Page 1 of 1

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:26 pm
by Mikey
Maybe he took a shortcut?

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:43 pm
by OCmike
He stole something?

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:19 am
by smackaholic
It's not a round trip. It is pretty much in one direction and downhill by a few hundred feet. Today's perfect weather and nice tailwind = fastest marathon ever.

rack the hell out of anyone that can breakoff 26 consecutive sub 5 minute miles. that is flying! and rack the chick that squeezed out a kid last september and put in a 2:26 time. That is a pretty fukking respectable time for a very good male runner.

I remember a few months back during a men/womens athlete comparison and noted that distance running has to be the only sport where world class women can beat really good, but not quite world class men. I believe it was during the chicks bball discussion where it was pointed out that good high school boys outclass world class women at roundball. Distance running is certainly a little different.

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:03 am
by Trampis
smackaholic wrote: I remember a few months back during a men/womens athlete comparison and noted that distance running has to be the only sport where world class women can beat really good, but not quite world class men. I believe it was during the chicks bball discussion....
You and Warwagon should go out on a date.

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:10 am
by Goober McTuber
Trampis wrote:
smackaholic wrote: I remember a few months back during a men/womens athlete comparison and noted that distance running has to be the only sport where world class women can beat really good, but not quite world class men. I believe it was during the chicks bball discussion....
You and Warwagon should go out on a date.
Absolutely. Be sure to videotape that shit. The smalltalk would be an instant YouTube classic.

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:18 am
by Mace
Rack the record breaking time in the marathon and tying Manny's time for rounding the bases in Boston.

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:38 am
by Screw_Michigan
Nobody fucking cares.

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:07 pm
by Dan Vogel
That time is unbelievable. Related to the topic I have a goal to run a half marathon this summer. It's something I've been pointing to since I began my get in shape campaign many months ago. I think I can do it.

I have a miserable life and wish I were dead!

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:25 pm
by Goober McTuber
Dan Vogel wrote:That time is unbelievable. Related to the topic I have a goal to run a half marathon this summer.
Be sure to post the details here on the board. mvscal will appreciate the time with your wife and kids.

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:06 pm
by Mikey
smackaholic wrote:It's not a round trip.
So somebody needs to move the car to the finish unless you want to run 52 miles?

What were they thinking?

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:28 pm
by Rack Fu
Jsc810 wrote:Did I see that right on the tv just now? Dude ran 2:03:02 at Boston? That's insane. How is that possible?
The more serious I get into endurance sports, the more I appreciate how truly unreal the top of the food chain athletes really are. Whether it's guys that can run 2:03 marathons or cyclists that can ride 30 mph up a mountain in the TdF or the guy who wins an Ironman in 8 hours.

I had a top-10% overall bike split at the Ironman 70.3 Texas two weeks ago and the top pro beat my ass by 32 minutes on the bike for a 56 mile ride... and swam 10 minutes faster (for 1.2 miles) and ran nearly 40 minutes faster (half marathon). I came close to the 5 hour mark and these guys are clocking in at 3:45.

Being genetically blessed with will and motivation to match is a scary thing.

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:47 pm
by BSmack
Rack Fu wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:Did I see that right on the tv just now? Dude ran 2:03:02 at Boston? That's insane. How is that possible?
The more serious I get into endurance sports, the more I appreciate how truly unreal the top of the food chain athletes really are. Whether it's guys that can run 2:03 marathons or cyclists that can ride 30 mph up a mountain in the TdF or the guy who wins an Ironman in 8 hours.

I had a top-10% overall bike split at the Ironman 70.3 Texas two weeks ago and the top pro beat my ass by 32 minutes on the bike for a 56 mile ride... and swam 10 minutes faster (for 1.2 miles) and ran nearly 40 minutes faster (half marathon). I came close to the 5 hour mark and these guys are clocking in at 3:45.

Being genetically blessed with will and motivation to match is a scary thing.
Having all the latest designer PEDs doesn't hurt either.

Re: 2:03:02

Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:54 am
by Diego in Seattle