Chauvin verdict

It's the 17th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
ML@Coyote
Elwood
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:20 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by ML@Coyote »

Kierland wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:08 am You really suck at this.
Why are you even here?
Sounds more like something a judge would say to you. :doh:
Kierland

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Kierland »

IKYABWAI

Are you sure you moved to SC and not KC.

Crawl back under your rock.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9845
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Softball Bat »

poptart wrote:Fucker Carlson








o_0
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Kierland

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Kierland »

[The judge] wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive(s) with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

Vyskocil's ruling last week, dismissing a slander lawsuit filed against Carlson, was a win for Fox, First Amendment principles and the media more generally, as Fox News itself maintains. As a legal matter, the judge ruled that Karen McDougal, the woman suing Carlson, failed to surmount the challenge.


He literally can’t slander you because he lies so much. :shock:
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9845
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Softball Bat »

Kierland wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:12 pm [The judge] wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive(s) with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

Vyskocil's ruling last week, dismissing a slander lawsuit filed against Carlson, was a win for Fox, First Amendment principles and the media more generally, as Fox News itself maintains. As a legal matter, the judge ruled that Karen McDougal, the woman suing Carlson, failed to surmount the challenge.


He literally can’t slander you because he lies so much. :shock:
Yep.

His is just a cartoon show.
Only there to be laffed at.

And yet the pitiful low IQ crowd actually thinks the little twat is presenting them with news.



rotf...
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9845
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Softball Bat »

shutyomouth wrote:Floyd was a fucked up idiot. Cop is a fucked up idiot.
Pretty much, yes.

That said, fucked up idiots are not in charge of snuffing out other fucked up idiots.

We definitely don't want that kind of a world.
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7074
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Smackie Chan »

Softball Bat wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:27 pmHis is just a cartoon show.
Only there to be laffed at.

And yet the pitiful low IQ crowd actually thinks the little twat is presenting them with news.
Very true. Alex Moffat (who is about the WORST stand-up comic I've ever seen, and I've seen many) does a good job on SNL of lampooning him...

"I see everything twice!"
User avatar
ML@Coyote
Elwood
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:20 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by ML@Coyote »

smackaholic wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:46 am The biggest victim has been the people who live in the hood who are dependent on cops doing the hard but necessary job of aggressive policing in places that badly need it. Murder rates have skyrocketed because the cops have decided to look the other way. And who can blame them? If I was a cop 2 years from retirement, I would do the same.
A cop who isn't willing to have his actions scrutinized shouldn't be a cop. It's all part of the job. We are all scrutinized for our job performance. Just because you carry a badge and a gun, it doesn't let you off the hook. Cops who "look the other way" ought to be fired. I don't believe that holding cops to a high job performance standard is going to create a shortage of them. The more a community appreciates and respects its police force, the more attractive the job will be to applicants.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Diego in Seattle »

smackaholic wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:49 am
Softball Bat wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:33 pm
smackaholic wrote:That mob was put down. One of them was even shot dead.

The cop they allegedly killed, yeah, he had a stroke. Likely pushed over the edge by all the commotion. Could have just as easily had it brought on by his OL yelling at him.
Yeah, the whole thing was pretty much a big nothing.
No, it wasn't a big nothing. But, had the Capitol cops had the backup they requested, maybe it could have been.

But Pelosi and company wanted a big something, so they denied help.
Pelosi isn't part of calling out the NG. The chief of Capitol police is. What time did that request from the chief go out, and when did the NG actually arrive?

And note what time the VPOTUS (president of the Senate) put out a request for the NG. But yeah, it's all Pelosi's fault. :meds:
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9845
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Softball Bat »

Roach wrote:rotfc . . . crying sad and mad at the apparent large number of LoIQ reptile brains out there. Jesus, who other than that would buy into his antics? Not the judge hahaha.

Image
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9845
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Softball Bat »

Smackie Chan wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:22 pm
Softball Bat wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:27 pmHis is just a cartoon show.
Only there to be laffed at.

And yet the pitiful low IQ crowd actually thinks the little twat is presenting them with news.
Very true. Alex Moffat (who is about the WORST stand-up comic I've ever seen, and I've seen many) does a good job on SNL of lampooning him...

Sadly, this is pretty close to reality.

:)
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9845
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Softball Bat »

Tucker's college yearbook photo.




Image




:lol: :lol:




Proud member of the Dan White Society.

And who is Dan White?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_White

Dan White = a violent, deranged killer.


Geez!
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Kierland

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Kierland »

ML@Coyote wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 5:37 pm
smackaholic wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:46 am The biggest victim has been the people who live in the hood who are dependent on cops doing the hard but necessary job of aggressive policing in places that badly need it. Murder rates have skyrocketed because the cops have decided to look the other way. And who can blame them? If I was a cop 2 years from retirement, I would do the same.
A cop who isn't willing to have his actions scrutinized shouldn't be a cop. It's all part of the job. We are all scrutinized for our job performance. Just because you carry a badge and a gun, it doesn't let you off the hook. Cops who "look the other way" ought to be fired. I don't believe that holding cops to a high job performance standard is going to create a shortage of them. The more a community appreciates and respects its police force, the more attractive the job will be to applicants.
No, cops who look the other way should be jailed. Why are you so soft on pigs?
And I know I give cops a lot of shit but it’s not even really their fault. They are, for the most part, not very smart. I blame the DAs and judges that encourage this behavior because they could stop it and they know better.

Edit to add: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/los-angele ... =116953265

The other officers are like “Naw Naw” I’m not going down with you. Good for them, maybe they saw what happened in Minn. when you stand around and let other cops commit crimes.
User avatar
ML@Coyote
Elwood
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:20 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by ML@Coyote »

What's your solution to the problem you perceive?
Kierland

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Kierland »

I’m not arguing with you over a solution you don’t see as necessary. I will debate whether we need police reform and then if you do decide we need it debate the solution.
User avatar
ML@Coyote
Elwood
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:20 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by ML@Coyote »

Things can always be improved, so yes, I am all for reform. I do not, however, think that calling police officers "pigs" is a good starting point. I also don't agree with you that all cops are bad.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by smackaholic »

He has no solutions.

He hates authority. He does everything he can to get the scumbags he represents off.

Are the there bad cops?

Sure there are. Chauvin is a good example of one. He never should have lasted on the job as long as he did. But getting rid of a unionized public sector person is nearly impossible.

There does need to be ample training. As for their pay, in my neck of the woods they’re paid pretty damn well.

But cops who have to work in areas where they sometimes have to be assholes to do the job, shouldn’t be second guessed. When a cop shoots a person when that person is moments from killing someone, people, especially overpaid athletes ought to shut the fukk up.

But these cops get absolutely no support from liberal politicians who, for political reasons, support the all cops are racist narrative

The result is these cops say “fukk it, you’re on your own”.

As a direct result, the real balck genocide, young balck males killing other young balck males is through the roof.

But the libs couldn’t possibly give the slightest of fukks, because balck lives matter.....when it’s in their political interest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Kierland

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Kierland »

ML@Coyote wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 5:39 pm Things can always be improved, so yes, I am all for reform. I do not, however, think that calling police officers "pigs" is a good starting point. I also don't agree with you that all cops are bad.
I do tend to be a bit of a bombthrower, but nice people get no place. That said, what percentage do you think have lied on the stand or falsified a report at least once?

And I vaguely remember you being a CO or something in a past life.
User avatar
ML@Coyote
Elwood
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:20 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by ML@Coyote »

Kierland wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 5:49 pm What percentage do you think have lied on the stand or falsified a report at least once?
Probably something similar to the percentage of defense attorneys who have lied about their clients.
Kierland

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Kierland »

So 100%
And you don’t see a problem with cops lying all the time?
User avatar
ML@Coyote
Elwood
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:20 am

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by ML@Coyote »

Your question was how many cops lied at least once. That hardly equates to lying all the time. And I don't know that defense attorneys lie all the time. You might. And maybe you're okay with that.

But we're getting off track. You still haven't presented any viable plan for police reform.
Kierland

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Kierland »

I already told you, I’m not wasting my time explaining a solution when you have not admitted there is a problem.
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7074
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Smackie Chan »

Kierland wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 5:49 pmnice people get no place
To what place are you trying to get?
ETA?
Asking for a friend.
"I see everything twice!"
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29543
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Mikey »

Kierland wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 7:02 pm lying all the time?
Cops and Hound Dogs.

Ain’t no friends of mine.
User avatar
Slap
Elwood
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:34 pm

Re: Chauvin verdict

Post by Slap »

Softball Bat wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 7:07 amImage
That guy has swallowed a lot of sperm.
smackaholic wrote:I would touch someone's dick, hell, I'd fukking blow him
Post Reply