T1B

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:57 pm You've studied politics longer than most of us have been alive, though. I know it's a Ponzi scheme. I was down-voted to invisibility at a liberal site many moons ago, for calling it that.

I'm not interested in your current thoughts, except in how they grew from your first thoughts. Again, you've studied politics longer than most of us have been alive: what was your intial reaction to The Social Security Act of 1935?

Should Reagan have begun taxing it?

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:03 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:57 pm You've studied politics longer than most of us have been alive, though. I know it's a Ponzi scheme. I was down-voted to invisibility at a liberal site many moons ago, for calling it that.

I'm not interested in your current thoughts, except in how they grew from your first thoughts. Again, you've studied politics longer than most of us have been alive: what was your intial reaction to The Social Security Act of 1935?

Should Reagan have begun taxing it?

You sound like one of those guru's who likes to examine the past to see more clearly what the future holds.

Well let me give you a hard dose of reality.
BURY YOUR PAST
JUST WALK AWAY.
LEAVE a little daisy or dandelion at the grave and never look back.

Embrace your future with open arms and plenty of lamb skin ribbed condoms. Love your future, suck it.
Because honestly? When you dig up your past, you end up buried.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:26 amI've studied politics and history longer than most of you have been alive.

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:38 pm It's cripplingly ironic how the evidence regarding those who claim to be the smartest and most educated is inversely proportional to the frequency and forcefulness of the claims themselves, whether the claims are about those making them or those from whose nutsacks they dangle. Almost invariably (and you are certainly no exception), what follows the claims are stunning displays of tardsmanship.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:46 pmDunning-Kruger

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:38 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:26 amI've studied politics and history longer than most of you have been alive.

It's cripplingly ironic how the evidence regarding those who claim to be the smartest and most educated is inversely proportional to the frequency and forcefulness of the claims themselves, whether the claims are about those making them or those from whose nutsacks they dangle. Almost invariably (and you are certainly no exception), what follows the claims are stunning displays of tardsmanship.

Look, a board needs its bitches, but seriously, we were already over our quota before you made your inglorious entrance. So do us all a favor and step in front of the nearest subway train asap. You won't be missed.

Got it? (Of course you don't; that was rhetorical.)

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:54 pm

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:38 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:26 amI've studied politics and history longer than most of you have been alive.

It's cripplingly ironic how the evidence regarding those who claim to be the smartest and most educated is inversely proportional to the frequency and forcefulness of the claims themselves, whether the claims are about those making them or those from whose nutsacks they dangle. Almost invariably (and you are certainly no exception), what follows the claims are stunning displays of tardsmanship.

Look, a board needs its bitches, but seriously, we were already over our quota before you made your inglorious entrance. So do us all a favor and step in front of the nearest subway train asap. You won't be missed.

Got it? (Of course you don't; that was rhetorical.)

Those who claim to be the smartest and most educated?

Not I.

I said I've studied it doesn't make me the smartest by any stretch of the imagination.

Yet you assumed that.

Do you go thru life making assumptions like that?

That's the recipe for a bad life boy.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:54 pmI said I've studied it doesn't make me the smartest by any stretch of the imagination.

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:14 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:54 pmI said I've studied it doesn't make me the smartest by any stretch of the imagination.

You do get points for that. Most intelligent thing I've seen you post.

EAP wrote:low IQ cocksuckers

Slap wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:25 pm

EAP wrote:low IQ cocksuckers

Most people believe you are a cocksucker.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:02 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:54 pm

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:38 pm

It's cripplingly ironic how the evidence regarding those who claim to be the smartest and most educated is inversely proportional to the frequency and forcefulness of the claims themselves, whether the claims are about those making them or those from whose nutsacks they dangle. Almost invariably (and you are certainly no exception), what follows the claims are stunning displays of tardsmanship.

Look, a board needs its bitches, but seriously, we were already over our quota before you made your inglorious entrance. So do us all a favor and step in front of the nearest subway train asap. You won't be missed.

Got it? (Of course you don't; that was rhetorical.)

Those who claim to be the smartest and most educated?

Not I.

I said I've studied it doesn't make me the smartest by any stretch of the imagination.

Yet you assumed that.

Do you go thru life making assumptions like that?

That's the recipe for a bad life boy.

Okay, so you're not the smartest here on politics and history, but you ARE the most educated, right? Since, you know, you've been studying these topics longer than anyone here has been alive.

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:38 pm Look, a board needs its bitches, but seriously, we were already over our quota before you made your inglorious entrance.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:46 pm

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:38 pm It's cripplingly ironic how the evidence regarding those who claim to be the smartest and most educated is inversely proportional to the frequency and forcefulness of the claims themselves, whether the claims are about those making them or those from whose nutsacks they dangle. Almost invariably (and you are certainly no exception), what follows the claims are stunning displays of tardsmanship.

Dunning-Kruger

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:04 amEAP is a character troll.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:52 pm magna cum

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:52 pm
Remember all the left wing bullshit that John Kerry was so much smarter than G W?

Turns out that G W had a higher GPA than kerry.

Stop assuring you putz you.

And, if memory serves, it was Joe Biden who always bragged about how smart he was.
magna cum laude, Joe used to brag?

You can bet that Joe came loudly behind the gym.
A skinny pencil neck like biden would've been cumming loudly.

But let's digress......

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:18 am
Why do you think every shitty poster is a "character troll?" That's an affront to anyone here who has actually run good character trolls.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:25 pmHe's the most educated here on politics yet not the smartest. That's a tricky intellectual feat.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:30 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:18 am
Why do you think every shitty poster is a "character troll?" That's an affront to anyone here who has actually run good character trolls.

So... meaning no offense has been taken. Ok.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:38 pm whitey tighties

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:39 am :?





Fuck you, Mgo.

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:14 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:54 pmI said I've studied it doesn't make me the smartest by any stretch of the imagination.

You do get points for that. Most intelligent thing I've seen you post.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:23 am

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:52 pm
Remember all the left wing bullshit that John Kerry was so much smarter than G W?

Turns out that G W had a higher GPA than kerry.

Stop assuring you putz you.

And, if memory serves, it was Joe Biden who always bragged about how smart he was.
magna cum laude, Joe used to brag?

You can bet that Joe came loudly behind the gym.
A skinny pencil neck like biden would've been cumming loudly.

But let's digress......

Character troll.

Though to be honest, Biden was smarter than Shrub and Kerry combined. Biden was a plagiarist, but he also knew his shit. Aging of the body is sad, but aging of the mind is infinitely worse.

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:57 am

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:14 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:54 pmI said I've studied it doesn't make me the smartest by any stretch of the imagination.

You do get points for that. Most intelligent thing I've seen you post.

More intelligent than the Peter north post, and how you actually tried out to be his "stunt cock" for the classic, "the NORTH POLE".
But you were short about 12.5 inches.
Then you landed a role on "bridget the midget". And even she laughed at you.

IB wrote:the 1995 McArthur Wheeler case

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:57 amMore intelligent than the Peter north post, and how you actually tried out to be his "stunt cock" for the classic, "the NORTH POLE".
But you were short about 12.5 inches.
Then you landed a role on "bridget the midget". And even she laughed at you.

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:14 am

IB wrote:the 1995 McArthur Wheeler case

Among the more interesting aspects of the study that resulted from that case was the test for sense of humor. Subjects lacking in the cognitive ability to recognize humor overestimated their sense of it. A classic example of this would be:

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:57 amMore intelligent than the Peter north post, and how you actually tried out to be his "stunt cock" for the classic, "the NORTH POLE".
But you were short about 12.5 inches.
Then you landed a role on "bridget the midget". And even she laughed at you.

Whereas the average, and even most below-average, individuals would rightfully find this to be completely devoid of humor, our specimen here apparently believes it to be side-splitting hilarious. While he may simply be excess to the board's stable of bitches, I will concede that he does provide some value (limited though it may be) as a guinea pig (or rat or gerbil; choose your rodent of preference) for continuing Dunning-Kruger effect studies.

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:14 am ...and even most below-average, individuals...

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:07 am

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:57 am

Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 11:14 pm

You do get points for that. Most intelligent thing I've seen you post.

More intelligent than the Peter north post, and how you actually tried out to be his "stunt cock" for the classic, "the NORTH POLE".
But you were short about 12.5 inches.
Then you landed a role on "bridget the midget". And even she laughed at you.

Just stop, dude. You're embarrassing yourself.

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:59 amEvery time you insult the president? You embarrass yourself.
Next to trump and his kids?
You are a sewer rat.
How's that reality feel?

Because if you don't understand that next to the president, and his kids? You are at the very bottom rung in life.
Yet why do we get the impression that you don't understand that?

Basic human psychology explains your behavior.
So quit the "superior" routine.
It's old and tired like you.
====================================================================================
You're trying too hard.
You are not a bright bulb.
Case studies?
How's it feel being a nothing?
You insult the president?
A zero like you insults trump?
Next to the president, and any of his kids? You're just a toilet bowl cleaner.

How's that reality grab ya?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:46 pmDunning-Kruger

Since Dunning and Kruger first published their results in the 1999 paper “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments,” the effect named for them has become a meme. It strikes a universal chord: as Dunning put it, the over- confident airhead “is someone we’ve all met.” The Ig Nobel Prize committee awarded the duo one of its satirical prizes in 2000. Actor John Cleese concisely explains the Dunning-Kruger effect in a much-shared YouTube video: “If you’re very, very stupid, how can you possibly realize that you’re very, very stupid? You’d have to be relatively intelligent to realize how stupid you are....And this explains not just Hollywood but almost the entirety of Fox News.” The Dunning-Kruger effect is now part of the vocabulary of Internet snark (and some who think they know what it means don’t quite get it). But the 1999 paper makes clear the authors’ opinion that the first place to look for a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus is in the mirror.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 5:01 am I never claimed that Barry wasn't born in Hawaii.
I don't know where he was born.

What I know is that the ridiculous PDF file he released is fake as hell.
Demonstrably so.

Among a slew of things, there are multiple letters on that file that are PIXEL IDENTICAL.
lol
An absolute IMPOSSIBILITY coming off a 1961 typewriter.

Anyone who actually cares to LOOK at evidence knows it.

EAD wrote:You can bet that Joe came loudly behind the gym.
A skinny pencil neck like biden would've been cumming loudly.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2019 4:19 am Now what are you babbling about?