Page 1 of 2

Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:04 am
by poptart
Oh... loser was run.

Anyway, his team will be pounded into it's own piss puddle on Sunday.

They've faced the 30th most difficult schedule so far (Oakland has faced the 2nd most difficult) and this move UP in competition will not be kind to them... or their running star, who sits out games with a sore thwoat, stubbed toe, bruised vag', or whatever...

The Brownies (those are girls) will have to have a little *HOT* slapped on their ass this week.

Cleveland's defense might be adequate, but the lack of quality they have faced makes it difficult to know for sure.
On offense, they scare nobody.

They're not doing jack shit on Sunday.

McFadden is due for another large game.

Al Davis Tribute Sunday.

Raiders all day.


Oakland - 27
Cleveland - 10

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:59 pm
by Felix
poptart wrote:Al Davis Tribute Sunday.
the duh's are only going to be able to ride the "our owner just died so we're motivated to go out and win" train for so long....

reality is going to catch up with them at some point

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:22 pm
by R-Jack
Felix wrote:
poptart wrote:Al Davis Tribute Sunday.
the duh's are only going to be able to ride the "our owner just died so we're motivated to go out and win" train for so long....

reality is going to catch up with them at some point
First home game since the passing.

Hows that reality thing going for your teams' alzheimer riddled owner that no one will give a fuck about when he dies?

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:46 pm
by Felix
R-Jack wrote:Hows that reality thing going for your teams' alzheimer riddled owner that no one will give a fuck about when he dies?
you're wrong.....many people (heirs) will care deeply when he passes along

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:58 pm
by Raydah James
Felix wrote: reality is going to catch up with them at some point
The "Reality" that this Raider team is young, fast, talented as fuck and a top 10 NFL team on the rise? Face it, we're a Campbell upgrade away from stomping balls all over the league. Madden will locate that upgrade this offseason, bank on it.


In the meantime, I'll enjoy the shitstains getting arabian goggled by the silver and black marblebag en route to the playoffs.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:23 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Raydah James wrote:The "Reality" that this Raider team is young, fast, talented as fuck and a top 10 NFL team on the rise?

I'd be curious to read your totally unbiased and well-informed take as to the other 9 teams that comprise this list and the order in which they are ranked.

Top 10? Excuse me while I ppppppffffffffffffffffttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:02 pm
by ChargerMike
R-Jack wrote:
Felix wrote:
poptart wrote:Al Davis Tribute Sunday.
the duh's are only going to be able to ride the "our owner just died so we're motivated to go out and win" train for so long....

reality is going to catch up with them at some point
First home game since the passing.
Hows that reality thing going for your teams' alzheimer riddled owner that no one will give a fuck about when he dies?

...the question is will they finally sell out that cesspool of a so called frikken stadium.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:30 pm
by Felix
ChargerMike wrote:...the question is will they finally sell out that cesspool of a so called frikken stadium.

oh they'll sell it out alright.....duh fan only gets one chance to honor the death of their owner by clocking someone upside the head...preferably when the unsuspecting aren't looking....

so I'm guessing the over/under on life threatening injuries/deaths at the fungus pit will be 6

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:38 pm
by R-Jack
ChargerMike wrote:
...the question is will they finally sell out that cesspool of a so called frikken stadium.
Last Dolt home game.
Image

..........you were saying.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:07 am
by poptart
ucant wrote:Top 10? Excuse me while I ppppppffffffffffffffffttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.
If I was ranking teams based on what has happend so far this season, I would put Oakland somewhere between 10-15 in the league.
Prolly closer to 10 than 15.

They've played a very difficult schedule (2nd most difficult so far according to Sagarin) - and 3 road games to 2 home games - and are sitting at 3-2.
They've handled it pretty well.

They'll now be facing three straight at home - vs. teams that are not all that hot.

Cleveland
KC
Denver

The Raiders have a serious opportunity here to get themselves right into the thick of the race in the West.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:11 pm
by ChargerMike
R-Jack wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:
...the question is will they finally sell out that cesspool of a so called frikken stadium.
Last Dolt home game.
Image

..........you were saying.
..you really don't expect Indy to be selling out after an 0-5 start do you?

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 8:32 pm
by Joe in PB
The Raiduhs still commit too many stupid penalties, lack discipline on defense giving up big plays, but have some enthusiasm and intensity. I'm impressed with McFadden and their run game, and it looks like they finally have a couple of WRs. The primer & soot definitely are contenders for the AFC West & I wouldn't be surprised if they won it. They out hit San Diego last season & I expect they'll do the same this year too.

That's Norv's problem, the Chargers have become soft under his tenure. No longer do they blow teams out of Qualcomm Stadium like they did under Schottenheimer. Every game now is closely contested, no matter the team. Marty couldn't win a playoff game, but he had the Chargers playing well in the regular season. Norv has the team sleep walking in the regular season, and might win a playoff game or two, if the team is fortunate enough to qualify. Yuck......

Anyway it is easy to see that the Raduhs now have direction and leadership that has been missing since Gruden left, & that could be the difference compared to recent years past.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:30 pm
by Joe in PB
Losing Campbell the rest of the season pretty much torpedoes the Primer & Soot's chances at the playoffs. Boller is "Rex Grossman" or a turnover waiting to happen. The Duhs would have been better off keeping Gradkowski who is nothing to write home about, but is a decent game manager & leader.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:12 am
by Raydah James
Joe in PB wrote:Losing Campbell the rest of the season pretty much torpedoes the Primer & Soot's chances at the playoffs.
:lol: :lol:

Yeah, since he's right up there with Rodgers, Gaydy, Brees, and Rivers. :meds:


Campbell is a game manager on a run the ball down your throat team, nothing more. Either Trent Edwards, who knows our offense and was great in pre-season before Alcula cut him in favor of a pine riding speedster (:roll:) will be back, or Carson Palmer will be had for a 2013 3rd rounder since our coach worked with him in Cincy. Worst case scenario is Madden dusting Favre off and getting him under center for us.....I could see that happening though, especially with the bye week giving him time to learn the O.

Either way, were fine. This isnt like Hostetler going down in the mid 90's with a season ending injury after we were 8-0 and ended up with Donald Hollis and an 8-8 record to finish the season out. Losing DMac or Bush would be massive blows to us.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:31 am
by Joe in PB
Having Boller as your starting QB is a massive blow. Trent Edwards, Boller, Grossman? They're all the same, turnover machines. Palmer isn't going to be traded just like Vincent Jackson wasn't, it sets a bad precedent, can't have the inmates running the asylum. Favre? Forget about it, he's done too.The Duhs won the battle but lost the war, & now have forks stuck in their backs, you just can't see it.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:45 am
by Raydah James
2011 season: 6 td's, 4 int's, 1 fumble lost. (4 more as well that were recovered by him or another offensive player). Completion %: 60

Yeah, how can we possibly replace that unmatched greatness.

Shut the fuck up, dick wrangler-you have no fucking idea of what you're talking about. With Madden and Ron Wolf running the show, im very confident we'll be fine. Just try not to squeal too loud when that Silver and Black foot goes straight up your soft Norvelous asses to the tune of 200+ rushing yards. Bitch.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:49 am
by Joe in PB
Image

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:03 am
by Raydah James
Brilliant post.


Cunt.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:10 am
by Joe in PB
Its never not funny when its true........

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:17 am
by poptart
I haven't yet heard what Campbell's official prognosis is.

If it's a broken collar bone, as feared, he's out for the year.

Camera shots of Boller's little lady might pacify me a little bit, but if either he or Edwards were a better option than Campbell, well... they'd have been on the field before him.

JC was doing a good job for us and I'm real sorry to see him go down.
He's a good ball-handler (important in our offense), he's a good game-manager, and he generally takes good care of the ball.
Not a star, but DECENT for what we are doing.

I'll wait and see what goes on the next few days before commenting further on the Raider QB situation.


Center S. Satele also went down.
Knee sprain?
He's out for the Grief game.

Not good.

We might only win by 17.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:50 am
by Raydah James
poptart wrote:He's a good ball-handler
Totally disagree, bro. He is nothing more than decent in that area. 5 fumbles in 6 games is too damn much for my liking....he's damn lucky theres been offensive personell around to bail his ass out and allow only 1 fumble lost.
he's a good game-manager. Not a star, but DECENT for what we are doing.
Agree.


Center S. Satele also went down.
Knee sprain?
He's out for the Grief game.
Good. He fucking sucks. I cringe every time I see that overrated ponytailed faggot swing his whole fucking head around pre-snap and give the ultimate "tell". We are considerably better on the line when the Wiz kid slides over to center and the rookie Barksdale takes over Stephan's spot. It isnt close. Satele has been injured a ton this year and the Wizkid/Barksdale combo has fucking PWNED. Barks is another draft gem that people will be talking about soon.....


We might only win by 17.
Yep. 8)

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:59 am
by trev
R-Jack wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:
...the question is will they finally sell out that cesspool of a so called frikken stadium.
Last Dolt home game.
Image

..........you were saying.
Shut up son.

I was at this game and it was nearly full.
No one wants to attend a game in Oakland but costumed raider thug.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:32 am
by poptart
Update:

Campbell does have a broken collarbone and is likely be done for '11.

Hue says Satele, although nicked, WILL play v. KC.
So take that for what it's worth.


Deal for C. Palmer?
The Bengirls say it's not happenin'.
Dunno.

D. Garrard?
Pfft..
Not really into it.

Brent Favre?
I'll ask b'husker.

Some other deal?
V. Young?
Naaah, can't be.

K. Orton?
hmmm...

Roll with Boller?

Jeff George?
Vince Evans? :mrgreen:

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:42 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Image

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:51 pm
by Sirfindafold
poptart wrote: D. Garrard?
Pfft..
Not really into it.
David Garrard: 89 TD's 54 INT's 61.4% Comp 85.8 passer rating W 39 L 37

Bringing in Garrard seems like a no-brainer to me. Pryor is at least a year away.

Boller looked like Rusty Hilger yesterday. Lets hope Hue can work his magic.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:05 pm
by poptart
Info I had on Garrard is that he might be a tad slow in picking up a new (and perhaps considerable) playbook.

If we do bring him in, I think much of Hue & Al S's playcalling creativity will be a thing of the past.

Nuts and bolts.
Run, run, play action...

I dunno.

Yeah, Garrard did pretty well for himself in J'ville, and he'd prolly be an upgrade over Boller, who I really don't have much confidence in.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:07 pm
by Felix
Raydah James wrote: Either way, were fine.

that's what I like about duh fan, there are always rainbows behind every dark cloud....methinks you're going to find out that campbell was more important than you seem to think he is....

kyle boller-really, I thought that guy was running a deli in san diego

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:41 pm
by atomicdad
Image

what were you saying Jack, I got sidetracked.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 7:54 pm
by Sirfindafold
Garrard's out. Needs back surgery.

JaMarcus II?

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:26 pm
by jiminphilly
Derek Anderson is 3rd string in Carolina. Can probably be had for a 6th.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:38 pm
by poptart
Campbell is having surgery tomorrow and says he can get back in 6 weeks... if all goes well.

With a broken right collarbone, is that even possible?

I don't think so.


Lechler looked pretty good throwing the ball yesterday. :)

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:07 am
by R-Jack
trev wrote:Shut up son.

I was at this game and it was nearly full.
No one wants to attend a game in Oakland but costumed raider thug.
OK.

What part of "Charger fan ran sellout smack right after a Charger blackout" is your vodka infused brain not grasping?

I've been to plenty of Raider blackouts as well. They looked like sellouts. Some may have been but not before the deadline. Nearly full doesn't mean a sellout so it doesn't make running sellout smack when your own team isn't selling out any less of a KYOA statement.

Think, then hit submit you stupid cunt.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:35 am
by trev
R-Jack wrote:
trev wrote:Shut up son.

I was at this game and it was nearly full.
No one wants to attend a game in Oakland but costumed raider thug.
OK.

What part of "Charger fan ran sellout smack right after a Charger blackout" is your vodka infused brain not grasping?

I've been to plenty of Raider blackouts as well. They looked like sellouts. Some may have been but not before the deadline. Nearly full doesn't mean a sellout so it doesn't make running sellout smack when your own team isn't selling out any less of a KYOA statement.

Think, then hit submit you stupid cunt.
San Diego is way ahead of Oakland in attendance for years now. I would go to any NFL venue BUT Oakland. Who would want to go there? But cheap, costumed up raider fan? Stop running any kind of sellout smack. We are consistent, sell out, or near sell out, not 20,000 down from sellouts, game after game, year after year.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:18 am
by R-Jack
trev wrote:Stop running any kind of sellout smack.

1-Learn to read
2-Actually read this thread
3-Take note of who is lobbing the sellout smack that I responded to
4-Take note of said retard's fandom
5-Ask him if he saw his teams last home game on TV
6-Drown your stupidity in yet another plastic bottle of cheap vodka

I'm not running sellout smack you insanely stupid twat. Questiong if a fanbase can sell out a home game when your teams game is blacked out is a monumental KYOA. That's what ChargerMike did, and I pointed it out.

Honestly, I shake my head reading your shit. You're that fucking dumb.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:37 am
by poptart
Shaun Hill to the Raiduhs?

"Rumor."


Developing...

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:07 am
by mvscal
Sirfindafold wrote:
poptart wrote: D. Garrard?
Pfft..
Not really into it.
David Garrard: 89 TD's 54 INT's 61.4% Comp 85.8 passer rating W 39 L 37

Bringing in Garrard seems like a no-brainer to me. Pryor is at least a year away.

Boller looked like Rusty Hilger yesterday. Lets hope Hue can work his magic.
Garrard isn't interested in playing this year. He's taking some time off.

Mike Brown is a complete fucktard if he doesn't trade Palmer. He's set with Dalton. There is no reason to continue the pissing contest with Palmer who will simply unretire next year.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:22 pm
by R-Jack
CBS is reporting that the Raiders are close to bringing Palmer in. The cost is going to be a 1st rounder and some sort of conditional pick.

This is definately not a stop-gap for while Campbell is out. You give up a first rounder, you're looking for a new starter. Campbell is a free agent I believe. I guess they'll decide he's done for the year and let him walk. Interesting.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:24 pm
by Joe in PB
The problem is Palmer isn't any better than Campbell. He hasn't been the same since the knee injury, but at least he's better than Boller.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:58 pm
by DallasFanatic
R-Jack wrote:CBS is reporting that the Raiders are close to bringing Palmer in. The cost is going to be a 1st rounder and some sort of conditional pick.

This is definately not a stop-gap for while Campbell is out. You give up a first rounder, you're looking for a new starter. Campbell is a free agent I believe. I guess they'll decide he's done for the year and let him walk. Interesting.
The bottom line is the cost of two first round picks for Palmer. An absolute bonehead decision for a QB on the decline. Seems like management is running the same course. Give up the world for overhyped veterans. Sorry Raider fan, you actually deserve better than this.

Re: Where the hell is Qbert?

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:14 pm
by R-Jack
Didn't see that the conditional pick was a 1st rounder. Those conditions better be pretty fucking high. I thought a 1st rounder alone was a bit much.

Mike Brown-keeper of the prosthetic cock.