Disgusting people

[Roach]

Marjoree. What a boot licking sycophant. Hero of the reptile brained.



The Ugly Disgusting "woman" in the Ass deodorant commercial. Makes me want to kill all my TVs.

[LTS TRN 2]

Naw, she's just a down to earth conservative who is willing to be unvarnished in her opposition to the "Admiral" Levine's and their perverted agenda. Of course no one would expect "roach" to offer any sort of specific issues, policies or positions that Greene supports that would so move him to such harsh and vivid personal attacks.

[Kierland]

All of them.

[LTS TRN 2]

Shut the fuck up.

Greene wants lower taxes, secure borders, Fauci in jail, Obama exposed, the Squad deported, violent criminals (joqqers) charged and imprisoned, the CRT agenda opposed and smashed, the Queer legions remanded back to their bath houses, and DeSantis in the White house come 2024.

Any problems? :P

[Kierland]

Ok so only 90% of her platform is stupid nazii stuff.
Lower taxes is good but so have never heard her talk about that. She probably means for billionaires just like Dump did. She’s a bag of shit the loons of Georgia lit on fire and chucked into Congress.



WTF is wrong with you people?

[Roach]

Ted fukkin Cruz coward.

Gutless creep lays low for fear he might have to take a stand on something.

[LTS TRN 2]

While I don't share her religious beliefs, the idea that she's proposing any sort of theocracy is as absurd as calling everyone a "nazii." It doesn't mean anything if everything is exaggerated into cartoonish nonsense.

I'll tell you what's not an exaggeration--that she would bend you like a pretzel and bounce you like a ball.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMjLQbqdIh0

[Mikey]

The dynamic duo.

In this photo they are both imagining what they would do if confronted with Trump's extremely small penis, and experiencing simultaneous orgasm.

[Kierland]

While I don't share her religious beliefs, the idea that she's proposing any sort of theocracy is as absurd as calling everyone a "nazii." It doesn't mean anything if everything is exaggerated into cartoonish nonsense.

I'll tell you what's not an exaggeration--that she would bend you like a pretzel and bounce you like a ball.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMjLQbqdIh0

Fake News.

[Left Seater]

The dynamic duo.

In this photo they are both imagining what they would do if confronted with Trump's extremely small penis, and experiencing simultaneous orgasm.

Why is Mikey thinking about dude's cocks?

[Mikey]

The dynamic duo.

In this photo they are both imagining what they would do if confronted with Trump's extremely small penis, and experiencing simultaneous orgasm.

Why is Mikey thinking about dude's cocks?

Why do you think he has more than one?

Do you know something that the rest of us don’t?

[LTS TRN 2]

Mikey, you dripping sweat mop from a bath house, are you really calling out fake seater for misplacing an apostrophe? C'mon, man. Sure, he meant "dudes' cocks," suggesting plural men. But you're so bored in the day room that you' just can't resist the most meaningless and tedious of nonsense? Really?

[Mikey]

Why would I assume that he was talking about more than one man (your preferred ménage combo from what I understand), when my original take referred to only one?

And the main subject was not the tiny dick, but the women who were apparently craving it. Why would you assume I was focused on male genitalia? Your projection is painfully obvious.

[LTS TRN 2]

Back to the day room--time for yer meds.

[Mikey]

Nice white flag.

[LTS TRN 2]

I have no idea what the whole "white flag, " whataboutism" and similar dodges are all about. What's the point? Is someone pretending to keep score? :)

[Kierland]

We get it you have no idea what logic is.

Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in "what about…?") denotes in a pejorative sense a procedure in which a critical question or argument is not answered or discussed, but retorted with a critical counter-question which expresses a counter-accusation. From a logical and argumentative point of view it is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.

[LTS TRN 2]

That's just stating the obvious, Squirmy, but it obviously doesn't apply to the ludicrous subject at hand--which was Mikey looking to steal one of fake seater's cookies in the day room by distracting him with a grammar correction of f-seat's toss off joke which actually attended a real question as far as the conservative congress gals and their desire (or not) to fellate the former president. The "you're another" fallacy was never in the mix, though it certainly applies when someone like Stacy Abrams goes down with the ship insisting on a fraudulent election loss while now demonizing everyone who thinks 2020 was tainted. Yes, "what about you?" certainly applies in such cases because they are not abstract logical problems, but concrete actions by individuals--just like in a criminal trial.

[Softball Bat]

Ted fukkin Cruz coward.

Gutless creep lays low for fear he might have to take a stand on something.

Rafael Cruz' daughter finds him revolting...










And Donald going yard on poor Rafael...













#basket_case

[Roach]

Marjorie getting divorced. Her new men:



"polyamorous tantric sex guru Craig Ivey"




Some gym manager

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... lover.html

[Donnie Baker's Ghost]

I bet Greene is an absolute riot between the sheets. Maybe I should DM her.