Re: Transgender convicted of sexually assaulting 10 year old
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 10:14 pm
Huh?Diego in Seattle wrote: Why do you hate the Constitution?
Sordid clambake
https://theoneboard.com/board/
Huh?Diego in Seattle wrote: Why do you hate the Constitution?
No surprise that a reference to the Constitution confuses you.Dinsdale wrote:Huh?Diego in Seattle wrote: Why do you hate the Constitution?
Diego in Seattle wrote:No surprise that a reference to the Constitution confuses you.Dinsdale wrote:Huh?Diego in Seattle wrote: Why do you hate the Constitution?
Try looking up the 8th Amendment.
Putting an inmate where experience & intelligence says that they are likely to be murdered would definitely qualify as "cruel & unusual punishment."Dinsdale wrote:Diego in Seattle wrote:No surprise that a reference to the Constitution confuses you.Dinsdale wrote:Huh?
Try looking up the 8th Amendment.
Uhm...
So, in your (feeble) opinion, treating an inmate the same as any other inmate counts as "cruel"? Or are you really going to clown yourself with "unusual"?
That's pretty funny shit.
Of course the guards would never tell other inmates that so and so is a Chester, so that he could get a taste of his own crime. They face no risk at all I am sure.Diego in Seattle wrote: Putting an inmate where experience & intelligence says that they are likely to be murdered would definitely qualify as "cruel & unusual punishment."
Few non-transgender prisoners face that same risk.
So you're against using the court system established by the Constitution as well as denying rights provided by said document.Derron wrote:Of course the guards would never tell other inmates that so and so is a Chester, so that he could get a taste of his own crime. They face no risk at all I am sure.Diego in Seattle wrote: Putting an inmate where experience & intelligence says that they are likely to be murdered would definitely qualify as "cruel & unusual punishment."
Few non-transgender prisoners face that same risk.
You have already used up your one " Why do you hate the Constitution?" blast in your response to Dins comment.Diego in Seattle wrote:So you're against using the court system established by the Constitution as well as denying rights provided by said document.Derron wrote:Of course the guards would never tell other inmates that so and so is a Chester, so that he could get a taste of his own crime. They face no risk at all I am sure.Diego in Seattle wrote: Putting an inmate where experience & intelligence says that they are likely to be murdered would definitely qualify as "cruel & unusual punishment."
Few non-transgender prisoners face that same risk.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
You have already used up your one " Why do you hate the Constitution?" blast in your response to Dins comment.[/quote]Derron wrote:So you're against using the court system established by the Constitution as well as denying rights provided by said document.Diego in Seattle wrote:Of course the guards would never tell other inmates that so and so is a Chester, so that he could get a taste of his own crime. They face no risk at all I am sure.Derron wrote:
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Yes, because the US justice system is perfect and infallible.atmdad wrote:Don't do the crime, if you can't do the the time.
I have zero sympathy for most convicted felons.
Rackatmdad wrote:Don't do the crime, if you can't do the the time.
I have zero sympathy for most convicted felons.
Okay, Barretta, what is the time? Who sets that standard?atmdad wrote:Don't do the crime, if you can't do the the time.
I have zero sympathy for most convicted felons.
It should be me.Diego in Seattle wrote:Okay, Barretta, what is the time? Who sets that standard?atmdad wrote:Don't do the crime, if you can't do the the time.
I have zero sympathy for most convicted felons.
But it's not, pendejo. Wanna try the thing known as reality?bigredretard wrote:It should be me.Diego in Seattle wrote:Okay, Barretta, what is the time? Who sets that standard?atmdad wrote:Don't do the crime, if you can't do the the time.
I have zero sympathy for most convicted felons.
Rape = Death Penalty
Harm a child = Death Penalty
Murder = Death Penalty.
Diego in Seattle wrote:But it's not, pendejo. Wanna try the thing known as reality?bigredretard wrote:It should be me.Diego in Seattle wrote: Okay, Barretta, what is the time? Who sets that standard?
Rape = Death Penalty
Harm a child = Death Penalty
Murder = Death Penalty.
I'm not the one who has a problem w/ acknowledging the existence of the Constitution, fucktard.bigredretard wrote:Diego in Seattle wrote:But it's not, pendejo. Wanna try the thing known as reality?bigredretard wrote:It should be me.
Rape = Death Penalty
Harm a child = Death Penalty
Murder = Death Penalty.
You are a liberal from Seattle culero. Reality left your vocabulary a long time ago.
I'm not the one who has a problem w/ acknowledging the existence of the Constitution, fucktard.[/quote]Diego in Seattle wrote:
You are a liberal from Seattle culero. Reality left your vocabulary a long time ago.
Whatever Diego'sDickSucker!Goober McTuber wrote:Brilliant use of that ubb code, buggeredfucktard.
Actually you Are the one having a problem with quotes . . .bigredretard wrote:I'm not the one who has a problem.
Eat a cock maricon!Get fucked wrote:Actually you Are the one having a problem with quotes . . .bigredretard wrote:I'm not the one who has a problem.
Oh I didn't properly greet you
cita esto
get fucked
You are a liberal. You have a problem with the constitution cabron.[/quote]bigredretard wrote:I'm not the one who has a problem w/ acknowledging the existence of the Constitution, fucktard.Diego in Seattle wrote:
You are a liberal from Seattle culero. Reality left your vocabulary a long time ago.
And you think that demanding to be treated as equal results in that happening?schmick wrote:A man, who is demanding to be treated like he's normal out in the general population public should have no problem with being treated as normal and put in to general population prison.
I have no idea of who you're referring to.Course the northwest is full of loonies and now one of those states is paying a drag queen prisoner because prison guards told dude to "man up" even though he was segregated from general population
Could you give those girls a quick lesson in that please ??Goober McTuber wrote:Brilliant use of that ubb code, buggeredfucktard.
Please explain how putting someone in gp where there are persons known to have homicidal intentions towards them is "equal."schmick wrote:Diego in Seattle wrote:And you think that demanding to be treated as equal results in that happening?schmick wrote:A man, who is demanding to be treated like he's normal out in the general population public should have no problem with being treated as normal and put in to general population prison.
Just how stupid are you?
How did that work out for Matthew Shepard?
I have no idea of who you're referring to.Course the northwest is full of loonies and now one of those states is paying a drag queen prisoner because prison guards told dude to "man up" even though he was segregated from general population
And socal residents have no business saying that other states are full of loonies. Just say'in....
Treating him as equal would be putting him in general population
Equal actually equals general population
Diego in Seattle wrote: Please explain how putting someone in gp where there are persons known to have homicidal intentions towards them is "equal."
Suppose a person is convicted of auto theft for a third time and gets a couple of years. That person has every right to expect they'll come out of the prison alive after completing their sentence (or the minimum time req'd if they do good time). Putting that person in a situation where a reasonable person would believe that a homicide might occur is not treating them equally. That would be subjecting them to a greater risk than the other prisoners have been subjected to. And it would be changing their sentence in place of a court. Again, why do you hate the Constitution?schmick wrote:Diego in Seattle wrote:Please explain how putting someone in gp where there are persons known to have homicidal intentions towards them is "equal."
Prisoners have homicidal intentions, that's why they're in prison.
Explain how coddling a prisoner and wasting resources on them that aren't wasted on other prisoners is equal
Dora the ass explorerschmick wrote:Third time auto theft is a third strike. Third strike should be hanging. I don't care if it's a third dui conviction. You didn't learn the first 2 times, you should hang.
Auto theft should hang the first time, it's like molesting, rape, murder, drug dealing, trespassing, illegally being in a foreign country...... first offense, hang them
But, a guy who has been convicted of Autotheft for a third time isn't going to be put somewhere other then general population.
You're arguing that this drag queen should be treated equally to other prisoners and that we treat them equally by treating him special instead of equal.
Now this drag queen is from a class of people demanding equal treatment and according to this drag queen, equal treatment is actually not equal at all but special, kind of like the argument you're making
Wait, are you a tranny?
Do you want the rest of us to refer to you as "Dora in Seattle" now?
You can say "should be this" or "should be that" until your face turns blue, but it doesn't change anything. Things aren't that way because of the Constitution. Don't like it? Either change the Constitution or GTFO of this country. We Americans like our constitutional republic, and we're not changing that, traitor.schmick wrote:Third time auto theft is a third strike. Third strike should be hanging. I don't care if it's a third dui conviction. You didn't learn the first 2 times, you should hang.
Auto theft should hang the first time, it's like molesting, rape, murder, drug dealing, trespassing, illegally being in a foreign country...... first offense, hang them
But, a guy who has been convicted of Autotheft for a third time isn't going to be put somewhere other then general population.
You're arguing that this drag queen should be treated equally to other prisoners and that we treat them equally by treating him special instead of equal.
Now this drag queen is from a class of people demanding equal treatment and according to this drag queen, equal treatment is actually not equal at all but special, kind of like the argument you're making
Wait, are you a tranny?
Because you hate America & her Constitution.schmick wrote:And throwing someone, from a group demanding equality, in to general population in prison is treating them as an equal
https://justdetention.org/wp-content/up ... r-Rape.pdfDinsdale wrote:You have yet to provide any evidence whatsoever that "transgendered" (no such thing) inmates are at any greater risk of violence than anyone else in the prison.
Put up or shut up time.
One study of California
prisoners found that 59 percent of trans-
gender women housed in men’s prisons
had been sexually abused while incarcerat-
ed, as compared to 4 percent of non-trans-
gender inmates in men’s prisons.
WTF does that have to do with anything, short bus coach?schmick wrote:Were they pretending to be women when they were sexually abused?Diego in Seattle wrote:https://justdetention.org/wp-content/up ... r-Rape.pdfDinsdale wrote:You have yet to provide any evidence whatsoever that "transgendered" (no such thing) inmates are at any greater risk of violence than anyone else in the prison.
Put up or shut up time.
One study of California
prisoners found that 59 percent of trans-
gender women housed in men’s prisons
had been sexually abused while incarcerat-
ed, as compared to 4 percent of non-trans-
gender inmates in men’s prisons.
Possibly. However activist judges can create laws with little regard for the Constitution.Diego in Seattle wrote:Things aren't that way because of the Constitution.
True.Left Seater wrote:Possibly. However activist judges can create laws with little regard for the Constitution.Diego in Seattle wrote:Things aren't that way because of the Constitution.
Wickard... Mic drop.Diego in Seattle wrote:True.Left Seater wrote:Possibly. However activist judges can create laws with little regard for the Constitution.Diego in Seattle wrote:Things aren't that way because of the Constitution.
Just look at Citizens United.