T1B

Wow. I wish I had a TV show.

Woof, woof...

Truth, Justice and E-Coli

That's a tough call. did the meat infect the beaver, or the beaver infect the meat.

Seeing as it's a woman who lets dogs eat from her snizz, I'll go with the latter.

Imus wrote:Wow. I wish I had a TV show.

Woof, woof...

Which moderator owns this troll?


I put up a thread about UK celebrity-famous-for-being-famous Jodie Marsh -- viewtopic.php?t=24175 -- honoring a bet made through Bizarre magazine, showing her getting a tattoo on her ass, along with commentary about what's on the video and my thoughts on the video... and I get TROTSed almost immediately.

But IMUS puts up a video without any information except that it involves a meat bikini, and it's allowed to stay up for hours.

Not only that, but Jodie Marsh getting a tattoo on her ass is not illegal.

Enticing multiple canines to eat the meat covering one's pussy, and lick one's bared non-meat covered ass may or may not be illegal -- in the same way non-related adults sleeping in the same bed as 4 year olds may or may not be illegal -- but both are edging towards what is illegal,

and the video went from funny (dog accidentally goes for the sniff) to encouraging bestiality the first time this chick rubbed her ass against a chain link fence for some dogs to lick at.

I turned it off.

So, which one of you mods owns the Imus troll?

Wait, is life fair?

If life was fair, every one of her posts would have an Auto-TROTS feature.

Don't know who trots'd your thread, but probably a good half of your thread hijacking, race-baiting bullshit is trots-worthy, so is it really worth quibbling about?

Regardless, if nothing else, your thread deserved to be trots'd for claiming (in the subject line, no less), that XXXL's thread, that is a prime example of something that was destined for TROTS, should not have ended up there. Bitching about the Trots-ing of another thread is a great way for your bitchy thread to keep the other company in the T1B shit pit.

Trollfessor wrote:Wait, is life fair?

British human female getting ass tattoo to honor a bet: not kosher for T1B

American human female bending ass out for canines to lick her privates: kosher for T1B


which is less safe for work? *And OCMike, XXL likes to surf. XXL isn't putting up a link to a possibly illegal activity. Does not compute that XXL would be TROTSed, and IMUS would be allowed to stay up for hours.


So, Mike, which moderator is the perv bestialist? I don't see Zyclone's name as a Main mod, so it can't be him.

I didn't TROTS it, but I sure see why.


Nobody gives a fuck what you think about the modding. regardless of the content of the rest of the thread.

If you don't like it. Leave. Please.

Don't know who Imus is. Most of the time he blows, as he's out of character (and do we really need a Don Imus troll in the first place?).

Additionally, I couldn't really care less who Imus is, as I've never really gotten into the "guess who is which troll" soap opera aspect at ANY of the boards. I just don't care.

Headhunter wrote: Nobody gives a fuck what you think about the modding. regardless of the content of the rest of the thread.

If you don't like it. Leave. Please.

Bingo.

Risa wrote:Which moderator owns this troll?

Who gives a fuck?

British human female getting ass tattoo to honor a bet: not kosher for T1B

American human female bending ass out for canines to lick her privates: kosher for T1B

NOW you're starting to get it.

BTW - are your nipples still facing upward, or do they look like chocolate meatballs racing down to the sewer? mvscal wants to know - or at least, he's willing to hear tell of it.

PSUFan, you're being weird.

Roach wrote:

...perv bestialist?

Wow that's pretty heavy.

I guess I might have TROTs it if I'd seen it earlier.

But the Imus thread has much more T1B appeal than yours: Provocotive title, dogs, sugestively clad women, genitals, sniffing, hell what more could a generally man's forum want?

It was alright while it was political. Intentionally stupid bitch puts on the pageant face, uses the pageant wave, hoists the America flag, and walks along the boardwalk wearing meat over her tities and pussy while wearing 6 inch heels. That's political. That's making several statements about the government, about corporations, about the carnivore versus vegan debate, about the status of women, about social mores, all at once. That's deep.

But shit lost track as soon as the one dog started trying to eat her bikini off. It's like the cameraman/director lost his mind. And homegirl went along with it, because she's an attention whore.

So, was Imus posting for the politics of the beginning, or the absurdity that came afterwards (I don't know how it ended)?

4th and long. Better punt:

http://www.vidmax.com/index.php/videos/view/1646

Risa wrote:
Blah..vegan...blah...social mores...blah blah...women's issues...blah...That's deep.

That, or it's some almost nekkid bitch in a meat bikini. One of the two.

But shit lost track as soon as the one dog started trying to eat her bikini off. It's like the cameraman/director lost his mind. And homegirl went along with it, because she's an attention whore.

Uh, chances are she went along with it not because she's an attention whore, but because she's a whore-whore. Hell, I've probably beat off to her getting nailed on some pron site or seven.

So, was Imus posting for the politics of the beginning, or the absurdity that came afterwards (I don't know how it ended)?

He was posting a movie of a whore in a meat bikini. What's so hard to grasp about that?

It was alright while it was political. Intentionally stupid bitch puts on the pageant face, uses the pageant wave, hoists the America flag, and walks along the boardwalk wearing meat over her tities and pussy while wearing 6 inch heels. That's political.

No it's not, you fucking god-blamed birdbrain. Go douche with an Uzi RIGHT FUCKING NOW

It was alright while it was political. Intentionally stupid bitch puts on the pageant face, uses the pageant wave, hoists the America flag, and walks along the boardwalk wearing meat over her tities and pussy while wearing 6 inch heels. That's political.

That's about the dumbest thing I've ever heard.


You see some weird shit in your view of the world. The rest of us saw a whore wearing meat.

I'm gonna have to agree with HH on this one IB. You are way off base.

I've seen the show that clip is taken from. Nothing about what that girl or her two other show mates does is even remotely political. The show features the Meat Bikini girl and her two friends doing other "political" things like riding around LA in a van, drinking water and peeing into buckets in an efforts to see who can fill theirs first. They also shit and vomit into said buckets. In another scene, a girl eats a burrito with the pubs of the men who film the show. In another, the girls give themselves a bikini wax by pressing their snatches onto a car's bumper and having someone peel out and pull the wax off their cunts. I wonder what kind of sociopolitical statement THAT was.

Were the antics in Jackass political? No. So a bitch doing similar shit isn't either.

I wonder what kind of sociopolitical statement THAT was.

Perhaps a lone cry in the wild against fossil fuel depletion?

That or a PETA "Fur is Murder" statement possibly.

The show features the Meat Bikini girl and her two friends doing other "political" things like riding around LA in a van, drinking water and peeing into buckets in an efforts to see who can fill theirs first. They also shit and vomit into said buckets. In another scene, a girl eats a burrito with the pubs of the men who film the show. In another, the girls give themselves a bikini wax by pressing their snatches onto a car's bumper and having someone peel out and pull the wax off their cunts.

Damn, I have to see this show. I'll be sure to post a polithread afterward.

I've never heard of or watched the show, Vic. I was just going by the clip. The women sound like drug abusers as well as attention whores. That -- or what is claimed on the show, isn't reality (a la that old joke about the guy who wanted out of the army, and came up with an elaborate plan to eat peanut butter out of a toilet to prove his insanity). And off-topic, would a similar show employing black women be thought of as 'jackass style porn'; or evidence of the deterioration within black culture and the bestial nature of black people?

On topic, that blows my mind that anyone would do such things. But again, it's just attention whoring. I've always wondered what happened to those women. A parade of 20 somethings, who are replaced as rapidly as they appeared. The rest of the story is needed.

The original concept of this clip, to me, was genius. Here's a woman who is butt-nekkid under her 'clothes' (aren't we all). She is using 'flesh', to cover her flesh. On the one hand she might as well wear leather. On the other, her use of animal muscle to cover herself is like wearing a negligee of air (to reset Roc). It's all meat, so why isn't it ok to go around butt nekkid in one's living flesh, but butchering another living creature to cover one's living flesh in dead flesh is permissible?

She seems, to me, to symbolize the wastefulness of American consumerism because here she is wearing the premium eating cuts of the meat but where is the rest of that cow? that pole is not bone; that flag is not sinew, blood and skin; her feet are not protected by hooves and skin. She's not even consuming that meat, she only jokingly tells a woman that she plans to cook the meat after her walk... but she has no problem whatsoever allowing dogs to lick at that meat. She has no problem tossing those pieces to the dogs. If she really needed that meat, she would have fought those dogs for it.... or she would have, indeed cooked that meat even after the dogs licked at it. She wasn't tossing it to them for the dog's benefit. Wasteful. Maybe she did cook and eat that meat after the dogs, I didn't watch the rest of the video. Did she?

On top of that, even her interaction with the dogs was in ways in which she distanced herself from them. The dogs receive what she wastes... but only to keep the dogs away from her until she's ready to use them (the dogs), as either garbage disposals or temporary entertainment for herself... then she moves away as soon as she can, while others hold the dogs back. The dogs exist for her benefit, as she holds that flag. The dogs receiving any benefit from her is at *her* whim, and on her time table. That's America using the rest of the world.

The fake pageant smile and the fake pageant wave are symbolic of the lies of the meat industry. 'Meat, it's what's for dinner', said the ad. But the ad never said anything about how that meat came to your table in the first place. Make the ad (in her case, her body and smile) attractive so that people don't worry about questions about why the ad exists (in her case, why she's out there in a meat bikini), and what the ad is covering up in it's attempt to get you to eat Meat.

The high heels mean pain for the sake of privilege. The high heels are a form of the Pedestal (tm). If she were truly naked, or advocating nakedness, she'd be barefoot. The high heels literally place her 'above' people, while thrusting her forward and outward, 'look at me!' But she's hobbled by those same heels (at least, how she was walking when I saw it. That first viewing could have left a wrong impression on me). America pays a price for its self-hobbling, but the rest of the world (the human on-lookers, the dogs) accept it.

If she tripped and fell, she'd be overrun with no ability to defend herself unless she used those heels to fight with instead of run on. She doesn't appear to be much of a fighter. She's counting on the camera -- a camera she owns -- to keep people in their proper places in relation to her, and on the dog's leashes to keep them from turning an absurdity into something that could get out of control very quickly. The camera could represent one of a couple things, in that case. The leashes are obvious.

She's too stupid to worry about falling and tripping. The camera will be there for her. And what doesn't protect her will be excised as if it never happened.

Finally, it's a kick in the ass to PETA. How can you drench someone in blood and offal who is already covered, literally, in blood and symbolic offal? PETA can talk all the shit they want about fur............. but they are still covering their own nakedness with fake ads meant to use attractiveness to prevent questioning what their real agenda is and how they obtain their goals. That, and they need to be honest about how they cover their own literal nakedness day to day.

Last, women are only allowed to be useful as the tools of men. Woman do not control the tools, they are tools... and can be replaced as tools are. Unless the cameraman is actually a woman. The camerawork didn't give off the vibe of femaleness, though.

That's some of the politics I got out of what I saw in that video. And then I turned it off, because I finally got that they weren't trying to make a point at all, they were just attention whoring, and the cameraman, as I stated, had lost his mind after the first dog.

Why is this shit being sold on the internet?

Invictus wrote:I'm gonna have to agree with HH on this one IB. You are way off base.

I've seen the show that clip is taken from. Nothing about what that girl or her two other show mates does is even remotely political. The show features the Meat Bikini girl and her two friends doing other "political" things like riding around LA in a van, drinking water and peeing into buckets in an efforts to see who can fill theirs first. They also shit and vomit into said buckets. In another scene, a girl eats a burrito with the pubs of the men who film the show. In another, the girls give themselves a bikini wax by pressing their snatches onto a car's bumper and having someone peel out and pull the wax off their cunts. I wonder what kind of sociopolitical statement THAT was.

Were the antics in Jackass political? No. So a bitch doing similar shit isn't either.

I'm trying to figure out when I or anybody else on this board drunk/sleep/otherwise posted that we needed Risa back. We did not. Truly, I'd rather have ('Skins) Dame back. At least she was cool, intelligent and posted some hot models every once in a while. God bless her. Hell...I would gladly have index back here in a New York minute rather than Risa. I mean, dude was a bonafide iodot (hence my gloss for him, "iodex", and my occasional posts that he was actually a white supremacist pretending to be a stupid black man, because I don't think I've ever actually met a brother that retarded) but he was entertaining. Even if it was usually unintentional.

How fucked up is Risa? I'd keep LTS TRN 2 on here rather than her. And I think I've made abundantly clear that LTS TRN 2 would do us, himself, and the world at large a service if he offed himself. Now that's seriously fucked up.

Risa wrote:I've never heard of or watched the show, Vic. I was just going by the clip. The women sound like drug abusers as well as attention whores. That -- or what is claimed on the show, isn't reality (a la that old joke about the guy who wanted out of the army, and came up with an elaborate plan to eat peanut butter out of a toilet to prove his insanity). And off-topic, would a similar show employing black women be thought of as 'jackass style porn'; or evidence of the deterioration within black culture and the bestial nature of black people?

On topic, that blows my mind that anyone would do such things. But again, it's just attention whoring. I've always wondered what happened to those women. A parade of 20 somethings, who are replaced as rapidly as they appeared. The rest of the story is needed.

The original concept of this clip, to me, was genius. Here's a woman who is butt-nekkid under her 'clothes' (aren't we all). She is using 'flesh', to cover her flesh. On the one hand she might as well wear leather. On the other, her use of animal muscle to cover herself is like wearing a negligee of air (to reset Roc). It's all meat, so why isn't it ok to go around butt nekkid in one's living flesh, but butchering another living creature to cover one's living flesh in dead flesh is permissible?

She seems, to me, to symbolize the wastefulness of American consumerism because here she is wearing the premium eating cuts of the meat but where is the rest of that cow? that pole is not bone; that flag is not sinew, blood and skin; her feet are not protected by hooves and skin. She's not even consuming that meat, she only jokingly tells a woman that she plans to cook the meat after her walk... but she has no problem whatsoever allowing dogs to lick at that meat. She has no problem tossing those pieces to the dogs. If she really needed that meat, she would have fought those dogs for it.... or she would have, indeed cooked that meat even after the dogs licked at it. She wasn't tossing it to them for the dog's benefit. Wasteful. Maybe she did cook and eat that meat after the dogs, I didn't watch the rest of the video. Did she?

On top of that, even her interaction with the dogs was in ways in which she distanced herself from them. The dogs receive what she wastes... but only to keep the dogs away from her until she's ready to use them (the dogs), as either garbage disposals or temporary entertainment for herself... then she moves away as soon as she can, while others hold the dogs back. The dogs exist for her benefit, as she holds that flag. The dogs receiving any benefit from her is at *her* whim, and on her time table. That's America using the rest of the world.

The fake pageant smile and the fake pageant wave are symbolic of the lies of the meat industry. 'Meat, it's what's for dinner', said the ad. But the ad never said anything about how that meat came to your table in the first place. Make the ad (in her case, her body and smile) attractive so that people don't worry about questions about why the ad exists (in her case, why she's out there in a meat bikini), and what the ad is covering up in it's attempt to get you to eat Meat.

The high heels mean pain for the sake of privilege. The high heels are a form of the Pedestal (tm). If she were truly naked, or advocating nakedness, she'd be barefoot. The high heels literally place her 'above' people, while thrusting her forward and outward, 'look at me!' But she's hobbled by those same heels (at least, how she was walking when I saw it. That first viewing could have left a wrong impression on me). America pays a price for its self-hobbling, but the rest of the world (the human on-lookers, the dogs) accept it.

If she tripped and fell, she'd be overrun with no ability to defend herself unless she used those heels to fight with instead of run on. She doesn't appear to be much of a fighter. She's counting on the camera -- a camera she owns -- to keep people in their proper places in relation to her, and on the dog's leashes to keep them from turning an absurdity into something that could get out of control very quickly. The camera could represent one of a couple things, in that case. The leashes are obvious.

She's too stupid to worry about falling and tripping. The camera will be there for her. And what doesn't protect her will be excised as if it never happened.

Finally, it's a kick in the ass to PETA. How can you drench someone in blood and offal who is already covered, literally, in blood and symbolic offal? PETA can talk all the shit they want about fur............. but they are still covering their own nakedness with fake ads meant to use attractiveness to prevent questioning what their real agenda is and how they obtain their goals. That, and they need to be honest about how they cover their own literal nakedness day to day.

Last, women are only allowed to be useful as the tools of men. Woman do not control the tools, they are tools... and can be replaced as tools are. Unless the cameraman is actually a woman. The camerawork didn't give off the vibe of femaleness, though.

That's some of the politics I got out of what I saw in that video. And then I turned it off, because I finally got that they weren't trying to make a point at all, they were just attention whoring, and the cameraman, as I stated, had lost his mind after the first dog.

Why is this shit being sold on the internet?

Invictus wrote:I'm gonna have to agree with HH on this one IB. You are way off base.

I've seen the show that clip is taken from. Nothing about what that girl or her two other show mates does is even remotely political. The show features the Meat Bikini girl and her two friends doing other "political" things like riding around LA in a van, drinking water and peeing into buckets in an efforts to see who can fill theirs first. They also shit and vomit into said buckets. In another scene, a girl eats a burrito with the pubs of the men who film the show. In another, the girls give themselves a bikini wax by pressing their snatches onto a car's bumper and having someone peel out and pull the wax off their cunts. I wonder what kind of sociopolitical statement THAT was.

Were the antics in Jackass political? No. So a bitch doing similar shit isn't either.

I want my 5 seconds back that I wasted scrolling past that post...

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote: I want my 5 seconds back that I wasted scrolling past that post...

You're a Ween fan. Your life is already wasted.