SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment

[Lillian Vernon]

That is all beside the point that the federal government should not be dictating to the states what they can and can not do.

If a state wants to treat a corporation like an individual, let them. If they don't let them do that too.

[Diogenes]

For the record, the case probably hinged on the Obama administration's insistence that they had the right to ban books.

As long as the publisher was incorporated, of course.

[Lillian Vernon]

Also for the record, mvscal is pulling the typical dodge I described weeks ago in another thread when everyone was lapping his cock about how "nails" he is.

He has kicked his own ass in this thread and I am happy to have been the one who pointed it out.

:lv:

[OCmike]

Sorry to disappoint. No cum in the pants and athiests such as myself don't often praise the Lord. As far as animal sacrifices go, I do plan to introduce cow flesh to my barbecue grill in a couple of hours. Would it be appropriate to tip back a glass of wine and be appreciative that the Court did it's job and prohibited Congress from taking fundamental rights away from its citizens?

Corporate personhood will be the end of American liberty.

You just watched "The Matrix" again, didn't you.

[Mikey]

Activist judges.

RACK 'em when they're on our side. Otherwise, string 'em up.

sin,

...oh wait never mind. I promised myself to drop all politics.

[Tom In VA]

Activist judges.

Where ?

[Mikey]

Activist judges.

Where ?

They're everywhere, dawg. Just look around you.

But don't let them know I told you. Please?

[Tom In VA]

Coast is clear over here.

But not for long. I'm watching Alex Jones "The Fall of the Republic".

Black helicopters and hilarity will ensue in the next few weeks.


WAR CyberCom

[Mikey]

Right now I'm reading Farewell My Lovely.

Seriously thinking of dropping my current job and becoming a private dick. Marlowe is just so cool.

[Tom In VA]

Marlowe is just so cool.

http://www.archive.org/details/OTRR_Cer ... ip_Marlowe

Good stuff.

[smackaholic]

Activist judges.

RACK 'em when they're on our side. Otherwise, string 'em up.

sin,

...oh wait never mind. I promised myself to drop all politics.

I like the way libs are spinning this as an "activist judge" decision.

How is it activist? Is it activist simply because SCOTUS has been getting it wrong over the last century?

Maybe THEY were the activists.

I got a kick out of some whiney bitch on the tube last night crying about how this goes against a century of SCOTUS precedent.

is he implying that precedent is the litmus test? how fukking regressive of him.

[Diogenes]

Activist judges.

RACK 'em when they're on our side. Otherwise, string 'em up.

sin,

...oh wait never mind. I promised myself to drop all politics.

I like the way libs are spinning this as an "activist judge" decision.

How is it activist? Is it activist simply because SCOTUS has been getting it wrong over the last century?

Maybe THEY were the activists.

I got a kick out of some whiney bitch on the tube last night crying about how this goes against a century of SCOTUS precedent.

is he implying that precedent is the litmus test? how fukking regressive of him.

What was the precedent for the government banning books again?




I mean U.S. precedent, not Obama's role models.