T1B

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12 ... rhood.html

“Segregation trees.” Only in the Republik of Kalifornia would an idea like this originate. Is it any wonder why Trump was elected when you have people who actually think like this?

Residents, led by real estate agent Trae Daniel, who moved into the neighborhood 14 years ago, have made four demands of the city. They include: removing the trees; building a 6-foot privacy wall for residents who want it; installing netting or something similar to prevent errant golf balls from flying into residents' yards; and planting new trees similar to those seen along other parts of the course.

Thanks, Rooster, for reminding us that California has an endless supply of idiots.

Outrageous.

Tamarisk are fucking weeds ANY reason to kill them is a good reason. Props to PS for at least coming up with an entertaining one.

Hey, the East Coast is every bit as fucked up in this regard...

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/29 ... -customers

Rooster wrote:

"Trea Daniel, a real-estate agent and a white resident of the neighborhood, was the voice for the community and led the charge for Lawrence Crossley residents to voice their concerns to the city, the paper reported."


Gee, I wonder what they're going to do with the land now that it's been cleared of trees?
Probably going to build a public park so the happy ghetto children can play....right?
Right?

Am I right?

Yeah...that's the motivation behind this "concerned" real-estate agent's civic concerns. Racial harmony and diversity.

"I just want to tear down the walls of racism. We're all Americans...united..."

Who knew Palm Springs had a black neighborhood?

trev wrote:Who knew Palm Springs had a black neighborhood?

Caddies and shoe shine boys have to live somewhere.

Isn’t Compton the Tar babies or something close?

What is racist about Tartars?

Left Seater wrote:Isn’t Compton the Tar babies or something close?

Depends on your definition of close.

More fake news from shedick.

Is there ANYTHING you won't lie about?

Doubling down on stupid I see. Why am I not surprised?

Nice triple down you stupid racist fuck. They are the tartars. The college has older people so they are the adult tars and the hs is the baby tars. Tartars are from Europe not Africa you stupid fuckhole. You could always go to compton and fight them.

A link you have already posted and two red xs. Good job tard.

schmick wrote:Tartars were Mongolian but to someone obviously suffering from downs syndrome Europeans may look like mongs

Yeah like 3%.
90% live in Eastern Europe or Western Asia.

It's nothing like moving to a airport or racetrack and then asking to remove the track or airport.

I drive with a Killer Bee and a wicked hook Without a treeline, I'll wipe out a sub-division.

Give me a week on that course. I'll take out every window in the neighbourhood, the tree goes back up.

I'm with Phibes. I've got a slice and a straight hook in my bag. They're going to wish they had trees if I play there.

The cool thing about losing the trees is you can then break out their windows with your drives and then roll up and ask to play the ball as it lies. The liability is on the homeowner not you the golfer. The homeowner bought the house knowing there were hazards. So when you break out the window just knock on the door and ask for your ball back or if you can play it. Just don’t take a divot from the carpet as that would then be on you.

Left Seater wrote:The cool thing about losing the trees is you can then break out their windows with your drives and then roll up and ask to play the ball as it lies. The liability is on the homeowner not you the golfer. The homeowner bought the house knowing there were hazards. So when you break out the window just knock on the door and ask for your ball back or if you can play it. Just don’t take a divot from the carpet as that would then be on you.

Damn straight and if the homeowner asks you to Cannonball it you better fucking Cannonball it.

Left Seater wrote: The liability is on the homeowner not you the golfer. The homeowner bought the house knowing there were hazards.

Is that true? If so that's brilliant. Anyone know where the law stands on nearby highways and passing motorists? Just asking for a friend.

Well not ALL the liability is on the homeowner, but yes there is a doctrine known as "coming to the nuisance" that heavily sheilds the golf course in this case.

Dr_Phibes wrote:

Left Seater wrote: The liability is on the homeowner not you the golfer. The homeowner bought the house knowing there were hazards.

Is that true? If so that's brilliant. Anyone know where the law stands on nearby highways and passing motorists? Just asking for a friend.

Yes it is. As long as you don’t purposely try to break their window or were acting in a recless manner then the liability is on the homeowner. Same for the highway. Our friends on a golf course in Sugar Land had an extra rider on their home insurance that paid for glass breakage on that side of the house outside of the normal deductible.

So not ALL the liability is with the homeowner. I just said that.

I wasn’t addressing you, ankle biter.

No you were just spouting fake news. Of course you don't want me pointing out again how full of shit you are.

Settle down liar fail. Go give your money away to CA then come back and try again.

Your previous post says you said what I did. Then you call it fake news. So if your latest post is true then you are spouting fake news as well. See how this works? Now get off my ankles.

Sorry I got confused. I have never seen you type anything that was actually true. My bad.