T1B

Posted: **Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:04 am**

JFK: Will Donald Trump allow release of secret John F Kennedy
assassination papers?

The anticipated release of thousands of never-seen government documents related to United States
president John F Kennedy's assassination has scholars and armchair detectives buzzing.

Now, they are waiting to see whether President Donald Trump will block the release of files that
could shed light on a tragedy that has stirred conspiracy theories for decades.

US Congress mandated in 1992 that all assassination documents be released within 25 years, unless
the president asserted doing so would harm intelligence, law enforcement, military operations or
foreign relations.

The National Archives now has until October 26 to disclose the remaining files related to Kennedy's
1963 assassination — that is, unless Mr Trump intervenes...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-28/w ... rs/8994862

Will the papers be released on 10/26?

Posted: **Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:49 am**

schmick wrote:Maybe he'll release the JFK Jr investigation where junior was killed so hiliary could win the NY state senate election

Posted: **Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:57 pm**

In October of 1963 this hard guy, a real ball buster, from Israel comes to see me in L.A. His name was Begin, or whatever he was calling himself. He was a sheenie from Russia, whatever, and he's telling me that JFK is really making problems for the Project, and we need to take care of this. And I'm thinking, what the fuck, he wants to whack the president of the United States? And he told me it was all set to go, that the FBI and LBJ were completely on board, and all we needed was a a team of good shooters, and he even recommended a French team I didn't even know about.

http://www.afrocubaweb.com/news/mossadjfk.htm

Posted: **Sat Sep 30, 2017 2:33 pm**

LTS TRN 2 wrote:... that JFK is really making problems for the Project... And that the FBI and LBJ were completely on board...

The Welfare State?

Posted: **Sat Sep 30, 2017 3:56 pm**

L45B wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:... that JFK is really making problems for the Project... And that the FBI and LBJ were completely on board...
The Welfare State?

Which Welfare State do you mean? The one that gives pittances to poor people or the one that gives truck loads of money to fatcats?

Posted: **Sat Sep 30, 2017 4:44 pm**

Moving Sale wrote:Which Welfare State do you mean? The one that gives pittances to poor people or the one that gives truck loads of money to fatcats?

They are one in the same-- causes and effects of each other in a neverending cycle of societal destruction-- as the act of stealing earnings from A to give it to B in the form of goods and/or services is a two-sided transaction, in which both the anointed receiver and anointed provider are the beneficiaries.

To believe that one solves the other is fantasy.

Posted: **Sat Sep 30, 2017 10:33 pm**

No, the Project was gaining nuclear weapons quicker than you could say Julius Rosenberg..

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/ ... ar-arsenal

bald hypocrisy is something we take in stride, it's like breathing to us..

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2017 9:07 am**

Countdown clock.

*CLICK* -----> https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/g ... 026T000001 <----- *CLICK*

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2017 12:18 pm**

It was largely Jews who developed the first bomb. Given their large number of really smart mofos and the neighborhood they live in, do you think there is a chance in hell they would not have gotten it.

Do you think they would dream of using it, unprovoked?

The Iranians and muzzies in general are different. Maybe you didn't get the memo, but they kind of would like to take over a bigger chunk of the planet than the shitty part they currently occupy. They would use nukes to do it, given the chance, although it does seem that that won't be necessary in Europe. They will just fukk their way to control.

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:20 pm**

smackaholic wrote:It was largely Jews who developed the first bomb.
Do you think they would dream of using it, unprovoked?

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:37 pm**

smackaholic wrote:It was largely Jews...

Largely.

XXXXL

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:21 pm**

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:57 pm**

Softball Bat wrote:
smackaholic wrote:It was largely Jews...
Largely.

Damn, Hank needs to ease up on the matzo balls. How can you be that big and still alive at the wrong side of 90? Prolly gets transfusions from 7 year old palestinian kids every day.

XXXXL

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2017 9:54 pm**

Gang tat on L hand?

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2017 9:58 pm**

smackaholic wrote:It was largely Jews who developed the first bomb. Given their large number of really smart mofos and the neighborhood they live in, do you think there is a chance in hell they would not have gotten it.

Do you think they would dream of using it, unprovoked?

The Iranians and muzzies in general are different. Maybe you didn't get the memo, but they kind of would like to take over a bigger chunk of the planet than the shitty part they currently occupy. They would use nukes to do it, given the chance, although it does seem that that won't be necessary in Europe. They will just fukk their way to control.

First, they stole it. Let's keep that in mind. Similarly, let's recall that Einstein himself warned against these seething Zio-nazis,

https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/this-day ... m-1.629813

and too let's not forget the unchecked legacy of lies , theft and murder--among other bedrock criminality--which has encompassed the 70-year history of this completely artificial race-state experiment. And yes, that includes murdering both JFK and RFK, and being behind 9/11. These are monstrous and thoroughly amoral people we're dealing with.

Next, let's consider the unrelenting smear campaign against Iran, fomented as much by the vile Saudis as the pernicious Zionists (who for some reason have never had a problem with each other..gee :?) In fact, Iran hasn't attacked anyone since Darius II.

As for the possibility of Israel launching a preemptive attack, of course they would--as they demonstrated in the "six day war," as well as several other unprovoked attacks (like the one upon the U.S.S. Liberty). The "Samson option" is a term not only derived from their (depraved) history, but coined by them as a real policy.

Posted: **Sun Oct 08, 2017 4:42 pm**

So, the Hebs stole the bomb?

From whom? Other Hebs?

Or did they steal it from the balck folks? I mean, we pretty much stole everything else from them, right?

Just ask Rev Al.

Posted: **Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:29 pm**

C'mon Smackie, put down the single malt. First, it wasn't "hebs" (that's "hebes" btw) who stole the bomb, but Zionists. The distinction is always crucial. Secondly, are you suggesting that because some of the prominent scientists were Jews (Oppenheimer, Teller) that somehow Jews own the Bomb?

The point is that the Israelis will steal anything, murder anyone, initiate a false flag attack on any scale (9/11), and not have a single moral qualm in the slightest. The Likud party is derived directly from the Herut gang, a ruthless syndicate headed by Begin and his gangster pals. Israel is a criminal enterprise posing as democracy.

As for stealing from blacks, I assume you're referring to Tom Jones covering Black Betty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckH2fjLeY9A

Oh that'll get yer toes tappin'

Posted: **Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:39 am**

LTS TRN 2 wrote:C'mon Smackie, put down the single malt. First, it wasn't "hebs" (that's "hebes" btw) who stole the bomb, but Zionists. The distinction is always crucial. Secondly, are you suggesting that because some of the prominent scientists were Jews (Oppenheimer, Teller) that somehow Jews own the Bomb?

The point is that the Israelis will steal anything, murder anyone, initiate a false flag attack on any scale (9/11), and not have a single moral qualm in the slightest. The Likud party is derived directly from the Herut gang, a ruthless syndicate headed by Begin and his gangster pals. Israel is a criminal enterprise posing as democracy.

As for stealing from blacks, I assume you're referring to Tom Jones covering Black Betty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckH2fjLeY9A

Oh that'll get yer toes tappin'

Zzzzzzz..........

Posted: **Tue Oct 10, 2017 3:49 am**

Hold on goobs, are you insisting that Tom Jones is part black?

Posted: **Tue Oct 10, 2017 5:23 pm**

Probably. Hell, I'm part black.

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2017 3:07 am**

Next Thursday.

Less than one week away.

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2017 1:48 pm**

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President,
the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:05 pm**

Now that Arlen Specter is dead I don't think there's a living person left who's had anything to do with the Kennedy assassination or the investigation of the assassination. There's no more reputations left to be ruined. I guess I'll care from a historians viewpoint that more historical data is always better. But if there was a cover-up it already worked.

Posted: **Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:34 am**

So Ted Cruz's father will finally be exposed ? ...Bravo Trumpy

Posted: **Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:36 am**

BSmack wrote:Now that Arlen Specter is dead I don't think there's a living person left who's had anything to do with the Kennedy assassination or the investigation of the assassination. There's no more reputations left to be ruined. I guess I'll care from a historians viewpoint that more historical data is always better. But if there was a cover-up it already worked.

It was kept under wraps for the family as well as others.

And I doubt the release of files will placate all the conspiracy theorists.

Posted: **Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:37 am**

Softball Bat wrote:
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President,
the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.

Funny how he would tweet that when, by law, he is required to do so unless their are compelling reasons related to national security.

Isn't this nice of him?

Posted: **Sun Oct 22, 2017 4:27 am**

Papa Willie wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
Softball Bat wrote:
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President,
the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.
Funny how he would tweet that when, by law, he is required to do so unless their are compelling reasons related to national security.

Isn't this nice of him?
Obammy had 8 years to do this, so why didn't he?

Once again your obsession w/ trying to blame things on people who aren't president kicks you in the ass.

The files were sealed by law in '92. Obama couldn't have released the files w/o breaking the law.

But I'm sure you'll be back shortly w/ another "but..but...but...what about Obama?!?!"

Posted: **Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:11 am**

Papa Willie wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
Softball Bat wrote:
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President,
the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.
Funny how he would tweet that when, by law, he is required to do so unless their are compelling reasons related to national security.

Isn't this nice of him?
Obammy had 8 years to do this, so why didn't he?

Maybe he just didn't give a fuck. You ever think about that? I know I don't give a fuck about it.

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:14 pm**

Papa Willie wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
Softball Bat wrote:
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President,
the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.
Funny how he would tweet that when, by law, he is required to do so unless their are compelling reasons related to national security.

Isn't this nice of him?
Obammy had 8 years to do this, so why didn't he?

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:34 pm**

I don't really expect much in the way of new evidence. My guess is much of it was destroyed long ago. It's complicated. What we do know is the government has been covering it up since the beginning, so that points to a conspiracy.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:41 pm**

smackaholic wrote:It was largely Jews who developed the first bomb.

You mean like Enrico Fermi?

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:42 pm**

Already the squirming (subhuman) visage of Gerald Posner is slithering through the managed mainstream media, insisting that the soon-to-be released FBI documents will further implicate Oswald--as per his alleged visit to Mexico shortly before the assassination. In fact the "tapes" of Oswald purportedly calling from the Mexican embassy have been shown to be a joke. How much of a joke? As much as the ludicrous "confession tape" of Bin Laden.

Here's a bit of background on the slimefuck Posner..
http://www.constantinereport.com/person/gerald-posner/

Posted: **Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:43 am**

Trump to release JFK files Thursday

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/25/polit ... index.html

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that his administration will release classified government
documents about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on Thursday, the deadline Congress
set for making the files public.

"The long anticipated release of the #JFKFiles will take place tomorrow. So interesting!" the President
tweeted.

Congress mandated the public release of the still-secret documents -- including FBI and CIA files -- by
the Thursday deadline, barring any action by the President to block the release of certain documents.

Trump still hasn't made clear whether he'll allow the full release of the documents or block certain files
from publication, which he can do if he believes making them public could pose harm to US intelligence,
law enforcement, the military or US foreign relations.

Elements of the intelligence community have urged Trump not to release some of the documents.
Historians who have studied the assassination do not believe the documents will lead to any bombshell
new conclusions in the Kennedy assassination, but the documents could shed more light on facets of the
investigation and Lee Harvey Oswald's mysterious trip to Mexico City weeks before the assassination.
Some have expressed concerns that the documents could be embarrassing to Mexico and damaging to
US-Mexico relations.

A White House official told reporters Saturday: "The President believes that these documents should be
made available in the interests of full transparency unless agencies provide a compelling and clear national
security or law enforcement justification otherwise."

:)

Posted: **Thu Oct 26, 2017 5:39 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote:
Softball Bat wrote:
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President,
the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.
Funny how he would tweet that when, by law, he is required to do so unless their are compelling reasons related to national security.

Isn't this nice of him?

They can be released after 25 years at the Presidents discretion. I see after 10 yrs away from here you're still a dumb fuck.

Posted: **Thu Oct 26, 2017 8:42 pm**

JCT wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
Softball Bat wrote:
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President,
the long blocked and classified JFK FILES to be opened.
Funny how he would tweet that when, by law, he is required to do so unless their are compelling reasons related to national security.

Isn't this nice of him?

They can be released after 25 years at the Presidents discretion. I see after 10 yrs away from here you're still a dumb fuck.

Your 10 yrs away definitely weren't spent getting smarter.

POTUS must release the files unless they present a national security risk. Do you really think that 54 years later there's anything in those files that would present a national security risk, mensa?

Posted: **Fri Oct 27, 2017 12:43 am**

Trump Delays Release of Some Kennedy Assassination Files

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/jfk-a ... ms-n814691

The U.S. government delayed the release of some files related to the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy, the White House said Thursday.

Instead, the National Archives released 2,981 documents Thursday evening, with the rest subject to a
180-day review of redactions from objecting agencies, the Trump administration said. The White House
said later that the remaining records would be released "on a rolling basis in the coming weeks."

"I am ordering today that the veil finally be lifted," President Donald Trump wrote in a memo Thursday
evening announcing the delay."At the same time, executive departments and agencies have proposed to
me that certain information should continue to be redacted because of national security, law enforcement,
and foreign affairs concerns," he wrote. "I have no choice — today — but to accept those redactions rather
than allow potentially irreversible harm to our Nation's security."

They've had how many years to prepare for release of the documents?

And they need a last minute halt so that they can get their shit straight?

LMAO!

Posted: **Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:52 am**

Read the last paragraph.

https://twitter.com/JacobAWohl/status/9 ... 7957598208

The Surgeon General's report says evidence clearly shows that two persons were involved with the first shot fired from the bridge across the park way in font of the car.

What the hell do surgeon generals know, anyway?

Posted: **Fri Oct 27, 2017 7:12 am**

What does it matter about what happened to the JFK 50+ years ago?
The Kennedy's were the first bunch of political aholes that played the system for years.
Fast forward many years and we have the Bush v Clinton bs playing the same games.
They are all crooks and are in dire need of an acute dose of lead poisoning.
Trump is a jackass, really, this latest budget authorizes printing more money?

Posted: **Fri Oct 27, 2017 9:16 am**

Posted: **Fri Oct 27, 2017 11:19 am**

At this point it makes no difference because all the files were not released. I can't even imagine the National Security interest in keeping any of these files classified.

T1B

J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?

Re: J.F.K. blown away, what else do I have to say?