T1B

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:38 pm**

This from Mark Halperin. You libs are familiar with him right?

Mark Halperin, the former political director at ABC News and a journalist and commentator on Newsmax, has some very bad news for Trump-haters. According to Mark, who’s reviewed both public and private polling data, Ms. Harris is in big trouble. We’re talking numbers that are as bad—if not worse—than Joe Biden’s.

“I’m warning those of you who want Trump to lose that by the middle of next month, there’s a real possibility, based on what I’ve seen in terms of public and private data … that Kamala Harris could be where Joe Biden was,” says @MarkHalperin. “Only one electoral college path and not a particularly strong hold on it.” #Trump #Harris

There was a video too, but I know you Cackles supporters wouldn't watch it. He also says PA is basically a lock for Trump.

As I've said, the polls are useless. They were wrong in 2016, and no one has done anything to improve polling. Infact, they've gotten exponentially worse.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:51 pm**

So you cite a poll, then you say polls are useless.

Carry on, dumbass.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:56 pm**

Who is Mark Halpern, and why should I care?

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 7:39 pm**

Whatever the 'polls" say, add 3 or 4 points (at least) to Dump's side.

There are a lot of closet Yam supporters.
And also, the electoral college favors the Republicans.

Finally, all of the Harris hysteria is pretty much based on -----> nothing.

When Scamala finally gets out of her protective bubble and has to engage with questions on the spot, people will realize she is both vacuous and unlikable.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:26 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:51 pm So you cite a poll, then you say polls are useless.

Carry on, dumbass.

My bad, I should've clarified - I should've said internal polling is much more reliable. The info gained from internal polling informs the campaigns, so that needs to be more accurate for the campaigns to focus where they need to.

The public polls are biased and reflect what the MSM wants to happen.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:31 pm**

She (Harris) had a VP approval of 29% immediately before being elevated to fill the corpse’s shoes. She hasn’t done anything (aside from filling the corpse’s she’s) since her elevation to change that view among most. She never won a primary delegate, ever. She’s terrible even to those who would vote for fruit filled Jell-O if it was the Team D candidate. She sucks. Everyone knows it. And it ain’t gonna get better. It’s a death Walz. Dance.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:32 pm**

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 7:39 pm There are a lot of closet Yam supporters.

I laughed.

Did you not learn anything from the European elections?

The silent majority is liberal. Not to mention, the abortion issue. Over half the population is female. And they are coming out big time this year.

Landslide.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:50 pm**

Landslide my ass. Yes, for Trump.

Just saw a highlight from the CNN interview, and that skank Dana Bash was completely leading her to get an answer she wanted.

And Harris didn't even take the bait! Bash asked her if her flipping was due to her rethinking the issues, and she doubled down on her radical views.

This will not be close.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:10 pm**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:31 pm She (Harris) had a VP approval of 29% immediately before being elevated to fill the corpse’s shoes. She hasn’t done anything (aside from filling the corpse’s she’s) since her elevation to change that view among most. She never won a primary delegate, ever. She’s terrible even to those who would vote for fruit filled Jell-O if it was the Team D candidate. She sucks. Everyone knows it. And it ain’t gonna get better. It’s a death Walz. Dance.

So you're saying that Gerald Ford was an illegitimate POTUS?

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:20 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:10 pm
88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:31 pm She (Harris) had a VP approval of 29% immediately before being elevated to fill the corpse’s shoes. She hasn’t done anything (aside from filling the corpse’s she’s) since her elevation to change that view among most. She never won a primary delegate, ever. She’s terrible even to those who would vote for fruit filled Jell-O if it was the Team D candidate. She sucks. Everyone knows it. And it ain’t gonna get better. It’s a death Walz. Dance.
So you're saying that Gerald Ford was an illegitimate POTUS?

The public thought so. How did he do in his election run, genius?

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:22 pm**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:31 pm She (Harris) had a VP approval of 29% immediately before being elevated to fill the corpse’s shoes. She hasn’t done anything (aside from filling the corpse’s she’s) since her elevation to change that view among most. She never won a primary delegate, ever. She’s terrible even to those who would vote for fruit filled Jell-O if it was the Team D candidate. She sucks. Everyone knows it. And it ain’t gonna get better. It’s a death Walz. Dance.

This is going to be fun.

Watching Hitler melt on November 5th.

I see a 5150 in Hitler's future.

Too funny.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:22 pm**

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:38 pm This from Mark Halperin. You libs are familiar with him right?

Yes. He's a sex pest like Dump. He's also the guy who asked Dump to name his favorite bible verse, to which Dump explained that he liked them all. So I guess I'll give Halperin that.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:31 pm**

Keep cackling, you two. The voting begins on 9/6/2024.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:17 pm**

Btw, my suggestion for all T1B members is to stay home on election day.

Don't feed into a system that shows you two piles of sh!t and tells you that you need to do your patriotic duty and vote for one of the piles.

Not IN.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:04 pm**

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:17 pm Btw, my suggestion for all T1B members is to stay home on election day.

Don't feed into a system that shows you two piles of sh!t and tells you that you need to do your patriotic duty and vote for one of the piles.

Not IN.

I'm voting for Harris. I like money too much.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:34 pm**

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:38 pm This from Mark Halperin. You libs are familiar with him right?

Mark Halperin, the former political director at ABC News and a journalist and commentator on Newsmax..

Eh, lost me right there, dip shit.
Find a credible source.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:26 am**

FiatLux wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:04 pm I'm voting for Harris. I like money too much.

You like giving the federal government your money.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 5:03 am**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:26 am
FiatLux wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:04 pm I'm voting for Harris. I like money too much.
You like giving the federal government your money.

You like to give your money to greedy corporations.

And you'll be doing more of that when the ignorant orange imbecile slaps tariffs on foreign-produced goods.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:30 am**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 5:03 am
Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:26 am
FiatLux wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:04 pm I'm voting for Harris. I like money too much.
You like giving the federal government your money.
You like to give your money to greedy corporations.

And you'll be doing more of that when the ignorant orange imbecile slaps tariffs on foreign-produced goods.

Since Biden/Harris took office, we’ve all been giving tons more money to greedy corporations.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:45 am**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:30 am
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 5:03 am
Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:26 am
You like giving the federal government your money.
You like to give your money to greedy corporations.

And you'll be doing more of that when the ignorant orange imbecile slaps tariffs on foreign-produced goods.
Since Biden/Harris took office, we’ve all been giving tons more money to greedy corporations.

Actually greedflation started with Covid in 2020.

But your statement seems to infer that you're okay with POTUS controlling what corporations can charge. Is that the case?

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 12:02 pm**

Hell no.

But I’m sick of inept and stupid policy that engenders inflation.

If Harris wins and implements the policies she’s suggested, inflation might be the least of our concerns.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 3:50 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:26 am
FiatLux wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:04 pm I'm voting for Harris. I like money too much.
You like giving the federal government your money.

http://theoneboard.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=53933

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:20 pm**

poptart wrote:Scamala ... vacuous

Vacuous indeed.

Dana Bash's first question was, "What will you do on day one?"

Scamala Harris had no answer.

LOL

Just a lot of hopey changey gibberish with NO specifics as to what she will do on day one when she steps into the Oval Office.

Ridiculous.

So, Bash had to ask the question a 2nd time.

At one point in the interview, the vapid one said (paraphrasing) she wanted to change what has gone on the last 10 years.

The remark was obviously intended to be a shot at Donald, who has been the loudest political drum over the past decade.

However, her remark ignores the reality that SHE has been part of the engine over the past 3.5 years that has taken America to where it is right now.

It isn't a pretty picture right now, sweetheart

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:28 pm**

It won’t matter. She could say she would move us to an 80% tax rate and her brain dead legion would vote for her.

They’re not voting FOR anything. It’s a vote AGAINST Trump.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:54 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:28 pm They’re not voting FOR anything. It’s a vote AGAINST Trump.

Simply not true. For example, I prefer Harris' positions re abortion over those of trump. Likewise, I want Harris to make appointments to the judiciary instead of trump.

That said, voting against trump is a perfectly good reason to vote.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 5:39 pm**

I wonder which one got the blow job.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 5:40 pm**

I'm halfway expecting Donald to make Scamala cry in the debate.

lol

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:09 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:54 pm
Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:28 pm They’re not voting FOR anything. It’s a vote AGAINST Trump.
Simply not true. For example, I prefer Harris' positions re abortion over those of trump. Likewise, I want Harris to make appointments to the judiciary instead of trump.

That said, voting against trump is a perfectly good reason to vote.

I actually can easily understand voting against Trump as a sole reason to choose Harris.

I will never understand how anyone can condone killing humans. Bizarre to me. And I have zero religious reasons impacting my thinking.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:11 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:54 pm I prefer Harris' positions re abortion over those of trump.

Please elaborate.

Trump has said that he would veto any federal legislation that bans or restricts abortion. His position is that the abortion issue is one for the voters in individual states to decide, and that the federal government has no role in that decision. And the individual states are enacting abortion provisions with regularity. So that seems to be working.

I'm not sure what Harris's position is. She and other dumbfucks say they want Roe back. I'm not sure how she could make that happen as President. Are you supporting a destruction of the current SCOTUS? Is there some kind of Roe-like statute in waiting that Congress could pass and she would sign? If so, I've never seen it. If she proposed efforts by the states to amend the US constitution to include a Roe-like framework, I might support it (although no one really knows how to define a Roe-like framework - does the right to an abortion cease as of the viability of the unborn etc.?).

Since this is the first issue you raised, what is it that you see Trump doing in a second term insofar as the abortion issue is concerned, which Harris would handle differently? And what would she do differently?

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:28 pm**

I do not want it for the states to decide. Abortion should be readily available all over the country. Don't like abortion? Then don't have one.

trump appointed Justices who lied during their confirmation hearings, and he has changed his positions. Not really interested in trying to filter thru the shit he says in an attempt to find a kernel of corn. The rabid anti-abortion organizations support trump, which tells me all I need to know.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:34 pm**

Boat, battery, shark , Hannibal Lector, windmills.

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:44 pm**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:11 pm
Roux wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:54 pm I prefer Harris' positions re abortion over those of trump.
Please elaborate.

Trump has said that he would veto any federal legislation that bans or restricts abortion.

Trump has made a lot of conflicting statements on this as well as other issues, always depending on which way he thinks the wind is blowing. So you get to pick whichever one also suits your purpose.

How conveeeeeeeeenient.

Do you seriously believe anything that comes out of his face?

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 7:08 pm**

Mikey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:44 pm Do you seriously believe anything that comes out of his face?

How do you understand it to believe it? There are so many examples, this one was from Tuesday:

You take a look at bacon and some of these products, and some people don’t eat bacon anymore. And we are going to get the energy prices down. When we get energy down - you know, this was caused by their horrible energy. Wind — they want wind all over the place. But when it doesn’t blow, we have a little problem.

That's what you want leading our country? Really?

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 8:44 pm**

Roux wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 7:08 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 6:44 pm Do you seriously believe anything that comes out of his face?

How do you understand it to believe it? There are so many examples, this one was from Tuesday:

You take a look at bacon and some of these products, and some people don’t eat bacon anymore. And we are going to get the energy prices down. When we get energy down - you know, this was caused by their horrible energy. Wind — they want wind all over the place. But when it doesn’t blow, we have a little problem.

That's what you want leading our country? Really?

So you agree that we are choosing between two complete morons?

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:46 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 8:44 pmSo you agree that we are choosing between two complete morons?

No. Neither is a moron.
Trump is a liar, sociopath, and a narcissist that may share
some of your political views.
Harris is a very intelligent woman with many different
political views than yours.

The biggest problem with both sides, not candidates, is that
everyone wants to tell the other what they can and can not
do. Just like the abortion deal ... worry about what YOU can
and can not do. Stop worrying so much about what the
fuck someone else can and can not do.
Like Walz has been saying of late .... "Mind your own damn business."

Posted: **Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:49 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:45 am
Actually greedflation started with Covid in 2020.

Your understanding of economics is far beyond anyone on this board’s comprehension.

Actually, you are one stupid fuck. Inflation is caused by the government, because it is the government’s responsibility to run the treasury and control how many dollar bills are in circulation.

The more new dollars that are pumped into the system, the less valuable are the dollars in your wallet. Because it’s paper, not precious metal. Companies are dogs chasing a bone, and the ones that benefit are the ones at the front of the line waiting to receive more of those newly minted dollar bills.

You arguing about taxes is laughable, because the amount of money this current administration has helicoptered into the economy, by printing new money, has been far more detrimental than any tax impact it could affect, positively or negatively.

But aside from that, your knowledge of trickle down economics and other strawmen arguments and empty slogans should be at the top of your resume. Super impressive.

Posted: **Sat Aug 31, 2024 6:00 am**

L45B wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:49 pm
Inflation is caused by the government, because it is the government’s responsibility to run the treasury and control how many dollar bills are in circulation.

The more new dollars that are pumped into the system, the less valuable are the dollars in your wallet. Because it’s paper, not precious metal. Companies are dogs chasing a bone, and the ones that benefit are the ones at the front of the line waiting to receive more of those newly minted dollar bills.

Blech. Too much economic theory, not enough economic history. Did someone get Friedman last Christmas, that might have passed in 1980?

There's more to be learned from the implementation of theory, I'm thinking of the British economy from roughly mid seventies to mid eighties when everything you say was gospel to some, the reality was quite different. You might even hopefully come away with the idea that you know less after study when typically you should know more. It is 'the dismal science' for a reason.

Posted: **Sat Aug 31, 2024 3:54 pm**

Posted: **Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:09 pm**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 3:54 pm

http://theoneboard.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=53933

The San Francisco Liberal is the only choice.

Now let's go make some more money!

I love a good money buzz.

Posted: **Sun Sep 01, 2024 4:19 am**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 3:54 pm

errr.. right. OK, that's pretty bad.

T1B

Uh oh...

Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...

Re: Uh oh...