T1B

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:15 am**

Defending his administrations tepid, less than forthcoming response to the Libyan embassy attack and the softball question John Stewart lobbed him:

Whenever 4 Americans get killed, that's not optimal.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... bout-biden

Dear lord, Nov. 6th can't get here soon enough. Neither can January 20th.

edit: bad link, find it for yourself if you like

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:23 am**

War Wagon wrote:

Dear lord, Nov. 6th can't get here soon enough. Neither can January 20th.

You can stop holding your breath and pouting?

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:26 am**

I knew I could count on Mikey to be first in with a lame response. That's Mikey, always meeting expectations.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:30 am**

War Wagon wrote:
Dear lord, Nov. 6th can't get here soon enough.

Obama is going to stomp Rottney into a shit-puddle.

You can always move to Canada...

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:39 am**

War Wagon wrote:Defending his administrations tepid, less than forthcoming response to the Libyan embassy attack

The subject is reaching soppy, Princess Di levels of emotional outrage, even mv is washing his hankie. Move on to the good stuff already :brad:

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:46 am**

Now now Phibes, patience.

Besides, it really doesn't get much better than watching lib poutrage over a spade being called spade.

This is the one issue they wish would go away, but it won't.

Sucks to be them, really. But you have to applaud the brave front they put on... all while pissing into the wind.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:49 am**

His name's Jon Stewart, idiot. Shut the fuck up already.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:55 am**

War Wagon wrote:lib poutrage

I don't see a lot of liberal "poutrage". I think they're just biding their time until election day, when they drop-kick Romney in the face...and they will.

War Wagon wrote: This is the one issue they wish would go away, but it won't.

Nobody cares. The right wing has tried to inflate this issue hard for two weeks now. It doesn't have "legs".

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:25 am**

A Morman flip-flopper, a gov of MASS with liberal leanings who shut down a coal plant because it "kills people", the architect of Obamacare MASS-version, former pro-choice, etc etc. is the best the GOP could offer to unseat a Dem president in over his head? Did somebody mix nyquil with their crack? Now Flip-Flop Romney goes on record as wanting to extend tax-cuts for the wealthy and eliminate the mortgage interest deduction and child tax credits (fuck you middle class and working poor!). Does anyone honestly believe he's not going to get shit-stomped?

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:35 am**

War Wagon wrote:Defending his administrations tepid, less than forthcoming response to the Libyan embassy attack and the softball question John Stewart lobbed him:

Whenever 4 Americans get killed, that's not optimal.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... bout-biden

Dear lord, Nov. 6th can't get here soon enough. Neither can January 20th.

edit: bad link, find it for yourself if you like

:? He was just responding using the same words Stewart used in his question.

Personally, I found this much more telling:

Asked what caused the confusion over the attack, the president responded: "Well, we weren't confused about the fact that four Americans had been killed, I wasn't confused about the fact that we needed to ramp up diplomatic security around the world right after it happened, I wasn't confused about the fact that we had to investigate exactly what happened so it gets fixed and I wasn't confused about the fact that we were going to hunt down whoever did it and bring them to justice."

The more he runs from it, the worse he makes it for himself. All he has to do to make this go away is say, "I don't know where the 'Youtube riot' explanation came from and I wish it would have been vetted before people had done interviews, but it wasn't." Instead he's defiant, acting like it's our fault that he and his Administration got caught bullshitting. That act didn't work for Bush/Cheney and it's not going to work for Barry either.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:08 am**

Obama was on Stewart's show?
Doesn't surprise me, he's a complete joke.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:49 am**

88 wrote:On a lighter note...

Romney had better material overall, but Obama's self-inflicted "Yankee Stadium" joke was pretty $$.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:55 pm**

Talk about quoting out of context. Here's the full exchange.

Stewart asked whether the administration needs to improve its internal communication going forward.

"Because I would say, even you would admit, it was not the optimal response, at least to the American people, as far as all of us being on the same page," he said.

"Here's what I'll say," Obama responded. "If four Americans get killed, it's not optimal. "

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:57 pm**

So Barry needed Stewart to put words in his mouth? Nor did he even realize how insensitive it was to use those words? Pathetic.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:34 pm**

He probably should have said, "If four Americans get killed, it's well below average."

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:55 pm**

Wolfman wrote:So Barry needed Stewart to put words in his mouth? Nor did he even realize how insensitive it was to use those words? Pathetic.

Outrage over semantics? REALLY? Go buy some fake gold coins from Glenn Beck, you nincompoop.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:14 pm**

BSmack wrote:Talk about quoting out of context.

Because of course, libs never do that.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:50 pm**

88 wrote:Setting aside the political horse-shit being thrown about regarding Obama's use of the word "optimal" as quoted above, how does Obama's statement make any sense whatsoever in response to the question asked by Mr. Leibowitz? Mr. Leibowitz asked whether the administration needs to improve its internal communications going forward. What does Obama's reference to four dead Americans have to do with that? If it makes it easier, go ahead and assume that Obama's response was "If four Americans get killed, it's tragic." What does such a response have to do with the failures of his administration's internal communication? Obama simply won't address that question in any way, as far as I can tell.

He can't address any failures in internal communication because there were no failures in internal communication. Their cover story failed and they were caught in a lie. That's it. They knew exactly what happened in Benghazi from the beginning. They knew there was no protest outside the consulate of any kind. There was only an attack.

The only question remaining is who ordered the cover up.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:53 pm**

mvscal wrote:There was only an attack.

The only question remaining is who ordered the cover up.

I don't mean to play the "you are melting" card, but...

...you are melting.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:06 pm**

What's the melt? It's simple observation.

There was no protest outside the consulate that night. That is an indisputable fact which was known by the administration that very night yet they spent the next couple weeks pushing a lie about a protest that never happened.

It is now also becoming clear that the protest in Cairo had fuck all to with a video clip as well.

The protest outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo was announced Aug. 30 by Jamaa Islamiya, a State Department-designated terrorist group, to protest the ongoing imprisonment of its spiritual leader, Sheikh Omar abdel Rahman. He is serving a life sentence in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

So....

Who ordered these lies and why?

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:05 pm**

Martyred wrote:I don't see a lot of liberal "poutrage". I think they're just biding their time until election day, when they drop-kick Romney in the face...and they will.

Barry is going to need a miracle at this point. His numbers are dropping faster than balls into Screwy's mouth and there isn't enough time to dig himself out.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:37 pm**

Obama simply won't address that question in any way, as far as I can tell.

Of course he won't. This thing is not going to go away. No one died in Watergate.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:53 pm**

Wolfman wrote:This thing is not going to go away.

Yes it will. Stop tugging at your pinafore, princess.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:06 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Martyred wrote:I don't see a lot of liberal "poutrage". I think they're just biding their time until election day, when they drop-kick Romney in the face...and they will.
Barry is going to need a miracle at this point. His numbers are dropping faster than balls into Screwy's mouth and there isn't enough time to dig himself out.

I seem to recall you predicting an Obama loss in '08 as well. :roll:

An Obama win in November would seem to make you the YAFJ of political election prognostications.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:31 pm**

Mace wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Martyred wrote:I don't see a lot of liberal "poutrage". I think they're just biding their time until election day, when they drop-kick Romney in the face...and they will.
Barry is going to need a miracle at this point. His numbers are dropping faster than balls into Screwy's mouth and there isn't enough time to dig himself out.
I seem to recall you predicting an Obama loss in '08 as well. :roll:

An Obama win in November would seem to make you the YAFJ of political election prognostications.

He's a FJ anyway.

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:35 pm**

Mace wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Martyred wrote:I don't see a lot of liberal "poutrage". I think they're just biding their time until election day, when they drop-kick Romney in the face...and they will.
Barry is going to need a miracle at this point. His numbers are dropping faster than balls into Screwy's mouth and there isn't enough time to dig himself out.
I seem to recall you predicting an Obama loss in '08 as well. :roll:

An Obama win in November would seem to make you the YAFJ of political election prognostications.

Barry never cracked 50 and is fading fast less than thirty days before the election. That's a political mayday going down in flames red alert for an incumbent President.

Wakey wakey

Posted: **Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:53 pm**

Yes it will.

Interesting seeing as the next Meet The Press type show---err----debate topic is foreign policy. Would be amazing if the topic of Libya did not come up. Barry better have something ready besides some cute made up words.

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:34 am**

Did covering up Pat Tilman's cause of lead poisoning cost Bush the election in 04?

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:15 pm**

BSmack wrote:

FTFY-NC

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:23 pm**

Truman wrote:FTFY-NC

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:01 pm**

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:52 pm**

Well played, Tru.

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:36 pm**

BSmack wrote:Did covering up Pat Tilman's cause of lead poisoning cost Bush the election in 04?

No, it didn't because he didn't cover it up, you fucking moron. The false narrative was being pushed up from unit level in Afghanistan not down from the White House.

It also had no relevance to the conduct of foreign policy.

T1B

Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart

Re: Obama on the Daily Show with John Stewart