Page 1 of 1

Lame

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:26 am
by Softball Bat
Sarah Fuller: The first woman to play in an SEC
and Power 5 college football game.


https://ftw.usatoday.com/2020/11/vander ... on-explain









Commentator: I don't know about you, Dave, but I got chills, man.

He got chills from that?

:?


Btw, fuckin' Daves.


She squibbed it.
A damn squib kick.
Wtf?

LOL



Up to the plate now, Jackie Robinson.

omg, omg, omg...

And on the first pitch he...

bunts it straight back to the pitcher
.



GO HOME, DARKIE!!!

Re: Lame

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:59 pm
by Slap
Her ass looked halfway decent when she trotted off the field.

Re: Lame

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:02 pm
by Screw_Michigan
She's really hot. Good for her. Fuck all the incels whining about Vandy's "woke stunt."

Re: Lame

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:49 pm
by Smackie Chan
Softball Bat wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:26 amBtw, fuckin' Daves.
No shit. Way better when they're not here.

Re: Lame

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:07 pm
by Innocent Bystander
Screw_Michigan wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:02 pm She's really hot. Good for her.
facepalm.jpg

Fuck all the incels whining about Vandy's "woke stunt."
She's a kicker. White female kickers are all over the place. There's no risk to white female kickers. It's the most protected position a born female could succeed at try-outs for.

Male kickers have to worry about being tackled. No born male is going to seriously attempt to tackle an attractive born white female kicker. (They might a black female, because it'd be safe to prove something, but that's a hypothesis.) We haven't reached Starship Troopers, yet, and born men are still born men.

Wake me when real football goes the eSports, Track&Field and Wrestling route by putting tranny dudes in for the 'firsts'. That would probably be the only way we see 'females' at quarterback, running back, corner back, linebacker, etc.

Re: Lame

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:24 pm
by L45B
Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:07 pm Wake me when real football goes the eSports, Track&Field and Wrestling route by putting tranny dudes in for the 'firsts'. That would probably be the only way we see 'females' at quarterback, running back, corner back, linebacker, etc.
Exactly. But trannies excelling at sports will only go the way of diminishing actual women’s sports, not the other way around.

Because tyrannys love trannies, that’s why.

Re: Lame

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:22 pm
by smackaholic
I can not wait for trannies to completely wreck NCAA "girls" basketball.

It's already a thing in HS track in a number of states.

Re: Lame

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2020 4:16 pm
by Kierland
Yeah but your a fucking POS so of course you want to wreck other people’s “stuff”

Re: Lame

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2020 5:56 pm
by Innocent Bystander
Kierland wrote: Mon Nov 30, 2020 4:16 pm Yeah but your a fucking POS so of course you want to wreck other people’s “stuff”
That's not what he's saying at all, Kierland.

Re: Lame

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:59 am
by Bobby42
Slap wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:59 pm Her ass looked halfway decent when she trotted off the field.
Agreed. She can keep on kicking.

Re: Lame

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:07 am
by Softball Bat
Comment: Isn't it interesting that this thread, with 10 posts, has 1,475 views?

Wat?

Re: Lame

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:26 am
by Innocent Bystander
Softball Bat wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:07 am Comment: Isn't it interesting that this thread, with 10 posts, has 1,475 views?

Wat?
Tight ass in tighter pants = :shock: eyes :shock:

Re: Lame

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:39 am
by Softball Bat
Innocent Bystander wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:26 am
Softball Bat wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:07 am Comment: Isn't it interesting that this thread, with 10 posts, has 1,475 views?

Wat?
Tight ass in tighter pants = :shock: eyes :shock:
No.

There is something else going on.

Re: Lame

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:28 am
by Innocent Bystander
Softball Bat wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:39 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:26 am
Softball Bat wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:07 am Comment: Isn't it interesting that this thread, with 10 posts, has 1,475 views?

Wat?
Tight ass in tighter pants = :shock: eyes :shock:
No.

There is something else going on.
Just review the IP logs.

Re: Lame

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:18 am
by Softball Bat
I'm not an admin.


Look at some other threads with 12-15 posts -- and see how many views they have.

This thread has 5 or 6 times as many views as it should have.

Re: Lame

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:38 pm
by Innocent Bystander
You're right (and it's 1794, now).

Roach?

Re: Lame

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:59 pm
by pron
Image


:)

Re: Lame

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 3:11 pm
by Slap
pron wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:59 pm Image


:)
She is very attractive. I could take her home to mom.

Re: Lame

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:06 pm
by Innocent Bystander
Slap and Pron are the same poster - Woah.