Conspiracy to take guns?

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
User avatar
Moby Dick
2017 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 2806
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: B-town

Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Moby Dick »

Alex Jones at it again...


Image
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Dinsdale »

I've been seeing a lot about this in the last few days, not just Jones' version.

While I hate to be the BizzarroLTS...

Some of this shit just doesn't add up. While on the surface, a hoax all but defies belief...

But it sure looks to be one, designed to shock ans awe... but poorly produced.

I'd think they'd do a better job of hiding the "victims," rather than having them caught on video after their "death."

And the professional actor from Mission Viejo[/i] down the street but past the fire station should probably have rehearsed more, so he could get the story straight about the yelling man[/i] distraught woman[/i] bus driver who led the kids past the firehouse then left them unattended with an old man who just moved into a house near a school who just happened to have a pile of teddy bears in his living room... who then heard the story of what happened from the kids... 30 minutes later. But hey - he had no idea that anything was going on, despite claiming to be outside while his street was choke with cops.

Not sure which of the several radically different stories of his we're supposed to believe.

And the "grieving father" who is whooping it up and having a grand old time until he thinks the cameras are rolling, then turns on the waterworks sure seems a little off. Actually, several parents sure seem to drop out of character when they don't think cameras are rolling.

And the police chief saying that anyone who reports any information that didn't come from him will be prosecuted? A little over the top.

There's plenty more to this story that sure seems awfully fishy... like most of it.

I'm not saying it's a hoax... just that it has all the makings of one. All that's missing is Manti Te'o wailing about winning a game for the "victims."
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Cuda
IKYABWAI
Posts: 10195
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:55 pm
Location: Your signature is too long

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Cuda »

Dinsdale wrote: bus driver who led the kids past the firehouse then left them unattended with an old man who just moved into a house near a school who just happened to have a pile of teddy bears in his living room...
Diego never posted anything about moving to connecticut.
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Mace »

KC Scott wrote: Otherwise it's lunatic fringe / tinfoil hat internet bullshit
This.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Dinsdale »

KC Scott wrote:if anyone can prove any of them are not dead and buried

How about ABC News? Are they a credible enough (albeit unwitting one) for you?





BTW -- At the beginning of the video, you see Robert Parker, the "victim's" father at the podium crying his eyes out, as a grieving father naturally would.


Right after whooping it up, joking around, then asking "are we ready to start?"






And yes, I'm having a hard time believing it myself...


but I'm pretty sure it happened.


Just a really sloppily produced hoax.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Dinsdale »

88 wrote:Jesus, dude. You are making LTSTRN2 look less like a lunatic than usual, and that takes effort.

It's taken days and days to convince me.

It appears so far outside of the realm of possibility, it's borderline impossible to even fathom.


Except the evidence is overwhelming.


Dozens upon dozens of problems with the story... and very clear photographic evidence that at least one of the "victims" is still alive and well.

Or what?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Dinsdale »

KC Scott wrote:it's her sister


Whose hair magically parted on the other side in 2 days, and is wearing her big sister's dress (apparently after the bullet holes and bloodstains were fixed).

I guess that's why dad is laughing immediately before turning on the waterworks at the presser... because he scored a sympathy freebie at the drycleaners.


Or maybe he just finds it hilarious the yelling man some chick the bus driver went right past the firehouse to drop the kids off at the pedophile's House ' O 'Teddy Bears.

Some of this shit is easily explained. No one with a brain in their head thinks dozens of unbelievable, ever-changing inconsistancies is easily explained.

Again -- very poorly produced movie. Makes Blair Witch Project look like a well thought out masterpiece.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Mace »

88 wrote:Something is definitely wrong with our country when an appreciable number of its citizens believe that persons serving in government are willing to orchestrate mass murders to further political agendas. Was it always like this?
Going back to JFK's assassination....yes. 9/11? Yes. There's a reason I scroll past every LTS post.

Conspiracy theorists are multi-generational and they're all fucking paranoid lunatics. I can't believe anyone would doubt the events at Sandy Hook or think for any reason that it was staged by the government. Totally fucking ridiculous. We may have many reasons to distrust our government and its officials but, for Christ's sake, you have completely lost your mind if you believe they'd stage a school shooting in order to enact gun control.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Mace »

Sudden Sam wrote:I know our gov't has pulled some nasty shit, but these shootings don't fit in that category...at least to me.

But these people who believe they are part of a conspiracy are very serious about it.
Oh, I know they're very serious about it but their suspicions are unfounded, just like the right wing extremist's screamings that the government is coming for our guns....they're not coming to your house to confiscate your guns, not that there aren't left wing extremists who wouldn't like to do that, but even they know it's not going to happen.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21669
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by smackaholic »

The level of dumbfukkery displayed by the anti-gun crowd on the interwebs really is stunning.

Some fukking mong made the statement...

"The gunman at Aurora got off 27 rounds in 30 seconds. You can't do that with a handgun." Implying that it required "mega clip assault riflles".

What a fukking maroon. I pointed out that he either was amazingly ignorant about handguns or bad at math or both.

How long do you figure it takes to empty a 15 round mag from a glock or sig? 6 or 7 seconds? 3 seconds to reload and the second mag is done in another 8 seconds. That's 30 rounds in under 20 seconds.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12398
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by mvscal »

Mace wrote:Conspiracy theorists are multi-generational and they're all fucking paranoid lunatics.
So there is no such thing as government conspiracies?
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12398
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by mvscal »

smackaholic wrote:"The gunman at Aurora got off 27 rounds in 30 seconds. You can't do that with a handgun." Implying that it required "mega clip assault riflles".
Would it be OK if he could only get off 27 rounds in 40 seconds? Is that the new standard?
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Trampis
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Trampis »

So did the government let Pearl Harbor happen so as to get into ww2?
Bad spelling is a diversionary tactic
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Rooster »

I do a mental eye roll whenever I hear someone spout off about the various conspiracies surrounding whatever the particular topic is for the day, but being far removed from US news over here in Afghanistan, I was in the messhall when they had CNN on instead of the NFL Network for a change. I was aware that Sandy Hook occured the day before, so I was rather nonplussed to see the father of Emilie Parker, ambitiously making use of his allotted fifteen minutes of fame by going out and doing a presser for a political cause rather than just expressing grief at losing his daughter.

Now, after having seen the footage from this video that shows him yukking it up just prior to his camera moment, I have to say he is either a very cold and calculating son of a bitch or he was not Emilie's biological father or... something. As a dad I cannot imagine a circumstance where such emotional callousness would ever present itself a single day after my child had met a violent end. Furthermore, by using the opportunity afforded him to push for a political agenda just seems incredibly Democratic Party-ish, where the political ends always justify the means.

In this I agree with Dins, the Parker press conference, in and of itself, smells very fishy.

Edit: Ok, that rabbit punch about the Democrats is over-the-top, but still the gist of my post remains the same: Mr. Parker is not what he seems or trys to portray himself as, ie. a loving, doting father tearfully memorializing his daughter. And there is something abjectly corrupt about that in light of the situation.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Mace »

mvscal wrote:
Mace wrote:Conspiracy theorists are multi-generational and they're all fucking paranoid lunatics.
So there is no such thing as government conspiracies?
I didn't say that, but there was no government conspiracy regarding the Sandy Hook shootings.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Dinsdale wrote:I've been seeing a lot about this in the last few days, not just Jones' version.

While I hate to be the BizzarroLTS...

Some of this shit just doesn't add up. While on the surface, a hoax all but defies belief...

But it sure looks to be one, designed to shock ans awe... but poorly produced.

I'd think they'd do a better job of hiding the "victims," rather than having them caught on video after their "death."

And the professional actor from Mission Viejo[/i] down the street but past the fire station should probably have rehearsed more, so he could get the story straight about the yelling man[/i] distraught woman[/i] bus driver who led the kids past the firehouse then left them unattended with an old man who just moved into a house near a school who just happened to have a pile of teddy bears in his living room... who then heard the story of what happened from the kids... 30 minutes later. But hey - he had no idea that anything was going on, despite claiming to be outside while his street was choke with cops.

Not sure which of the several radically different stories of his we're supposed to believe.

And the "grieving father" who is whooping it up and having a grand old time until he thinks the cameras are rolling, then turns on the waterworks sure seems a little off. Actually, several parents sure seem to drop out of character when they don't think cameras are rolling.

And the police chief saying that anyone who reports any information that didn't come from him will be prosecuted? A little over the top.

There's plenty more to this story that sure seems awfully fishy... like most of it.

I'm not saying it's a hoax... just that it has all the makings of one. All that's missing is Manti Te'o wailing about winning a game for the "victims."


^^This is what happens when you spend a lot of time alone and smoke a lot of weed.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13294
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Left Seater »

^^^^^^^^ If that is true what is LTS' excuse?
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Moby Dick
2017 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 2806
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: B-town

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Moby Dick »

So an AR wasnt used at Sandy Hook...


but there was HARD EVIDENCE there was??

sup with that..
Image
User avatar
Felix
2012 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 9269
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
Location: probably on a golf course

Re: Conspiracy to take guns?

Post by Felix »

I remember when I first read the whole 9/11 conspiracy theories and my first reaction was to think
"it takes a special kind of asshole to think government officials would perpetrate something like that in order to push some agenda"

this takes conspiracy nut job to a whole different level
get out, get out while there's still time
Post Reply