Page 2 of 2

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:13 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Scrote, nobody knows or cares WTF you're babbling about with this .net nonsense. And even if they did, they wouldn't believe you. You don't exactly have a great track record of honesty and integrity around here. You never gave me any password to any .net troll. I would have no interest in using it even if you did. I haven't posted there in ages, or even visited the place.

You are being very pursenickety.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:58 pm
by Innocent Bystander
And this is the point where I ain't buying this shit no more. People who have met each other casually in real life and will say nothing but good things about them in real life don't turn around and punk them as lower than low on a message board.

Y'all some straight fools for this.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:01 pm
by R-Jack
To be fair, I have not met Scott off of these boards. To be honest, I have little time for liars in my life and thinskinned closet faggots probably wouldn't enjoy my company anyway.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:20 pm
by Smackie Chan
R-Jack wrote:thinskinned closet faggots probably wouldn't enjoy my company
So it wouldn't get better?

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:27 pm
by R-Jack
:lol:

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:00 pm
by War Wagon
R-Jack wrote:To be fair, I have not met Scott off of these boards.
I have, once. Scott, Truman and I tailgated at the Royals 2001 home opener.

It's hard to judge from one encounter, so long ago, but I thought both were solid then, and now.

Scott and I have had some issues over the years, but never to the point that I would call him untrustworthy or anything less than a decent person.

We've been in the same $$$ FFL league for 15 years, along with several other old timers, and I don't believe that any of us would have much bad to say about him.

I think the best (or worst) character description was once coined by OC Mike: "Scott loves him some Scott". No sin, that.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:12 pm
by BSmack
War Wagon wrote:I think the best (or worst) character description was once coined by OC Mike: "Scott loves him some Scott". No sin, that.
Image

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:38 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Innocent Bystander wrote:And this is the point where I ain't buying this shit no more. People who have met each other casually in real life and will say nothing but good things about them in real life don't turn around and punk them as lower than low on a message board.
I haven't said anything in here about Scott that I wouldn't say to his face. Like I said before, I can separate Scott the real life guy from Scott the T1B admin. Some people are cool off the board, but a-holes on the board. It's not a hard concept to grasp.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 10:36 pm
by kcdave
KC Scott wrote:What part of Family members have always been off limits do yo fail to grasp?
The part that I fail to grasp is, neither posting a family members pic, nor a pic of the member
himself is an actual violation according to the rules. Lots of jibberish about personal info, names,
IP's and such, but NO WHERE does it specify that you can't post a pic of a member OR their family.
NO WHERE. It is simply taboo in these where abouts to post a member of someones family, just
as it is taboo to post a photo of another member.
War Wagon wrote: kcdave ..... I saw what you wrote about my wife, calling her a "transvestite".
I have to set the record straight on this. I do not want false information and lies being posted here.
I never called Wags wife a "transvestite." That word is not included in my vernacular, and probably not
a word I would even spell correctly without spell check on any given day. However, I did say she
looks like a trannie, but now I am wondering if that correct spelling is actually "tranny". Either way,
I didn't call her any of the three. I don't know her. I have no idea what she really is. I only know
that she looks like a tranny/trannie to me.
War Wagon wrote:I don't know how you tracked her FB page down, nor do I care. But it shows, yet again, what a serial online stalker you are. Having never actually met you, I don't know what you're like in IRL, but expect you're just as much of a total jerk.
While I wish I had the time, energy, resources and knowledge to go David in Tulsa and do
as I please online, I'm an internet retard with likely, very few more discernible skills than you,
and certainly less time to use them.

Unlike Scott, you have a less than common name, Wags. But, you do share that name with a
friend of mine from my days in the Army. He, however has a slightly different spelling. At any
rate, you share the name, thus it is one that I won't forget. Your particular spelling is much less
common, and it stands out when you see it. Years ago, a friend posted a pic on fb or her daughter
involved in a certain sporting setting. Pictured with her and tagged, was a gal that shares your same
name and spelling. Two clicks away was your fb page, and 1 more click was your wife's fb page.
The whole thing took me all of 5 seconds and three or four clicks. So no Wags, I am not some serial
stalker as you would like to make me out to be. What I do have is memory, which seems to be fading
every day, and you have an uncommon spelling of a somewhat common name.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:51 pm
by War Wagon
kcdave wrote:...you have an uncommon spelling of a somewhat common name.
Yeah, I get that a lot. 90 % of people and can't spell it if I pronounce it and likewise can't pronounce it if I spell it. When I read off the spelling to someone over the phone, most can't even write that down correctly the first time.

But we're a proud clan of Scotchmen, fiercely proud of that name and lineage, that family and my 12 year old dad having immigrated thru Ellis Island in 1928.

As for my wife of 33 years, she's my sweetheart. She has never posted on any message board other that FB. You can post whatever you want about me (and have) while I've done the same.

Taking cheap shots at her, however, was uncalled for and over the line, no matter how the rules read.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:57 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Sorry, Purse. I didn't out Kaley. There were plenty of photos of Kaley floating around before I posted that photo. Was it stupid for me to do that? Yes. Did I out him? No.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:18 am
by trev
This board was on life support but Scott done shot it thru the heart and killed it.

I'm not out of misery yet though. It's sad.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:29 am
by Dr_Phibes
This board was on life support but Scott done shot it thru the heart and killed it.
I dunno. Bit of a Princess Bride ending, everyone is kissing and making up and rushing to explain themselves. American curtain-twitching is worse than Coronation Street. In 48 hours it's back to whisky, defrosting your truck and the Dave Clark Five.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:26 pm
by BSmack
Willie, you ever notice how the older people get the bitchier they get? :lol:

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:51 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
88 wrote:Get off my lawn!
You know, if you were a communist, you wouldn't be troubled with property ownership concerns. ("Get off the Democratic Worker's Lawn!")
My suggestion is to hit Phibes up with a PM. He'll hook you up, bro.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:55 pm
by Mikey
War Wagon wrote:
kcdave wrote:...you have an uncommon spelling of a somewhat common name.
Don't recall seeing that thread, but I always thought you shared a name with this guy:

Image

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:02 pm
by Moving Sale
Most of you know my last name and for those who don't a quick google search using three simple things you all know about me would produce 30 pages with my name all over them.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:16 pm
by trev
LOL. Desperate for business?

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 5:30 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Moving Sale wrote:...a quick google search using three simple things you all know about me...
I typed in bullet-headed + midget + annoying into Google. The results were staggering. Should I try Bing?

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:36 pm
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:This is a seriously TROTTable thread at this juncture. Just saying.
I've been offline for days. Just found this thread. TROTTable? Fuck no, this belongs in the archives.

Get back here Screwball. Your looks are nowhere near as embarrassing as your posts.

As for Magoo, it took 12 years but I finally ran your ass.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:34 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Now Scrote is channeling his inner Pacedog. Threatening to kick my ass via PM next time he comes to my town. Where do you want to meet? The old oak tree behind the elementary school?

This is sad, Scott. Really. Seek help.

Re: Dan Vogel has a point

Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:10 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Now Scrote is channeling his inner Pacedog. Threatening to kick my ass via PM next time he comes to my town.

Lucky you.

His last PM to me involved muscle-relaxants, a bottle of Chivas and a suitcase full of Charles Bronson DVD's for a...and I'm quoting verbatim here...

"...weekend where two dudes can be bro's and feel free around one another, because that's what bro's do..."



Image