Now here's some "Change You Can Believe In."

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:31 pm

Under today’s proposal, the no-go zones

When you skim over that, it has a certain ring to it.

Verrrry progressive solution there.

Aww, tell me you don't love it.

MadRussian · Post by **MadRussian** » Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:46 pm

The nog zones has a certain ring to it.
Perhaps they can put plexiglass viewing windows on it so we can watch them get fed when the bunches of bananas fly over teh wall :D

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:50 pm

What a great idea !!

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:23 pm

The proposal has the provisional support of D.C. Councilman Harry “Tommy” Thomas, D-Ward 5, whose ward has become a war zone.

“They’re really going to crack down on what we believe to be a systemic problem with open-air drug markets,” Thomas told The Examiner.

Looks to me like the people most affected by this would be the upper middle class teens of Northern Virginia and Maryland who are just going to have to find some good locally grown chronic until the heat blows over.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:44 pm

Gaza--->Baghdad--->D.C.

The "War On Terror" comes home.

Welcome to your gulag, fuckos.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:08 am

Different war Marty, but certainly one we should have spent much more of that half trillion on.

ADAM · Post by **ADAM** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:46 am

Just using my 1st Amendment right here.......

If Obama is elected.....?

Just don't see a "full presidential term" happening.........

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:37 am

Mister Bushice wrote:Different war Marty, but certainly one we should have spent much more of that half trillion on.

You wanna spend more than half a trillion turning your country into Checkpoint Charlie, complete with sniper towers and
roadblocks? Yeah, that's not living in a police-state at all...

Go right ahead.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:01 am

Martyred wrote:
Mister Bushice wrote:Different war Marty, but certainly one we should have spent much more of that half trillion on.
You wanna spend more than half a trillion turning your country into Checkpoint Charlie, complete with sniper towers and
roadblocks? Yeah, that's not living in a police-state at all...

Go right ahead.

FUCK no.

Improve the roads, bridges, develop alternative energies, drill for our own, and spend a chunk on training the the national guard to eliminate the crips and bloods, El Norte, and whatever fucking asian gangs are here.

Make the US a bad place to fuck with. Let the rest of the world fend for themselves.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:58 pm

Sorta runs afoul of the Global Economy, though...

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:49 pm

“I’m not worried about the constitutionality of it.”

Yeah, we know. You've wasted our time with this bullshit before.

Sin,
The United States Supreme Court

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:37 pm

PSUFAN wrote:Sorta runs afoul of the Global Economy, though...

doubtful it would be as afoul as it is now....

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:56 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:Different war Marty, but certainly one we should have spent much more of that half trillion on.

who gives a shit about crackhead thuggin nogs offing each other? i say pick up the pace.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:29 pm

titlover wrote:
Mister Bushice wrote:Different war Marty, but certainly one we should have spent much more of that half trillion on.

who gives a shit about crackhead thuggin nogs offing each other? i say pick up the pace.

It's when they start offing the casual pedestrian, rob the local store, have a gun battle on a public street or open fire at a night club is when things need to be reigned in. We're well past that shit.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:52 pm

Some more change to believe in...

moonbattery.com wrote:Peeking Under the Rock at BHO's Website
Check out some of the "flavors of crazy" found at the official Barack Obama campaign site:

Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY

Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Marxists/Socialists/Communists for Obama

Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Why does Sen. Obama have to deny his culture to be popular in the U.S.?: Aren't the Nation of Islam Followers American too?

Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Abdur-Rahim Kashif's Blog: Vice President Keith Ellison

Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Wilma's Blog: Hillary is not a monster; She is a powerful Illuminist Witch!

Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Maulayna Bilal's Blog: Why shouldn't Iran have nuclear weapons?

Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Akido Busandi's Blog: May God Have Mercy on Apostates

Most of the links no longer work. Like cockroaches, once you shine a light on the scarier pages of the Obamessiah's site, they quickly vanish. But then you turn your back, and new ones appear. Yet with the media's slavish assistance, people who don't really follow politics might be convinced that Obama isn't a dangerous extremist backed by hostile lunatics.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:54 pm

Cooter's been sipping too much of Michelle Malkin's vaginal kool aid.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:16 pm

And you've been schlurping too much Obamajizz, Monica

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:35 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:
titlover wrote:
Mister Bushice wrote:Different war Marty, but certainly one we should have spent much more of that half trillion on.

who gives a shit about crackhead thuggin nogs offing each other? i say pick up the pace.
It's when they start offing the casual pedestrian, rob the local store, have a gun battle on a public street or open fire at a night club is when things need to be reigned in. We're well past that shit.

take away the citizens best means of protection form those thugs, handguns, and that's what you fucking get. fuck DC. they voted for this bullshit liberal gubment, and voted for a fucking crackhead, TWICE. let them rot with it.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:36 pm

It ain't just DC. It's all over. There are gangs in virtually every town.

Handing out guns to everyone won't solve every gang problem. Making involvement in a gang a felony with automatic chain gang membership to clean and fix roads, clear up their own fucking graffiti and a few years in prison doing hard time might help. Fuck the war on drugs.

And the parents of any kid under the age of 15 found to be involved in gang related activity should be held accountable as well.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:59 pm

In Baltimore today two toddlers were injured by stray bullets.

http://www.wbaltv.com/news/16554768/detail.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Seems to me the biggest problem in all of this is a severe lack of fire discipline. Perhaps an "immunity day for firearms training" is in order. Tag them, let them go that day, then hunt them down and eliminate them. At least in the meantime they won't be spraying and praying so much that innocent people get killed.

The unfortunate fact is, they've got such a grip on their communities that the people keep their mouths shut and can't or won't help police. They're either afraid of the gangs or afraid of the cops.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:16 pm

mvscal wrote:
Mister Bushice wrote:Handing out guns to everyone won't solve every gang problem.
Gang members should be mobbed, lynched and/or summarily executed on sight by Vigilance Committees of outraged local citizens.

Agreed. Make being a gang member hazardous to breathing.

_Porter_ · Post by **_Porter_** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:20 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:Making involvement in a gang a felony with automatic chain gang membership to clean and fix roads, clear up their own fucking graffiti and a few years in prison doing hard time might help.

In principle, this is all well and good, and probably would serve as a deterrent to some, but it'll never happen in this politcally correct society. All of the black groups will cry that there are enough brothas behind bars already and that this new law directly targets them. La Raza and their ilk will join the argument and pretty soon you'll have any politician who votes for something like this being labeled a racist. One need only look as far as the "battle" against illegal immigration in border states to see how far politicians are willing to go when faced with that label.

All that aside, other than someone caught in obvious gang activity such as being in the act of a drive-by when arrested, how do you determine who's in a gang and who's not? Many gang members hang out on street corners, as we all know, to mark their territory. Does that mean that hanging out on a corner now gets you charged with a felony? :? Things would have to be very clearly defined or you might as well be passing another legislation of thought, like the hate crimes laws currently on the books.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:27 pm

It wouldn't be that hard.

Nearly every local cop knows who is and who is not in the gangs in his beat. In LA, they have lists of names
of most prominent gang members, Nearly all gang members tat themselves to identify their gang affiliation, and in some areas of LA they've made laws forbidding them from hanging out together as a group.

But until they come up with a way to make being in a gang the worst decision you could make when you're young, it won't stop being attractive to join. They have free run of most of the schools in the cities where there is a high population of blacks or Mexicans, and they contribute big time to the crime rate.

Unless they start doing civil service work, It's a no brainer to shut them down.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:01 am

^^^^^

coming soon to your hood !!

_Porter_ · Post by **_Porter_** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:23 am

Mister Bushice wrote: Unless they start doing civil service work, It's a no brainer to shut them down.

Don't they already dominate the DMV, Social Services, TSA and pretty much every gov't job everywhere?

If you're referring to community service work, I can't think of anything that I want a jese or homie doing, other than picking up trash along the freeway.

Yes, there are charters(?) in certain cities that prohibit gangs from assembling, but what if you just see a known gang member wearing colors with gang tatts? Can you arrest him? You know he's a gang member, but what crime has he committed?

I'm not trying to play devil's advocate here, just trying to point out that it's not as easy as just "arresting all gang members and charging them with felonies". The first homie that went to trial based on those charges would have a douchebag ACLU lawyer representing him crying about his constitutional right to assembly, etc, etc. The charter/law would probably go to the SC and get shot down as unconstitutional.

I'm all for cleaning up the shit of our society, but you can't go all Stasi on the bastards, even though they might deserve it.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:35 am

Remember the last time the government violently cracked down on gangs on a nationwide level?

Janet Reno

The 90's

The Militia Movement

_Porter_ · Post by **_Porter_** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:44 am

Martyred wrote:Remember the last time the government violently cracked down on gangs on a nationwide level?

Janet Reno

The 90's

The Militia Movement

Other than the kids that died in the Waco fire, I don't have a problem with how that went down. If you are dumb enough to shoot at cops, you pretty much deserve whatever hand fate deals you.

The last time government cracked down on street gangs was following the Rodney King cop acquittals. Gangbangers were lighting all kinds of shit on fire: cars, buildings, businesses. As soon as firefighters showed up to put out their science project, they opened fire on them, so the governor called out the National Guard. It was actually pretty funny to see footage of shitbag gang losers with their 9mms turned sideways, standing in the middle of the street and shooting at a soldier with an M-16, firing from cover. Um, you lose.

For those of you scoring at home, M16 > 9mm.

MadRussian · Post by **MadRussian** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:05 am

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:22 pm

_Porter_ wrote:
The last time government cracked down on street gangs was following the Rodney King cop acquittals. Gangbangers were lighting all kinds of shit on fire: cars, buildings, businesses. As soon as firefighters showed up to put out their science project, they opened fire on them, so the governor called out the National Guard. It was actually pretty funny to see footage of shitbag gang losers with their 9mms turned sideways, standing in the middle of the street and shooting at a soldier with an M-16, firing from cover. Um, you lose.

For those of you scoring at home, M16 > 9mm.

The government did no such fucking thing. The riots ended because the post office wouldn't deliver welfare checks in neighborhoods where the rioting was going on. Babymommas had to shuffle on down to the post office if they wanted they checks & food stamps.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:25 pm

BSmack wrote: upper middle class teens of Northern Virginia and Maryland who are just going to have to find some good locally grown chronic until the heat blows over.

C'mon, if you're going to N-town to buy pot, you're in a fucked up situation, to put it mildly.

I'm down with the brave mayor Lanier. Reclaiming and reparing our nation begins with securing our cities. It's pretty fucked up as well that our urban conditions are basically the same as Iraq after it was invaded and wrecked!

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:29 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Reclaiming and reparing our nation begins with securing our cities.

No. "Reclaiming" our country involves actually living by the rule of law...

Which was laid out in a document over 200 years ago, and has been trashed to an astounding degree over the years... including trying to (illegally) restrict a citizen's right to defend themself.

I believe hey call it the "Second Amendment," or something like that. I tink the 4th one comes into play here, as well.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:48 pm

I got yo Second Amendment right here, bitch! Let me get my home dogs..

'the fuck!...whose this Dinsfuck piece of trash..let's cap the bitch!

Dins, I'm not sure what you're trying to say..not that it matters because gentle but firm voices like yours calling for basic decency have been busted and turned out like so many twenty-dollar whores. You know, by the gentlemen above who are presently shooting up the neighborhood, bitch-slapping Eddie Haskell and butt-fucking his mother. Good luck with that.

_Porter_ · Post by **_Porter_** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:52 pm

Cuda wrote:
_Porter_ wrote:
The last time government cracked down on street gangs was following the Rodney King cop acquittals.
The government did no such fucking thing. The riots ended because the post office wouldn't deliver welfare checks in neighborhoods where the rioting was going on. Babymommas had to shuffle on down to the post office if they wanted they checks & food stamps.

I don't know if you're doing a piss poor job of trying to be funny, or if you're actually this stupid.

Go Google "rodney king riots, national guard" and join the rest of us in reality.

The riots ended because the National Guard, about 1k extra police and marines showed up in tanks. Funny how that tends to make nogs with popguns stay inside.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:43 pm

maybe you could google up some video of the Nat Guard shooting at gangbangers. Surely youtube must have something on it.

put up or shut up, cunty

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:31 pm

I don't know if you're doing a piss poor job of trying to be funny, or if you're actually this stupid.

With Cuda, it's a tantalizing mix of both...plus, he's a fairly skilled meatwasher.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:30 pm

Solid book. Obviously it is over the head of the average dittotard.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:42 am

http://www.eyeblast.tv/Public/Video.aspx?rsrcID=2036" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Interesting video on Obama, our next President.

Netboy Reid · Post by **Netboy Reid** » Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:58 am

mvscal wrote:Well now I suppose this qualifies as change I can believe in insofar as it would be a change and I do believe Onogga is that dumb. Whether or not Winnie the Pooh is the best template for your foreign policy is another issue.
I guess that means Netboy Reid will be Secretary of State.

SHUT UP

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:21 am

mvscal wrote:Disarm the public, lock them into ghettos and declare martial law. Outfuckingstanding.

Verrrry progressive solution there.

Considering how often the word is misused by people who don't know the meaning, it's funny they're actually going to get one.

D. C.? Couldn't happen to a better place.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:26 am

mvscal wrote:Well now I suppose this qualifies as change I can believe in insofar as it would be a change and I do believe Onogga is that dumb. Whether or not Winnie the Pooh is the best template for your foreign policy is another issue.
I guess that means Netboy Reid will be Secretary of State.

Barack Obama aide: Why Winnie the Pooh should shape US foreign policy
Winnie the Pooh, Luke Skywalker and British football hooligans could shape the foreign policy of Barack Obama if he becomes US President, according to a key adviser.

Richard Danzig, who served as Navy Secretary under President Clinton and is tipped to become National Security Adviser in an Obama White House, told a major foreign policy conference in Washington that the future of US strategy in the war on terrorism should follow a lesson from the pages of Winnie the Pooh, which can be shortened to: if it is causing you too much pain, try something else.

Mr Danzig told the Centre for New American Security: “Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.”

He spelt out how American troops, spies and anti-terrorist officials could learn key lessons by understanding the desire of terrorists to emulate superheroes like Luke Skywalker, and the lust for violence of violent football fans.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... olicy.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
One is left to wonder what the Smurfs might have to say about economic policy.

If he puts the teletubbies in his cabinet, I'm moving to Australia.