T1B

Sorry to be a wet blanket, JSC, but it looks like for performance enhancing drugs. One game suspension (Auburn), possibly more. Also, a 3rd player is rumored to have failed the test as well.

The fair thing thing to do is to suspend a couple/few Alabama players as well. They've got to be guilty of something.

One game seems awfully light for PEDs, if true.

I wouldn't worry about LSU vs Auburn. Utah St almost beat them and then Fresno St beat Utah St by a bigger margin. So that should tell you how good AU is.

It's probably more of an IQ test -- designed to catch anyone who isn't smart enough to pass a PED test.

Don't tell me it's not rampant in D1. While not the same, I know a guy who played 1AA ball, and said PEDS were pretty much standard operating procedure.

Atomic Punk wrote:I wouldn't worry about LSU vs Auburn. Utah St almost beat them and then Fresno St beat Utah St by a bigger margin. So that should tell you how good AU is.

Yes, because the transitive property always works. ND lost to USF, Pitt beat the shit out of USF, so Pitt would slaughter ND. Except the fact ND beat Pitt.

Killian wrote:Yes, because the transitive property always works.

I didn't say that. It's about match ups, but AU didn't impress me when I watched them.

supposedly it was synthetic weed

Adelpiero wrote:supposedly it was synthetic weed

AP's post? That would make sense.

Adelpiero wrote:supposedly it was synthetic weed

This is illegal?