Denver is a faggot team

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:32 am

Unfortunately Oakland looks to be ..... dead, Jim.

Even though the game looks to be a mismatch, and not much worth disecting, it wouldn't be proper to NOT have a thread up for a Dungver v Oakland game.
So this is it.

Mule fan is about the most limp-wristed gang of fan homos posting on this board, but at least their team has the look of a legit NFL squad.
Oakland fans are outstanding on this board, but their team, on the other hand, has dark storm clouds everywhere.

So Denver romps ... ?
No.

I believe the Oakland Raiders will be 'in' this game at half .... maybe even leading 10-9 or something.
Then, just like in the previous 4 games this season, Art and his staff of zeros will be woefully exposed as inadequate.
They will be outcoached and out-adjusted quite badly.
Couple that with the inherent Piled High City altitude advantage (and league conspiracy advantage too), and you've got the Broncs winning by a comfortable margin.

I'll say ......

Denver 30
Oakland 16

This Denver win will raise the Shanahan/Shottenheimer daily double v. Al's 'commitment to excellence' record to 43-12.

Commitment to ..... WHAT ... ?

Again, that stat is 43-12 in favor of Rat and Shit-the-beder.

I would define that as a commitment to being a bukkake target, myself.
But, I'm not a Hall of Fame legend maverick dude.

Hey, Al's squads would have to sweep Rat and Shit-the-beder for 8 straight years ..... just to reach .500. hahahaha

Whatever the case, fuck Dungver and it's faggot team, faggot owner, faggot fans, and faggot everything.

Makes me ill.

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:48 pm

poptart wrote: (and league conspiracy advantage too)

Interesting. Care to elaborate?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:49 pm

Nixhex wrote:
poptart wrote: (and league conspiracy advantage too)

Interesting. Care to elaborate?

Thanks for nothing.

sin

scroll wheels

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:11 pm

You two dry-jerks are worse than Mule fan homosezual.

Have you no take or prediction on the ballgame .... ?
People on this board USED to have a pair of acorns and half-a-brain.
Hell, I visited the KC v. Shittsburgh thread and gave both a take and a prediction.
Take was damn good and prediction will be shown to be money.

You two weasels have done nothing more than ask dumb questions and ....... pad sickly-obscene post totals.

Figure out the conspiracy on your own Nix.
It's really no fun if dad gets all the rubiks cube colors to match for ya, is it .... ?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:22 pm

You want the truth?

The Raiders suck, and so do you. You need to start bandwagoning the Pusan Cornholers, cause the Raiders are through. Shannarat will run the score up to. Did you see his little bit on NFL Network? Where he said, "Next week we got the Raiders, my favorite team". ;)

Mules 37

Raiders 7

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:25 pm

poptart wrote: Have you no take or prediction on the ballgame .... ?

I do.....

I see lots of pain and humiliation in the Raydud's immediate future......

but I'd like to personally thank the Faiders for saving me a bunch of money......

I'd originally penciled this game in my travel plans, but thanks to the ineptness of the dud's, I canceled the trip.......

Broncos-31
Dud's-13

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:32 pm

Sure, squirt.
You only like to watch ballgames on blue fields.

Eat a turd, fairy.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:56 pm

poptart wrote:Sure, squirt.
You only like to watch ballgames on blue fields.

Eat a turd, fairy.

you've got one thing going for you........your avatar......

other than that, there's not much on your teams horizon other than another blown first rounder.....

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:38 pm

Denver's offense hasn't done much and still won't. The Raider's offense has no chance against the Denver defense. Shanahan owns the Raiders. It's that simple.

Denver 23

Oakland 10

Pops~

Throwing out "Conspiracy" takes is kinda drastic. Questioning that take is hardly stupid. I'd honestly like to know what you think the NFL is doing to help Denver. You say to figure it out on my own. I think your claim of conspiracy is hollow and you have nothing to back it up. Prove me wrong.

atomicdad · Post by **atomicdad** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:08 pm

I'd Rack Pop but that would be a sign of being a meat gazing puckered starfish penetrator.

I admit I have no take on this game other than it is going to be about as competitive and compelling as the Bolts vs the Friscofag 49er game.

Prediction, Plummer is going to play down to his competition level again keeping a glimmer of hope for Raider fan until Rod Smith saves his ass in the final minutes, again. John Lynch is going to be carted off the field when he snaps a cankle after getting cut blocked by that cheating homo Nalen.

atomicdad · Post by **atomicdad** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:24 pm

Hey, don't fuck with me, I was on a roll? I still don't like either of them.

Not during the game, but after when those fags are lubing each other up in the showers, and they get into a fight to see who is first to jackhammer Plummers asshole. Thats what I meant.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:15 pm

poptart wrote:Unfortunately Oakland looks to be ..... dead, Jim.

Even though the game looks to be a mismatch, and not much worth disecting, it wouldn't be proper to NOT have a thread up for a Dungver v Oakland game.
So this is it.

Mule fan is about the most limp-wristed gang of fan homos posting on this board, but at least their team has the look of a legit NFL squad.
Oakland fans are outstanding on this board, but their team, on the other hand, has dark storm clouds everywhere.

So Denver romps ... ?
No.

I believe the Oakland Raiders will be 'in' this game at half .... maybe even leading 10-9 or something.
Then, just like in the previous 4 games this season, Art and his staff of zeros will be woefully exposed as inadequate.
They will be outcoached and out-adjusted quite badly.
Couple that with the inherent Piled High City altitude advantage (and league conspiracy advantage too), and you've got the Broncs winning by a comfortable margin.

I'll say ......

Denver 30
Oakland 16

This Denver win will raise the Shanahan/Shottenheimer daily double v. Al's 'commitment to excellence' record to 43-12.

Commitment to ..... WHAT ... ?

Again, that stat is 43-12 in favor of Rat and Shit-the-beder.

I would define that as a commitment to being a bukkake target, myself.
But, I'm not a Hall of Fame legend maverick dude.

Hey, Al's squads would have to sweep Rat and Shit-the-beder for 8 straight years ..... just to reach .500. hahahaha

Whatever the case, fuck Dungver and it's faggot team, faggot owner, faggot fans, and faggot everything.

Makes me ill.

Absolutely beautiful.

RACK

Tart is fucking $$$$, as usual.

d-townmike · Post by **d-townmike** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:44 pm

Denver offense is gradually trying to figure things out. If it weren't for the weather conditions on Monday night, that game would have been a far less defensive match up.

We're still not perfect with the offense; still many kinks to work out (I miss Gary Kubiak) but they will eventually come around.

As long as the offense keeps it mostly on the ground, Denver shouldn't have any trouble running up the score, err I mean, beating the Faiders handedly especially at home and in the national spotlight again.

Duh's 3
Broncos 35

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:54 pm

d-townmike wrote: We're still not perfect with the offense

allow me.........

NO SHIT SHERLOCK

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:10 pm

Denver Offense is Bad - 3rd lowest point total in the league (49) behind Tampa (48) and Oakland (47).

Fortunetly for them they have the # 1 scoring defense in the league (34 PA).

It won't be a nail biter, but it will be ugly.

Denver 17
Oakland 6

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:21 pm

poptart wrote: Commitment to ..... WHAT ... ?

I would define that as a commitment to being a bukkake target....

Just a casual drive-by to BWA! at ^^^that.

Oh, and just so 'tart doesn't get all snippety and stuff...

dung - 24
duhs - 13

Red · Post by **Red** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:41 am

Dirty Laundry

Shanny makes his living whipping the primer and soot,
Give him his back pay and he'll remove the boot,
People love it when the raiduhs lose,
They love dirty laundry.

Well, he could have been your head coach
But he wound up here.
We just have to run it
And we've nothing to fear.
Oh and five is certainly near,
We need dirty laundry.

Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em all around.

You've got the bumbling rookie
Can't sustain a drive,
He tries to throw it to his half back
who doesn't know that it's live.
It's hilarious when 'duhfans cry,
Give us dirty laundry.

Where is The Jumpsuit?
Is Alcula dead yet?
We know your fanbase would
feel no regret.
Another loss is a safe bet,
We need dirty laundry.

Your offensive line has no idea
What's going on,
Randy Moss didn't know just
where he had gone,
It's going to be a long flight home,
Keep your dirty laundry.

Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em where they sit,
Kick 'em all around.

Another losing season,
"Wait til next year"
"We miss John Gruden" is all that you hear,
We love to break it off in your rear,
We love dirty laundry.

Vegas says fifteen,
I don't think it's that close.
The best you can hope for
is to say "Almost."
We all know The Rat is king.
Give us dirty laundry.

Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em when they're down.
Kick 'em when they're up,
Kick 'em all around.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:42 am

I'll be pleasantly surprised if the Raiders score sunday night.

Mules 27 Raiders 3. :cry:

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:05 am

Rack the Texan.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:29 am

Red gets a Rack!!!

Nice work.

d-townmike · Post by **d-townmike** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:49 am

Red isn't bad at all, nice work!

Still can't hold up to me.

Sincerely,
Willie in KC

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:14 am

Nix,

Immaculate Deception, Rob Lytle non-fumble, 'tuck rule' game.

3 fairy tale playoff calls, all of which drastically swung games against .... guess who ... ?

Before that fantasy 'tuck' call had you EVER seen that call made in an NFL game ... ?
Have you seen it called since ... ?
When does this supposed 'rule' ever come into play ... ?
Answer: It doesn't.

Did you see the Troy Palamalu INT v. Indy which sealed the Steeler win last January ... ?
Reversed ... ?
Ummm............
How on freaking earth was THAT game-ending interception overruled ... ?
Gotta give NFL poster boy Peeyton just ONE more shot at getting over.
Almost worked.
Nice try, league.

The Raiders have been at, or very near, the top of the chart in NFL penalties nearly every freaking year for 35 yrs.
Matters not who the coach is ...... the silver helmets get more penalities..... and a LOT more.
The Raiders are officiated 'differently' than other teams.
Just the way it is, Nix.
Don't expect you to like hearing about it.

Just Raider fan bitching ... ?
To a degree, sure.
But I think you'd probably have to be a Raider fan to be sensitive to it.
We all recognize it.
Oakland gets hosed by the zebras time-and-again.
I've learned to expect it.

Dungver violated the salary cap in both '97 and '98 and the league let them GET AWAY WITH IT.

* '97 Super Bowl Champion Dungver Cheaters
* '98 Super Bowl Champion Dungver Cheaters

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:00 am

Red wrote:Dirty Laundry

are we doing racks or bwa's.....

drummer · Post by **drummer** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:14 am

Felix wrote:
Red wrote:Dirty Laundry

are we doing racks or bwa's.....

Fuck it, I'm gonna RACK it.

RACK pops also, for his opening salvo.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:27 am

War Wagon wrote: Oh, and just so 'tart doesn't get all snippety and stuff...

So much for that effort.

We've been run....

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:49 am

War Wagon wrote:
We've been run....

HUH????? :roll:

just Post a Tip in the Bowling Forum as your Penance.

btw...Red's is a BWA....

poppy is a RACK!

...errr...

Donkeys 20
Raiduhs 3

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 7:50 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:The purest definition of MYOPIA. It will NEVER cease to amaze me.

Btw, Oakland had a 'strange and inexplicable' call go against them in BOTH Chef games last year.
Both calls went against the Raiders at critical times on BIG plays.
Crucial, costly, and 'strange' ... to say the least.

Game 1: R. Moss caught a TD pass but was called for a completely phantom PI on a play in which he didn't even TOUCH the defender. I still can't get over that call. WTF'inF was THAT, man ????

Game 2: KC frantically trying to move the ball, down by 3 verrah late. E. Japser sacked T. Green at the KC 40 yd line with :34 seconds left in the game. Would have kept the clock running and brought up a 3rd and 10 play. Somehow a zebra calls a completely phantom 'tripping' penalty on Jasper. TOTAL FUCKING BULLSHIT. Stops the clock .... 1st down KC at midfield.

The zebras just simply ... missed ... those calls, huh ... ?

Sour grapes ... ?
Yes, I suppose.

Horsehit calls displaying either COMPLETE AND UNFATHOMABLE incompetency ...... or agenda.
You decide, Mr Sheep.

And btw, here's the Polalamu play again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsk1wypwlR4

Paul (or anyone) ..... wanna take a shot at explaining how the official can go into the replay booth and then come out and overrule that INT .... ?

He's incompetent ... ?

That's it ... ?

He's in the booth speaking to someone, right .... ?

Comes out and makes THAT overrule ... ?

Just a moment of incompetence, poptart.

No, sorry.

I wasn't born yesterday.

Looks like shit, smells like shit .......

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:56 pm

Pops you make some good points. I don't want to believe any of that garbage. That doesn't mean it's false. I can totally see the NFL wanting certain players and teams to succeed. It's all about the $$$.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:26 pm

Seems to me that it'd be in the league's best interest for the Raiders to be good, seeing how they are one of the most recognizable assets the league has and is always top five in merchandise sales.

The Raiders have historically had more penalties called against them than other teams. The Raiders also have a history of drafting, signing, or acquiring through trades players that are raw and undisciplined, but are fast or fairly skilled. Coincidence or making your bed and needing to shaddap and lie in it?

You know I'm not a hater, Tart. I think the league is better when the Raiders are good, but their penchant for penalties and current outright suckiness is nothing but a product of Count Al's failed design for building a team.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:10 pm

poptart wrote: Btw, Oakland had a 'strange and inexplicable' call go against them in BOTH Chef games last year.
Both calls went against the Raiders at critical times on BIG plays.
Crucial, costly, and 'strange' ... to say the least.

I used to think pops was merely a conspiracy theorist, but it turns out he may be on to something........

strange indeed.....

godzilla2002 · Post by **godzilla2002** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:37 pm

Broncos 24
Raiders 17

godzilla2002 · Post by **godzilla2002** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:40 pm

Since 1999 60% of all teams that started off 0-4 won their 5th game.
That would worry me a bit if it wasn’t for the fact I got that information from hearing Mike Shanahan say it on a local radio station today. The Rat will have his team ready to play Sunday!
That said 15 points is too much. The Raiders would love get their first win against the Broncos and the Broncos offense still hasn’t shown they can score more than 17 points in a game, until now, this game the Broncos will score more, but I see either a let down by Denver’s defense or Oakland flat out plays harder than they have all year cause it’s the Broncos and it’s a nationally televised game. Take the Raiders and the points.

Broncos - 24
Raiders - 17

Rack Red's "Dirty Laundry"

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 4:14 am

Cute pic and all, Felix, but glaring by it's omission is your take on the Polamalu INT reversal.

WhatsMyName · Post by **WhatsMyName** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:32 am

The Broncos will absolutely destroy the Raiders. It might even be a shutout. This game will NOT be on NFL Replay.

By the way, Raider fans suck. At least Denver fans can fill their stadium, you can't. Weak fan support locally, large gang support nationally. Great rep.

Broncos 42, Raiders 0.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 1:32 pm

I really don't have a care one way or another about this thread.

I just wanted to drop a quick rack for the pop for making me laugh everytime I see the thread title.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 1:38 pm

Oh, and fwiw, I'm of the opinion that the Polamalu INT reversal was simply a function of the ref not fully understanding the rules... with a dash of stupidity. No way do I think it was conspiracy.

Mal · Post by **Mal** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 4:18 pm

I wrote a long ass post in this thread a few days back that somehow never made it in.

Fuck if I'm writing all that shit again.

Raiders D has showed some heart but keeps wilting late.

Walter has promise but simply isn't ready yet.

Still believe it or not I expect Oakland to make a game of it, at least early.

Won't matter in the end. Denver is primed, their coach and team will be motivated to kick the crap outta the S & B on national TV.

One sided game. Oakland 42 Denver 9

Myopia lives.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:02 am

poptart wrote:but glaring by it's omission is your take on the Polamalu INT reversal.

as horseshit of a call I've seen in a long long time......

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:36 pm

Lacking a pair, eh Felez ... ?
To think that that call was reversed AFTER review is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE.
No post-game "aww gee, sowrry, our guy missed it" statement issued from the league cuts it.
Nowhere CLOSE to cutting it.
Pete Morelli saw indisputable visual evidence to overrule that INT ... ?
Bull fucking SHIT.

The fix was in.

They count on sheep like you.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:14 pm

tart, there is no conspiracy against the Rayduds......

are they subject to more scrutiny than the typical team.....you betcha....but that's what comes when you're the most penalized team in football.......

have they had bad calls against them......sure, the New England game and the infamous "Tuck" was a bad call....but based on the rules in place at the time it was the officials interpretation of the rule.....but I think I can safely say that there was no call from the booth saying "lets fuck the Raiders here".........

geez, talk about your conspiracy nutjobs....

anywho....

enjoy the asskicking the Broncos lay on your boys tonight.....

T1B

Denver is a faggot team

Denver is a faggot team

Re: Denver is a faggot team

Re: Denver is a faggot team

Re: Denver is a faggot team

Re: Denver is a faggot team

Re: Denver is a faggot team

Re: Denver is a faggot team