T1B

BSmack wrote:Paterno had the chance not once but every day thereafter for the next 9 years to do the right thing. He never did and never would have.

I get the feeling Sandusky had some dirt on Paterno as well.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

BSmack wrote:Paterno had the chance not once but every day thereafter for the next 9 years to do the right thing. He never did and never would have.

I get the feeling Sandusky had some dirt on Paterno as well.

I'm pretty sure that is why JoePed hired a DC lawyer at 500 bucks an hour.

enough.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:Weinreb gets directly to the heart of the matter. Power, in all of its forms is inherently unsafe. It conveys the ability to compel others against their wishes. It conveys the ability to get away with things the average person would never dream of. And worst of all, when the kind of absolute power that folks like Joe Paterno had within the domain of Penn State University becomes UNQUESTIONED absolute power, there is nobody left willing to sound the alarm when a truly heinous abuse of power like say, a long time assistant raping boys in the shower becomes the matter of a system wide cover up.

I don't really buy that. It has more to do with economics than anything else. The football program is the engine that drives the entire university and the livelihood of a good portion of the surrounding community. I don't see JoePed as some sort of megalomaniac besotted with power. He's more like the mayor from Jaws.

McQueary, it's all psychological. You yell "Horseplay in the showers," everybody says, "Huh? What?" You yell "PEDOPHILE ASS RAPE," and we've got a panic on our hands...

Best post in the thread.


One of my kin went to a clinic and Sandusky taught long snapping. Nothing happened to him fortunately, but, this is sad. I had aspired to go to Penn St as a young football player, "Linebacker U". Special place in my heart for that school even though I never got there.

My hunch is the lack of his single sense of purpose - football - and the stress of this will more than likely kill JoePa. I can see him gone within the year. Other than that, I hope the victims will be able to find peace with this and carry on in their lives.

Random gratuitous shot of a resonably attractive and not very bright PSU fan.

BSmack wrote:Random gratuitous shot of a resonably attractive and not very bright PSU fan.

She kind of looks like that chick that Ben Roethlisberger raped.

The first one, I mean...not the second one he raped.

Okay, maybe I meant the second one...

Goddamn...I keep mixing up my Roethlisberger rape victims...

BSmack wrote:Random gratuitous shot of a resonably attractive and not very bright PSU fan.

wonder if she could wear those jeans just a little lower?

i'm sure some lucky young co-ed will lower them before the day's over.

BSmack wrote:Random gratuitous shot of a resonably attractive and not very bright PSUFAN.

$5 says she's got a skidmark in her panties


provided she's wearing any, that is

wtf is with the joe face on her belly? is joeped a fukking cyclops? it would have worked much better with her going topless. hell, full frontal nudity would have been even better. give joe a nice little goatee.

Obviously not everybody gets it.

bradhusker wrote:enough.

what the FUCK is this shit?

I just got thru speaking with a penn st alum. the guy is 79 years of age, and he told me that this is just the tip of the iceberg, so to speak.

This scandal is much more serious than at the Joe Pa level. We are talking law enforcement turning their backs here. When you have the campus police not doing anything, and, a District attorney goes missing along with his hard drive? This is HUGE.

ALSO, to have a post like this deleted is a JOKE. and may I say, gets me pretty pissed off.

Ive seen a lot of bullshit cowards in my day, but this? this takes the cake.

bradhusker wrote:enough.

How THE FUCK is reporting a conversation with a penn st alum who is 79 years of age, not worth posting?

ANSWER THE FUCKIN QUESTION!!

This guy has seen it all, been thru it all, I felt honored just to speak with him. And yet you feel that what he had to say is not worth much?

WHAT A JOKE.

BSmack wrote:reasonably attractive

To another pudgy beaver, yeah, I guess.

Brad,

If you weren't too stupid to read, you would see I gave reasoning.

Stop spamming and shut the fuck up.

R-Jack wrote:Stop spamming and shut the fuck up.

Kinda redundant, don't you think?

poptart wrote:To another pudgy beaver, yeah, I guess.

She's a dime a dozen around these parts, sir.

To those who still believe Joe didnt know and wouldve done something....

Sandusky was still using the weight room at PSU and went to Joe Paterno's last game. The grand jury testimony was back in December 2010.

You can argue that JoePed didnt know in 1995, 1998, 2000 or 2002 but you can't argue that JoePed has known the past 12 months and still let the guy be around the program

Mace wrote:I've read the Grand Jury report and there's nothing there are no facts there that would villify Paterno unless you're jumping to conclusions based on pure speculation of what you think happened and what you think he knew, and when. I'll wait for all of the facts to come out and then draw my own conclusions. The Board of Trustees did what they had to do in firing Paterno and separating the university from everyone associated with the football program and Sandusky.

Why didnt they fire his coaching staff before the season since they all testified back in 2010 that they knew Sandusky touched little boys and they did nothing to stop it?

A couple of the board of trustees are probably banging little boys as well. They werent going to do shit to JoePed until the public and the media went apeshit.

Mr T wrote:
Sandusky was still using the weight room at PSU...

Okay, so there's record of him lifting, but is there any evidence of...



...of...




...steaming?

Mr T wrote:

Mace wrote:I've read the Grand Jury report and there's nothing there are no facts there that would villify Paterno unless you're jumping to conclusions based on pure speculation of what you think happened and what you think he knew, and when. I'll wait for all of the facts to come out and then draw my own conclusions. The Board of Trustees did what they had to do in firing Paterno and separating the university from everyone associated with the football program and Sandusky.

Why didnt they fire his coaching staff before the season since they all testified back in 2010 that they knew Sandusky touched little boys and they did nothing to stop it?

A couple of the board of trustees are probably banging little boys as well. They werent going to do shit to JoePed until the public and the media went apeshit.

You're asking me? You're asking the wrong person. There are a lot of questions not answered in the Grand Jury report that will likely come out later....whenever this comes to trial.

Curious to see how you measure up?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Curious to see how you measure up?

Rack!

Sin,

Irie Lagos

Toddowen wrote:

Mace wrote: There are a lot of questions not answered.

The big one being the final head count of molestations.

And who knows if all of the victims will even come forward. Most generally they don't.

Mace wrote:You're asking me? You're asking the wrong person. There are a lot of questions not answered in the Grand Jury report that will likely come out later....whenever this comes to trial.

Questions being answered? I don't think so. I think the conversation will go like this.

Tom Corbett: When a plot against the Emperor failed... the plotters were always given a chance... to let their families keep their fortunes. Right?
Jerry Sandusky: Yeah, but only the rich guys, Tom. The little guys got knocked off and all their estates went to the Emperors. Unless they went home and killed themselves, then nothing happened. And the families... the families were taken care of.
Tom Corbett: That was a good break. A nice deal.
Jerry Sandusky: Yeah... They went home... and sat in a hot bath... opened up their veins... and bled to death... and sometimes they had a little party before they did it.

BSmack wrote:

Mace wrote:You're asking me? You're asking the wrong person. There are a lot of questions not answered in the Grand Jury report that will likely come out later....whenever this comes to trial.

Questions being answered? I don't think so. I think the conversation will go like this.

Tom Corbett: When a plot against the Emperor failed... the plotters were always given a chance... to let their families keep their fortunes. Right?
Jerry Sandusky: Yeah, but only the rich guys, Tom. The little guys got knocked off and all their estates went to the Emperors. Unless they went home and killed themselves, then nothing happened. And the families... the families were taken care of.
Tom Corbett: That was a good break. A nice deal.
Jerry Sandusky: Yeah... They went home... and sat in a hot bath... opened up their veins... and bled to death... and sometimes they had a little party before they did it.

Gee, I guess they can just bypass the trial since you have all of the answers. :roll:

Mace wrote:Gee, I guess they can just bypass the trial since you have all of the answers. :roll:

Never said that. What made you think I did say that I had all the answers?

Mace wrote:There are a lot of questions not answered in the Grand Jury report that will likely come out later....

Sure. And none of those answers are going to make JoePed or anyone else associated with this horrorshow look any better than they do right now. It's all downhill from here.

Toddowen wrote:He should be. But then again, there are those who undoubtedly think otherwise. {shoutout to Mvscal}

He can go ahead and kill himself after he spills his guts. You, on the other hand, can off yourself anytime. It's cool.

smackaholic wrote:

BSmack wrote:Random gratuitous shot of a resonably attractive and not very bright PSU fan.

wonder if she could wear those jeans just a little lower?

i'm sure some lucky young co-ed will lower them before the day's over.

Hmmm. Are you suggesting she’s a lesbian? Or maybe with than lantern jaw she’s sporting a marble bag?

Reasonably attractive? Maybe in your house.

RACK Van!!

Van nailed it. And what is she smiling about when everyone around her looks serious?

trev wrote:Van nailed it. And what is she smiling about when everyone around her looks serious?

her drunk ass is probably on the jumbotron

Goober McTuber wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

BSmack wrote:Random gratuitous shot of a resonably attractive and not very bright PSU fan.

wonder if she could wear those jeans just a little lower?

i'm sure some lucky young co-ed will lower them before the day's over.

Hmmm. Are you suggesting she’s a lesbian? Or maybe with than lantern jaw she’s sporting a marble bag?

Reasonably attractive? Maybe in your house.

she kinda does have a bit of a jay leno chin going. as for the rest of the grill, i'll reserve judgement until i see a pic without those ridiculous glasses. i base my observations on the one section of her that we can see. that section passes muster just fine.

and ya, i guess that dude van posted pretty well nails, facewise. i'll bet his midrift doesn't look as good, though.

smackaholic wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

smackaholic wrote:wonder if she could wear those jeans just a little lower?

i'm sure some lucky young co-ed will lower them before the day's over.

Hmmm. Are you suggesting she’s a lesbian? Or maybe with than lantern jaw she’s sporting a marble bag?

Reasonably attractive? Maybe in your house.

she kinda does have a bit of a jay leno chin going. as for the rest of the grill, i'll reserve judgement until i see a pic without those ridiculous glasses. i base my observations on the one section of her that we can see. that section passes muster just fine.

Do you know what a co-ed is?

[quote="Goober McTuber]Do you know what a co-ed is?[/quote]

I thought I did.

Isn't it a college student who inhabits a co-ed dorm? I seem to remember it generally used in reference to females, but, don't believe it necessarily has to.

guess I didn't.

it only applies to females.

not terribly logical, imo. but neither is leaving off the apostrophe in the possessive form of it.

smackaholic wrote:guess I didn't.

it only applies to females.

not terribly logical, imo. but neither is leaving off the apostrophe in the possessive form of it.

A co-ed is a chick with a tight shaved pussy, who lives to suck dick and swallow cum. How could you not know this? Unless your a fag.