T1B

Your proposition requires the earth to be in motion, rotating on an axis and also revolving around the sun.
And your proposition also requires water to be clinging to the outside of this flying, spinning ball.
A child knows this will not happen.
lol

Until proven otherwise, the earth is as we all experience -- stationary.
This is what is rational to assume.
The sun, moon, and stars (lights) are in motion above us.

If you want to post your proof that the earth is moving, take a shot at that.
Otherwise I continue to chuckle at your assumptions and arrogance.

So post something we can all try that shows the flat stationary erff and the eclipse that happened last night.

Your problem is you can’t. So instead you attack gravity.

Go ahead show us your model.

I have never claimed a model, because -----> I do not know.
What I have are assumptions.
I don't claim it is a fact that the earth is flat, but I consider it to be a rightful assumption.

The globe is obviously VERY ridiculous, and I honestly laff at those who continue to pimp it.
Why do you do this?
NASA's cartoons are about all you've got.

I would like to know what is happening with a lunar eclipse, but I have not found an answer yet that satisfies me.



Btw, YouTube has been actively censoring/deleting/manipulating flat earth content now for a few years.
And it has escalated.

On "flat earth" videos, YouTube posts the following message directly under the video...


Flat Earth
Wikipedia
The flat Earth model is an archaic and scientifically disproven conception of Earth's shape as a plane or disk.


LOL


Number 1, they are full of shit.
Number 2, why do they post such a thing on flat earth video content, and why do they so actively censor flat earth videos?

What's the big deal?

Like I said, you got nothing.

Meanwhile the globe model explains 95% of things and yet you toss it out without question because something doesn’t fit in your mind.

Meanwhile you believe in the Bible which requires far more FAITH as very little can be proven.

Why are you inconsistent? I use a bit of faith in both God and globe earth. You on the other hand claim belief in something that can’t be proven and discard faith when 95% can be proven.

Yes, I am happy to place faith in my God, not in silly nonsense that proven human shysters try to pass off on me.

This is a good one to show the absurdities NASA sells the sheeple...







Dude, you claim to be all about reckless spending, yet we fund NASA to the tune of over 50 million dollars a day.
And we've been being RIPPED by them like this for decades.

And you say nothing about them, but instead are happy to let them prop up this zany globe fantasy that you, for some weird reason, choose to cling tightly to.

Ponderous.



It is fine.
All will be revealed.

The firmament will be broken, the stars will fall to earth, and the Lord God will be seen by all.
And He won't be coming to make fliends at this point.

The Day of the Lord!
The ultimate, "Wait until your Father gets home" moment.
EPCOT!



Isaiah 34:4
All the host of heaven shall rot away, and the skies roll up like a scroll. All their host shall fall, as leaves fall from the vine, like leaves falling from the fig tree.

Revelation 6:12-17
Then I looked when the Lamb opened the sixth seal, and a huge earthquake took place; the sun became as black as sackcloth made of hair, and the full moon became blood red;
and the stars in the sky fell to the earth like a fig tree dropping its unripe figs when shaken by a fierce wind.
The sky was split apart like a scroll being rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved from its place.
Then the kings of the earth, the very important people, the generals, the rich, the powerful, and everyone, slave and free, hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains. They said to the mountains and to the rocks, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of the one who is seated on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb,
because the great day of their wrath has come, and who is able to withstand it?”





You can run, but make no mistake, you cannot hide.

Why do you lie?

I have said every government line item needs a 25% spending cut tonight. I never said exempt NASA.

And I employ faith in both instances. You on the other hand only employ faith in limited situations. That makes you a hypocrite.

Still waiting on your model we can all experiment with in our own homes.

Lefty wrote:I have said every government line item needs a 25% spending cut tonight. I never said exempt NASA.

Okay.
Thank you for correcting me on that.

But...

Only a 25% cut for NASA?
They need to be eliminated, with many folks put up on trial.


My model?

They guy whose model (globe) would NEVER work demands that I present my model.
lol

Neither of us have the correct model right now.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 1:46 am Only a 25% cut for NASA?
They need to be eliminated, with many folks put up on trial.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 1:46 am They guy whose model (globe) would NEVER work demands that I present my model.

My model completely and totally explained the recent eclipse.

You can’t produce anything that even explains 10% of happenings.

SM wrote:

Do you really think this landed on the moon?











This is NASA's picture of -----> Pluto.









They laff at you.
They mock you with the "space" bullshit they present to you...










Why do the sizes of continents change drastically in different years?









And on and on and on...

Lefty wrote:My model completely and totally explained the recent eclipse.

Yeah, if you get past the lunacy of water clinging to the outside of a flying, spinning ball you might really have something!




The detachment from reality is truly staggering.

And men like this pilot the planes you sit in, folks.

:)

I understand gravity. Something that completely baffles you.

But go ahead and show us a model that explains even 50% of the eclipse with your dinner plate beliefs.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 3:45 amI understand gravity. Something that completely baffles you.

But go ahead and show us a model that explains even 50% of the eclipse with your dinner plate beliefs.

Gravity is one of your gods.
It in no way explains how the waters of the earth stay pinned to a flying, spinning ball.
It is ridiculous.

For me, explaining the eclipse is not necessary.
I would like to, sure, but not having a comfortable explanation does not deter me in the least.
It just has not yet been revealed.


1. For the bulk of human history, people have had the understanding that the earth is flat and stationary. And WAY prior to the heliocentric model being widely accepted, those holding to the flat earth view were accurately forecasting when the eclipses would occur. They had various explanations for them, but I am not personally satisfied by those explanations.

2. The globe zealots have their theory for the lunar eclipse. That is fine. Just know that there is a LONG list of scientific theories that have been superseded. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersede ... in_science
You "know" things until -----> you DON'T "know" things.

3. Also, not having a working map for a flat earth does not mean flat earth is necessarily wrong. There are certainly VERY compelling reasons for assuming the earth is flat and stationary. You don't toss that aside just because you don't have a comfortable explanation for the lunar eclipse. Well, the zealots do, but yeah...
There is a major agenda there.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 12:28 am Your proposition requires the earth to be in motion, rotating on an axis and also revolving around the sun.
And your proposition also requires water to be clinging to the outside of this flying, spinning ball.
A child knows this will not happen.
lol

Until proven otherwise, the earth is as we all experience -- stationary.
This is what is rational to assume.
The sun, moon, and stars (lights) are in motion above us.

If you want to post your proof that the earth is moving, take a shot at that.
Otherwise I continue to chuckle at your assumptions and arrogance.

So you're all in with Aristotle? Lucretius says hi... :wink:

But make no mistake, I was wrong, you've got game. And I'm with ya, sure as the moon being artificial and all driven narratives of human history and existence being outrageously false on so many fronts.

As for your own fakery--preaching Jesus to K-pop--it's irrelevant. Hang in, this could get good quick..

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 4:29 am He's right. The space flights are being done outside of the government now. NASA really doesn't do shit. Their day is over. Oh - they try to cry about global warming now, but that's a fucking joke. Hell - NOAA is funded to do that.

NASA is now Captain Dunsel.

Just because they contract out the launches doesn't mean its being done "outside of government" now.

Oh, yes. Of course, the RWNJ belief that NASA is worthless because it contracts out the launches for human spaceflight. Might want to run that past all the moderate GOPers who would disagree with you on that.

NASA budget is $23 billion. Drop in the fucking bucket.

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 5:06 pm And what’s the deficit again?

Nobody cares.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 8:48 pm

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 5:06 pm And what’s the deficit again?

Nobody cares.

And there is the problem with both parties. Liberals generally don’t care at all. Most conservatives give it lip service, but they want to restrict spending cuts only to some areas. Government is wasteful. Period. Full stop.

This is why we need an immediate 25% spending cut on each and every line item, tonight.

So your policy preference is to trigger a full on recession?

Gotcha.

Oh because runaway inflation is so much better?

Nice policy position.

I was afraid this would happen.

Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?

Most Rice grads can do much better than that.

Left Seater, like many on this board, lives in a binary world.

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm I was afraid this would happen.

Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?

Most Rice grads can do much better than that.

Not this one. He actually knows better but his greed and hate have so consumed his life he will do anything too grow his money pile.

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm I was afraid this would happen.

Most functioning adults saw this inflation coming from miles away. Props to you I guess for seeing the obvious.

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?

Of course those aren’t the only options. But one is the option your leadership has taken. There are all kinds in between. But we need a major spending cuts tonight. And if you don’t think there is 25% waste in federal government spending then you are even dumber that we thought, which is damn near impossible.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 11:38 pm

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm I was afraid this would happen.

Most functioning adults say this inflation coming from mikes away. Props to you I guess for seeing the obvious.

I resemble that remark.

:brad:

Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 11:38 pm

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm I was afraid this would happen.

Most functioning adults saw this inflation coming from miles away. Props to you I guess for seeing the obvious.

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?

Of course those aren’t the only options. But one is the option your leadership has taken. There are all kinds in between. But we need a major spending cuts tonight. And if you don’t think there is 25% waste in federal government spending then you are even dumber that we thought, which is damn near impossible.

So now you pine for those grand ol’days of Herbert Hoover. You truly are a regressive being.

Are we to really blame you though? The village idiot will be laughed at for sure, but no thinking person could take your ideas seriously. You suggest deflationary policy to erode decades of wealth? And that helps who exactly?

But… but… erm… government bad. Yeah.

How about any of those other options you claim to identify? Nothing worthwhile there? You’ve done your analysis and 25% instantaneous federal spending cuts are the best way to go?

We can negotiate down to 20% or so. But we spend far too much and this needs to stop.

Big fatliar. Everything is just one big fox talking point with you. Thinking is hard when you’re dumb.

See my post to begin this thread.



In an effort to make their commitment [to the LGBTQ+ community] more visible, the Rays this year
decided to follow the lead of the Giants and add rainbow-colored logos to their Pride Night uniforms,
to the "TB" on their caps and a sunburst on their right jersey sleeves.

https://www.tampabay.com/sports/rays/20 ... q-support/



Now faggotry has to be celebrated by dolling ballplayers up in fag logos.







#incrementally

Yes including people is a horrible thing to do.

MS wrote:Yes including people is a horrible thing to do.

As far as I know, fags have always been free to go to ballgames.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 11:14 pm

MS wrote:Yes including people is a horrible thing to do.

As far as I know, fags have always been free to go to ballgames.

Clearly you don't know much...

1. The fact that the gheys were at the ballgame VALIDATES my take, Diego.

2. I was not there to witness the *kiss*. All we have is what was written in the news. I don't know what kind of a *kiss* took place, and I do not know what other things the lesbians did. I do not know all the circumstances surrounding the episode.

3. Btw, the "kiss cam" bullshit should get lost. More commentary on that should be added here in this Incrementally thread. The ball game is a not a night club. At the rate we're going we'll have couples humping on the 3rd base line in about 20 years.

4. I went to a Brooklyn Nets game 6 or 7 years ago and it was -----> brain damage. It was 60% basketball and 40% carnival. Not IN. Every stop of play there were projectiles flying around, lights flashing everywhere, "clowns" spazzing around everywhere, and dipshit Smackie Chan wannabes blaring their idiotic voices throughout the arena. People seemingly have no capacity for sitting in solitude for 7 seconds. There evidently must be a constant influx of lowest-common-denominator "entertainment," or else they are -----> very sad.

What a shit show.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:51 am dipshit Smackie Chan wannabes

I was hoping at least one person would catch that balst!

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:51 am 1. The fact that the gheys were at the ballgame VALIDATES my take, Diego.

Go ahead & tell us how two lesbians or two gays would be identified at the turnstiles from two straight people from the same gender....

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 11:14 pm

MS wrote:Yes including people is a horrible thing to do.

As far as I know, fags have always been free to go to ballgames.

I was taking about you you intolerant fuck.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:51 am
3. Btw, the "kiss cam" bullshit should get lost. More commentary on that should be added here in this Incrementally thread. The ball game is a not a night club. At the rate we're going we'll have couples humping on the 3rd base line in about 20 years.

What a shit show.

Only small children, stupid people and assholes use the slippery slope fallacy un-ironically.

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 4:13 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:51 am
3. Btw, the "kiss cam" bullshit should get lost. More commentary on that should be added here in this Incrementally thread. The ball game is a not a night club. At the rate we're going we'll have couples humping on the 3rd base line in about 20 years.

What a shit show.

Only small children, stupid people and assholes use the slippery slope fallacy un-ironically.

How Softball Batshit Crazy wants the stands to look like...

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 4:08 pm

poptart wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:51 am 1. The fact that the gheys were at the ballgame VALIDATES my take, Diego.

Go ahead & tell us how two lesbians or two gays would be identified at the turnstiles from two straight people from the same gender....

In our modern era, all people (unless they are a visible threat of some kind) have been free to enter a ballgame.

Identifying their sexuality is a total non-issue.