T1B

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:29 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote:
smackaholic wrote:watching idiots brag about how much they overpay for their housing will never not be funny.

btw, 20 minutes to work, 45-50 if i ride my bike. i owe 49K on my house.

me.
How's your unemployment rate?

I believe it is a bit under 9% at the moment, which is slightly under the average. I 'spose DC has the lowest in the country since you fukks have been sucking the life out of the rest of the country since, well, the last 80 years or so. I suspect this will change fairly soon, once even DC realizes the well is dry.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:33 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:You live in Wisconsin. That pretty much is Iowa. It's all Iowa.

-m2

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:37 pm**

Mace and Goober wrote:Hills, lakes, forests.

-Dins

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:42 pm**

smackaholic wrote:I 'spose DC has the lowest in the country since you fukks have been sucking the life out of the rest of the country since, well, the last 80 years or so.

Technically, Screw sucks up life into a mop.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:44 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
There is a difference.
Fair enough.

One is boring flat land with corn and fat chicks.
The other, boring flat land with cheese and fat chicks.

Iowa chicks are fatter and nastier with hygiene issues. Wisconsin chicks are prettier, a bit on the heavier side and can at least carry a conversation.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:44 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
smackaholic wrote:I 'spose DC has the lowest in the country since you fukks have been sucking the life out of the rest of the country since, well, the last 80 years or so.
Technically, Screw sucks up life into a mop.

Sometimes he uses a mop.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:50 pm**

Mace wrote:Besides that, we've got a better football team.

No, you don't.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:56 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
Mace wrote:Besides that, we've got a better football team.
No, you don't.

Still in denial, Goobs? Check the score from last fall and get back to me. For that matter, check the head to head over the past decade. Using your rationale, I guess Iowa is better than Ohio State. :roll:

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:02 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
Mace wrote:Besides that, we've got a better football team.
No, you don't.

Sorry I forgot the:

Sincerely,

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:08 pm**

The Packers? Okay, I'll give you that one....but only because the Pack refuses to schedule the Hawkeyes.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:14 pm**

Just wanted to remind you that Wisconsin has professional sports franchises. Iowa has a football team, a wrestling team and a fan base epitomized by theJON.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:36 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:Just wanted to remind you that Wisconsin has professional sports franchises. Iowa has a football team, a wrestling team and a fan base epitomized by theJON.

I was fully aware that Wisconsin has professional teams and that Iowa does not, Goobs, and, yes, we've got a good football team and the best wrestling team in the country, but I would dispute that JON epitomizes the Iowa fan base....although you're probably not far off the mark. The same folks who praise Ferentz and Norm Parker right now were the ones calling for their heads a few short years ago. The same folks are now calling for Lickliter's head and are too stupid to realize that we've got a good basketball coach who simply needs a few years to get things moving in the right direction. There are a number of Iowa fans who I would describe as frontrunning bitches who know nothing of what they speak when it comes to athletics....and I would not include JON in that category.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:46 pm**

BSmack wrote:
Mikey wrote:In most of California 1200 sf would get you a small 2 br apartment.

Average detached home size is probably upwards of 2200. Around here more like 2800 - 3000.
Really? Here's now many single family homes under 1250 sq feet are for sale in Fallbrook.

http://www.trulia.com/for_sale/Fallbroo ... 1250_sqft/

So you found, what, 34 homes at 1250 sf and below. I compliment on your search engine capabilities.

Did you happen to notice that they're mostly grouped in a few parts of town, a lot of them are 1 or 2 bedrooms and mostly at least 40 years old? At least one of them's a trailer and one is basically a shack that somebody's selling as a SFH

. And almost all are foreclosures.

If you knew anything about Fallbrook you might be able to draw some conclusions from this, but I won't bore you with local details.

A search in the same zip code for 2000 sf and above brings up 197 listings. About 1/2 of them are over 3000 sf.

http://www.trulia.com/for_sale/Fallbroo ... ce;a_sort/

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:34 pm**

Mace wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
smackaholic wrote:I 'spose DC has the lowest in the country since you fukks have been sucking the life out of the rest of the country since, well, the last 80 years or so.
Technically, Screw sucks up life into a mop.
Sometimes he uses a mop.

Both RACKable posts-btw-imo.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:39 pm**

Mace wrote: Hills, lakes, forests? If you think that all of Iowa is flat, then you've never been in southern Iowa.

Hmm... well I've been in southern Iowa many times, at least in the western part, and I don't recall much in the way of hilly terrain. Unless what you're referring to are river bluffs, which I suppose would seem not flat in comparison to the ginormous rivers you have bordering your flanks.

So I was curious and broke out the trusty ol' Rand McNally Atlas:

Iowa Highest Point: Osceola County, 1670 ft. which happens to be in the far northwestern quadrant of your hogfarm. It's not even any particular hill, but an entire fucking county they're referring to. That kinda' epitomizes how nondescript Iowa is.

Now before you go scrambling for your Atlas, Mace, let me save you the time and trouble of finding your bi-focals.

Missouri Highest point: Taum Sauk Mtn, 1772 ft. in the beautiful Ozarks.

And Goobs, save it. Yes, I looked and Wisconsin has some hill called Timmons which measues a mighty 1,951 ft. above sea level.

Of course Dins is giggling like an hysterical schoolgirl right about now so might I just add that Iowa and Wisconsin ragging on each other is akin to Missouri and Arkansas doing the same.

Posted: **Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:47 pm**

War Wagon wrote:Of course Dins is giggling like an hysterical schoolgirl right about now

Well, that 1670 feet is a little more than was lost off the top of Mt St Helens 30 years ago.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:17 am**

War Wagon wrote:
Mace wrote: Hills, lakes, forests? If you think that all of Iowa is flat, then you've never been in southern Iowa.
Hmm... well I've been in southern Iowa many times, at least in the western part, and I don't recall much in the way of hilly terrain. Unless what you're referring to are river bluffs, which I suppose would seem not flat in comparison to the ginormous rivers you have bordering your flanks.

So I was curious and broke out the trusty ol' Rand McNally Atlas:

Iowa Highest Point: Osceola County, 1670 ft. which happens to be in the far northwestern quadrant of your hogfarm. It's not even any particular hill, but an entire fucking county they're referring to. That kinda' epitomizes how nondescript Iowa is.

Now before you go scrambling for your Atlas, Mace, let me save you the time and trouble of finding your bi-focals.

Missouri Highest point: Taum Sauk Mtn, 1772 ft. in the beautiful Ozarks.

And Goobs, save it. Yes, I looked and Wisconsin has some hill called Timmons which measues a mighty 1,951 ft. above sea level.

Of course Dins is giggling like an hysterical schoolgirl right about now so might I just add that Iowa and Wisconsin ragging on each other is akin to Missouri and Arkansas doing the same.

I wasn't comparing southern Iowa with the Ozarks, Wisconsin, or Oregon, Wags, but was simply saying that not all of Iowa is flat. South central and southeastern Iowa resemble northern Missouri in terrain. As for Osceola County, it may be the highest point in Iowa, but the terrain is flat as your wife's chest. It's got something to do with that whole glacier thing that passed through Iowa when I was a young child.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:32 am**

while we're on the subject of highest points, CT has an interesting fact in this regard. I think it is unique in the US, but, not sure.

It's highest "mountain" (thought I'd throw those quotes in there for ya, dins) is not it's highest point. bear mt is the highest peak as somewhere around 2000 ft, which apparently gives us bode over wisconsin, iowa and a handful of other states. It's highest point is actually on the slope of neighboring Mt frissell. who has the lowest high point? gotta be either florida or possibly delaware. i'm pretty sure the highest bit of land in florida is probably where they plowed some up for an overpass.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:37 am**

Mace wrote:...the terrain is flat as your wife's chest.

Hey now!

I thought you said you weren't at that trollstop in Lamoni.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:43 am**

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:28 am**

Arch Angel wrote: Wisconsin chicks are prettier, a bit on the heavier side and can at least carry a conversation.

" Twenty dollars for a blow job, or you can fuck me with out a condom for fifty dollars" is not a conversation. It is a business transaction.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:37 am**

Mikey wrote:A search in the same zip code for 2000 sf and above brings up 197 listings. About 1/2 of them are over 3000 sf.

And this is what passes for a backyard in a 300k home in California?

319k for a 2400 sq ft home and this is a short sale?

http://www.trulia.com/property/30017120 ... k-CA-92028

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:42 pm**

smackaholic wrote: who has the lowest high point? gotta be either florida or possibly delaware. i'm pretty sure the highest bit of land in florida is probably where they plowed some up for an overpass.

I would have guessed Louisiana, what with New Orleans sitting below sea level. But actually it’s California. Death Valley sits 282 feet below sea level.

Google is your friend. Or at least a casual acquaintance.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:26 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
smackaholic wrote: who has the lowest high point? gotta be either florida or possibly delaware. i'm pretty sure the highest bit of land in florida is probably where they plowed some up for an overpass.
I would have guessed Louisiana, what with New Orleans sitting below sea level. But actually it’s California. Death Valley sits 282 feet below sea level.

Google is your friend. Or at least a casual acquaintance.

English is your friend, or maybe not.

And you needed Google to learn that Death Valley is the lowest point in the USA?

Really?

Florida has the "lowest high point," and I didn't need Google to know that either. I suppose Flyovers don't take nearly the interest in topography that us humans do.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:30 pm**

If Google ever takes a long time to load, that's because it's trying to track down Dinsdale.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:32 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
smackaholic wrote: who has the lowest high point? gotta be either florida or possibly delaware. i'm pretty sure the highest bit of land in florida is probably where they plowed some up for an overpass.
I would have guessed Louisiana, what with New Orleans sitting below sea level. But actually it’s California. Death Valley sits 282 feet below sea level.

Google is your friend. Or at least a casual acquaintance.
English is your friend, or maybe not.

Dinsdale wrote:Hell, an expansion team from a state known for cousin-fucking and a disdian for education has one the Cup MUCH more recently than any of your pathetic teams... because none of the good players want to live in your shithole.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:39 pm**

a disdian for education has one the Cup MUCH more recently than any of your pathetic teams

EH-LIMINATED!

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:23 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:If Google ever takes a long time to load, that's because it's trying to track down Dinsdale.

Exactly. Dinsdale does not use Google. If Dinsdale happens to get something wrong, Google goes back and adjust their links accordingly.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:26 pm**

If you seem lost while on the way from point A to point B using your DinsDins device, you didn't know where the fuck you were going to begin with. DinsDins will show you the RIGHT way.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:46 pm**

Dinsdale is a man of many functions - one of them being a human toilet.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:55 pm**

oh my heavens.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:17 pm**

smackaholic wrote:who has the lowest high point?

Posted: **Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:49 am**

WAGS?!

Wags!!

Posted: **Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:05 am**

and now we return you to your originally scheduled thread...

what exactly is this treatment tiger is getting?

seems to me there is one treatment for his ailment.

chop his fukking balls off!!!!

i am so fukking tired of this bullshit story. all the fukking psychoanalyzing.

he doesn't need "treatment".

he doesn't have an illness.

he's a fukking bazillionaire dude doing what most any dude would do, given the opportunity.

all tiger needs to do is get back on the fukking golf course. what he does to fix things with elin is between he and elin.

if he's smart he will realize that banging a nordic supermodel between cashing ginormous checks, really ain't a bad way to go through life.

if he's a bit less smart, he will tighten up his ho procurement process.

if he's a really dumb neeegah, he'll get back to banging everything in sight and hand out his cell number to them all.

T1B

Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play

Re: Tiger Press Conference - In Play