Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

It's the 17th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by smackaholic »

Softball Bat wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 11:28 am
The Big Pickle wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 10:31 amThe black guy ATTACKED the guy with the gun!
Most likely because in that moment, he believed the Billy Bob was going to blow his ass away.
In that moment, he probably thought he had to go after the guy with the gun -- or die.

Look, if you're going to pull off a "citizen's arrest," you better have your shit together on it.
If not, let it pass.
Get a description, call the cops, maybe follow him.

If you pull out firearms you are opening up the possibility for things to go VERY wrong, which they did in this case.
The black dude attacked because he didn't want to go to jail and he figured Billy-Bob didn't have the balls to shoot him.

He figured wrong.

Shoulda just kept on "jogging".

Had Billy-Bob's intention been to just shoot him a gnigger that day, he'd have shot him long before the guy was able to get a hand on his gun. Kinda hard to miss with a shotgun.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Diego in Seattle »

smackaholic wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 9:29 am
Diego in Seattle wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 4:16 am Since when is fighting back with COMMENSURATE FORCE not allowed?
So, when someone attemts to pull your gun away from you, you should just wrestle with him because he isn't quite armed yet?

How about if the guy wins that wresting match and becomes armed?

You could argue that going after him in the first place was dumb, but GA law does permit citizen's arrests. I am sure these 2 dudes sitting in a cell right now would agree with you.

What exactly is mean't by citizen's arrest? Does it stipulate that it can't involve weapons? I doubt it.

Would this be in the news if everyone involved was white or balck?
Going after him in the first place was dumb, especially going after someone for a property crime onto a property that wasn't theirs.

GA laws do permit citizen's arrests, but the courts have ruled that when the citizen initiates that contact they no longer have the right to claim self-defense, and this will especially be true if it is proven that Abery was unarmed. The courts have also ruled that deadly force isn't justified, either.

Abery could be alive today if these two hicks had simply observed & reported. And that's what the courts are going to go by.

BTW, an arrest is the act of taking a person into custody in a manner prescribed by law. Think about that for a while....
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Papa Willie wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 6:55 am https://www.news4jax.com/news/2013/12/0 ... ball-game/

He didn't have the smiley face on him there - like he does with all of the media pictures you see now.

Let's go ahead and admit that he was a stupid fucker.
Now do the Michigan terrorists at the state capitol....

Image
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13257
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Left Seater »

Diego in Seattle wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 2:36 am
SOMEONE WHO CONFRONTS ANOTHER PERSON CANNOT CLAIM SELF-DEFENSE.
Diego in Seattle wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 4:16 am Since when is fighting back with COMMENSURATE FORCE not allowed?

Now you are spinning yourself into a hole you won’t be able to get out of. You claim someone who is the confronter can’t claim self defense, but then contradict that and say he can defend himself but only with commensurate force. What? Forgetting your first statement that is clearly wrong, see my music example, and assuming your second statement is somewhat true, when one party tries to take a gun away from the other the original person with the gun is now using commensurate force when they pull the trigger.

Please keep putting your contradictions in all caps. It makes it easier to find and points out your lack of understanding.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Papa Willie wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 6:55 am https://www.news4jax.com/news/2013/12/0 ... ball-game/

He didn't have the smiley face on him there - like he does with all of the media pictures you see now.

Let's go ahead and admit that he was a stupid fucker.
ONCE AGAIN, the lying corrupt fake news media has duped the low IQ weak minded sheep.
This punk was a piece of shit.
When the mike brown case broke on the mainstream media, they portrayed him as a smiley college kid with a promising future. A real nice boy.

How many times can you stupid fucks be played by fake left wing news?
Last edited by EAP on Mon May 11, 2020 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 11999
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by mvscal »

Softball Bat wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 11:28 am
The Big Pickle wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 10:31 amThe black guy ATTACKED the guy with the gun!
Most likely because in that moment, he believed the Billy Bob was going to blow his ass away.
In that moment, he probably thought he had to go after the guy with the gun -- or die.

He ran from the cops and then tussled with them when he was arrested on his prior weapons charge. His "thought" process was demonstrably fucked long before he thought it would be good idea to try to snatch a shot gun out of someone's hands.

Once again, not an innocent jogger just minding his own business.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

mvscal wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 2:32 pm
Softball Bat wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 11:28 am
The Big Pickle wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 10:31 amThe black guy ATTACKED the guy with the gun!
Most likely because in that moment, he believed the Billy Bob was going to blow his ass away.
In that moment, he probably thought he had to go after the guy with the gun -- or die.

He ran from the cops and then tussled with them when he was arrested on his prior weapons charge. His "thought" process was demonstrably fucked long before he thought it would be good idea to try to snatch a shot gun out of someone's hands.

Once again, not an innocent jogger just minding his own business.
This punk was bad news.
Yet the lying fake news media portrays him as a victim?
His parents raised him well.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Innocent Bystander »

mvscal wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 2:32 pm
Softball Bat wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 11:28 am
The Big Pickle wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 10:31 amThe black guy ATTACKED the guy with the gun!
Most likely because in that moment, he believed the Billy Bob was going to blow his ass away.
In that moment, he probably thought he had to go after the guy with the gun -- or die.

He ran from the cops and then tussled with them when he was arrested on his prior weapons charge. His "thought" process was demonstrably fucked long before he thought it would be good idea to try to snatch a shot gun out of someone's hands.

Once again, not an innocent jogger just minding his own business.
The McMichaels were not arresting him for a weapons charge.

The McMichaels had no business using deadly force and initiating a confrontation. The McMichaels aggressively confronted Ahmaud. The Mcmichaels do not get to claim self defense for the equivalent of 'crying out in pain while assaulting you'.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 2:40 pm
mvscal wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 2:32 pm
Softball Bat wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 11:28 am
Most likely because in that moment, he believed the Billy Bob was going to blow his ass away.
In that moment, he probably thought he had to go after the guy with the gun -- or die.

He ran from the cops and then tussled with them when he was arrested on his prior weapons charge. His "thought" process was demonstrably fucked long before he thought it would be good idea to try to snatch a shot gun out of someone's hands.

Once again, not an innocent jogger just minding his own business.
This punk was bad news.
Yet the lying fake news media portrays him as a victim?
His parents raised him well.
He didn't get his day in court. Or are we doing away with that in the post-Covid19 US?
User avatar
The Big Pickle
Nubian Pole Sitter
Posts: 3173
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:57 am

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by The Big Pickle »

Papa Willie wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 4:53 pm
What exactly does that have to do with this case?

I didn’t think liberals did “WHATABOUTS”?

Jesus Christ you southern rednecks really are stupid!

Image

These gniggers are one more Trayvon Martin/ Michael Brown/ Ahmaud Arbery away from putting a cap in your fat georgia red neck......

Consider yourself warned.....Deys ain't be taking no sheit from you cracka mutda fukkka no mo's!
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 2:54 pm
mvscal wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 2:32 pm
Softball Bat wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 11:28 am
Most likely because in that moment, he believed the Billy Bob was going to blow his ass away.
In that moment, he probably thought he had to go after the guy with the gun -- or die.

He ran from the cops and then tussled with them when he was arrested on his prior weapons charge. His "thought" process was demonstrably fucked long before he thought it would be good idea to try to snatch a shot gun out of someone's hands.

Once again, not an innocent jogger just minding his own business.
The McMichaels were not arresting him for a weapons charge.

The McMichaels had no business using deadly force and initiating a confrontation. The McMichaels aggressively confronted Ahmaud. The Mcmichaels do not get to claim self defense for the equivalent of 'crying out in pain while assaulting you'.
IB.
I AGREE WITH YOU!
Are you capable of complex thought?
You're right. Those yokels are trigger happy morons.
But at the same time? This punk kid was trouble. Assaulting cops. etc...etc....
Read Papa's link.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Mon May 11, 2020 6:22 pm
IB.
I AGREE WITH YOU!
Are you capable of complex thought?
If I don't get my coffee, hash brown and eggs?

You're right. Those yokels are trigger happy morons.
But at the same time? This punk kid was trouble. Assaulting cops. etc...etc....
Read Papa's link.
I did. At what age can one open carry? (and yeah it says signs were posted, still was he allowed to apply for legally carrying a gun?) If he had a gun at a school event, why didn't he have a gun while allegedly casing a worksite? Does that make sense to you?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Papa Willie wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 8:51 am

Yeah - just jogging around in jogging clothes.
That glasses wearing freak is worried that the video could be used as a "false narrative".
BUWAHAHAHA

Like the video of Mike brown, moments before he attacked officer Darren Wilson?
Showing him picking up the store manager and slamming him into a wall.

False narratives are EXACTLY what fake news IS today. They LIVE for false narratives.

Like when msnbc edited the 911 call in the trayvon case.
Or ANY major news stories. Take you pick!!!

No one is saying the video justified the shooting. We just want to know the facts.
Is that too much to ask? For the supposed news to give us the straight story?
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 10:02 am
Papa Willie wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 8:51 am

Yeah - just jogging around in jogging clothes.
That glasses wearing freak is worried that the video could be used as a "false narrative".
BUWAHAHAHA
That glasses wearing freak is the attorney for the owner of the property. The owner is now claiming they had nothing to do with chasing Ahmaud down or discussing citizen's arrests.

The property owner is publically throwing the McMichaels under the bus. The false narrative per the attorney is the property owning giving their blessing to chasing Ahmaud off while calling 911.

(Those aren't construction boots on his feet.)

What should happen to the property owner for lying to save their own skin?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 11:01 am
EAP wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 10:02 am
Papa Willie wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 8:51 am

Yeah - just jogging around in jogging clothes.
That glasses wearing freak is worried that the video could be used as a "false narrative".
BUWAHAHAHA
That glasses wearing freak is the attorney for the owner of the property. The owner is now claiming they had nothing to do with chasing Ahmaud down or discussing citizen's arrests.

The property owner is publically throwing the McMichaels under the bus. The false narrative per the attorney is the property owning giving their blessing to chasing Ahmaud off while calling 911.

(Those aren't construction boots on his feet.)

What should happen to the property owner for lying to save their own skin?
False narratives are when you hide and omit things.
Remember Al Sharpton saying that the video of mike brown in the convenience store was not relevant? It was relevant.
AGAIN, not using the video to justify the shooting.
Got it?
The media was putting out the false narrative that he was just out jogging.
He wasn't. He was trespassing and stealing hammers🔨
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Papa Willie wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 10:38 pm

Hmmmmm. Evidently he'd been doing this repeatedly.
like I said.
The fake news media is 100% false narratives, all of the time.
They are the propaganda arm of the left wing government control socialist party.
Anyone who doesn't know this in 2020, needs to see a shrink.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by smackaholic »

I will admit to being a nosey fukk in the past, walking through a home under construction without permission. Trespassing, basically. Not to steal anything. Just because I am interested in how houses are constructed.

But had the neighbor walked up to me with a shotgun and told me the cops were on the way, I would have just sat the fukk down and waited. I wouldn’t try to take his weapon.

What I wonder is will we see changes in citizen arrest laws?

Those necks showed poor judgement, IMO. If someone was taking my neighbor’s shit, I’d call 911 and maybe I might even follow him, in my car, windows up, to direct cops when they arrived.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Diego in Seattle »

smackaholic wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 1:25 pm Those necks showed poor judgement, IMO. If someone was taking my neighbor’s shit, I’d call 911 and maybe I might even follow him, in my car, windows up, to direct cops when they arrived.
And that is what cops are directed to do when they are off-duty. Be good witnesses. And from what I've heard McMichaels was a cop for 30 years. He should have known better.

The fact that this guy & his son didn't do that, combined with the fact that he had a hard-on for anyone who might think stole his gun from his truck shows that it was very likely that McMichaels & McMichaels Jr. were very likely the aggressors.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13257
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Left Seater »

Diego in Seattle wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 1:41 pm
The fact that this guy & his son didn't do that, combined with the fact that he had a hard-on for anyone who might think stole his gun from his truck shows that it was very likely that McMichaels & McMichaels Jr. were very likely the aggressors.
Dude, coffee or liquor or something before you start posting. Besides the attack on English there, you admit you are making assumptions.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Diego in Seattle wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 1:41 pm
smackaholic wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 1:25 pm Those necks showed poor judgement, IMO. If someone was taking my neighbor’s shit, I’d call 911 and maybe I might even follow him, in my car, windows up, to direct cops when they arrived.
And that is what cops are directed to do when they are off-duty. Be good witnesses. And from what I've heard McMichaels was a cop for 30 years. He should have known better.

The fact that this guy & his son didn't do that, combined with the fact that he had a hard-on for anyone who might think stole his gun from his truck shows that it was very likely that McMichaels & McMichaels Jr. were very likely the aggressors.
Off duty cops are directed to do?
Are you an idiot?
An off duty cop who sees a criminal peeping and trespassing, doesn't have to wait for other cops to arrive you stupid fuck.

Neither do ordinary citizens. You cowardly sniveling low IQ.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

smackaholic wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 1:25 pm I will admit to being a nosey fukk in the past, walking through a home under construction without permission. Trespassing, basically. Not to steal anything. Just because I am interested in how houses are constructed.

But had the neighbor walked up to me with a shotgun and told me the cops were on the way, I would have just sat the fukk down and waited. I wouldn’t try to take his weapon.

What I wonder is will we see changes in citizen arrest laws?

Those necks showed poor judgement, IMO. If someone was taking my neighbor’s shit, I’d call 911 and maybe I might even follow him, in my car, windows up, to direct cops when they arrived.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BINGO!

IF I'M telling the criminal that the cops are coming? And he tries to grab my gun? HE'S THE AGGRESSOR.

I CALLED the police. Then told the trespassing peeping criminal that the cops were on their way.
Then the low life animal grabs my weapon? And Diego thinks I'M the aggressor?

You are one stupid sub human.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Diego in Seattle »

schmick wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 9:00 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 1:41 pm
smackaholic wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 1:25 pm Those necks showed poor judgement, IMO. If someone was taking my neighbor’s shit, I’d call 911 and maybe I might even follow him, in my car, windows up, to direct cops when they arrived.
And that is what cops are directed to do when they are off-duty. Be good witnesses. And from what I've heard McMichaels was a cop for 30 years. He should have known better.

The fact that this guy & his son didn't do that, combined with the fact that he had a hard-on for anyone who might think stole his gun from his truck shows that it was very likely that McMichaels & McMichaels Jr. were very likely the aggressors.
Anqueefa pussy pretending to know the procedures of police officers

Not all police departments are neutered with stand down orders like the police in the north west
All my education & training was in LoCal, idiot.

But that's how most veteran officers roll, regardless of location.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13257
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Left Seater »

Difference, between off duty and retired. Most off-duty officers usually have their piece and badge on them at all times. I asked a cop today if they are supposed to stand down and be a witness when off duty. He laughed and said no way.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Innocent Bystander »

Left Seater wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 11:58 pm Difference, between off duty and retired. Most off-duty officers usually have their piece and badge on them at all times. I asked a cop today if they are supposed to stand down and be a witness when off duty. He laughed and said no way.
Not all municipalities have same policies?
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13257
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Left Seater »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Thu May 14, 2020 1:05 am
Left Seater wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 11:58 pm Difference, between off duty and retired. Most off-duty officers usually have their piece and badge on them at all times. I asked a cop today if they are supposed to stand down and be a witness when off duty. He laughed and said no way.
Not all municipalities have same policies?
I have no idea. But what a waste if Diego’s take is true that some departments want off duty cops to stand down and just observe.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Left Seater wrote: Thu May 14, 2020 2:20 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: Thu May 14, 2020 1:05 am
Left Seater wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 11:58 pm Difference, between off duty and retired. Most off-duty officers usually have their piece and badge on them at all times. I asked a cop today if they are supposed to stand down and be a witness when off duty. He laughed and said no way.
Not all municipalities have same policies?
I have no idea. But what a waste if Diego’s take is true that some departments want off duty cops to stand down and just observe.
At least one reason for it is if the officer is off-duty with a family member or significant other. By engaging themselves it risks identifying his/her loved ones to criminals. That puts their safety at risk.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13257
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Left Seater »

Long way to go for that. Criminals are going to not focus on the person with the gun and instead focus on the loved ones in the heat of the moment? I doubt it. Further there are much easier ways to threaten family members.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by smackaholic »

Diego in Seattle wrote: Thu May 14, 2020 2:33 am At least one reason for it is if the officer is off-duty with a family member or significant other. By engaging themselves it risks identifying his/her loved ones to criminals. That puts their safety at risk.
That is the weakest shit answer ever. I am sure that the officer takes into account how he would proceed IF he is with his family and as LS said, there are easier ways to discover who family members are. Just follow them home.

If this is indeed the policy, it is more likely a case of town lawyers playing CYA. Don't do the right thing. Nobody gives a fukk about protecting the public. It's about protecting the city checkbook. When a thief successfully completes a theft, it's no skin off the town's nose. Too bad for the victim.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Carson
2012 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 4602
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: NOT in The Gump

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Carson »

mvscal wrote: Sun May 10, 2020 6:29 pmYou will get the benefit of the doubt in situations like this once you people, as a culture, decide to stop behaving like feral animals not before.
They're trying, I think:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/wh ... n-n1208151
"I'm changing my patterns," he said, "because I can't change the color of my skin."
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Thu May 14, 2020 1:05 am
Left Seater wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 11:58 pm Difference, between off duty and retired. Most off-duty officers usually have their piece and badge on them at all times. I asked a cop today if they are supposed to stand down and be a witness when off duty. He laughed and said no way.
Not all municipalities have same policies?
You're for off duty officers standing down?

If that's true, you need to question your mental stability.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 11999
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by mvscal »

EAP wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 10:02 am
Papa Willie wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 8:51 am

Yeah - just jogging around in jogging clothes.
That glasses wearing freak is worried that the video could be used as a "false narrative".
BUWAHAHAHA

A false narrative? You mean false narrative like 'dead gnigger being out for a jog when he was set upon by racist rednecks who just blew him away out of sheer meaness of spirit' kind of false narrative?
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 11999
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by mvscal »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 11:01 am The false narrative per the attorney is the property owning giving their blessing to chasing Ahmaud off while calling 911.
That's the homeowner's insurance company talking. I would call it proper due diligence. Of course nobody is claiming the property owner gave their blessing.

It does; however, clearly demolish the "innocent jogger" false narrative. So...what was dead gnigger doing in that neighborhood since he clearly wasn't jogging?
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Diego in Seattle »

mvscal wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 12:47 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 11:01 am The false narrative per the attorney is the property owning giving their blessing to chasing Ahmaud off while calling 911.
That's the homeowner's insurance company talking. I would call it proper due diligence. Of course nobody is claiming the property owner gave their blessing.

It does; however, clearly demolish the "innocent jogger" false narrative. So...what was dead gnigger doing in that neighborhood since he clearly wasn't jogging?
Probably about the same as the other people who were videotaped walking through the site.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 11999
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by mvscal »

Diego in Seattle wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 1:20 am
mvscal wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 12:47 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: Tue May 12, 2020 11:01 am The false narrative per the attorney is the property owning giving their blessing to chasing Ahmaud off while calling 911.
That's the homeowner's insurance company talking. I would call it proper due diligence. Of course nobody is claiming the property owner gave their blessing.

It does; however, clearly demolish the "innocent jogger" false narrative. So...what was dead gnigger doing in that neighborhood since he clearly wasn't jogging?
Probably about the same as the other people who were videotaped walking through the site.
Probably not since dead gnigger was supposed to be out for a jog, remember? Does dead gnigger look like he was jogging in that security cam footage?
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Diego in Seattle »

mvscal wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 2:49 am
Diego in Seattle wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 1:20 am
mvscal wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 12:47 am

That's the homeowner's insurance company talking. I would call it proper due diligence. Of course nobody is claiming the property owner gave their blessing.

It does; however, clearly demolish the "innocent jogger" false narrative. So...what was dead gnigger doing in that neighborhood since he clearly wasn't jogging?
Probably about the same as the other people who were videotaped walking through the site.
Probably not since dead gnigger was supposed to be out for a jog, remember? Does dead gnigger look like he was jogging in that security cam footage?
So if one takes a break from exercising they aren't really exercising at all. Got it.

🙄X infinity
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
Carson
2012 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 4602
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: NOT in The Gump

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Carson »

Well, things just got more interesting:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ahmaud-arber ... ony-murder
Bryan initially claimed he was being a good Samaritan by recording Arbery's death, though that description quickly came under scrutiny.

"He is a liar," Lee Merritt, an attorney hired by Arbery's mother, told Fox News, adding that Bryan's story had changed from saying he was trying to trap Arbery to now "launching a campaign to clear his name."

"If he was a good Samaritan, he would have honked his horn. It's worth noting that on the video, he doesn't even flinch. He doesn't gasp. Shot after shot. He simply takes it all in," Merritt said.
What about neighbors who may have watched/recorded it through their windows or from their yards? Are they murderers, too?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Diego in Seattle wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 3:25 am
mvscal wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 2:49 am
Diego in Seattle wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 1:20 am
Probably about the same as the other people who were videotaped walking through the site.
Probably not since dead gnigger was supposed to be out for a jog, remember? Does dead gnigger look like he was jogging in that security cam footage?
So if one takes a break from exercising they aren't really exercising at all. Got it.

🙄X infinity
Wow. Just when we thought you couldn't get any more stupid.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by EAP »

Carson wrote: Fri May 22, 2020 6:20 am Well, things just got more interesting:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ahmaud-arber ... ony-murder
Bryan initially claimed he was being a good Samaritan by recording Arbery's death, though that description quickly came under scrutiny.

"He is a liar," Lee Merritt, an attorney hired by Arbery's mother, told Fox News, adding that Bryan's story had changed from saying he was trying to trap Arbery to now "launching a campaign to clear his name."

"If he was a good Samaritan, he would have honked his horn. It's worth noting that on the video, he doesn't even flinch. He doesn't gasp. Shot after shot. He simply takes it all in," Merritt said.
What about neighbors who may have watched/recorded it through their windows or from their yards? Are they murderers, too?
Did they call him an "unarmed black man"?
As soon as he grabs my weapon, he's armed.
As soon as Mike Brown grabbed officer Wilson's weapon, he was armed

Legislation needs to happen.
You grab my weapon, it's attempted murder.
Period.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by smackaholic »

Papa Willie wrote:
Never trust edited video.

There are breaks in it.

Why?

What happened?

Was he there to peddle drugs?

No clue.

One more reason to legalize every last bit of it. Let people be stupid. Nothing good comes from attempting to police that activity.

And world’s worst taker operator should have it and any other weapons/sharp instruments taken from him. He’s an idiot. He tazed the dude when he had his hands out and was making no threatening gestures



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Kierland

Re: Ahmaud Arbery A.K.A. Trayvon Martin II

Post by Kierland »

Left Seater wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 11:58 pm Difference, between off duty and retired. Most off-duty officers usually have their piece and badge on them at all times. I asked a cop today if they are supposed to stand down and be a witness when off duty. He laughed and said no way.
A local Police Chief (out of his jurisdiction) tried to intervene in a situation I was involved in a year or so ago. I told him to GFH and when he pulled his badge I pulled out my phone and told him to walk away or I was speed dialing our local sheriff's cell. He walked away, fuckin' JUBM.
Post Reply