![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![silly :doh:](./images/smilies/icon_doh.gif)
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
Ouch.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: Chefs -- Is it possible to score negative pts?
poptart wrote:Early season games tend to be not as friendly to offenses as they are defenses.
And with Brady missing preseason action and the Pats offense not really in sync, I can't see them dropping 40+ on KC.
Nope, not at all.
I'd look for a NE win by a score of about ... 24-10.
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
That was a well written, coherent and lucid take. Where did you copy it from?RevLimiter wrote:While I have no grandiose ideas about the Chiefs having any chance whatsoever to win this football game against arguably the best top to bottom football team in the entire NF of L, I do however think that they will have a better then average chance of running the ball up and down the field on them.
I like Larry Johnson's chances of getting 100+yards and a TD or two on the Pats' D, and I REALLY REALLY want Chan Gailey to let Brodie Croyle drop back and fire a few balls deep into the Pats' secondary, as they look to be an unmitigated disaster so far. They REALLY should've just paid Asante Samuel the money and stayed the course with guys like Randall Gay....but they didn't and Terrence Wheatley/Ellis Hobbs have been getting LIT UP. Unfortunately, D-Bowe and Tony G. comprise our capable pass catchers, and I'm fairly sure that Hoodie knows how to deal with them. I'll call it-
Patriots- 38
Chiefs- 17
Start checking all of the Chiefs' message boards. You'll find it.BSmack wrote:That was a well written, coherent and lucid take. Where did you copy it from?RevLimiter wrote:While I have no grandiose ideas about the Chiefs having any chance whatsoever to win this football game against arguably the best top to bottom football team in the entire NF of L, I do however think that they will have a better then average chance of running the ball up and down the field on them.
I like Larry Johnson's chances of getting 100+yards and a TD or two on the Pats' D, and I REALLY REALLY want Chan Gailey to let Brodie Croyle drop back and fire a few balls deep into the Pats' secondary, as they look to be an unmitigated disaster so far. They REALLY should've just paid Asante Samuel the money and stayed the course with guys like Randall Gay....but they didn't and Terrence Wheatley/Ellis Hobbs have been getting LIT UP. Unfortunately, D-Bowe and Tony G. comprise our capable pass catchers, and I'm fairly sure that Hoodie knows how to deal with them. I'll call it-
Patriots- 38
Chiefs- 17
Maybe I did....and maybe I DIDN'T copy it. Either way, good luck finding it.BSmack wrote:That was a well written, coherent and lucid take. Where did you copy it from?RevLimiter wrote:While I have no grandiose ideas about the Chiefs having any chance whatsoever to win this football game against arguably the best top to bottom football team in the entire NF of L, I do however think that they will have a better then average chance of running the ball up and down the field on them.
I like Larry Johnson's chances of getting 100+yards and a TD or two on the Pats' D, and I REALLY REALLY want Chan Gailey to let Brodie Croyle drop back and fire a few balls deep into the Pats' secondary, as they look to be an unmitigated disaster so far. They REALLY should've just paid Asante Samuel the money and stayed the course with guys like Randall Gay....but they didn't and Terrence Wheatley/Ellis Hobbs have been getting LIT UP. Unfortunately, D-Bowe and Tony G. comprise our capable pass catchers, and I'm fairly sure that Hoodie knows how to deal with them. I'll call it-
Patriots- 38
Chiefs- 17
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
TRANSLATION: You just rolled snake-eyes.R-Jack wrote:No need to search. The two complete paragraphs with three-syllable words included coming from the guy who used to have his takes written for him is pretty much all the proof anyone needs.RevLimiter wrote: good luck finding it.
I really don't care anymore. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Since you don't plan on leaving anytime soon, I think I speak for everyone when I say that you don't plagiarize enough.
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
RevLimiter wrote:TRANSLATION: You just rolled snake-eyes.
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
Aw, c'mon Paul. Give us a hint. This could be fun, sorta' like an Easter egg hunt.... and YOU get to hide the eggs.RevLimiter wrote:good luck finding it.
LMAO....not even close.War Wagon wrote:Aw, c'mon Paul. Give us a hint. This could be fun, sorta' like an Easter egg hunt.... and YOU get to hide the eggs.RevLimiter wrote:good luck finding it.
Getting warm?
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
Stick to the topic at hand? You mean like you did in this thread, you FAT fucking RETARD?RevLimiter wrote:If you can't figure it out then DROP IT and stick to the topic at hand.
Thanks for the tacit admission of plagiarism.RevLimiter wrote:LMAO....not even close.War Wagon wrote:Aw, c'mon Paul. Give us a hint. This could be fun, sorta' like an Easter egg hunt.... and YOU get to hide the eggs.RevLimiter wrote:good luck finding it.
Getting warm?
Nice work, Horshak.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Class is over. Consider yourself schooled, 'tard.
Dismissed.
It wouldn't have mattered if Brady had played the whole game, they weren't going to cover the spread, much less put up 40 points on the Chiefs defense yesterday. He looked tentative, fragile, and immobile from the first snap until his ACL got snapped.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:It took NE losing their record setting QB and franchise player to do it… but 'tard finally got something right in this thread.
"I know I am but what is Indy????" The more KC retorts change, the more they stay the same, eh?War Wagon wrote:As for being embarrassed by losing to Cassell, why don't you ask Peyton how embarrasing it is to lose to Kyle Orton.
RevLimiter wrote:I like Larry Johnson's chances of getting 100+yards and a TD or two on the Pats' D,
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
Didn't Brady have 76 yards of passing in half a quarter?War Wagon wrote:It wouldn't have mattered if Brady had played the whole game, they weren't going to cover the spread, much less put up 40 points on the Chiefs defense yesterday. He looked tentative, fragile, and immobile from the first snap until his ACL got snapped.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:It took NE losing their record setting QB and franchise player to do it… but 'tard finally got something right in this thread.
That game was a dropped pass off Dwayne "Hands of Stone" Bowe in the endzone from going to overtime.
As for being embarrassed by losing to Cassell, why don't you ask Peyton how embarrasing it is to lose to Kyle Orton. At Home.
Or don't, because there's a lot more to a game than just the QB.
Nice job not including the entire quote or the context.mvscal wrote:Yeah, no drop off between Brady and Matt Cassel.War Wagon wrote:It wouldn't have mattered if Brady had played the whole game,![]()
Take a shit post lap.