I love NBC busting these freakophiles.

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Thu May 11, 2006 1:39 am

fucking pervs trying to hump on kids oughta have their necks snapped

jtr · Post by **jtr** » Thu May 11, 2006 1:44 am

when animals stuck in human bodies go wild!

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Thu May 11, 2006 1:44 am

Fucking classic!!

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu May 11, 2006 2:16 am

Didn't NBC wire up some c-4 to a chevy pick up just to make sure it exploded real nice for the cameras in one of their previous "exposes"

$5 says all those Diegos they "caught" are NBC employees

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Thu May 11, 2006 2:30 am

Cuda wrote:Didn't NBC wire up some c-4 to a chevy pick up just to make sure it exploded real nice for the cameras in one of their previous "exposes"

$5 says all those Diegos they "caught" are NBC employees

...ok, I'm tired of seeing Mick Foley go up in flames!

Rich Fader · Post by **Rich Fader** » Thu May 11, 2006 2:30 am

Cuda wrote:Didn't NBC wire up some c-4 to a chevy pick up just to make sure it exploded real nice for the cameras in one of their previous "exposes"

$5 says all those Diegos they "caught" are NBC employees

...which is not necessarily the same as saying they're fake pervs.

:twisted:

And yes, the "exploding pickup" was a Detcord NBC story.

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Thu May 11, 2006 2:41 am

Cuda wrote:Didn't NBC wire up some c-4 to a chevy pick up just to make sure it exploded real nice for the cameras in one of their previous "exposes"

$5 says all those Diegos they "caught" are NBC employees

they ain't gotta do nothin to make these guys implode on camera.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Thu May 11, 2006 2:42 am

Cuda wrote:$5 says all those Diegos they "caught" are NBC employees

Nah ... way too many complete dumbfucks who think they can get over via the Internet, despite these sting operations -- both from TV and law enforcement -- going on for years now.

I used to chat in Yahoo in the late-90s, early 2000s, in the 30s rooms. It's been more than a year since I checked in -- haven't since, mainly because there are way too many seriously moronic people online. When it comes to the Internet, Alexander Hamilton was right.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu May 11, 2006 4:15 am

i watched this shit tonight. every single one of those fuckers brought rubbers, RACK the cops for taking every single one of those assholes down hard. the guy from dateline was a big douche, but he's just riding the coattails of this. nbc (and perverted justice, or whatever the name is) could go to every state and set up stings like this and have new weekly footage for the next five years, this could be the next cops or amerikkka's most wanted. seeing various pieces of shit showing up is just too good. the dude with the kid? the final guy, the hillbilly from texas now in fla, the puerto rican guy. fuck those pieces of shit.

the biggest thing that stuck out to me was how utterly stupid all these guys were. obviously they are all mentally deficient because of what they are doing, but when the dateline guy came out, only a few guys hit the eject button right away, if at all. 80% of them tried to talk themselves out of it, not even knowing who the fuck this old guy or even what was going on. what worthless pieces of shit.

my favorite was the eminem wanna be 21 year old who brought his sister and her two kids around. i would have shot him in the face myself. "hey nbc, two words: role-playing chat room." and "i don't need 14-year old girls, i got plenty of girls."

Roofer · Post by **Roofer** » Thu May 11, 2006 4:48 am

LMAO

I'm watching this shit right now.

"Would you like some milk to go with those cookies"?

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Thu May 11, 2006 12:39 pm

Love the show- fuck those pervs if this is real!

But my question- how are they able to broadcast their faces? I thought they had to sign a release form to have their images transmitted. If these guys are really the pervs they are and don't want people to know- why would they allow NBC to use their images?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu May 11, 2006 1:38 pm

Jsc810 wrote:
RadioFan wrote:When it comes to the Internet, Alexander Hamilton was right.
What did he say?

I think he said to keep them mvscals chilled, because the Wolf will be comming directly.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Thu May 11, 2006 2:06 pm

RadioFan wrote:
Cuda wrote:$5 says all those Diegos they "caught" are NBC employees
Nah ... way too many complete dumbfucks who think they can get over via the Internet, despite these sting operations -- both from TV and law enforcement -- going on for years now.

I used to chat in Yahoo in the late-90s, early 2000s, in the 30s rooms. It's been more than a year since I checked in -- haven't since, mainly because there are way too many seriously moronic people online. When it comes to the Internet, Alexander Hamilton was right.

I used to chat in a chat room on yahoo as well; while I was in college and for a little while afterwards. Once or twice a year I pop in still to see who is still around. It was room that centered on college athletics and I actualy met a handful of people from the room at different sporting events. Nothing too dis-similar than from what used to go on at the Troll Stops but I stopped going in as often after I fot married, the little girls and boys started coming in, and porn bots got out of controll. It was back in my days of heavy drinking (something I am thankful that my wife gave me the purpose to bring to a hault, never forced me mind you I just didn't feel the need to drink as often) and most of the get togethers centered around sporting events, as I stated, and lots booze. Nobody was ever underage, hell most of the time I was by far and away the youngest of the bunch getting together. A couple of still keep incontact through myspace but that place is beggining to get out of controll as well. MOst of the ladies from the crew have changed their profiles to saying 14 so the pervs can't harrass them as much which is rather sad because it makes it so much more difficult too communicate because of the filters.

The internet is just getting out of controll basically. .

DMike316 · Post by **DMike316** » Thu May 11, 2006 2:09 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote:The internet is just getting out of controll basically.

I'll bet Al Gore never saw this coming when he invented the internet.

Invictus · Post by **Invictus** » Thu May 11, 2006 2:23 pm

BSmack wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:
RadioFan wrote:When it comes to the Internet, Alexander Hamilton was right.
What did he say?
I think he said to keep them mvscals chilled, because the Wolf will be comming directly.

Sheet negro, that's all you had to say.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Thu May 11, 2006 3:48 pm

DMike316 wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote:The internet is just getting out of controll basically.
I'll bet Al Gore never saw this coming when he invented the internet.

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu May 11, 2006 4:11 pm

theses shitstains need to be taken down. however, at the end of the day, all they did was talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop.

sayin.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu May 11, 2006 4:29 pm

titlover wrote:theses shitstains need to be taken down. however, at the end of the day, all they did was talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop.

sayin.

Yea, but they THOUGHT they were talking to someone's 13 year old daughter.

The same logic applies to the dudes who buy oregano from undercover cops.

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu May 11, 2006 4:32 pm

BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:theses shitstains need to be taken down. however, at the end of the day, all they did was talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop.

sayin.
Yea, but they THOUGHT they were talking to someone's 13 year old daughter.

The same logic applies to the dudes who buy oregano from undercover cops.

no. the cop is real. the little girl doesn't exist.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu May 11, 2006 4:51 pm

titlover wrote:
BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:theses shitstains need to be taken down. however, at the end of the day, all they did was talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop.

sayin.
Yea, but they THOUGHT they were talking to someone's 13 year old daughter.

The same logic applies to the dudes who buy oregano from undercover cops.
no. the cop is real. the little girl doesn't exist.

You're being deliberately dense. Intent is an element of a crime. Period.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm

BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:theses shitstains need to be taken down. however, at the end of the day, all they did was talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop.

sayin.
Yea, but they THOUGHT they were talking to someone's 13 year old daughter.

The same logic applies to the dudes who buy oregano from undercover cops.

What sorry excuses for pot heads. I got jipped once in Junior High and after that I knew the difference between Oregano and the Mary Jane.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu May 11, 2006 5:00 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:Intent is an element of a crime. Period.
All elements of the crime must be established.

No shit. That's why they get these jackoffs to commit an overt act as well. Like go meet them for the purpose of having sex.

M2 · Post by M2 » Thu May 11, 2006 5:07 pm

I guess there really isn't much too watch on tv.

What happened to the days when people actually had lives?

Looking in people's closets is the new entertainment?

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu May 11, 2006 5:41 pm

BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:
BSmack wrote: Yea, but they THOUGHT they were talking to someone's 13 year old daughter.

The same logic applies to the dudes who buy oregano from undercover cops.
no. the cop is real. the little girl doesn't exist.
You're being deliberately dense. Intent is an element of a crime. Period.

no, I'm not. it is teetering on entrapment and unconstitutionality.

Nishlord · Post by **Nishlord** » Thu May 11, 2006 5:43 pm

titlover wrote:theses shitstains need to be taken down. however, at the end of the day, all they did was talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop.

sayin.

You're very dim.

Tip for any single women out there; if you want cybersex with a hunky police officer, go in a kid's chatroom and predend to be a paedophile.

By the way - what was the NBC programme called? The BBC did a three-part documentary called The Hunt For Britain's Paedophiles, and it was grim as fuck, although essential viewing. It's doing the rounds on torrent boards at the moment and is highly recommended.

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Thu May 11, 2006 5:53 pm

titlover wrote: no, I'm not. it is teetering on entrapment and unconstitutionality.

Entrapment would be the 40 yr old cop posing as the 14 year old girl intiating the dirty talk to the man and then arresting him for it after. The cops just sit in a room talking about stupid shite and wait. These fucks IM the "child", bring it up and they are the ones that solicit sexual favors- cyber or otherwise. That is a crime.

There is nothing different than a female cop standing on the corner posing as a hooker, then arresting a john for offering to pay her to lick his love pump.

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu May 11, 2006 5:53 pm

Nishlord wrote:
titlover wrote:theses shitstains need to be taken down. however, at the end of the day, all they did was talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop.

sayin.
You're very dim.

Tip for any single women out there; if you want cybersex with a hunky police officer, go in a kid's chatroom and predend to be a paedophile.

By the way - what was the NBC programme called? The BBC did a three-part documentary called The Hunt For Britain's Paedophiles, and it was grim as fuck, although essential viewing. It's doing the rounds on torrent boards at the moment and is highly recommended.

you're very uninformed about the Constitution. stick with the monarchy shit, fuckhead.

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:05 pm

BBMarley wrote:
titlover wrote: no, I'm not. it is teetering on entrapment and unconstitutionality.
Entrapment would be the 40 yr old cop posing as the 14 year old girl intiating the dirty talk to the man and then arresting him for it after. The cops just sit in a room talking about stupid shite and wait. These fucks IM the "child", bring it up and they are the ones that solicit sexual favors- cyber or otherwise. That is a crime.

There is nothing different than a female cop standing on the corner posing as a hooker, then arresting a john for offering to pay her to lick his love pump.

He IS posing as a 14 yo. there isn't a child. what's the difference if he called some sex line and told the chick to act like a little girl or have his wife dress like a school girl? getting very close to the thought police here.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:14 pm

BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:theses shitstains need to be taken down. however, at the end of the day, all they did was talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop.

sayin.
Yea, but they THOUGHT they were talking to someone's 13 year old daughter.

The same logic applies to the dudes who buy oregano from undercover cops.

Was Inky Dave into oregano too?

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:18 pm

titlover wrote:
BBMarley wrote:
titlover wrote: no, I'm not. it is teetering on entrapment and unconstitutionality.
Entrapment would be the 40 yr old cop posing as the 14 year old girl intiating the dirty talk to the man and then arresting him for it after. The cops just sit in a room talking about stupid shite and wait. These fucks IM the "child", bring it up and they are the ones that solicit sexual favors- cyber or otherwise. That is a crime.

There is nothing different than a female cop standing on the corner posing as a hooker, then arresting a john for offering to pay her to lick his love pump.
He IS posing as a 14 yo. there isn't a child. what's the difference if he called some sex line and told the chick to act like a little girl or have his wife dress like a school girl? getting very close to the thought police here.

Okay- let's take this one step at a time. Its not the posing that is entrapment. It would only be entrapment if the cop, posing as the child, IMed a guy in a room and said. "Hi, I'm 14, horny and willing. I want you to come over to my house and fuck me like a wild beast". But that's not what happens. These cops sit in the chat room and wait for someone to IM them. THEN- they talk normal to them (about school, life, etc...) and wait for the sick fuck on the other end to bring up sex. They don't go into details- leaving that to the IRIE on the other end to hang himself

And having a 21 year old consenting woman pose as a young child is not a crime- and no one is saying it is. It is sick & disqusting- but they are consenting adults. You are tryng to compare apples & oranges.

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:29 pm

BBMarley wrote:
titlover wrote:
BBMarley wrote: Entrapment would be the 40 yr old cop posing as the 14 year old girl intiating the dirty talk to the man and then arresting him for it after. The cops just sit in a room talking about stupid shite and wait. These fucks IM the "child", bring it up and they are the ones that solicit sexual favors- cyber or otherwise. That is a crime.

There is nothing different than a female cop standing on the corner posing as a hooker, then arresting a john for offering to pay her to lick his love pump.
He IS posing as a 14 yo. there isn't a child. what's the difference if he called some sex line and told the chick to act like a little girl or have his wife dress like a school girl? getting very close to the thought police here.
Okay- let's take this one step at a time. Its not the posing that is entrapment. It would only be entrapment if the cop, posing as the child, IMed a guy in a room and said. "Hi, I'm 14, horny and willing. I want you to come over to my house and fuck me like a wild beast". But that's not what happens. These cops sit in the chat room and wait for someone to IM them. THEN- they talk normal to them (about school, life, etc...) and wait for the sick fuck on the other end to bring up sex. They don't go into details- leaving that to the IRIE on the other end to hang himself

And having a 21 year old consenting woman pose as a young child is not a crime- and no one is saying it is. It is sick & disqusting- but they are consenting adults. You are tryng to compare apples & oranges.

ok, it's illegal to buy dope from anyone, posing or not. it's not illegal to talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop even though the perp was thinking it was a little girl. how is that any different if some dude's girlfriend dresses up like a little girl while he bangs her. how do you know he really isn't hoping it is a little girl for a few minutes. it's thought police shit.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:32 pm

titlover wrote:ok, it's illegal to buy dope from anyone, posing or not. it's not illegal to talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop even though the perp was thinking it was a little girl.

That's where you're wrong.

You're just going to spin this around in circles anyway. So if you want to think it is OK to talk dirty to a 13 year old girl, send her nude pics of yourself and make plans to have sex with her, by all means please feel free to give it a go. I hope it all works out for you in prison.

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:36 pm

BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:ok, it's illegal to buy dope from anyone, posing or not. it's not illegal to talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop even though the perp was thinking it was a little girl.
That's where you're wrong.

You're just going to spin this around in circles anyway. So if you want to think it is OK to talk dirty to a 13 year old girl, send her nude pics of yourself and make plans to have sex with her, by all means please feel free to give it a go. I hope it all works out for you in prison.

there is no 13 yr. old girl. that's my god damn point!!!

it's illegal to buy weed from ANYONE!!!!!!!!

jtr · Post by **jtr** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:38 pm

Waiting for some network to run this same thing but for women pedophiles looking for young boys, dont laugh they are probably out there.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:39 pm

titlover wrote:
BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:ok, it's illegal to buy dope from anyone, posing or not. it's not illegal to talk dirty to a 40 yr old cop even though the perp was thinking it was a little girl.
That's where you're wrong.

You're just going to spin this around in circles anyway. So if you want to think it is OK to talk dirty to a 13 year old girl, send her nude pics of yourself and make plans to have sex with her, by all means please feel free to give it a go. I hope it all works out for you in prison.
there is no 13 yr. old girl. that's my god damn point!!!

it's illegal to buy weed from ANYONE!!!!!!!!

And if one is buying oregano from an undercover narc, there is NO POT.

Is this shit starting to sink in yet?

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:48 pm

BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:
BSmack wrote: That's where you're wrong.

You're just going to spin this around in circles anyway. So if you want to think it is OK to talk dirty to a 13 year old girl, send her nude pics of yourself and make plans to have sex with her, by all means please feel free to give it a go. I hope it all works out for you in prison.
there is no 13 yr. old girl. that's my god damn point!!!

it's illegal to buy weed from ANYONE!!!!!!!!
And if one is buying oregano from an undercover narc, there is NO POT.

Is this shit starting to sink in yet?

it's illegal to buy pot from anyone, anytime, anywhere (withing US borders and save the whole mendicinal thing). so intent is very easy to prove. it's not illegal to talk nasty to a cop even if you thought you were getting some little girl. not trying to spin it in circles, just saying this tactic is prolly one step too far. it's no different than two people online role playing. it's sick, depraved, but not illegal.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:49 pm

titlover wrote:it's illegal to buy pot from anyone, anytime, anywhere (withing US borders and save the whole mendicinal thing). so intent is very easy to prove. it's not illegal to talk nasty to a cop even if you thought you were getting some little girl. not trying to spin it in circles, just saying this tactic is prolly one step too far. it's no different than two people online role playing. it's sick, depraved, but not illegal.

It is damn easy to prove intent. That's what chat logs are for.

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:53 pm

BSmack wrote:
It is damn easy to prove intent. That's what chat logs are for.

And showing up at the "kid's" house with condoms and alcohol after said chat

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:54 pm

BBMarley wrote:
BSmack wrote:
It is damn easy to prove intent. That's what chat logs are for.
And showing up at the "kid's" house with condoms and alcohol after said chat

That would be the kicker.

Uncle Fester · Post by **Uncle Fester** » Thu May 11, 2006 6:56 pm

Why don't they just grab the guys who show up, load them on a burning wooden ship, and send it off Niagara Falls?