T1B

I like the Giants, especially with Gronk hurting.

38-27

War Wagon wrote:I like the Giants, especially with Gronk hurting.

38-27

X2

The Giants have better defense (especially pass rush), & more good receivers (who aren't lame).

Giants - 31
Patriots - 24

Of course if Belichick is sandbagging and Gronk has a regular ankle sprain it'll be closer.

Giants - 31
Patriots - 28

Giants 34-20

They have two many weapons for NE's shit D and their front 4 is good enough to offset little behind them. I'd like to be wrong. But that's how I see it.

NE 31
NYG 24

Revenge is a powerful motivator. Pats 34 Giants 24

Cosmo Kramer wrote:Revenge is a powerful motivator.

I am sure all 7 players leftover from the 2007-08 season agree with you. What about the other 46?

Patriots 27

Giants 20



MVP - Brady

I would take the Giants +3 if I was betting the line.

I lean toward thinking NY will win outright, but I have very little interest in the game.

Dislike for the Gaytriots and disdain for the city of New York.

A piss shower for both of 'em.


Hope somebody dies on the field.

Has it ever happened?

Make history, boys. :)

poptart wrote:Hope somebody dies on the field.

Has it ever happened?

Make history, boys. :)

Why, yes, pops, a player has died during a game. From a heart attack. I hope you’re happy.

I remember when this happened and Howard Cosell covered it the next night on Monday Night Football. You’ll be happy to know, pops, that because of his chest pains weeks beforehand, Hughes came to know the Lord. A religion based on fear, eh?

http://www.aolnews.com/2010/10/22/one-o ... nd-on-him/

Toddowen wrote:Imagine Giant fan being the more scholarly of the two?

Which one blasts the larger load across your face, Tardd?

Giants 31
Patriots 20

I might watch it.

It's a good time to go out and do other things, though, because normal crowds are pretty thin.

Pats 27
G-men 23

I think the Pats control the game by mid 3rd quarter and give up a late score for the 4 point win

Joe in PB wrote: The Giants have better defense

NYG - 25.0 PPG

NEP - 21.4 PPG


Maybe "better" according to the eyeball test, and due to getting healthier.

Staistically?

Must be a PB thing.


Pats had more INTs, equalled NYG in forced fumbles, and scored more points on defense. Statistically, the only place the Giants are better than the Pats is over the Pats' pathetic pass D.


Joe, I can provide you with links to multiple sites with NFL stats, so you can bookmark them, and not appear so misinformed all the time.

Total defense. Giants are 27th, NE 31st.

Last time I checked, points is how the game won

Dinsdale wrote:

Joe in PB wrote: The Giants have better defense

NYG - 25.0 PPG

NEP - 21.4 PPG


Maybe "better" according to the eyeball test, and due to getting healthier.

Staistically?

Must be a PB thing.


Pats had more INTs, equalled NYG in forced fumbles, and scored more points on defense. Statistically, the only place the Giants are better than the Pats is over the Pats' pathetic pass D.


Joe, I can provide you with links to multiple sites with NFL stats, so you can bookmark them, and not appear so misinformed all the time.

Statistically the Eagles had the 8th ranked defense in the NFL. You'd have a hard time convincing ANYONE who watched that team with any regularity that the Eagles had the 8th ranked defense in the league. On the local radio this morning a show had on Ray Didinger who happens to be in enshrined in the Profootball HOF (writer's wing). In short, his resume is impeccable. He happens to watch film. A lot of it since he also works for NFL Films.

His take? The Eagles defense was one of the worst defenses in the NFL.

Yet, they're ranked 8th per NFL.com

I don't think Joe is misinformed. Rather I think he's doing what a lot of (serious) fans tend to do which is to not only look at stats but realistically judge how a team has played over the last half of the season as well as the playoffs with both an eyeball look as well as stats more reflective of how the team is playing now.

I saw one of the premier offensive teams in the NFL this past season get shut down by a really good Giants defense in Wisconsin a few weeks ago. How they played against the Packers matter a lot more than how the Giants D played in weeks 1-8.

Dinsdale wrote:

Joe in PB wrote: The Giants have better defense

NYG - 25.0 PPG

NEP - 21.4 PPG


Maybe "better" according to the eyeball test, and due to getting healthier.

Staistically?

Must be a PB thing.


Pats had more INTs, equalled NYG in forced fumbles, and scored more points on defense. Statistically, the only place the Giants are better than the Pats is over the Pats' pathetic pass D.


Joe, I can provide you with links to multiple sites with NFL stats, so you can bookmark them, and not appear so misinformed all the time.

What isn't amazing is I don't need to look at stat sheets to have a better & more accurate take than you dim bulb (see 9er Giants NFC champ thread).

Do you ever post a take, or do you just follow me around sucking my ass?

Cueball wrote:Last time I checked, points is how the game won

I don't think anyone was contesting that.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Cosmo Kramer wrote:Revenge is a powerful motivator.

I am sure all 7 players leftover from the 2007-08 season agree with you. What about the other 46?

Brady is the only one that counts so...look for him to have a great game.

Cosmo Kramer wrote:

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Cosmo Kramer wrote:Revenge is a powerful motivator.

I am sure all 7 players leftover from the 2007-08 season agree with you. What about the other 46?

Brady is the only one that counts so....

Why?

Cosmo Kramer wrote:Brady is the only one that counts so...look for him to have a great game.

Yes. I am sure Brady will try harder this time. Yeah. That's the ticket. He wasn't properly motivated back in 2008. Ya know, the chance at 19-0 and immortality wasn't enough. Now that he has a chance to "get someone back" he will surely win.

I can't decide which shit take of yours stinks worse... the one where you said "all you have to do is outscore the other team to win"... or this pile of rhino dung.

Too close to call.

Dinsdale wrote: I can provide you with links to multiple sites with NFL stats, so you can bookmark them, and not appear so misinformed all the time.

There's liars, damned liars, and stats.

Then there's Dims, constantly running his trap like a toilet with a bad flapper.

I'd rather watch the Pro Bowl than this pathetic abortion of a game.

poptart wrote:Hope somebody dies on the field.

HOLY GUACAMOLE

mvscal wrote:I'd rather watch the Pro Bowl than this pathetic abortion of a game.

then why post that pathetic abortion of a take?

should be an imminently watchable game. The two teams that deserve to be there, are there.

you just pissed because it's two East coast teams?

War Wagon wrote:should be an imminently watchable game.

Based on what compelling storyline or matchup? What it will be is a fucking joke.

Imminently?



Stop it, Wags. Just...stop it. You're killing me over here.

mvscal wrote:I'd rather watch the Pro Bowl than this pathetic abortion of a game.

Not every Super Bowl can be as exciting as a 49-26 beatdown, you sniveling cunt.

And truthfully, no one gives a fuck whether you tune in or not. I doubt you SoCal hippie lettuce smoking, no life having, surfer fucks could pull yourselves away from the beach to watch the game even if your own shit franchise was about to get its shit pushed in... again. Hang 10, bbbbrrrraaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Dinsdale wrote:Staistically?

Statistically, in NFL history, one NFC defense (Bears) has actually KILLED an opponent.

No AFC defense has made it's mark.


Thanks, Gobbler.


I think I like the Giants just a little more now.

Van wrote:Imminently?



Stop it, Wags. Just...stop it. You're killing me over here.

Kansas City. Where big words go to die.

eminently

Goober McTuber wrote: Kansas City. Where big words go to die.

eminently

Even spelled correctly, I don't think that word means what Wags think it means.

mvscal wrote:

War Wagon wrote:should be an imminently watchable game.

Based on what compelling storyline or matchup? What it will be is a fucking joke.

The "Rematch?" Brady exacting revenge? Can the Giants pull off another miracle run?

And really? You need a "compelling storyline" to watch a football game? It's the fucking Super Bowl, and what appears to be a pretty competitive matchup to boot. Two teams are going to line up and smack pads for all the marbles. What more do you want?

Well, for starters, he wouldn't mind seeing Tim Tebow run a QB sneak in the Super Bowl...naked.

what?

Definition of IMMINENT
: ready to take place; especially : hanging threateningly over one's head <was in imminent danger of being run over>

Goobs, Van... I just roll words off the top of my head, they perplex you.

Rack my Catholic education, but you guys are 'tards, as in unread.

Goober McTuber wrote:

Van wrote:Imminently?



Stop it, Wags. Just...stop it. You're killing me over here.

Kansas City. Where big words go to die.

eminently

Yes, Goobs, you are an unread idiot.

Definition of EMINENT
1: standing out so as to be readily perceived or noted : conspicuous
2: jutting out : projecting
3: exhibiting eminence especially in standing above others in some quality or position : prominent

That's all well and good, Wags, except you used 'imminently,' not 'eminently,' which is the correction Goobs provided. You wanted to use 'eminently'—your Kansas Citian gray matter was just aching to extract the word from those besotted cobwebs—but when push came to shove you butcherfucked it right the hell up.

Whitey's posts are imminently readable.

So Wags, because it's about to occur, that's what makes it so... watchable? Imminently watchable?

Just admit to the mistake and move on. Or better yet, just ignore the gaffe and move on. Digging a deeper hole for yourself helps you... how?