T1B

Sirfindafold wrote:

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2019 5:31 pm Since the Mueller report is a "total exoneration" of Donald, why wouldn't he enthusiastically welcome Mueller to please come forward and testify asap?

Mueller can roll in, explain how Donald (and Barr) have it right, and that there was no collusion or obstruction.
Don is exonerated, completely.

Put it to bed.

Why not?




We all know the answer.

There's two answers.

He's trying to put this costly charade in the rear view mirror to focus on more pressing issues like China, Iran, North Korea, the southern border, etc.

No matter what he does, quacks like yourself, little mikey, queerland, McTriggered, screwey, and much of the DNC won't be satisfied.

Exactly

OH yeah, AND Rack Ucant.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

One of the funniest (or most pathetic) things about this whole Drumpf presidency is tools like Blow, Sirfuckafist, .088, mvcreep, and others thinking that Donald actually cares about the good of the country.

... and working stiffs like them.







He freaking LAFFS at the working class m0rons who carry his water.

As he pays no taxes for many years and lives like a playboy.


Fucking UN
REAL.

The conned don’t know they are being conned it’s the beauty of the con.

Of course there are the grifters in the group working their own grift like 88nazis and Brokenpsyche.

Sirfindafold wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2019 6:53 pm
There's two answers.

He's trying to put this costly charade in the rear view mirror to focus on more pressing issues like China, Iran, North Korea, the southern border, etc.

No matter what he does, quacks like yourself, little mikey, queerland, McTriggered, screwey, and much of the DNC won't be satisfied.

Dumbfuck. There's an easy way to put this whole thing behind him, assuming he's not crooked (a big leap of faith there), and it's not by stonewalling.

Continue to drink from the orange semen firehose, though. The board needs its morons.

another world class melt.

Nice white flag.

YouCant wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2019 5:54 pmWhy don't you tell us what fruit you like in the Cosmopolitans that you swill from your wide assortment of phallic-shaped martini glasses?

Are you a faggot?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 1:24 am

Please

What have we done to deserve this?

Why hasn't this asswipe been arrested yet?

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/don-mc ... 1557525630

Don McGahn Rebuffed White House Request to Say Trump Didn’t Obstruct Justice

After release of the Mueller report, the president sought to have the former White House counsel say that he didn’t believe the president’s push to dismiss the special counsel constituted a crime

By Rebecca Ballhaus
Updated May 10, 2019 7:10 p.m. ET
WASHINGTON—Within a day of the release of the Mueller report last month, President Trump sought to have former White House counsel Don McGahn declare he didn’t consider the president’s 2017 directive that he seek Robert Mueller’s dismissal to be obstruction of justice, but Mr. McGahn rebuffed the request, according to people familiar with the matter.

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-campaign ... on-1406761

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 2:53 am https://www.newsweek.com/trump-campaign ... on-1406761

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Nobody clicks your links. Have a take, don't suck, moron.

And if the "oranges" of the Mueller investigation was not on the up-and-up, does that mean that all of Don's corruption that Mueller (and others) has uncovered magically -----> goes away?

You people must be on one hell of a crazy acid trip.

88 wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 3:16 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 3:50 am

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 2:53 am https://www.newsweek.com/trump-campaign ... on-1406761

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Nobody clicks your links. Have a take, don't suck, moron.

1) It was your guy that beat the fake news angle like a dead horse. I’m sure you have a post of you posting the same pic but directed at your dear leader.

2) Your gf Joe42 didn’t even post a take.

3) You are a disgusting POS.

And you're a partisan tard who believes laws only apply to Republicans.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Link me up to where I said that?

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 7:21 pm And you're a partisan tard who believes laws only apply to Republicans.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The irony is overwhelming.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 9:05 pmThe irony is overwhelming.

Is this the DC version of IKYABWAI?

Jesus Christ, don't you supposedly write for a living? I can't imagine you're being handsomely rewarded for composing such unimaginative dreck.

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 7:21 pmAnd you're a partisan tard who believes laws only apply to Republicans.

Moving Sale said this a couple of pages ago...

Moving Sale wrote:And I could not care less who Barr pulls into his red web.

It's amazing how often you dolts kick your own @sses as you desperately seek to defend the odious buffoon in the oval office.

He's a joke, as are you.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 9:18 pm He's a joke, as are you.

That is ironic coming from you. Dam near all of your takes are a joke and fall flat.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 11:20 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 9:18 pm He's a joke, as are you.

That is ironic coming from you. Dam near all of your takes are a joke and fall flat.

Is this the DC version of IKYABWAI?

Jesus Christ, don't you supposedly write for a living? I can't imagine you're being handsomely rewarded for composing such unimaginative dreck.

... or something like that.

^^ Your best take ever.

Or, something like that.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 11:20 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 9:18 pm He's a joke, as are you.

That is ironic coming from you. Dam near all of your takes are a joke and fall flat.

Feel free to enter the discussion and have your f@t ass kicked.

Flat earth and we should immediately sell all stock say what?

Zero for two.


1. I've said dozens of times that I don't claim to know for sure what the shape of the earth is. It certainly isn't my fault that you cannot prove your dumb globe.

2. I never said to sell all stock. I hold stock.

Whatever. You can’t prove it isn’t a globe. I have seen the curvature from the cockpit. Also a number of us have offered you a flight between Southern Hemisphere cities and crickets.

You also have told us to sell our stock as a crash was coming. But tell yourself whatever you want to help yourself sleep. Most will do the same when they are as wrong as often as you are.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 1:51 am Also a number of us have offered you a flight between Southern Hemisphere cities and crickets.

I'll take you up on this. Where would we go?

You need to go full flat earth before that offer is extended to you.

My suggestion was one of the Australia to South America flights. But if you want to tag along we can probably get a group rate

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 3:12 am You need to go full flat earth before that offer is extended to you.

My suggestion was one of the Australia to South America flights. But if you want to tag along we can probably get a group rate

Well I do agree with you that the world is round, so I hope that wouldn't 86 me. Would we fly in a Gulfstream?

Naw. It would be commercial. 787 or 777.

LS wrote:Whatever. You can’t prove it isn’t a globe. I have seen the curvature from the cockpit. Also a number of us have offered you a flight between Southern Hemisphere cities and crickets.

You also have told us to sell our stock as a crash was coming. But tell yourself whatever you want to help yourself sleep. Most will do the same when they are as wrong as often as you are.

1. This is my last post responding to these things in this thread. This thread is about the Mueller Report. If you want to talk earth shape or finance, pull up an old thread or start a new one.

2. You've seen no curvature from the cockpit. Picture? A southern hemisphere flight would not prove your globe.

3. I've said that I am 70% cash, 30% market short (stock). I anticipate a major decline. If you are long stocks, well, enjoy the ride down. It's gonna be a helluva ride. Jmo.

So now you know what I have and haven’t seen. What a complete and total pompous ass.

But yeah bail out and don’t talk about things on a message board.

Troll on troll.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 2:52 pm So now you know what I have and haven’t seen. What a complete and total pompous ass.

But yeah bail out and don’t talk about things on a message board.

Troll on troll.

Way to go all ignoratio elenchi on us and then blame him for not falling for you it you fat yellow fuck.

So now the Radical Left Dems don’t talk about Collusion anymore, because the Mueller Report said
there was No Collusion, they only want to talk about Obstruction, even though there was No Obstruction
or No Crime - except for the crimes committed by the other side!

- Don (5/11/19)



- The Mueller Report did not say there was no collusion.

- The Mueller Report also did not say there was no obstruction.

- The Mueller Report did not say there was no crime.

Three blatant lies in one tweet.


If the report totally exonerates him, why is he continually lying about what it says?

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2019 7:21 pm So now the Radical Left Dems don’t talk about Collusion anymore, because the Mueller Report said
there was No Collusion, they only want to talk about Obstruction, even though there was No Obstruction
or No Crime - except for the crimes committed by the other side!

- Don (5/11/19)



- The Mueller Report did not say there was no collusion.

- The Mueller Report also did not say there was no obstruction.

- The Mueller Report did not say there was no crime.

Three blatant lies in one tweet.


If the report totally exonerates him, why is he continually lying about what it says?

One, the report did not say there was collusion.
Two, the report did not say there was obstruction.
Three, the report did not say there was a crime committed by Trump.
You’re grasping at figments of your imagination, ‘tart.

1. Why do you divert away from Donald's three blatant lies and try to turn it back on me? He lied three times in one tweet, dude. I didn't do that.

2. Collusion: secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.

Donald colluded with Russia. Unquestionably.

3. Mueller chose not to charge CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. That is a different animal than collusion.

4. The report said that if Mueller could have cleared Donald of obstruction, it would have so stated. The report did not say that there WASN'T a crime(s) by Donald. It was left for Congress.

5. Donald is now desperately trying to shut down legitimate fact-finding that is the duty of Congress.


You are on the wrong side of history, guy.

Nice white flag you red jizz swallowing hack.

.088 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2019 2:56 am Your flat erf arguments are more persuasive than that shit ^^^, even to an astronaut orbiting the erf in the International Space Station. Give it up.

You are a boob.


So now the Radical Left Dems don’t talk about Collusion anymore, because the Mueller Report said
there was No Collusion, they only want to talk about Obstruction, even though there was No Obstruction
or No Crime - except for the crimes committed by the other side!

- Don (5/11/19)


Three lies in one tweet.



.088 the hack...

Post from the Mueller Report where it says there was no collusion.
Post from the Mueller Report where it says there was no obstruction.
Post from the Mueller Report where it says there was no crime(s).



GO...

Two more blatant lies this morning...


Ever since the Mueller Report showed No Collusion & No Obstruction, the Dems have been working overtime
to damage me and the Republican Party by issuing over 80 demands for documents and testimonies, and with
NO REASON. That’s all they want to do - don’t care about anything else!

- Don



The Mueller Report did not say there was no collusion.
The Mueller Report did not say there was no obstruction.
In fact, it very plainly says that if it could have cleared Don of obstruction it would have stated so.



Don says the sky is not blue.
His kneepadders come in and say, "Yeah, the sky isn't blue!!"



I've never seen anything so fucked up in all my life.

And why don’t you show us where his campaign informed us of the Trump Tower meeting before it happened.

There was an attempt by the campaign to secretly coordinate with what they thought were Russian officials to effect the outcome of the campaign. Full stop. Why the Deep State was unwillingly to state that in the report is unknown to me, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.