Alex Smith

M2 · Post by M2 » Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:42 pm

This is why Alex Smith was the #1 player choosen in the draft...

and some of you tards have him as the worst qb in the league at #32... :roll:

Alex Smith

m2

Red · Post by **Red** » Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:53 pm

Good point. #32 might be a bit high considering he might not even be a starting quarterback this season.

M2 · Post by M2 » Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:57 pm

Red wrote:Good point. #32 might be a bit high considering he might not even be a starting quarterback this season.

yeah... :roll:

Brilliant response.

m2

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:06 pm

m2 wrote:This is why Alex Smith was the #1 player choosen in the draft.

He was the best option for the quarterbackless team that happened to have the #1 pick.

Duh.

FaTaL · Post by **FaTaL** » Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:49 am

hey he cant be worse then dilfer, harrington or boller

Louis Cyphre · Post by **Louis Cyphre** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:28 am

Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener. I guess Lombardi #6 will have to wait another year, right m2?

M2 · Post by M2 » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:49 am

Louis Cyphre wrote:Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener. I guess Lombardi #6 will have to wait another year, right m2?

That's being rather generous.

It's the right call, since he looked like a deer in headlights out there. He just turned 21, and the WCO is the most difficult O to master. Walsh even said he won't run it at Stanford because it takes about 5 years to fully understand all the intricacies of the WCO.

I think by the bye week, he'll be thrown into the fire, be it hell or high water. He needs the reps to get the feel for the WCO. It took Montana 3 years before he was put on the field in the WCO.

m2

Cueball · Post by **Cueball** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:29 am

m2 wrote:
Louis Cyphre wrote:Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener. I guess Lombardi #6 will have to wait another year, right m2?
That's being rather generous.

It's the right call, since he looked like a deer in headlights out there. He just turned 21, and the WCO is the most difficult O to master. Walsh even said he won't run it at Stanford because it takes about 5 years to fully understand all the intricacies of the WCO.

I think by the bye week, he'll be thrown into the fire, be it hell or high water. He needs the reps to get the feel for the WCO. It took Montana 3 years before he was put on the field in the WCO.

m2

Yeah, but he looked sooooooooooo good on that practice field. Tens of people seemed like they felt the same way.

Do your job m0ds and get a hold of this situation, I'M GETTIN' ANNOYED

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:31 am

m2 wrote:
Red wrote:Good point. #32 might be a bit high considering he might not even be a starting quarterback this season.
yeah... :roll:

Brilliant response.

m2

the TRUTH hurts don't it chime boy? :wink:

M2 · Post by M2 » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:39 am

Cueball wrote:
m2 wrote:
Louis Cyphre wrote:Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener. I guess Lombardi #6 will have to wait another year, right m2?
That's being rather generous.

It's the right call, since he looked like a deer in headlights out there. He just turned 21, and the WCO is the most difficult O to master. Walsh even said he won't run it at Stanford because it takes about 5 years to fully understand all the intricacies of the WCO.

I think by the bye week, he'll be thrown into the fire, be it hell or high water. He needs the reps to get the feel for the WCO. It took Montana 3 years before he was put on the field in the WCO.

m2
Yeah, but he looked sooooooooooo good on that practice field. Tens of people seemed like they felt the same way.

Do your job m0ds and get a hold of this situation, I'M GETTIN' ANNOYED

So? Take that shit up with your mommy.

Rack #32!

m2

drummer · Post by **drummer** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:49 am

Alex Smith was the #1 pick because the Niners needed a QB , and nobody wanted to trade up to the #1 pick , because there was no 1 player compelling enough to be coveted at #1 by other teams .

If the Niners could have traded down , they would have . They were considering that prior to the draft .

Smith hadn't completed a first down yet .

Besides , you were on the Rodgers bandwagon earlier , right ?

M2 · Post by M2 » Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:14 am

drummer wrote:Alex Smith was the #1 pick because the Niners needed a QB , and nobody wanted to trade up to the #1 pick , because there was no 1 player compelling enough to be coveted at #1 by other teams .

If the Niners could have traded down , they would have . They were considering that prior to the draft .

Smith hadn't completed a first down yet .

Besides , you were on the Rodgers bandwagon earlier , right ?

Yep.

I still think Rodgers will be the better qb, but I hope I'm wrong.

m2

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 4:00 am

Cueball wrote:
m2 wrote:
Louis Cyphre wrote:Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener.

Do your job m0ds and get a hold of this situation, I'M GETTIN' ANNOYED

sorry Al...was busy tonight.

m2's last post in this thread is perfect.

T1B

Alex Smith

Alex Smith

Re: Alex Smith