T1B

Ok.

Two films.

The Passion. Directed by Mel Gibson.

The last temptation of christ.
Directed by Martin Scorsese.

To me, Mel's film is a masterwork. A stunning film which dosen't seem like you are at a movie theater, BUT rather transported back 2000 years to be a witness as the event unfolded.

That's the highest praise you can give any director and his work.
That he successfully brought you to a place, dropped you off, and afterwards, you are an emotional wreck.

The music, the lighting, the art direction, the acting, the entire fucking piece of art was sheer magnificence.

On Marty's film the last temptation.

Harvey keitel and willem dafoe's accents took me to coney island where fags routinely give bj's in dirty filthy toilet stalls.

The movie is on par with such classics as "Joe Dirt' and Bill Cosby's "Leonard Part 6".

The critics? Mostly left wing socialist jews, universally praised the Scorsese film, while bashing and trashing Gibson's film.

I've been studying film for 50 years. And yes, the critics do miss the mark every now and then.
Apocalypse now is a prime example.
Trashed upon release in 79.
Today, highly regarded around the world as a classic.

BUT, this example of those two films, has got to be a prime example of just how off the mark, critics can be.

And yes, politics played a role in the trashing of Mel Gibson's classic work of art.

Back then on a spring day, my brother and I were transported back 2000 years and were made witness to the last hours of christ.

It was correct to the historical text. And that's a huge plus.
The left wing critics lied and said it wasn't.
It struck a major emotional chord with millions, reducing grown men and women to pools of quivering mush.
The left wing socialist critics lied and said it didn't.

To this day, this is one of the prime examples that I use when I lecture on this subject.

There is no historical text on Jesus. Certainly nothing extemporaneous. All we have are gospels written years later.

EVERYTHING is about the left being scum.
Tell people you are the best at whatever it is being discussed.
Trust the process.
Our dear leader is god.
Flood the motherfuckin’ zone.

Sin,
88tools

BSmack wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:52 pm There is no historical text on Jesus. Certainly nothing extemporaneous. All we have are gospels written years later.

Let me correct you.
It's indeed a text.
I'll let you decide if it's historical or not.
But it's indeed a text.
And two of the texts were written by men who knew jesus.
Nice try
But you're wrong.

BSmack wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:52 pm There is no historical text on Jesus. Certainly nothing extemporaneous. All we have are gospels written years later.

Again. Two of the authors met jesus. John was close to him.
So they aren't handed down years later, at least two are not.

Jsc810 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:00 pm Both movies are just different takes on the same fairy tale.

Spoken like a person who cannot understand great art.
The only fairy tale is the one in your bugle boy jeans.

BSmack wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:52 pm There is no historical text on Jesus. Certainly nothing extemporaneous. All we have are gospels written years later.

Just for the record?

John was very close to Jesus.
Closer than Barack Obama was to his dirtbag, grifter, man -whore
father.
So the gospel according to St. John, has a lot more credibility than Barry's book, "Dreams of my father".

OTST

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:19 amOTST

Oh really?

St. John the divine knew him.
Barack never really knew his grifter commie dad who fucked so many men and women that Barack has half- brothers and sisters all around the globe.

He isn't debating your point.

He is pointing out that you are a tedious hack.

And there is no debating that point.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 6:25 am He isn't debating your point.

He is pointing out that you are a tedious hack.

And there is no debating that point.

If that were indeed true, I'd be a paid professional troll living under a bridge in some swamp.

EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:41 pm If that were indeed true, I'd be a paid professional troll living under a bridge in some swamp.

Good. No one should freelance for Buzzfeed.

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:40 am

EAP wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:06 pm

BSmack wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:52 pm There is no historical text on Jesus. Certainly nothing extemporaneous. All we have are gospels written years later.

Let me correct you.
It's indeed a text.
I'll let you decide if it's historical or not.
But it's indeed a text.
And two of the texts were written by men who knew jesus.
Nice try
But you're wrong.

Care to link us up with that "text?" And "historical or not". WTF does that mean? You believe it even though you know it is not verifiable?

Truly you remain Mr. Tedious

Guess you missed the entire post.

I said that John KNEW jesus.
They were close.

Barack Obama really didn't know his piece of shit commie grifter father who fucked thousands of women and girls.
As a result, Obama's book, "Dreams of my father", is less reliable than the gospel of St. John. Because John was much closer to jesus than obama was to his dirty commie man -whore father. That's why Obama has hundreds of half brothers and sisters spread out in 3rd world countries. His commie dad was fucking males and females and trannies too.
Got it now?

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:51 pm

I said that John KNEW jesus.
They were close.

Sure, but how do you know? Got some credible evidence? Other than say, some version of the "bible".

Do you have a credible version of barry's birth certificate, other than the new digital version made by left wing socialist officials from Hawaii?

How do you know?

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:51 pm

I said that John KNEW jesus.
They were close.

Sure, but how do you know? Got some credible evidence? Other than say, some version of the "bible".

Do you have a credible version of barry's birth certificate, other than the new digital version made by left wing socialist officials from Hawaii?

How do you know?

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:40 am

EAP wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:06 pm

BSmack wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:52 pm There is no historical text on Jesus. Certainly nothing extemporaneous. All we have are gospels written years later.

Let me correct you.
It's indeed a text.
I'll let you decide if it's historical or not.
But it's indeed a text.
And two of the texts were written by men who knew jesus.
Nice try
But you're wrong.

Care to link us up with that "text?" And "historical or not". WTF does that mean? You believe it even though you know it is not verifiable?

Truly you remain Mr. Tedious

Hi, Roach.
- Can start with the Opus Dei site and work backwards...?
https://opusdei.org/en/article/what-do- ... out-jesus/
-- Jews said Jesus was a sorceror who led Israel astray by mocking the words of the wise and discussing scripture as if he were a Pharisee, and whose five (!) disciples continued to practice sorcery after Yeshu was executed on the eve of Passover as a false authority
-- Josephus' words were forged and changed by medieval European Christians, better preserved by Arabic Muslims
-- Who is the Syrian Mara bar Sarapion?


Jews and Romans kept records of everything. Is lack of evidence proof of evidence of a form of damnatio memoriae?

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:03 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:55 pm

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:51 pm

Sure, but how do you know? Got some credible evidence? Other than say, some version of the "bible".

Do you have a credible version of barry's birth certificate, other than the new digital version made by left wing socialist officials from Hawaii?

How do you know?

Focus! You blithering idiot. We're talking about jesus and your claim of how he know "john."

Nothing to do with Obama except in that emotional little girl head of yours. I never claimed anything about his birth certificate. Can you answer the simple question, or will you just further confirm what a tedious little c_nt you are.

Hey pussy boy???
Focus on facts.
An analogy serves to sharpen critical thinking skills, which you don't possess.

The only writings we have, show beyond all doubt that jesus and John actually knew one another.

Just like the other famous people we know about 2000 years ago you low IQ cocksucker.

Why display stupidity about anyone who lived that long ago?
Don't make us call you out for being a dumb fukk.

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 5:01 pm No answer, so noted. Just the spittle strewn ravings of a tedious c_nt.

Thanks for participating in t1b and helping define the idiot fringe. It's tards like you make the boards go round, like punching dummies with tiny heads, and any brains they have are in their ass.

Now there's an analogy.

No.
Thank YOU.
You aren't the decider of what's real or not real over 2000 years ago.
Your take is just as stupid as any other low IQ take.

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:11 pm But IB. I love you but . . .

The very first paragraph of that link negates EAP's entire premise.

"The first references made to Jesus in literary documents other than Christian writings are those by Hellenist and Roman historians who lived during the second half of the first century or the first half of the second, and therefore not long after the events took place."

As B said, "There is no historical text on Jesus. Certainly nothing extemporaneous."

That's why I asked about a possible intentional official erasure.

Pontius Pilate existed.

Pontius Pilate's own history has a lot of missing gaps?

Pontius offended the Jews. Jews made trouble for Rome.
Rome sacked Pontius. Connection to the lack of info regarding Yeshu?

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:23 pm

Roach wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:11 pm But IB. I love you but . . .

The very first paragraph of that link negates EAP's entire premise.

"The first references made to Jesus in literary documents other than Christian writings are those by Hellenist and Roman historians who lived during the second half of the first century or the first half of the second, and therefore not long after the events took place."

As B said, "There is no historical text on Jesus. Certainly nothing extemporaneous."

That's why I asked about a possible intentional official erasure.

Pontius Pilate existed.

Pontius Pilate's own history has a lot of missing gaps?

Pontius offended the Jews. Jews made trouble for Rome.
Rome sacked Pontius. Connection to the lack of info regarding Yeshu?

Sorry.
According to his fucked up logic,
All texts pertaining to christ are made up out of thin air?

You're full of shit.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:35 pm You're full of shit.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:35 pm
Sorry.
According to his fucked up logic,
All texts pertaining to christ are made up out of thin air?

You're full of shit.

Roach was asking for references outside of the Bible. There is nothing wrong with that, and everything right. That's not fucked up, that's actual scholarship.

That court case is the smoking gun to everything. Something happened. Something major enough to recall a fucking Roman back to his Emperor. What happened to the paperwork?

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:06 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:35 pm
Sorry.
According to his fucked up logic,
All texts pertaining to christ are made up out of thin air?

You're full of shit.

Roach was asking for references outside of the Bible. There is nothing wrong with that, and everything right. That's not fucked up, that's actual scholarship.

That court case is the smoking gun to everything. Something happened. Something major enough to recall a fucking Roman back to his Emperor. What happened to the paperwork?

You're spot on accurate.
Something major indeed.
Point being?
In just a short time, something major is gonna shake the Washington swamp to it's very core.
Anyone listen to the attorney general today?

He's spot on to the letter of the law.
Coney McCabe etc....committed felonies

The entire mainstream press and media are ignoring this.
That's major corruption.

The former attorney general Loretta lynch allowed obstruction by her 30 year friend.

Every left wing type on this board is completely duped and manipulated by the left wing press.

I'm glad about that fact.

You won't see the indictments coming.