Trump/GOP bullshit

[Kierland]

hydroshock

Nice backpedal.

[Bucmonkey]

And your alternative is what?

Just farm your honey bees...Trump positioned your retirement perfectly...

[Softball Bat]

And yet you have done almost nothing else but suck his dick for the last year.

Yeah, not many things are more hilarious than .088 now trying to pretend as if he's been off Donald's nuts for almost a year.





I really don't know what he lacks more, brains or balls.

[Goober McTuber]

I'm just trying to get back in the swing of things after a 2-week vacation...

Even as the 2020 race begins in earnest, President Donald Trump is already suggesting that Democrats cannot beat him fairly -- raising the specter that if he loses next November, he will suggest that the election was not legitimate.

"The Democrats in Congress yesterday were vicious and totally showed their cards for everyone to see," Trump tweeted Tuesday, referring to House Democrats' launching of a broad-scale investigation into him. "When the Republicans had the Majority they never acted with such hatred and scorn! The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!"

Trump 2020 campaign press secretary Kayleigh McEnany echoed that sentiment in a statement on the Democratic investigations. "These desperate Democrats know they cannot beat President Trump in 2020, so instead they have embarked on a disgraceful witch hunt with one singular aim: topple the will of the American people and seize the power that they have zero chance at winning legitimately," she said.

And asked Wednesday about the Democratic investigations, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said this: "They continue to be a group totally taken by small radical leftist fringe of their party and they're completely controlled by it, they know that's not enough to beat this President so they're going to look for other ways to do that."

All of that rhetoric fits into a very clear pattern: Convince the Trump base that it is not possible for him to lose a fair and legitimate election in 2020. Thus, if he loses, it must be, by definition, illegitimate.

None of this should be surprising, given Trump's oft-stated view of the 2016 election -- in which he won the Electoral College but lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by nearly 3 million votes.

Less than three weeks after winning the White House in 2016, Trump sent out this tweet: "In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally."

In a meeting with a bipartisan group of lawmakers just days after his inauguration, Trump was at it again -- reportedly telling the gathering that somewhere between 3 and 5 million illegal votes were cast in the 2016 election and, had only legitimate votes been cast, he would have won the popular vote in addition to the Electoral College.

Neither Trump nor anyone in his administration has ever provided any evidence of his claims of widespread illegality. A commission formed by Trump -- and chaired by failed Kansas gubernatorial candidate Kris Kobach -- was disbanded after less than a year. And study after study has shown that widespread voter fraud -- of the sort alleged by Trump -- simply does not exist.

Of course, Trump is less interested in the facts about voter fraud -- or lack thereof -- than he is about convincing his base that if he loses, it's not because he got less votes, it's because something nefarious is being perpetrated against him by the elites.

How do I know? Because Trump was doing it in the 2016 election -- before he knew he actually won.

In an interview on Fox News Channel on Election Day 2016, Trump said this:

[LOL]"It's largely a rigged system. And you see it at the polling booths, too. There are reports that when people vote for Republicans the entire ticket switches over to Democrats. You've seen that. It's happening at various places today. It's been reported. In other words, the machines, you put down a Republican and it registers as a Democrat. They've had a lot of complaints about that today."[/LOL]

So, yeah.

This is straight from the Trump blueprint -- and not just in politics, either. In his past life as a businessman, Trump would regularly declare victory on a deal loudly and publicly -- even when the facts didn't bear out his bluster. Hell, he somehow spun three bankruptcies as wins for him!

It's not just that Trump doesn't like losing. (No one likes losing.) It's that he is unwilling to accept any sort of loss for fear that defeat might take some of the shine off of his all-I-do-is-win persona.

In the business world, that approach was mostly harmless. Trump could say whatever he wanted but, at the end of the day, it was pretty clear who won and who lost a deal. Money, usually, changed hands. And while lots of people Trump dealt with rolled their eyes about his massive exaggerations, they usually just ignored them.

In politics, Trump's inability to accept that he could lose fair and square is far, far more dangerous.

Michael Cohen, Trump's former longtime fixer, said as much during his congressional testimony in front of the House Oversight Committee last month. "Given my experience working for Mr. Trump, I fear that if he loses the election in 2020, that there will never be a peaceful transition of power," said Cohen.

Sit with that for a minute. And realize what it would mean if the sitting incumbent President of the United States simply refuses to concede he has lost in 2020.

[Derron]

Jonesing that hard are you ??

But even after two weeks...no fucks given about your latest cut and paste drivel.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

...your latest cut and paste drivel.

It's a scroll-wheel nightmare.

[Softball Bat]

Great, dude brought a check. But as has been pointed out it could be for anything. Just because a liar says it is for x doesn’t make it so.

He's been convicted of lying to congress and is looking at a 3 year prison term, so now he's believable?

Six additional checks have now been submitted by Cohen, to go along with the two previous submitted.

Six of them signed by Donald.
Two others signed by Don Jr. and A. Weisselberg.



The checks to Mr. Cohen were sent on a more or less monthly basis throughout 2017, Mr. Trump’s first year in office. Mr.
Cohen provided two checks to the House committee last week and his lawyer, Lanny J. Davis, provided the additional six
checks to The Times this week. Mr. Cohen’s team said it was searching for three others.

Of the eight checks now available, seven were for $35,000 and another was for $70,000 to cover two months’ worth of payments.
Six were signed by Mr. Trump himself while he was president and the other two were signed by his eldest son, Donald Trump
Jr., and his company’s chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/05/us/p ... e=Homepage



Cohen has concocted this whole thing, and has even gone so far as to try to deceive the committee by producing eight checks, signed by three people?

This is what you want to believe?





Tell us your theory, DUMB@SSES.

What were these checks for?

When can we expect Don Jr., A. Weisselberg, or Donald himself to provide proof for what these checks were really for?
Surely that should be easy for them to do.


Checks were for what?

GO...

[Left Seater]

Who knows exactly what they are for, but even the angry racist midget lawyer could raise enough reasonable doubt as to what those checks could potentially be payment for.

But keep skipping right over the fact he likely perjured himself.

[Kierland]

How does that orange racist cock taste in your mouth you fat greedy racist?

[Goober McTuber]

...your latest cut and paste drivel.

It's a scroll-wheel nightmare.

It's.........













.....the Truth.

[Softball Bat]

Who knows exactly what they are for, but even the angry racist midget lawyer could raise enough reasonable doubt as to what those checks could potentially be payment for.

Oh, well if "the midget" could tell us what the eight checks could potentially be for, certainly you can tell us.

GO...

But keep skipping right over the fact he likely perjured himself.

If he perjured himself, do the eight checks disappear?

LMAO!




Damn, this is fun.

Btw, where is Joe?

[Softball Bat]

What's sad is a lonely lard ass from Hickville *popping* like a weasel in to threads to make inane comments that are not at all relevant to the discussion.




Mental illness.

[Screw_Michigan]

Paul Manfort only got four years. What a travesty. No point in Trump pardoning him now, the pardon isn't worth it.

[Goober McTuber]

Does Trump reside in the White House or the Waffle House?

(CNN) — President Donald Trump on Monday night backed away from his push for a vote on an Obamacare replacent until after the 2020 elections, bowing to the political reality that major health care legislation cannot pass in the current Congress.

Trump's statements come a week after his administration announced that it now agreed with a judge's ruling that the entire Affordable Care Act should be scrapped. The opinion was a dramatic reversal from the administration's previous stance that only portions of the act could not be defended.

Trump's latest move allows him to wait on the issue as legal challenges against the health care law, also known as Obamacare, make their way through the federal court system. If it's ultimately overturned, Trump can claim he made good on a campaign promise in time for his 2020 re-election campaign -- though he would then face the prospect of an estimated 20 million Americans losing their health insurance on his watch, with no Republican replacement in the legislative pipeline. If it's upheld -- as it has been in previous Supreme Court challenges -- he can rail against a "liberal" court system.

"The Republicans are developing a really great HealthCare Plan with far lower premiums (cost) & deductibles than ObamaCare. In other words it will be far less expensive & much more usable than ObamaCare. Vote will be taken right after the Election when Republicans hold the Senate & win back the House. It will be truly great HealthCare that will work for America," Trump declared in a series of tweets. "Also, Republicans will always support Pre-Existing Conditions. The Republican Party will be known as the Party of Great HealtCare. Meantime, the USA is doing better than ever & is respected again!"

Trump unsettled Republican lawmakers last week by putting the spotlight back on the thorny issue of repealing and replacing Obamacare, vowing that his party would turn to replacing the health care law as his administration backed a federal court ruling striking down the law in its entirety. Republican congressional leaders quickly sought to distance themselves from Trump's latest drive, mindful that passing such a proposal would be virtually impossible in a divided Congress.

Trump's tweets dialed back expectations that Republicans would be able to pass major health care legislation before the 2020 election, but his promise of a vote that would hinge on a Republican takeback of the House ensures nonetheless that health care will figure prominently in 2020. That is a fight Republicans are wary to have after they suffered huge losses in 2018 congressional races in large part over the issue of health care.

That trepidation did not stop Trump last week from reversing his administration's previous legal position that only certain parts of Obamacare should be struck down, instead arguing that the entire law should be scrapped. The appeals process will likely stretch into next year.

Trump has been stymied on one of his primary campaign promises -- to repeal the signature law of his predecessor -- despite multiple attempts in Congress. Trump attempted on multiple occasions to repeal Obamacare during 2017, when his party was in control of both chambers of Congress, but failed to do so due to a lack of support within his own party.

The failed attempts proved to be a galvanizing force for Democrats in the 2018 midterms. Health care was the top issue for Democratic and independent voters, and focusing on the issue helped Democrats take over the House in January.

The President has insisted in recent days that, despite his administration's position that all of the ACA should be struck down, the GOP will be the party of health care. He's also repeatedly promised to protect people with pre-existing conditions, a provision that would be eliminated if the federal district judge's ruling in a Texas case is upheld on repeal.

Trump said Thursday he's asked Republican senators to work on a replacement to the Affordable Care Act, but no such group appears to exist. Multiple Republican senators who Trump name-checked said they were not a part of a working group, but had spoken with the President about health care recently.

And on Wednesday, Marc Short, Vice President Mike Pence's chief of staff and the former White House legislative affairs director, claimed on CNN that "the President will be putting forward plans this year" to replace Obamacare through Congress.

White House officials were quick to tell CNN that Short had gotten ahead of White House deliberations.

The White House has yet to decide whether it will take the lead on crafting an Obamacare replacement, they said, or whether the President will punt to Republican lawmakers.

[Softball Bat]

The Republicans are developing a really great HealthCare Plan with far lower premiums (cost) & deductibles than ObamaCare.

- Don





Oh sure.
Sure, sure.

[Mikey]

[Diego in Seattle]

Is Trump going to close the border with just one Mexico or all 3?

[Mikey]

Including "Mexico" there's actually four.

And there could be more of them if you keep going south.

[Sirfindafold]

3,1,2

sin,

McTrigger and little mikey

[Screw_Michigan]

“You’re going to win your elections because of health care," Trump says. When voters ask health care questions, Republicans should tell them their first vote in the next Congress will be on a GOP health care plan, he adds. Not much of a response from the crowd.

Lol, good luck with that asswipes.

[Softball Bat]

I'm afraid Don is cracking up.
Can't handle the pressure.


Claimed today that his father was born in Germany.





His father was born in NY.
This is the 4th time he has made this false claim, btw.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 51946.html

He also lied in The Art of the Deal, writing that his father was born in Sweden.

It's not like these are difficult things to verify, btw.




And this truly bizarre series of fuck-ups, also today...











#oranges

[Screw_Michigan]

He has fewer firing synapses than Melty. He is literally ruling from the toilet. We are so fucked.

[Softball Bat]

We must, however, acknowledge, as it seems to me, that man with all his noble
qualities... still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly orange.

- Charles Darwin

[Carson]

Popetart quoting Darwin.

Funny.

[Mikey]

You are gripping, amigo. Gripping. Better start those impeachment proceedings in earnest. He’s about to start wiping your ass with your own degenerates.

[BSmack]

I suppose popetart works better than whoreofbabylontart.

[Goober McTuber]

Popetart reference has been around for years.

[Softball Bat]

pimptart

puptent

popturd

popfart

poptwat

[Softball Bat]

His father was born in NY.
This is the 4th time he has made this false claim, btw.

Check this short video, people...





What is up with this?

[Mikey]

Don't need to watch any video. He's a fucking retard.

[Softball Bat]

Lyin' Ted

[Diego in Seattle]

Faux News reporter tries to look tacticool while trying to produce a false impression that the border is a war zone...

[image]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag ... Fz1TUqp7PA[/image]


Bro...you forgot something...

[Diego in Seattle]

Pele is giving Mexico a one year warning to clean up the border.

If they don't comply he's going to put them on double secret probation.

[mvscal]

Oh, so Don did have an option.

Beyond that obvious fact, Don had two full years to work in DC with the party that he leads in total control.

He was not and is not in total control of the party he leads, dullard.

[Softball Bat]

I said the party Don leads had total control for 2 years.
Fact.

If he was too incompetent to rally the troops behind his agenda then that was his problem, wasn't it?


Dummy.

[Mikey]

Oh, so Don did have an option.

Beyond that obvious fact, Don had two full years to work in DC with the party that he leads in total control.

He was not and is not in total control of the party he leads, dullard.

I guess he's not leading it then.

[Derron]

Pele is giving Mexico a one year warning to clean up the border.

If they don't comply he's going to put them on double secret probation.

Too bad we could not put you on double secret probation. Like not posting for a year or so. You are just jealous that you did not get to fuck Dean Wormers 13 year old daughter on the football field. Right up your wheelhouse there.

[Kierland]

She was the mayor’s daughter you stupid tiny fuck.

[Kierland]

“The Country is full.”

No you red menace there are laws and shit which say otherwise.

God god you Trump ball lickers are horribly craven fucks.

[Joe in PB]

Our country needs no borders, illegal immigration enforcement, or misdemeanor enforcement on drug addicts turning our largest cities into shit strewn shantytowns.

Oh yeah, and America never was great.

Sincerely,

Queerland and other liberal eunuchs