Iowa caucus, call it

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21651
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by smackaholic »

win-willard
place-ron paul
show-santorum

santorum, will end up the nominee IMO. for 2 main reasons. he doesn't have paul's head in the sand foreign policy and he doesn't have magic undies. all the rest of the alleged conservatives had their moment. i think they'll stick with rick, simply because nobody is left.

i get a crack out of the so called pundits who keep asking why mit can't break 25%. they say it's romneycare or he isn't conservative enough.

bullshit.

it's his religion. period. end of story. too many fundies (sup tart?) in the republican party to let a mormon win.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by poptart »

smackaholic wrote:it's his religion. period. end of story. too many fundies (sup tart?) in the republican party to let a mormon win.
Yes, he's a wierdo.

In fact, I think Santorum should adopt a new campaign slogan starting from here-on-out.


Santorum 2012 - Don't Let the Mormon Win!
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by War Wagon »

Jsc810 wrote: A truly sad group, but someone has to win tomorrow.
No surprise you'd regurgitate lib bile like a good little Obama cocksucker.
I'll call it for Romney.
As will I - in November as well as tomorrow..
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12086
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by mvscal »

Jsc810 wrote:Image


A truly sad group, but someone has to win tomorrow.
What is truly sad is that every single one of those dildos up there would be a dramatic improvement over the fucked up Kenyan halfwit in office right now.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12086
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by mvscal »

smackaholic wrote:santorum, will end up the nominee IMO.
He couldn't even win in his home state in 2006. How is he going to win nationwide in 2012?
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by poptart »

mvscal wrote:Kenyan
Tin foil.



:wink:
User avatar
Go Coogs'
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2415
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:59 pm

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Go Coogs' »

Everyone was hot on Huckabee in the ealry caucuses, but it was McCain by a large margin in the end.

I feel as though Santorum is the Huckabee of this group. He'll steal a couple of caucuses early and gain a lot of attention but Romney will win in the end.

How come nobody has bought into Paul yet? He is by far the most sane one of that entire group.
88 wrote:Go Coogs' (Regular Season Total Points Champ)
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12086
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by mvscal »

Go Coogs' wrote:He is by far the most sane one of that entire group.
Uh, no. Ron Paul lost even a nodding acquaintance with sanity long ago.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

mvscal wrote:Uh, no. Ron Paul lost even a nodding acquaintance with sanity long ago.
Registering and posting as "Jimmy Rimjob" at one of the most degenerative shitholes in the history of the internet probably doesn't qualify you as much of an authority on sanity. Sayin'.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mace »

Romney leads Paul by a couple of points in the latest Iowa poll with Santorum in third with his stock rising daily. My guess is Romney wins.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Van »

Image

2, 3, 4, 6, 5, 1
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20574
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Screw_Michigan »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
mvscal wrote:Uh, no. Ron Paul lost even a nodding acquaintance with sanity long ago.
Registering and posting as "Jimmy Rimjob" at one of the most degenerative shitholes in the history of the internet probably doesn't qualify you as much of an authority on sanity. Sayin'.
Bwahah.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29903
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mikey »

The fact that anybody gives a flying fuck about what happens in Iowa shows how truly disfunctional our system is.
User avatar
Y2K
Internet Overlord
Posts: 2830
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:07 am
Location: Fresno CA.

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Y2K »

Mikey wrote:The fact that anybody gives a flying fuck about what happens in Iowa shows how truly disfunctional our system is.
This is so true. Who fucking cares?
User avatar
M2
2005 Cryin' Ryan Winner
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: "Baghdad by the Bay"

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by M2 »

Y2K wrote:
Mikey wrote:The fact that anybody gives a flying fuck about what happens in Iowa shows how truly disfunctional our system is.
This is so true. Who fucking cares?
The unemployed "grease spot" from orange country with around 150,000 posts this year.


You need to blame someone when you wander around in public with a "fanny pack" at Knott's Berry Farm .
Image
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21651
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by smackaholic »

if knee high tassled suede boots are part of your work outfit, you don't need to be running appearance smack on anyone.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12086
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by mvscal »

Jsc810 wrote:Perry compares defeating Obama to defeating the Nazis.


Stupid motherfucker. That is an insult to all those who actually served on D-Day.
Not in the least. It is going to take a comparative effort to dig this sad, fucked up country out of the financial and economic hole dug by this administration.

Chimpy's wildest money shots were only a drop in Screwy's mop bucket compared to the oceanic, rough surf bukkake sessions with which Obongo has drenched the American taxpayer.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by War Wagon »

Mikey wrote:The fact that anybody gives a flying fuck about what happens in Iowa shows how truly disfunctional our system is.
most people voting in Iowa at least know how to spell dysfunctional.

Idiot.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29903
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mikey »

Took you quite a while to figure it out.
Main Entry: dys·function Pronunciation Guide
Variant(s): also dis·function \ds, ()dis+\
Function: noun
Etymology: dys- or 1dis- + function
1 : impaired or abnormal functioning (as of an organ of the body)
2 : a nonadaptive trait or condition; especially : one failing to serve a useful or adjustive purpose in society
- dys·functional \ds, ()dis+\ adjective
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mace »

War Wagon wrote:
Mikey wrote:The fact that anybody gives a flying fuck about what happens in Iowa shows how truly disfunctional our system is.
most people voting in Iowa at least know how to spell dysfunctional.

Idiot.
Fuck the spelling. What's it mean??

Oh, thanks, Mikey, but can you now explain all those big words in the definitions to me and all of the other dysfunctional Iowans?
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29903
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mikey »

Iowans aren't disfunctional, the system is disfunctional. Iowans are in general good salt of the earth heartland Americans who, every four years, have their importance in the larger scheme of things inflated by the political press by a factor of about 1,000.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mace »

Mikey wrote:Iowans aren't disfunctional. They're, in general, good salt of the earth heartland Americans who, every four years, have their importance in the larger scheme of things inflated by the political press by a factor of about 1,000.
Agreed, and the vast majority of Iowans will be happy when the media leaves the state, along with all of the fucking politicians. I unplugged my phone last week after getting a steady stream of phone calls from politicians with their recorded bullshit and surveys. We have the misfortune of being first in line for the caucuses and primary elections....something that's only important to our state politicians.
The usual participation in the Iowa "caucuses" is about equivalent to the population of Pomona, CA. Why should they count for anything more than a minor city in Los Angeles County?
We don't count for anything more than anyone else, we're just first in line. New Hampshire is next. We just have the good fortune to be the testing plot for all of the political ads that you will poor bastards will have to suffer through later. I might be wrong, but I don't think anyone who has ever won a caucus in Iowa has ever been elected....aside from the incumbent.
Last edited by Mace on Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by War Wagon »

the political press will move on and largely forget about Iowa starting about, say, tomorrow.

In the meantime, let them have their say. Somebody has to go first, might as well be them.
H4ever
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1388
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:01 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by H4ever »

Yea....never understood what was so important about Iowa other than voting first. Wonder why Kansas or somebody doesn't vote a week before Iowa to steal their thunder? Some sort of rule or law?
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mace »

H4ever wrote:Yea....never understood what was so important about Iowa other than voting first. Wonder why Kansas or somebody doesn't vote a week before Iowa to steal their thunder? Some sort of rule or law?
Other states have moved their dates up but we just change our date so that we can be first. It happened this year, which is why the caucus is on January 3, and our state politicians were willing to move it into December just to remain first. I guess they enjoy the media exposure and getting their 15 minutes which, thankfully, is almost up.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by War Wagon »

H4ever wrote:Some sort of rule or law?
yes, there are rules and laws that govern how and when a primary election may be conducted as opposed to a caucus.

But I won't delve into them because somebody might think it's dysfunctional.
User avatar
missjo
I'm a Fucking Princess
Posts: 643
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:50 am
Location: Oz

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by missjo »

mvscal wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:Image


A truly sad group, but someone has to win tomorrow.
What is truly sad is that every single one of those dildos up there would be a dramatic improvement over the fucked up Kenyan halfwit in office right now.
In all Honesty do you really think America would be in any better condition socially & economically with John McCain & Sarah Palin in charge the last 3 years?
& how would they have made it so
especially since the problems with the economy were in the making long before he took office
I mean look at what is happening in the rest of the world
You just can't fix stupid...trust me I've tried
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7167
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Smackie Chan »

Jsc810 wrote:Image


A truly sad group
Interesting BBC article here showing how the limeys view this year's crop.

Yeah, I know...who gives a big fat fukken hamster cokk what those dentally challenged nimrods think. Still, some interesting takes from an outsider's perspective. I especially like "the focus in American politics on religious views of matters sexual seems very alien."
"They say that I have no hits and that I’m difficult to work with. And they say that like it’s a bad thing!”

Tom Waits
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by poptart »

Ken Doll Romney is such a blatant phony baloney pile of dicks that it's hard to believe that any rational adult would vote for him.


Santorum??

LMAO! LMAO!

Dennis Miller: Santorum's not going to get the nomination. He sounds like Charlie Brown's parents in the background.


Great job, Iowa.

You bunch of fucking idiots - Hi Mace!
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Goober McTuber »

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, whose strong base of evangelical Christian supporters has thrust him into contention in Iowa, said on Monday that he believes states should have the right to outlaw birth control and sodomy without the interference of the Supreme Court.

In an interview with Jake Tapper on ABC News, Santorum reiterated his opposition to the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling that prevented Connecticut from banning contraception.

“The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that," he said. "It is not a constitutional right. The state has the right to pass whatever statutes they have. That's the thing I have said about the activism of the Supreme Court--they are creating rights, and it should be left up to the people to decide."

Santorum said he also opposes the Supreme Court's 2003 Lawrence v. Texas decision striking down a ban on sodomy in Texas and 13 other states. Even though he would not personally vote for a ban on sodomy, he said, he thinks states should legally be able to pass them, because sodomy is not a constitutionally protected right.

"I thought that law was an improper law ... but that doesn't mean the state doesn’t have a right to do that," he said.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

smackaholic wrote:santorum, will end up the nominee IMO.
Here's what I think happens from here on out . . .

Only a matter of time before both Perry and Bachmann drop out of the race, the overwhelming majority of supporters of both will then go to Santorum.

The former frontman for Newtie and the Blowhards stays in the race, basically as a stalking horse on behalf of Santorum and used against Who Let the Dogs Out and, if necessary, Paul.

That all points to Santorum ultimately winning the nomination, imho.
mvscal wrote:He couldn't even win in his home state in 2006. How is he going to win nationwide in 2012?
He'll win the nomination. The general election is another story, though.
mvscal wrote:Kenyan
Returning to your birther roots, I see.

By all means, keep it up. I'm sure it'll work out quite well for you.
War Wagon wrote:
JSC810 wrote:A truly sad group, but someone has to win tomorrow.

No surprise you'd regurgitate lib bile like a good little Obama cocksucker.
Uhhh, you might want to check Chip's posting history. Dude voted for your boy, W, twice, supported Giuliani in '08 and Gary Johnson this year, and also called a McCain landslide win in '08 the day before the election. He's a Republican through and through, just a little disillusioned with the direction the party has taken. Better late than never, I guess.
Last edited by Terry in Crapchester on Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mace »

poptart wrote:Ken Doll Romney is such a blatant phony baloney pile of dicks that it's hard to believe that any rational adult would vote for him.


Santorum??

LMAO! LMAO!

Dennis Miller: Santorum's not going to get the nomination. He sounds like Charlie Brown's parents in the background.


Great job, Iowa.

You bunch of fucking idiots - Hi Mace!
Iowa doesn't elect the nominee, they just eliminate some of the pretenders like Perry, Newt, and Bachmann. Santorum came out of nowhere in the past week and was basically ignored by Romney the past several months. That won't be the case now, and they will target him the same way they targeted Newt and Perry, and will get the same results. Romney will be the nominee when all is said and done.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mace »

Jsc810 wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:Uhhh, you might want to check Chip's posting history. Dude voted for your boy, W, twice, supported Giuliani in '08 and Gary Johnson this year, and also called a McCain landslide win in '08 the day before the election. He's a Republican through and through, just a little disillusioned with the direction the party has taken. Better late than never, I guess.
:shock: Damn, Terry, you've been paying attention. And you're right, except I'm more than just a little disillusioned. My votes:

1980 Reagan
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush
1992 Bush
1996 Clinton
2000 Bush
2004 Bush
2008 McCain

But if Santorum is nominated, then I'm voting for Obama.

What the right wing has done to the Republican party nauseates me.
We share the same voting record except for '96, and also share the same disgust for what the Republican Party has become. Right wing religious whack jobs are now dictating policy and platform and won't understand why they can't win a general election.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by War Wagon »

Mace wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:Uhhh, you might want to check Chip's posting history. Dude voted for your boy, W, twice, supported Giuliani in '08 and Gary Johnson this year, and also called a McCain landslide win in '08 the day before the election. He's a Republican through and through, just a little disillusioned with the direction the party has taken. Better late than never, I guess.
:shock: Damn, Terry, you've been paying attention. And you're right, except I'm more than just a little disillusioned. My votes:

1980 Reagan
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush
1992 Bush
1996 Clinton
2000 Bush
2004 Bush
2008 McCain

But if Santorum is nominated, then I'm voting for Obama.

What the right wing has done to the Republican party nauseates me.
We share the same voting record except for '96, and also share the same disgust for what the Republican Party has become. Right wing religious whack jobs are now dictating policy and platform and won't understand why they can't win a general election.
I rarely C & P multiple quotes but this series all require a response.

Terry, I don't care who Jsc voted for in the past or if he has called himself a republican, he's certainly not a conservative in any modern sense.

Jsc, your support of abortion and gay marriage nauseates me. The fact you're a scumbag lawyer heightens that sense. Oh, and I'll call bullshit on you voting for Reagan in 1980 since you wouldn't have been old enough to vote.

Mace, so being against abortion and gay marriage makes one a "right wing religious whack job"? So be it then, even though I'm not all that religious, unless you would call keeping my fridge stocked with Bud Light religious. In that, I'm a fervent believer.

But I love how people who support murdering babies or cornholers setting up house preach about tolerance while at the same time being completely intolerant of anybody espousing the least bit of religious faith. Go fuck your hypocritical selves.

As for Romney or Santorum, I'm ok with either of them but will go with Romney because I believe he has the best chance of beating Obama.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Van »

Wags wrote:Oh, and I'll call bullshit on you voting for Reagan in 1980 since you wouldn't have been old enough to vote.
Huh? 1980 was thirty-one years ago. Thirty-one plus eighteen (voting age) equals forty-eight. You're calling bullshit on Jsc being forty-eight? Dude has sutures older than that.
I love how people who support murdering babies or cornholers setting up house preach about tolerance while at the same time being completely intolerant of anybody espousing the least bit of religious faith.
When do you ever see pro-choice or pro-gay marriage types advocating the banning of religious faith...as in, making it illegal?

Your psychotic conservative zeal is writing checks that common sense can't cash.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by War Wagon »

psst... 31+18 = 49

and 1980 was 32 years ago.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Van »

War Wagon wrote:psst... 31+18 = 49
:lol:

:doh:
and 1980 was 32 years ago.
Depends on the month, obviously. So how old do you think Jsc is? You don't think he's at least fifty?

Oh, and why did you skip this one...
Van wrote:
I love how people who support murdering babies or cornholers setting up house preach about tolerance while at the same time being completely intolerant of anybody espousing the least bit of religious faith.
When do you ever see pro-choice or pro-gay marriage types advocating the banning of religious faith...as in, making it illegal?
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3593
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Mace »

Mace, so being against abortion and gay marriage makes one a "right wing religious whack job"? So be it then, even though I'm not all that religious, unless you would call keeping my fridge stocked with Bud Light religious. In that, I'm a fervent believer.
I didn't mention abortion or gay marriage, Wags, but feel free to continue ad libbing on my behalf.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by War Wagon »

Jsc810 wrote:I was born on March 10, 1962, I turn 50 in a few months. The 1980 election was held in November, I was 18.
50 in 8 days - shudder, I'll be officially old. Beats the alternative, I guess. And I stand corrected then. For some reason I had it you were a year or two younger... but only felt and looked older. I still bet you're lying and really voted for Carter.

Van, I skipped that because I wanted to. Seemed irrelevant at the time, still does.

Mace, I'm curious then what traits you so despise make up a right wing religious whack job if not for their stance on abortion and gay rights?
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: Iowa caucus, call it

Post by Van »

Ummm, their stance on religion?

:lol:
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
Post Reply