the people needing to get their government back.

Really? Since when? Wasn't even an issue in the '08 election. Did the government change drastically recently?

COMPLETELY out of control deficit, will continue to seriously plague us - or DOOM us.

Don't you think it is strange to have so much vitriol over an issue that didn't bother you much before?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:40 am

Two things woke people up, Bace.

1) The serious economic collapse - and the subsequent doubling down on our deficit spending as a supposed 'cure' for our economic woes

2) The economic truths that Ron Paul clearly articulated

Understand that MANY within the tea party are at SERIOUS odds with the republican establishment, and wish to in NO way identify with that party.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:50 am

Bizzarofelice wrote: if another issue suddenly becomes more pressing than the deficit, will the tea partiers be able to change course or will they fade into the background?

Good question.

The Tea Party came about as a spontaneous backlash against the universal healthcare mandate, imo, not the (growing) deficit itself.

But even if the healthcare issue were to go away, the near term (growing) deficit isn't.

So no, I don't think they'll fade into the background.

And no matter your political stripe, you have to give these Tea Party honks their due. Never before have I seen a group come out of nowhere like this and made themselves relevant in the space of two years. Unless we're counting Egypt.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:53 am

War Wagon wrote:Never before have I seen a group come out of nowhere like this...

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:55 am

Always nice to see the Northern Light shine upon the darkness in this country.

Good one Marty, you might be right. I like the Term Limit deal. Too many career politicians.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:06 am

Bizzarofelice wrote:
poptart wrote: There is nothing more pressing than the people needing to get their government back.
Really? Since when? Wasn't even an issue in the '08 election. Did the government change drastically recently?

Yeah. The banks tanked themselves and Bush gave them a bailout that was used in part to pay bonuses to the tools that fucked everything up. That was the impetus of the movement that would become the Tea Party. The problem is that the guy that won the election a few months later ran as a Washington outsider, yet he hired Geithner and kept Summers (after stating that the people who made the mess shouldn't be the ones cleaning it up) to run the government printing press and then added a shitload more debt on top of the debt that everyone had already gotten pissed about. That got the Tea Partiers off of their couches and out at rallies. Did you just get back from a 16-month stay in a grass hut in Botswana or something? All of this stuff was in the news quite a bit...

Don't you think it is strange to have so much vitriol over an issue that didn't bother you much before?

Barry took over a clusterfuck of an economic situation, granted. But he chose to "fix" it by issuing a second round of bank bailouts (much of which was allowed again to be distributed as bonuses), a "stimulus" that was effectively 3/4's of a trillion dollars in earmarked pork (after promising to end earmarks all during the campaign) and bailed out the UAW...errr, the auto industry. He then proposed his brilliant fix of our country's healthcare system that didn't touch any of the core issues, other than ones that added to the debt or resulted in higher premiums and lowered coverage for those who already had insurance. And just to make sure that he pissed off everyone else that wasn't already in "What the fuck is he DOING?"-mode, he's authorized his Homeland Security Secretary to install full-frontal pron cameras, peddled by former HS Sec-turned-lobbyist Michael chertoff :?, anywhere there's a percieved or invented potential threat.

This guy has done seemingly everything possible to piss off every registered voter in both parties AND independents and you think people don't like him because he's black? Go fuck yourself.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:33 am

Hasn't the Tea Party had a factional split, though? There's the Ron Paul intellectual wing (is he a libertarian or a Tea Partier), the Sarah Palin wing and the Koch brothers. Might be more, I'm not sure.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:33 am

Absolutely. And yeah, there are a few racist toolbags at Tea Party rallies too. Sadly, that's all you'll see on the evening news. I mean, which makes a more compelling news story, the average guy with an average job who is fed up with DC bullshit, or a guy holding a picture of the white house with a freshly planted watermelon patch? Especially in today's days of tabloid journalism where sensationalism sells, if there's one fruitcake bigot in a crowd of 10,000, he'll be the first one with a microphone in his face every time.

What's sad is that it began as a grassroots non-GOP, non-Dem movement of independents who were fed up with assholes on both sides of the aisle whoring themselves out to special interests, and it's been hijacked in part by fringe elements on the far right.

But the Tea Party as an organization really shot itself in the foot by backing unelectable candidates in the past election. When your party is struggling to get itself noticed, gain credibility and define its identity, supporting "2nd ammendment solutions" Sharon Angle and a candidate who would even think to run an "I'm not a witch" commercial

isn't too bright.

As for the fascination with Sarah Palin, there are two reasons: She doesn't look like the standard plain-jane, cunty DC politician (see: Boxer,Barbara) and the left is instantly livid every time Palin says a word. As soon as the libs stop caring what Sarah Palin says, she goes away. And really, what's the big deal? All she is is a small town PTA mom with the very narrow views that come from living in a rural community. Anyone who's spent any time in a small town has met plenty of people like her. She's completely unelectable to any national office, and won't be running for President, so stop giving her the reaction she's looking for and she goes away.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:34 am

Screw_Michigan wrote:Newsflash, dumb fuck. Williams got shitcanned because NPR told him to stop talking shit about his employer on competing networks. He failed to do as his superiors told him.

Wrong. He got fired because he said he gets nervous when he sees Muslims get on the plane he is on.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:37 am

Bizzarofelice wrote:
poptart wrote: There is nothing more pressing than the people needing to get their government back.
Really? Since when? Wasn't even an issue in the '08 election.

Oniggger's entire campaign was predicated around that concept, you stupid, braindead fucktard.

"Hope and Change" ringing any bells, dumbfuck?