T1B

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:
I guess the Dems have kicked Keith Ellison to the curb.

They kicked Al Franken to the curb. Anything else?

H4ever wrote:I'm a registered Republican since 1988. That being said... do we really want Roe vs Wade overturned (which very well may start a civil war in this country)? I'm sorry... I don't agree with abortion but that bull has big horns. I dunno. Be careful what you wish for. Kavanaugh is the guy "they" need plugged into this slot. holy shit...stand clear and enjoy the show edit: and they're doing all kinds of unprecedented and desperate shit to get this guy pushed through. hmmmm God bless America, land of the "free"

H4ever wrote:do we really want Roe vs Wade overturned?

Dinsdale wrote:

H4ever wrote:do we really want Roe vs Wade overturned?

Care to name a case where the SCOTUS reheard the same case andboverturned it?

smackaholic wrote:After this fiasco, Trump should go with judges as hard right as he can find just to punish the dems.

The fact is, Kavanaugh is a fairly middle of the road Bush conservative. And he has a record of bending over backwards to promote women. So much for his efforts.

Gotta hand it to the dems for sticking to the Archie Bunker smear strategy.

Clarence Thomas- Big ole' sex crazed negro. Better lock up your daughters.

Brett Kavanaugh-Drunken mic sexual predator.

Rooster wrote:

smackaholic wrote:After this fiasco, Trump should go with judges as hard right as he can find just to punish the dems.

The fact is, Kavanaugh is a fairly middle of the road Bush conservative. And he has a record of bending over backwards to promote women. So much for his efforts.

Gotta hand it to the dems for sticking to the Archie Bunker smear strategy.

Clarence Thomas- Big ole' sex crazed negro. Better lock up your daughters.

Brett Kavanaugh-Drunken mic sexual predator.

RACK that take. To the Dems: You want to see just how bad for you it really could get? Hopefully Trump gets to put three more Justices on the bench, all of whom skewer every last single Progg sacred cow they worship, starting with killing their own children. A handmaid’s tale, indeed.

Sudden Sam wrote:

Rooster wrote:Only when the life of the mother is at stake— that is the line that I draw. Let’s be frank here, unrestricted abortion is wanting the option to off your kids at will. Might as well draw the line at 18 years of age where the child is a legal adult if the only distinction is just how old a child can be before he’s protected from a violent death at the hands of his own mother. Face it, it’d solve a lot of discipline problems raising teenagers.

“Sorry kid. You messed up one too many times, so I gotta put you down. Hopefully your little brother will learn from your mistakes and be a better and more productive member of this family than you have been.”
<sound of a gunshot out of the frame of the camera>

RACK this.

A Yale classmate of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh accused him on Sunday of being untruthful in his testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee and making a "blatant mischaracterization" of his drinking while in college.

"I can unequivocally say that in denying the possibility that he ever blacked out from drinking, and in downplaying the degree and frequency of his drinking, Brett has not told the truth," Chad Ludington said in a statement to CNN.

Ludington said in the statement he often drank with Kavanaugh when they were classmates, and said Kavanaugh had played down "the degree and frequency" of his drinking in his testimony. Ludington said he often saw Kavanaugh "staggering from alcohol consumption," and said he often became "belligerent and aggressive" while drinking.

In his testimony to the judiciary committee Thursday, Kavanaugh denied ever blacking out from drinking.

Ludington said in his statement he witnessed Kavanaugh throw a beer in a man's face once for making a semi-hostile remark, "starting a fight that ended with one of our mutual friends in jail."

"It is truth that is at stake," Ludington said in a statement. "and I believe that the ability to speak the truth, even when it does not reflect well upon oneself, is a paramount quality we seek in our nation's most powerful judges."

Ludington is a professor at North Carolina State University, The New York Times reports, and he has appeared to have made small political contributions to Democratic candidates.

Ludington said in the statement he does not believe "heavy drinking or even loutish behavior of an 18 or even 21 year old should condemn a person for the rest of his life," but said if Kavanaugh "lied about his past actions on national television, and more especially while speaking under oath in front of the United States Senate, I believe those lies should have consequences."

Ludington said he "cringed" when he watched the Fox News interview with Kavanaugh and his wife Monday and when Kavanaugh testified under oath on Thursday to the judiciary committee.

Ludington said he felt it was his civic duty to tell of his experience drinking with Kavanaugh, and said in his statement he is going to take his information to the FBI. He told the Times he would go to the FBI on Monday.

The FBI has reopened a background check on the Supreme Court nominee, but the probe is narrowly focused, top officials said in interviews on Sunday. Kavanaugh's drinking history, which has come up in the allegations, is not part of the probe, a source tells CNN.

Ludington is not the first of Kavanaugh's former classmates to come forward and tell the story of a young man who drank to excess in college. Liz Swisher, another classmate, told CNN that Kavanaugh was not truthful in his testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee about his drinking habits when he was at Yale.

"There's no problem with drinking beer in college. The problem is lying about it," Swisher said on "Cuomo Prime Time." "He drank heavily. He was a partier. He liked to do beer bongs. He played drinking games. He was a sloppy drunk. He was more interested in impressing the boys than he was in impressing the girls. I never saw him be sexually aggressive, but he definitely was sloppy drunk."

James Roche, Kavanaugh's freshman year roommate at Yale, also spoke out.

"Brett and I did not socialize beyond the first few days of freshman year. We talked at night as freshman roommates do, and I would see him as he returned from nights out with his friends. It is from this experience that I concluded that although Brett was normally reserved, he was a notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time, and that he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk," Roche said in a statement.

The White House did not have any immediate reaction on behalf of itself or Kavanaugh, but directed CNN to comments made by Chris Dudley, a close friend of Kavanaugh's and a former NBA player.

Dudley recalled that Kavanaugh was never aggressive when he drank.

"He wasn't that type of person," Dudley said.

Dwayne Oxley, who lived on same floor as Kavanaugh in Ezra Stiles College, said he would typically not talk to reporters, but that he wanted to lend his voice in support of the nominee. While the two men, he said, haven't stayed in close touch, he said he knew Kavanaugh well in college. They were both part of the same secret society: Truth and Courage, but not at the same time.

Oxley said it was college and that people drank, but "I never saw him in a state where he wasn't in control."

He said he knew of Ramirez and when he saw the picture, he definitely recognized her. He said he was "sympathetic" to her and to Blasey Ford, but "it's just not who I knew as Brett Kavanaugh."

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:A guy in his early 20's drank? In college?

Goober McTuber wrote:
And he chose to lie about it, under oath.

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Make no mistake--Brett Kavanaugh is a revolting asswipe who is completely unfit serve on the Supreme Court.

Left Seater wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Make no mistake--Brett Kavanaugh is a revolting asswipe who is completely unfit serve on the Supreme Court.

Is this based on your continued lie/straw man/fake news or is there something of actual substance you are basing this claim on?

Left Seater wrote:Is this based on your continued lie/straw man/fake news or is there something of actual substance you are basing this claim on?

Goober McTuber wrote:I don't you stupid, slack-jawed fuck-knuckle.

Goober McTuber wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:

Rooster wrote:Only when the life of the mother is at stake— that is the line that I draw. Let’s be frank here, unrestricted abortion is wanting the option to off your kids at will. Might as well draw the line at 18 years of age where the child is a legal adult if the only distinction is just how old a child can be before he’s protected from a violent death at the hands of his own mother. Face it, it’d solve a lot of discipline problems raising teenagers.

“Sorry kid. You messed up one too many times, so I gotta put you down. Hopefully your little brother will learn from your mistakes and be a better and more productive member of this family than you have been.”
<sound of a gunshot out of the frame of the camera>

RACK this.

It figures that you would rack a totally moronic take. Something Rooster is well-known for.

smackaholic wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:I don't you stupid, slack-jawed fuck-knuckle.

So, you were a heavy drinker and a member of your high school rape team (prolly JV)?

And you have no record, and a long list of people that will vouch for your sterling character?

Goober McTuber wrote:

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:A guy in his early 20's drank? In college?

And he chose to lie about it, under oath.

smackaholic wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:A guy in his early 20's drank? In college?

And he chose to lie about it, under oath.

But...but...Ted Kennedy!

smackaholic wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:I don't you stupid, slack-jawed fuck-knuckle.

So, you were a heavy drinker and a member of your high school rape team (prolly JV)?

And you have no record, and a long list of people that will vouch for your sterling character?

Rooster wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:RACK this.

It figures that you would rack a totally moronic take. Something Rooster is well-known for.

What's unfortunate is that you did not suffer a violent death at the hands of your mother. It'd have saved us years of your drivel.

Goober McTuber wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote: And he chose to lie about it, under oath.

But...but...Ted Kennedy!

88 wrote:

Mikey wrote:He lies under oath and refused to answer straight-forward questions in his confirmation hearing. Rapist or not, he's not fit to be a Supreme Court Justice.

You or I might do the same under similar circumstances, but we're not up for a lifetime appointment to the SC. Yes it's a different standard. As it should be.

Just STFU already.

Have you paused to take notice of the two complete buffoons that were appointed to the Supreme Court by Obama and confirmed by the Senate? The Wise Latina (only one of those terms is true) was confirmed 68–31 (with 8 Repukes voting to confirm her). Butch Kagan was confirmed 63–37 (with 5 Repukes voting to confirm her). A like number of Demotards should support Kavanaugh. He is far more qualified to serve on the Court than either of the last two seated, and will show it in his opinions over the next two decades.

smackaholic wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:But...but...Ted Kennedy!

Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Ellison, etc.....

There’s a double standard and you know it. A rep senator got run for a wide stance. Dem Senator drowns someone while drunk, nothing to see folks, move along.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Klobuchar: “You’re saying there’s never been a case where you drank so much that you didn’t remember what happened the night before or part of what happened?”

Kavanaugh: “If you’re asking about blackout, I don’t know—have you?”

Papa Willie wrote:Fuck - between how you can barely make a post without my name in it, or your sig - I obviously own you as much as I do 'toolio.