T1B

......when the Left has these two staunch Democratic uh Rev's. running their rhetoric around the country. I was just wondering in light of Howeirds recent idiotic utterings.


BTW...No, you can't join Jesse's Rainbow Push coalition by clicking the link

What's the B-side on that Al Sharpton limited edition picture disk?

Martyred wrote:What's the B-side on that Al Sharpton limited edition picture disk?

It's Mike's favorite song, "Cracka Shut the Fuck Up".

I laughed heartly

The 12" extended dance re-mix?

Cool.

Why is the Right called "The religious Right"?

Because there is a sucker born every minute?

It's a contrast with the sacreligious left.

ChargerMike wrote:......when the Left has these two staunch Democratic uh Rev's. running their rhetoric around the country. I was just wondering in light of Howeirds recent idiotic utterings.


BTW...No, you can't join Jesse's Rainbow Push coalition by clicking the link

Bingo!~!

Last night Hannity was broadcasting from the Billy Graham Crusade.

A right-wing news channel broadcasting from a religious event......I wonder why that might be? :roll:

Diego in Seattle wrote:Last night Hannity was broadcasting from the Billy Graham Crusade.

A right-wing news channel broadcasting from a religious event......I wonder why that might be? :roll:

Political pandering at its finest ;)

Why is the Right called "The religious Right"?...
I agree completely. They should be called the Religious Wrong.

Religious Blight.

The right isn't called the 'religious right', the religious right is called the 'religious right', it's a subset, you moron.

See You Next Wednesday wrote:The right isn't called the 'religious right', the religious right is called the 'religious right', it's a subset, you moron.

No freekin duh Einstein...

My point being, why don't we hear "Religious Left" (subset if you will ) in light of the two aforementioned moron Rev's spewing Leftist rhetoric from coast to coast.

Religious right:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Use of the term Religious Right is thought by some to be an example of stereotyping by liberal media and leftwing political activists. Others believe that there is no stereotyping at all, and the term "religious right" is used more often than other similar terms (such as "religious left") simply because in the United States the Christian Right forms a more unified group than others of the Christian community.

Uh, hope that clears it up for ya :wink:

ChargerMike wrote:

See You Next Wednesday wrote:The right isn't called the 'religious right', the religious right is called the 'religious right', it's a subset, you moron.

No freekin duh Einstein...

My point being, why don't we hear "Religious Left" (subset if you will ) in light of the two aforementioned moron Rev's spewing Leftist rhetoric from coast to coast.

There is nothing "religious" about the two con artists in question.


They are merely overseers keeping their flocks on the Dem massa's plantation in line.


The left is by nature, sacreligious.

^^^^^^^^^^^^

Very definitely "gets it"

Diogenes wrote: There is nothing "religious" about the two con artists in question.

They are all con artists. Jackson and Sharpton are media whores, Pat Robertson will interpret the Bible to suit his hayseed pigfucker views, Falwell was considered an out-there freak until he convinced enough hayseed pigmolesters to follow in his ways... no man of God is looking to garner headlines.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

Diogenes wrote: There is nothing "religious" about the two con artists in question.

They are all con artists. Jackson and Sharpton are media whores, Pat Robertson will interpret the Bible to suit his hayseed pigfucker views, Falwell was considered an out-there freak until he convinced enough hayseed pigmolesters to follow in his ways... no man of God is looking to garner headlines.

Yep. What he said.

Same goes for Swaggert, Dr. Gene Scott (fun though he was to watch at 3 am), Billy Graham, Benny Hinn, leftist priests and nuns protesting at naval shipyards/presidential speeches/government stuff or doing that "liberation theology" bullshit...

"... doing that "liberation theology" bullshit..."

You mean that "bullshit" where Romero asked the junta to stop killing peasants and raping nuns, only to get a dome full of lead?

Martyred wrote:"... doing that "liberation theology" bullshit..."

You mean that "bullshit" where Romero asked the junta to stop killing peasants and raping nuns, only to get a dome full of lead?

I wouldn't go so far as to say that every priest on TV is a fraud, but the ones who repeatedly answer the call from CNN to comment on shit like the Michael Jackson trial are complete fuckups.

Martyred wrote:"... doing that "liberation theology" bullshit..."

You mean that "bullshit" where Romero asked the junta to stop killing peasants and raping nuns, only to get a dome full of lead?

No, I'm referring to the bullshit that is laden in Marxist ideology and terminology, as it was pushed in Africa and Latin America. Even JPII wound up denouncing it (which makes sense, given his anticommunist stance).

Mike the Lab Rat wrote:his anticommunist stance

He was anticommunist because the communism practiced was anti-religion.

Diogenes wrote:generalizations

Whatever works for you, who am I to dispute it? You've got your views and further discussion ain't gonna change them.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

Diogenes wrote: There is nothing "religious" about the two con artists in question.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

Diogenes wrote: What you overlook, unintentionally or otherwise, is that Falwell, Robertson et al are religious leaders who (rightly or wrongly) speak out on political issues.

Those cited on the left are primarily politicians disguised as religious leaders.

And the left is overwhelmingly dominated by secularists who are inhearantly hostile to any religion except their fundamentalist atheism, masquerading as being "openminded" and "tolerant"

Diogenes wrote:What you overlook, unintentionally or otherwise, is that Falwell, Robertson et al are religious leaders who (rightly or wrongly) speak out on political issues.

Pat Robertson ran for president, dipshit. How much more of a politician can you be???

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:

Diogenes wrote:What you overlook, unintentionally or otherwise, is that Falwell, Robertson et al are religious leaders who (rightly or wrongly) speak out on political issues.

Pat Robertson ran for president, dipshit. How much more of a politician can you be???

Pat Robertson's 700 club preaches Christianity, not Republicanism.


The fact that the counterculture is rabidly hostile to religion, and that the POP is ruled by said counterculture, means that not only are they going to ruffle leftists' feathers, but that in some cases they confuse their own secular positions (on abortion, for example) for religious issues.

I've yet to see any evidence that either Sharpton or Jackson has ever preached anything other than neocom politics.

Diogenes wrote:Pat Robertson's 700 club preaches Christianity, not Republicanism.

The hell it does. The whole show is nothing more than an ad for the GOP and far right social positions.

Diogenes wrote:

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:

Diogenes wrote:What you overlook, unintentionally or otherwise, is that Falwell, Robertson et al are religious leaders who (rightly or wrongly) speak out on political issues.

Pat Robertson ran for president, dipshit. How much more of a politician can you be???

Pat Robertson's 700 club preaches Christianity, not Republicanism.


The fact that the counterculture is rabidly hostile to religion

Wrong.

Most people are only hostile to religion when it's being forced down their throats. If you are against homosexuality, abortions, and dignified deaths, then don't participate in such activities. When you legislate your beliefs on others is when people get testy.

But go ahead & continue to melt that the world is against you. :roll:

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Diogenes wrote:

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote: Pat Robertson ran for president, dipshit. How much more of a politician can you be???

Pat Robertson's 700 club preaches Christianity, not Republicanism.


The fact that the counterculture is rabidly hostile to religion

Wrong.

Most people are only hostile to religion when it's being forced down their throats. If you are against homosexuality, abortions, and dignified deaths, then don't participate in such activities. When you legislate your beliefs on others is when people get testy.

I wasn't refering to the majority, just the rabid kooks who run the POP.

And it is the left legislating their exremist beliefs from the bench.

Diogenes wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Diogenes wrote: Pat Robertson's 700 club preaches Christianity, not Republicanism.


The fact that the counterculture is rabidly hostile to religion

Wrong.

Most people are only hostile to religion when it's being forced down their throats. If you are against homosexuality, abortions, and dignified deaths, then don't participate in such activities. When you legislate your beliefs on others is when people get testy.

I wasn't refering to the majority, just the rabid kooks who run the POP.

And it is the left legislating their exremist beliefs from the bench.

16 out of the last 24 years the GOP has appointed judges.

But it's the "left" legislating from the bench?

Better up your dosage bud.

BSmack wrote:

Diogenes wrote:Pat Robertson's 700 club preaches Christianity, not Republicanism.

The hell it does. The whole show is nothing more than an ad for the GOP and far right social positions.

Bullshit.


But then you probably think the founding fathers were a bunch of "far right" kooks.