Disturbing films

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Disturbing films

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Right....look, Husker, check back with "Dr. Phibes" and maybe he can fill your obviously depleted scrips. Of course I don't roll out any sort of intellectual approach to any subject on this palsied forum, let alone movies :popcorn: . Are you kidding? I mean beside your obviously total fakery to begin with :wink: But when it comes to piano playing, Condi takes a back seat to Nixon. She touts some classical training but actually can't play for shit. I think lack of a soul has something to do with it. Her record as National Security Director was of course the worst in American history--and not only for 9/11. Her tenure as Secretary of State was similarly dismal and disgraceful. She is a weak and hapless total fraud who facilitated--if only by passive inaction--the greatest crime in modern history.

Now there's a disturbing flick to be made--"9/11--The Inside Job" Who would play Condi? Whoopi Goldberg?

Here's the starring cast of heinous criminals...what do you think...Ed Asner as Cheney?
Image
Before God was, I am
Jerkovich
Please pay attention to Me
Posts: 1149
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:10 pm

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Jerkovich »

Mikey, you kill me!
Image
Jerkovich
Please pay attention to Me
Posts: 1149
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:10 pm

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Jerkovich »

Mikey, you kill me!
Image
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by bradhusker »

LTS, of course you call the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, "the greatest crime in history", because you are a very disturbed individual. ONLY a disturbed person such as yourself could twist this around.
Saddam was a mass killer of both women and children. The United Nations didnt care to oppose him, due to the fact that the UN is filled with Muslim nations with murderers of their own.
ONLY a sick depraved mind like yours LTS, can call GW and Condy criminals. EVEN though your beloved Bill Clinton can be viewed saying the exact same things as both Cheney and Bush.

LTS, your mind is so sick and distorted, that when you call GW a criminal, I am this close to having you "baker acted".
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by R-Jack »

Of course I don't roll out any sort of intellectual approach to any subject
File this under the "water is wet" category.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Disturbing films

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sorry to break up the Fasci "what if" party, but just because you tedious seething right-wing rats are still pissed that you lost WWII doesn't mean you know shit about films, music, literature, history, philosophy, or the taste of trembling poontang, because you obviously don't. You voted for Sarah Palin!!! You are such utterly disgraced piles of melting ice in a urinal, such reused plastic dog-shit bags, such total cowards as to make the Watch Captain look honorable. Why...do you even try? Just stand on your hind legs, pant and wait for a treat!
Are you capable of discussing anything without nonsensically reverting back to righty/lefty purse swinging, you depthless robot?
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12086
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by mvscal »

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sorry to break up the Fasci "what if" party, but just because you tedious seething right-wing rats are still pissed that you lost WWII doesn't mean you know shit about films, music, literature, history, philosophy, or the taste of trembling poontang, because you obviously don't. You voted for Sarah Palin!!! You are such utterly disgraced piles of melting ice in a urinal, such reused plastic dog-shit bags, such total cowards as to make the Watch Captain look honorable. Why...do you even try? Just stand on your hind legs, pant and wait for a treat!

Huh?
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 3954
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Pandorum was good. Not really disturbing, but I liked it.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Disturbing films

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

mvscal wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sorry to break up the Fasci "what if" party, but just because you tedious seething right-wing rats are still pissed that you lost WWII doesn't mean you know shit about films, music, literature, history, philosophy, or the taste of trembling poontang, because you obviously don't. You voted for Sarah Palin!!! You are such utterly disgraced piles of melting ice in a urinal, such reused plastic dog-shit bags, such total cowards as to make the Watch Captain look honorable. Why...do you even try? Just stand on your hind legs, pant and wait for a treat!

Huh?
What do mean "Huh?"..as though you didn't vote for McCain/Palin? Can you even breath without lying? And B-Juice...I mean "Dr. Phibes"...yes Pandorum is good but not disturbing. So who fucking cares? you want disturbing, check out City Of Life And Death, the grim tale of the Japanese devastation of Nanking. now go back to pretending to do do whatever it is you pretend to be.
Before God was, I am
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 3954
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Well it didn't really touch on what film theorists of the 1970s used, Althusserian Marxism, Brechtian aesthetics, Lacanian psychoanalysis and semiotics to try to expose the ideological workings of mainstream Hollywood cinema and to suggest an avant-garde alternative to mainstream narrative cinema which would trigger the disruption of bourgeois ideological thinking in the audience and its replacement with objective theoretical thinking, echoing Marx's prophesy that under socialism, 'the senses themselves will become directly theoretical'.

We'd best consult King Crimson about this.

hippy.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Disturbing films

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

What's this, your B-Juice fake "socialist' drivel just rolled out automatically because you are one lazy fuckstain? And it's really poorly done--no real satire achieved at parodying the insufferable art-speak, etc. Why...do you even try? Humor us and give us a hint.
Before God was, I am
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 3954
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Dr_Phibes »

It's irony you fucking twat. Do yourself a favour, look into it.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Disturbing films

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

No. it's not "irony" at all. It's just a sloppy attempt at satire. Don't you know what irony is? Invented by the Greeks of course, irony is a technique of dramatic suspense--either tragic or comic--where the audience knows something the actor doesn't. Your hack explanation is actually worse than your weak-hammed attempt at comedy. Get your act together.
Before God was, I am
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 3954
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Dr_Phibes »

While you are a hippy, I admire your resolve 8)
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12086
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by mvscal »

LTS TRN 2 wrote:What do mean "Huh?"..as though you didn't vote for McCain/Palin?
No, I didn't.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by bradhusker »

Papa Willie wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:No. it's not "irony" at all. It's just a sloppy attempt at satire. Don't you know what irony is? Invented by the Greeks of course, irony is a technique of dramatic suspense--either tragic or comic--where the audience knows something the actor doesn't. Your hack explanation is actually worse than your weak-hammed attempt at comedy. Get your act together.

Have you ever pissed in a water fountain and thought "this is just what I want to be"?
No, But someone should piss into LTS's mouth and wash some of that phoney pretentiousness down his throat.
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

Three pages in, and nobody has mentioned any of these?

Image

Image

Image

I'm pretty sure I'll never forget the curb-stomping scene.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
DELSDAD
Elwood
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 6:06 pm

Re: Disturbing films

Post by DELSDAD »

I think someone did mention Silence.

Very entertaining thread hijack BTW.

I thought of this one.
Image
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Goober McTuber »

The most disturbing film of all....











































....covers AP's bathroom mirror.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Disturbing films

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Terry in Crapchester wrote:Three pages in, and nobody has mentioned any of these?
Meh. Those are all pretty mainstream movies. Nothing wrong with that, but none of them even scratch the surface of truly disturbing violence, torture and depravity compared to other films, like some mentioned in this thread.

Stay innocent, Terry.

For me, personally, what has been seen, cannot be unseen. :shock:
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Goober McTuber »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Meh. Those are all pretty mainstream movies. Nothing wrong with that, but none of them even scratch the surface of truly disturbing violence, torture and depravity compared to other films, such as any of Toddowen's home movies.
FTFY.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by bradhusker »

salo,

so far, none of you has put forth anything, and I mean ANYTHING even one tenth as disturbing as salo.

Nazis forcing nubile young naked teens to violate one another? Eat each others warm feces? Drink each others warm piss? Nazis jacking off to such depraved acts? And this is only scratching the surface with this film. I actually have seen the directors cut of this grotesque film, deleted scenes and all. And I am here to tell you that I will never ever be the same as a result of viewing this repulsive piece of celluloid.

im damaged goods.
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Goober McTuber »

I don't often read bradhusker posts, but when I do, I find sig material.

Sincerely,

Image
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by bradhusker »

Goober McTuber wrote:I don't often read bradhusker posts, but when I do, I find sig material.

Sincerely,

Image
Goober, if you watched "salo", you'd be more than just damaged goods, you would piss and shit in young girls' mouths. AND, you'd partake in their piss and shit with glee in your heart.
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Disturbing films

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Husker, you're supposed to take the meds, not tape them to your nipples. Did you even see Salo? There are no Nazis in it at all. Those soldiers portrayed are Italian Black Shirt fascists, and the kids are actors, the feces is fake--there's no urine scenes--and the sex is mannered (which means it is implied with the convention that allows the actors to keep their clothes on while apparently having intercourse). The theme of the film is the collaboration of the Italian aristocracy during the war with the Italian Fascists and the overall German Nazi design. The filmmaker assumes the audience is familiar with the writings and philosophy of Marquis De Sade. And except for the fascinating cast of faces--those decadent aristocrats--the film is rather boring as the long speeches are rolled out pretty much in the flat and tedious style of De Sade.

Another actual candidate for this list might be We Have To Talk About Kevin, a disturbing story of a mother (Tilda Swinton) dealing with the aftermath of her (classic Bad Seed) son having committed a high-school massacre (bow and arrow, pep-rally :popcorn: ). Excellent troubling subtleties in the mother/son relationship and great acting all around.
Before God was, I am
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by bradhusker »

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Husker, you're supposed to take the meds, not tape them to your nipples. Did you even see Salo? There are no Nazis in it at all. Those soldiers portrayed are Italian Black Shirt fascists, and the kids are actors, the feces is fake--there's no urine scenes--and the sex is mannered (which means it is implied with the convention that allows the actors to keep their clothes on while apparently having intercourse). The theme of the film is the collaboration of the Italian aristocracy during the war with the Italian Fascists and the overall German Nazi design. The filmmaker assumes the audience is familiar with the writings and philosophy of Marquis De Sade. And except for the fascinating cast of faces--those decadent aristocrats--the film is rather boring as the long speeches are rolled out pretty much in the flat and tedious style of De Sade.

Another actual candidate for this list might be We Have To Talk About Kevin, a disturbing story of a mother (Tilda Swinton) dealing with the aftermath of her (classic Bad Seed) son having committed a high-school massacre (bow and arrow, pep-rally :popcorn: ). Excellent troubling subtleties in the mother/son relationship and great acting all around.
I guess I can safely assume that you've not seen the directors cut with the deleted scenes? Certain scenes were cut from the final version of the film, due to the fact that these scenes were so vile and disgusting, that no "civilized" society would tolerate them.

Do you understand what kind of depravity im talking about here? There are things going on in those deleted scenes that I CANNOT even print here in this forum for fear of my own life.

Until you come to grips with that, I dont know what else there is to tell you.
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Disturbing films

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

An absolute lie, there is no "director's cut" You're a disgrace as a comedian.


Another actual candidate for a truly disturbing film is Melancholia, with Wagner never sounding so right (yikes!) and the death of the planet never seeming so natural. A tough sled through the first half, but its trenchant underwater pace is designed to build up the finale.
Before God was, I am
bradhusker
Certified Cockologist
Posts: 2085
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:18 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by bradhusker »

LTS TRN 2 wrote:An absolute lie, there is no "director's cut" You're a disgrace as a comedian.


Another actual candidate for a truly disturbing film is Melancholia, with Wagner never sounding so right (yikes!) and the death of the planet never seeming so natural. A tough sled through the first half, but its trenchant underwater pace is designed to build up the finale.
Why would I lie? What is there to gain by lying about a sick, vile disgusting film? A film that pretends to have some artistic value, BUT, in reality, is nothing more than kiddie porn.

I didnt say that I own this disgusting film. I merely had the misfortune to view a version that few have ever seen. YOU LTS are mad that you dont have the connections that I do in order to view rare cinema. AND as a result, you lash out with, "LIAR LIAR panties on FIRE".

LTS- Life is all about "connections", its who you know buddy.
I'll pull you out of that one bunk hilton and cast you down with the sodomites. The warden, shawshank redemption.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Dinsdale »

Without going back through 3 pages...

Has this not been mentioned yet?


Image
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Invictus
H.N.I.C.
Posts: 797
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:53 am

Re: Disturbing films

Post by Invictus »

I think it has Dinsy.

"World's Greatest Dad" directed by Bobcat Goldthwaite is creepy but funny. Robin Williams' son asphyxiates during a choking session and some real hyjinx ensue when he covers it up. There is also a nude scene at the end that I think everyone will enjoy.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Disturbing films

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

DELSDAD wrote:I think someone did mention Silence.

Very entertaining thread hijack BTW.

I thought of this one.
Image
Good flick, but not disturbing--unless you're a bi-sexual New York SOHO party vamp who can't get laid. I thought the film expressed one actual interesting idea when the scientist who had tracked the UFO to the NYC apartment roof asks the disbelieving kids, "Why..do you suppose they would have to be big?"

And Wonderland was properly grim and bloody, but in a cool sort of action flick style. Val Kilmer's last good role?

Trainspotting was a flat-out dark comedy, complete with happy ending, so...no.

Okay, a truly disturbing flick was released last year, and some of you actually voted for this malignant creature..

It's God's Will that I resign while saying "I'm not a quitter"...and that I continue to pretend I'm important...
Image
Before God was, I am
Post Reply