a Rolling Stone should gather no mas

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:13 pm

Nice going, but then again what do you expect from a left wing nut job rag.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:42 pm

What the fuck are you babbling about?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:46 pm

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:What the fuck are you babbling about?

Don't worry about it.
Haven't you heard of dementia?

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:33 pm

Mikey is just pissed that his hero didn't make the cover of his latest edition of Tiger Beat.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:54 pm

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:What the fuck are you babbling about?

He's talking about how Felchco will want to suck the skin off his nutsack when he sees that picture.

Are you suddenly unconversant with basic propaganda techniques?

BarFlie · Post by **BarFlie** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:07 am

Collector's item of libtard extremism. Get a copy asap cuz they may be rare before you realize it.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:17 am

Not surprising when you have dumb fucks with Che Guevara T shirts. Nothing much else says, it's cool to celebrate a mass murderer---it's hip.

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:27 am

Big O, your kids were probably in diapers the last time that rag was relevant.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:58 am

I wonder if Dr. Dzhokhar is gonna buy five copies for his mother.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:01 am

Mikey wrote:I wonder if Dr. Dzhokhar is gonna buy five copies for his mother.

:|

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:04 am

more misplaced outrage, just like the Zimmerman verdict. RS isn't celebrating the perp, just documenting what happened and may have led to it. They call him a failed monster on the cover, what's the problem? You don't like the celeb pic? Get over it.

why is it that people always need something to be pissed off about?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:28 am

War Wagon wrote:more misplaced outrage, just like the Zimmerman verdict. RS isn't celebrating the perp, just documenting what happened and may have led to it. They call him a failed monster on the cover, what's the problem? You don't like the celeb pic? Get over it.

why is it that people always need something to be pissed off about?

You just lost conservative victimization cred with that take.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:29 am

War Wagon wrote:more misplaced outrage, just like the Zimmerman verdict

Yeah, that's was "misplaced outrage" alright. Nothing about vigilante justice to be outraged about, eh Whitey?

Trampis · Post by **Trampis** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:56 am

Believe it or not, the kid probably didnt pose for a lot of pics with a scowl on his face and a burning American flag in the background.

I'm dumbfounded why this is a big deal.

BarFlie · Post by **BarFlie** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:05 am

Only African American's can kill other African American's and get away with it. /End of debate

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:16 am

Wolfman wrote:

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:36 pm

A worthy send up.

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:12 pm

Wolfman wrote:

Nice going, but then again what do you expect from a left wing nut job rag.

They should have had him wearing a hoodie.

I don't really understand all the criticism. There are like 15 or 20 public photos of the guy, and we've seen them all. They chose the one that fit the cover and fit the article, which apparently asks "How did a seemingly decent kid turn into a monster ?" It's an important question, but one that many Americans don't really want to consider; we want our heroes really good and our bad guys really bad.

Bin Laden was worse, he killed a lot more people; are Time and Newsweek glorifying him ?

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:35 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
War Wagon wrote:more misplaced outrage, just like the Zimmerman verdict
Yeah, that's was "misplaced outrage" alright. Nothing about vigilante justice to be outraged about, eh Whitey?

Spot on, Screwey. George shoulda just laid there and let that colored kid monkey-stomp him to death. The audacity of some folks...

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:40 pm

M2 wrote:Bin Laden was worse, he killed a lot more people; are Time and Newsweek glorifying him ?

No, they were reporting the news. RS is perceived to be commentary on music and celebrity.

That said, that pic helped them accomplish their objective: Attain relevancy (for a month, anyway) and sell more magazines. Nothing to see here...

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:42 pm

Papa Willie wrote:True - but those mags weren't exactly trying to make a hero out of ObL like RS is this little guy. RS is desperate, though. They've lost a lot of readers over the years, so this is just another example of "bad press is good press".

The RS cover is just a drop in the bucket.

I don't recall the same kind of backlash regarding these McVeigh covers, although it was in the days before the social media age...

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:49 pm

I didn't even know Rolling Stone was still in business

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:50 pm

Truman wrote:
M2 wrote:Bin Laden was worse, he killed a lot more people; are Time and Newsweek glorifying him ?
No, they were reporting the news. RS is perceived to be commentary on music and celebrity.

Rolling Stone has been doing legitimate articles for decades:

Is Tsarnaev more of a monster than Charles Manson ? Who knows, I'll let the history books decide that, but both are worthy of examination.

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:00 pm

Perhaps Rolling Stone should have gone with this photo, of Tsarnaev being apprehended on the boat, released by one of the officers who took him into custody. Note the laser sight on his forehead.

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:22 pm

Papa Willie wrote: RS is a bunch of cock-chewing moronic SF faggots that will do ANYTHING to survive. They're trying to say "he didn't mean to, the conservatives made him do it". And I can say that will full confidence - without even having read the article.

I imagine that the vast majority of the people upset by the cover haven't actually opened an issue of Rolling Stone in a decade. The cover may typically feature celebrities, but there's always one or more news stories announced in large type as well. Here are the four recent covers... the investigative reports include Gangster Bankers, The NRA vs. America, Rape & the Military, What Obama Must Do About the Climate Crisis and The Truth about the Bailout.

Papa Willie wrote:They should seriously just stick to music. Then again - their reviews have almost always been the opposite of what is truth in that, and they've always put liberal licking shit deposits (like Springsteen) up on a pedestal where they have no business in being at.

Rolling Stone's investigative reporting... is probably the best in the US now.

Tabibi is an impressive journalist. The cover is to make the magazine money. It's a free market after all. Don't like it ? Don't buy it.

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:47 pm

Papa Willie wrote: I haven't bought it in about 30 years. And quit trolling about it's "investigative reporting". It's one of the most biased chunks of shit anywhere, and that's saying a helluva lot. Even as a teenager, I quickly saw and understood how painfully gay & fucked up they were. Sorry that you haven't progressed to that level of maturity yet.

Matt Taibbi has a new piece available on Rolling Stone's website saying basically the same thing... that people generally agree with the 70's Dr. Hook song that only self-described "big rock singers" get on the cover of Rolling Stone, and they just don't know that Rolling Stone has long been in the "hard news" business as well. To Taibbi, the gap between perception and reality is largely responsible for the outcry. ( Taibbi says that's been part of the magazine's focus since its inception.)

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 2:30 am

Truman wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:
War Wagon wrote:more misplaced outrage, just like the Zimmerman verdict
Yeah, that's was "misplaced outrage" alright. Nothing about vigilante justice to be outraged about, eh Whitey?
Spot on, Screwey. George shoulda just laid there and let that colored kid monkey-stomp him to death. The audacity of some folks...

Why do you hate personal responsibility?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 2:59 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:Why do you hate personal responsibility?

Self defense is the most basic form of personal responsibility, moron.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:12 pm

I guess vigilantes aren't responsible for their behavior, eh you wetbacked piece of shit?

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:15 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:Why do you hate personal responsibility?

You DO realize Martin attacked Zimmerman, correct?

“He jumped out from the bushes, and he said, ‘What the fuck is your problem, homie?’ And I got my cell phone out to call 911 this time, and I said, ‘I don’t have a problem.’ And he goes, ‘Now you have a problem,’ and he punched me in the nose,” Zimmerman told the investigator.

Zimmerman said the blow knocked him to the ground, and Martin got on top of him.

“He puts his hand on my nose and my mouth, and he says ‘You are going to die tonight,’ ” said Zimmerman. “As he banged my head again, I just pulled out my firearm and shot him… He is mounted on top of me, and I just shot him, and he falls off. And he’s, like, ‘Alright you got it, you got it.’ “

Read more: http://fox59.com/2013/07/01/george-zimm ... z2ZbBnhgUK

Why do YOU hate the Constitution?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:25 pm

Truman wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:Why do you hate personal responsibility?
You DO realize Martin attacked Zimmerman, correct?

You DO realize Zimmerman initiated the entire confrontation, right? Fuck off, cunt.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:35 pm

Wrong again, shitdick. Tr'noggle was killed during the commission of a violent crime in a straight up, cut and dried case of self-defense.

Asking a stranger what they are doing in your neighborhood isn't initiating a confrontation. Punching somebody in the fucking face IS initiating a confrontation. I'm not in the least bit surprised to see that you are too fucking stupid to understand that.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:37 pm

mvscal wrote: Asking a stranger what they are doing in your neighborhood isn't initiating a confrontation.

Doing it while armed? Yeah, that's no big deal.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:42 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Truman wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:Why do you hate personal responsibility?
You DO realize Martin attacked Zimmerman, correct?
You DO realize Zimmerman initiated the entire confrontation, right? Fuck off, cunt.

Oh. So Zimmerman pulled his weapon and then physically attacked Martin with his nose as Trayvon came up from behind? Well, then, that changes things...

You're gonna make a swell journalist, Screwey: If the facts don't fit the truth, make 'em up.

Die in a South African necklacing.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:44 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
mvscal wrote: Asking a stranger what they are doing in your neighborhood isn't initiating a confrontation.
Doing it while armed? Yeah, that's no big deal.

Just because concealed carry isn't legal in the District doesn't mean that it's illegal in other places that actually acknowledge the constitution.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:46 pm

Oh OK, so what's legal and what's not determines if something is right or not.

Die of ass AIDS.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:47 pm

Truman wrote: Just because concealed carry isn't legal in the District doesn't mean that it's illegal in other places that actually acknowledge the constitution.

Assault is legal in Florida?

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:52 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Truman wrote: Just because concealed carry isn't legal in the District doesn't mean that it's illegal in other places that actually acknowledge the constitution.
Assault is legal in Florida?

Of course not, which is why Zimmerman had legal precedent to use deadly force on Martin. Now you're catching on, Screwey..

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:22 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
mvscal wrote: Asking a stranger what they are doing in your neighborhood isn't initiating a confrontation.
Doing it while armed? Yeah, that's no big deal.

What difference does that make? Zimmerman didn't draw his weapon until after the niqqer violently assaulted him.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Sun Jul 21, 2013 3:28 am

Truman wrote:and I said, ‘I don’t have a problem.’ And he goes, ‘Now you have a problem,’ and he punched me in the nose,”

This doesn't surprise me, Justin Bieber is running amok as well. WTF is going on down there?