T1B

It’s called posting on a message board, but you being a fat stupid Darwin nominee have to deflect because you have no actual take.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 11:24 pm There are plenty of photos out there where modern airlines are flying with holes in their wings. Most of them from metals much stronger than steel.

Is your google broken or are those all fakes as well.

"..metals much stronger than steel"...?? Fake-seat, yer syntax red flags are off the charts, just sayin'.. :wink:

Perhaps the airliner--carrying Harrison Ford as the president--was being pelted with beryllium chunks from a Russian-sponsored terrorist chopper as it was preparing to land? But they landed safely, damnit.

As you're supposed to know, the wings are the fuel tanks on airliners, and holes are a serious no-no. And of course your tepid claim of photos of wing-damaged airliners flying is absurd--especially the sort of damage incurred from hitting a steel pole at 530 mph.

But since you're in the mood for spinning yarns, how about if you remind us of your theory--delivered with apparent sincerity--of flight 77's wings folding onto the fuselage so as to allow the passage of the entire aircraft into the 10-foot hole without breaking the windows where the wings (and engines) would have struck.

Sheesh, we're going to need some more popcorn. :)

Keep kicking your own ass. Yes metals stronger than steel. Like the metals used in aircraft engines themselves.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 28, 2022 1:14 am the wings are the fuel tanks on airliners, and holes are a serious no-no. And of course your tepid claim of photos of wing-damaged airliners flying is absurd-

I guess these photos are fakes then and all of the passengers who saw this and those on the ground are in on the consipracy.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 25, 2022 8:03 pm it would immediately burst into flames and crash, period. The wings are the fuel tanks, And the entire aircraft is intentionally diffuse in its weight distribution, which means the wings are not protected at all

Just pulling shit out of your ass again?

Hell, there was even two fires, one in one of the wing fuel tanks. But wait, the plane was able to land safely.

http://www.atsb.gov.au/media/4173625/ao ... _final.pdf

What was that you were saying about popcorn?

x infinity

Your pics are pathetic.

Let's talk about controlled demolition..and pilots who can't fly, like the supposed L-seater on flight 77...oops, neither he nor any of the 19 alleged hijackers had any training or experience in even attempting to pretend to fly a 757...

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:23 am Your pics are pathetic.

Right.

As pathetic as you claim, they prove you to be full of shit once again.

Says the guy who doesn’t know how steel melts.

Fuck off you fat nazii.

Nice straw man.

Again you have no idea what that means. Probably because you are a fat stupid Nazi.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 6:41 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:23 am Your pics are pathetic.

Right.

As pathetic as you claim, they prove you to be full of shit once again.

The one pic is simply a hole in the fuselage, and the second is a small hole in the top of the wing. So what? How does that possibly compare to the claim of flight 77 hitting steel poles at 530 mph--and nothing supposedly happened at all?

And what about the fact of the engines hanging 15-feet below the nose--which struck at 10-feet off the ground? How do you attempt to ignore this?

And what of the supposed pilot have ZERO experience training to fly a 757?

How dare you continue this farce of pretending to be a pilot while defending a preposterous and ludicrous official story of 9/11?

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 10:18 pm
The one pic is simply a hole in the fuselage, and the second is a small hole in the top of the wing. So what?

So what? It continues to prove you to be a liar.

The first photo isn’t of the fuselage. We he second photo shows two holes in the wing.

Further the report talks of fire in a fuel tank.

Another claim you lied about being impossible.

Keep bringing the lies.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sat Oct 01, 2022 8:25 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 10:18 pm
The one pic is simply a hole in the fuselage, and the second is a small hole in the top of the wing. So what?

So what? It continues to prove you to hear liar.

The first photo isn’t of the fuselage. We he second photo shows two holes in the wing.

Further the report talks of fire in a fuel tank.

Another claim you lied about being impossible.

Keep bringing the lies.

Just more proof you have no idea how steel melts or anything about Physics or you would have addressed it.

More lies. No need to address that when he is making up shit.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sat Oct 01, 2022 9:20 pm More lies. No need to address that when he is making up shit.

Making up what? That a 757 supposedly hit several steel poles at 530 mph--and nothing happened?

That the engines hang fifteen-feet below the nose?

That the supposed pilots had ZERO training on a 757?

That a reporter for CNN who was the first on site said that there was clearly no evidence of an airliner crash?

That you won't dare to address any of the obvious giant holes in the official story?

That you are a total fraud--and not a pilot at all?

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sat Oct 01, 2022 9:20 pm More lies. No need to address that when he is making up shit.

I was talking about the point I was making but you are too stupid to know that and even if you understood, you are too chicken to actually address the issue of how steel melts you fat stupid traytorr.

So you are completely giving up on your previous statements about immediately bursting into flames and crashing. If so that’s a great first step.

I never said that you lying fat traytorr.