Jimmy G to Seattle...

talking about who was arrested today

Moderators: Shoalzie, Biggie

Post Reply
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Dinsdale »

Few players as good at the up-the-gut blocking as Unger (QQMF).
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Joe in PB »

Jimmy Graham, separated at birth from Sam Bowie.

Image

Image

I think there is some question whether his shoulder will be 100% next season. I believe Payton made the trade in case it isn't, eliminating having to cut him the following year to dump his 10 mil a year salary and getting nothing.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8943
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Diego in Seattle »

I can't say that I care for this trade. We already have a couple of very good TE's, and our O-line has been suspect at times. Unger was rather injury prone last season, but I don't think getting rid of him w/o getting more help for the line was a good idea.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Dinsdale »

Diego in Seattle wrote:We already have a couple of very good TE's
Really?

Then why weren't they on the active roster last year?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Joe in PB »

Actually, before the trade I thought Luke Willson was due for an above average season this year.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8943
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Luke Wilson definitely has the skills for the position. Thought there was a second, but I guess I missed Zach Miller being cut for failing his physical.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12087
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by mvscal »

Joe in PB wrote:Actually, before the trade I thought Luke Willson was due for an above average season this year.
Pretty big fucking difference between above average and elite.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Dinsdale »

The more I think about it, the dumber this trade sounds. The Shithawks are primarily a running team. So they traded an all-pro center for a guy that in his career at TE, has blocked approximately... no one, ever?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Joe in PB »

Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29908
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Mikey »

Papa Willie wrote:The Falcons are picking up a lot of fuckers that average about 3 games a season.
They should be fresh then.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12087
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by mvscal »

Dinsdale wrote: The Shithawks are primarily a running team.
A running team that didn't have the confidence to pound it inside from two when all the chips were on the table.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by Joe in PB »

Brain fart plain & simple. If the Seahawks would have gone to 4 WRs & spread out the NE defense. No way they would have stopped Lynch from scoring. That loss is on Pete Carroll.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12087
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Post by mvscal »

Joe in PB wrote:That loss is on Pete Carroll.
No question about that. I understand throwing in that situation but that throw into that much traffic was begging for disaster. A back shoulder fade to someone like Graham of of play action would be an extremely high percentage play. Almost unstoppable.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Post Reply