Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Sat Sep 22, 2018 5:50 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Killian wrote:Simple. Believe women who accuse conservatives, don't believe women who accuse liberals. Everything in his life boils down to left vs. right. His whole persona is that of an aggrieved wanna be victim who doesn't want to take accountability for his own actions. Fuck, it's even in his username.
When Keith Ellison is nominated to a Senate confirmed position that requires hearings we can certainly hash out his personal behavior with women.

But he's not, Brett Kavanaugh is, so go fuck yourself in the mean time.

Good for thee but not for me. Got it, you hypocritical cunt bag.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:45 am

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politics ... index.html

So she names 4 people who were at this party, and all 4 have stated that they have no recollection of said party.

As always, Fredo, you hitched your waggon to the wrong horse.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 12:43 am

Well, looks like #2 came forward. He's pretty much fucked.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:14 am

The second allegation? He showed his dick to to someone at a party when he was at Yale.

Burn him at the stake.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:30 am

I believe Rush Limbaugh or Mark Steyn or someone like that called this. He said there will be more allegations from others. It is a concerted effort by the George Soros funded left to smear Cavanaugh and block Trump's agenda. Such level of depravity I've never seen. The Bork and Thomas nominations not withstanding. And Ted Kennedy whose actions resulted in the death of a young woman is called The Lion of the Senate?? Amazing.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:04 am

This second allegation is flimsier than the first, which is damn near impossible.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:05 am

Wolfman wrote:I believe Rush Limbaugh or Mark Steyn or someone like that called this. He said there will be more allegations from others. It is a concerted effort by the George Soros funded left to smear Cavanaugh and block Trump's agenda. Such level of depravity I've never seen.

Assume that this really is some kind of Democrat conspiracy.

If the situation was reversed, would you be at all surprised if the Republicans did exactly what you think the Liberals

are doing?

Would you be disappointed if they didn’t?

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:55 am

Mikey wrote:
Wolfman wrote:I believe Rush Limbaugh or Mark Steyn or someone like that called this. He said there will be more allegations from others. It is a concerted effort by the George Soros funded left to smear Cavanaugh and block Trump's agenda. Such level of depravity I've never seen.
Assume that this really is some kind of Democrat conspiracy.

If the situation was reversed, would you be at all surprised if the Republicans did exactly what you think the Liberals are doing?

Would you be disappointed if they didn’t?

Yes, I would. And no, I wouldn’t.
I guess I’m weird like that thinking that there are still standards of decency that civil society needs to adhere to, particularly when the stakes are high.

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:03 am

Truly, if Kavanaugh steps down or is asked to rescind his nomination, it’d be poetic justice for Trump to nominate a justice who actually would embody all the things the Left thinks Kavanaugh is going to do, ie. outlaw abortion, force women to wear red cloaks and white bonnets, enter into indentured servitude towards men, no longer drive cars, and lose their right to vote.

As it is, I am genuinely embarrassed for the Left that they are so bereft of integrity and morality that they have stooped to this level. This isn’t just one person acting in this fashion, it’s an entire political wing, possibly half this nation which believes that the outcome supersedes the process. When that is the case, rescinding the Bill of Rights cannot be far behind.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 12:43 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Killian wrote:Simple. Believe women who accuse conservatives, don't believe women who accuse liberals. Everything in his life boils down to left vs. right. His whole persona is that of an aggrieved wanna be victim who doesn't want to take accountability for his own actions. Fuck, it's even in his username.
When Keith Ellison is nominated to a Senate confirmed position that requires hearings we can certainly hash out his personal behavior with women.

But he's not, Brett Kavanaugh is, so go fuck yourself in the mean time.

I believe Keith Ellison is currently the nominee for Minnesota attorney general? He sounds like a piece of shit, but I'll let the voters of Minnesota determine that. They seem like sensible people dontcha know?

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:33 pm

Piece of shit? He’s your party’s next-in-command.

https://youtu.be/j3dIa039MGQ[/youtube]

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:33 pm

88 wrote: It sickens me. If the Republicans did anything like this, I would never vote for one again. This is who you want running the country? Imagine you have lead a near perfect life like Judge Kavanaugh, and have been nominated for a dream job, and this fake shit happens. Absolutely amazing.

Are you cool with this action by the D’s? How low do you want your politics to go?

Fake shit?

How bout dem apples?

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:47 pm

screwey is just pissed that Kavanaugh didn't stick his crank in his face.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:14 pm

The fact that Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg and "The Wise Latina" are on the highest court tells me the Republicans had no desire to throw bullshit allegations into the process.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Sep 25, 2018 2:27 pm

MAGA = Make Another Groundless Accusation?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:51 pm

Tina Nguyen wrote:As Washington braces for Thursday’s media frenzy, an even more ominous prospect hangs over the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court: a sinister allegation teased by Michael Avenatti that could explode Kavanaugh’s confirmation—or be another dud. Avenatti, after all, has developed something of a dubious reputation in the six months since he first entered (and quickly dominated) the national scene. His bare-knuckle defense of adult-film actress Stormy Daniels, relentless takedown of Michael Cohen, and undeniable talent for media, social and otherwise, have transformed him into a formidable opponent of Donald Trump and an unlikely Democratic presidential hopeful. It was Avenatti who first predicted that Cohen would be indicted, and Avenatti who later dumped records of Cohen’s suspicious bank activity online. But the ubiquitous “porn lawyer,” as Republicans have dubbed him, has also struck out on occasion. A mysterious CD or DVD containing visual evidence related to Trump’s relationship with Daniels was never released. His “three additional female clients” who he said were “paid hush money prior to the 2016 election” have yet to come forward. So it is with some hesitancy that Democrats are tiptoeing around Avenatti’s latest would-be bombshell: that he is representing another woman with “credible information regarding Judge Kavanaugh” and what he described as “gang rape.”

“We are aware of significant evidence of multiple house parties in the Washington, D.C. area during the early 1980s, during which Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and others would participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs to allow a ‘train’ of men to subsequently gang rape them,”Avenatti wrote Sunday in an e-mail to Mike Davis, chief counsel for nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will be overseeing Thursday’s hearing. “There are multiple witnesses that will corroborate these facts and each of them must be called to testify publicly.”

Evidence to support such an accusation would surely upend Kavanaugh’s confirmation, which has already become a Chernobyl-like political disaster for the White House. But with the clock ticking down to Kavanaugh’s confrontation with Christine Blasey Ford—the Palo Alto University professor who has accused him of a drunken sexual assault at a high-school party 36 years ago—Avenatti’s new client has yet to come forward. On Monday morning, Avenatti tweeted that his client “has previously done work within the State Dept, U.S. Mint, & DOJ,” has been granted “multiple security clearances” in the past, and is eminently credible. On Tuesday, as doubts piled up on both sides of the aisle, Avenatti explained that his client’s name and accusations would be disclosed “only when SHE is ready and we have adequate security measures in place.” Both, he said, should be expected “within the next 36 [hours]”—potentially just hours before the Senate hearing is scheduled to begin.

Democrats are treading cautiously, for now. “If he has something to introduce, he should do it now. I haven’t had any contact with him,” Senator Mazie Hirono told Politico, while her colleague Brian Schatz was more blunt: “You know I never have no comment, but I have no comment about Michael Avenatti.” (One hour after initiating the 36-hour countdown, Avenatti said he was setting his Twitter account to “private” due to “the bots and Trump trolls” attacking him.)

Contrast that with the Democrats’ stentorian defense of Deborah Ramirez, Kavanaugh’s second accuser, who told The New Yorker that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her when both were Yale undergrads. Multiple Democrats told Politico that they had reason to believe Ramirez, despite her own admission that her recollection was hazy, and called for the Senate to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation until both Ford and Ramirez’s accusations were fully investigated. “By pushing forward with this Thursday’s hearing, we’re at real risk of not hearing all of the relevant allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Senator Chris Coons said. “Any senators who don’t have real concerns about Judge Kavanaugh’s reputation, his integrity, ought to take a step back and reconsider at this point.”

Republicans, seizing on Avenatti’s controversial reputation, have attempted to twist his new allegation to their advantage. “How do we know this is a baseless smear against Judge Kavanaugh?” tweeted G.O.P. Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel. “1) No witnesses. 2) No corroborating evidence. 3) Michael Avenatti is involved.”

But even as Republicans and Democrats tussle over the politics of the Kavanaugh accusations—with the Republicans attempting to paint them as ungrounded and politicized, and Kavanaugh going on Fox News to insist he just wants a “fair process” and for his voice to be heard—the threat of a last-minute Avenatti shocker has political observers on edge and at least some Democrats cautiously optimistic.

For now, Avenatti says he is delaying his announcement in order to properly prepare for the avalanche of scrutiny: “We’re deciding how that would occur, making sure there is security in place. We’re getting our ducks in a row,” he told Politico. “This is a very strategic and methodical approach, which is what we did with Stormy Daniels.”

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:57 pm

So none of this came up in the 6 previous times he was vetted for various positions?

Curious.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:17 pm

Could be. I never heard of the guy till now.

At least the GOP in Wisky can laugh it off.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:44 pm

Killian wrote:So none of this came up in the 6 previous times he was vetted for various positions?

Curious.

Politics are a bitch, aren't they? Maybe you should have picked a less repulsive nominee, maybe picking one who didn't oh say believe the president is above the law.

Fuck off.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Tue Sep 25, 2018 8:09 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Killian wrote:So none of this came up in the 6 previous times he was vetted for various positions?

Curious.

Politics are a bitch, aren't they? Maybe you should have picked a less repulsive nominee, maybe picking one who didn't oh say believe the president is above the law.

Fuck off.

Just come out and say that the ends justify the means. You honestly sound like an unhinged twat right now.

You say repulsive, I say political smear job. One of us has a history of being correct, time and time again. The other is you.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Sep 25, 2018 8:50 pm

Killian wrote:One of us has a history of being correct, time and time again.

You got that right. You are beyond delusional.

BBUT BUT BUT IT'S NOT FAIR! POLITICAL SMEAR JOBS ARE ONLY FAIR WHEN REPUBLICVANS DO IT!

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Tue Sep 25, 2018 8:58 pm

Why don't you link me up to a political smear job done by republicans towards a democrat. Was it saying that a presidential candidate didn't pay his taxes? Was it saying that the same candidate wanted to put "y'all back in chains"? Nope, that was done to discredit Romney.

And now, there is this absolute fucking hit job on someone because lefties lost an election and think that accusing someone of sexual assault and rape are completely fine, so long as it keeps them from the position.

You are a morally bankrupt person and honestly one of the dumbest people I have ever seen mash the submit button on any iteration of these boards.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:08 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:Maybe you should have picked a less repulsive nominee...

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 1:05 am

Killian wrote:Why don't you link me up to a political smear job done by republicans towards a democrat. Was it saying that a presidential candidate didn't pay his taxes? Was it saying that the same candidate wanted to put "y'all back in chains"? Nope, that was done to discredit Romney.

And now, there is this absolute fucking hit job on someone because lefties lost an election and think that accusing someone of sexual assault and rape are completely fine, so long as it keeps them from the position.

You are a morally bankrupt person and honestly one of the dumbest people I have ever seen mash the submit button on any iteration of these boards.

Life is so unfair, isn't it Killiard?

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 1:37 am

Way to not answer the question as usual, Fredo.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 1:54 am

Brooks Patterson thinks you're a pussy. Jesus, change your diaper already.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 1:57 am

Strike 2. Still can't answer a simple question about a bullshit claim you made. Maybe you're Christine Blasey Ford.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:37 am

I'm not answering your question because it is disingenuous.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:18 am

Screw_Michigan wrote:I'm not answering your question because it is disingenuous.

There's nothing disingenuous about it, Christine. You just can't do it. What you can do is throw out baseless accusations and then run and hide when you inevitably get called on your bullshit.

Strike 3, pussy. You prove once again that you are robbing others of perfectly good oxygen and suck at life.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:08 pm

Jesus Sam. Have a little dignity.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:09 pm

Killian wrote:
There's nothing disingenuous about it, Christine. You just can't do it. What you can do is throw out baseless accusations and then run and hide when you inevitably get called on your bullshit.

Strike 3, pussy. You prove once again that you are robbing others of perfectly good oxygen and suck at life.

Don't you have sky wizards to be praying to? And schools that you didn't graduate from to root for?

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:33 pm

Are you this much of a spineless, weak kneed pussy in real life?

I bet you've been friend zoned a lot in your life.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:14 pm

Is Kennedy up for confirmation?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:39 pm

Sudden Sam wrote: Dignity? The Dems are leaning on Avenatti (sp?).

Only you would post a 4chat take and use it as gospel.

I had softened on my view over the years that you weren't very smart. But this is a discouraging development.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:52 pm

What a smear campaign, says sky wizard believer Killitard.

https://www.axios.com/third-woman-sexua ... 04913.html

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:09 pm

1st claim - horseshit
2nd claim - horseshit

Any guesses as to the outcome of this claim?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:24 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Only you would post a 4chat take and use it as gospel.

Sudden Sam wrote:Yeah, the above may be total BS

Screw_Michigan wrote:schools that you didn't graduate from to root for?

Screw_Michigan wrote:I'm back at GW for my seventh consecutive official season as a season ticket holder. The year before I just bought tickets at the gate for all but a handful of games.

We axed our successful coach...

Your ability to pummel yourself is staggering.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:45 pm

Killian wrote:Why don't you link me up to a political smear job done by republicans towards a democrat.

You've got to be kidding, right?

Just off the top of my head I can think of a few...Kenya, Muslim, Swift Boat, Benghazi, email, etc., etc.

It works both ways.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:10 pm

Mikey wrote:Benghazi, email

Those were actual, real events. And the person accused of causing them was proven a liar.

Agreed on your other examples.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:22 pm

Mikey wrote:
Killian wrote:Why don't you link me up to a political smear job done by republicans towards a democrat.
You've got to be kidding, right?

Just off the top of my head I can think of a few...Kenya, Muslim, Swift Boat, Benghazi, email, etc., etc.

It works both ways.

No, I'm not kidding. But I was proving a point. Even on something as simple as the question I asked above, Fredo simply will not answer. He's not interested in a debate or discussion, he just wants to drive by. When something is easily provable (I was specifically thinking of the swift boat stuff in '04), he can't answer the question.

Of course they work both ways. And each side will disagree about the veracity and malice of each one.