T1B

Looking forward to Arizona vs Oklahoma in about an hour.

I'm hoping it's a close game. But I see Arizona crushing Chokelahoma. I'd put Arizona up there with Washington and Oregon as the best teams in the PAC 12. Maybe better than Washington and Oregon.

I agree. Should be a good game.

Once the Wildcats got past that loss to a weak Mississippi State team, they’ve been on a serious roll.

Bowls

I’ve been waiting all day for a my bowls to come around. Just now had a nice pre-game warm up and now I’m getting an appetite for dinner. Digestion has been a little screwed up with all the rich food this past week.

Gotta wild one in Tejas.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Fri Dec 29, 2023 5:14 am Gotta wild one in Tejas.

Good God. The Big 10 offenses are horrible.

Washington and Oregon are going to own the Big 10 next year.

Ohio state 3 points.

Iowa 0 points.


Too funny.

Big 14 is the suck

The Bama defense.

And these teams are the future of the NFL?????

NFL is already full of shitty football as it is. They'll have to water it down even more to make it flag football...and not the yellow ones that are thrown seemingly 50% of the plays.

All I see is 80% nawgles suited up and most of the time they're just bitchin at each other as if they were back in "da hood."

d-townmike wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:08 pm All I see is 80% nawgles suited up and most of the time they're just bitchin at each other as if they were back in "da hood."

You are a piece of shit.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:12 pm

d-townmike wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:08 pm All I see is 80% nawgles suited up and most of the time they're just bitchin at each other as if they were back in "da hood."

You are a piece of shit.

Yeah? Well, prove me wrong!

The Bama offense.






Now we know why Bama lost by double digits at HOME to a crap Texass team. Hell, just a few years ago even Cal swept the home and away against Texass.


Looks like Whoregon should have been the 4th team in this playoff.

2023 California Golden Bears football
Record 6–7 (7th in Pac-12)

North Texas W 58–21
Auburn L 10–14
Idaho W 31–17
Washington L 32–59
Arizona State W 24–21
Oregon State L 40–52
Utah L 14–34
USC L 49–50
Oregon L 19–63
Washington State W 42–39
Stanford W 27–15
UCLA W 33–7
Texas Tech L 14–34

Cal fans haven’t got a clue.

The ACC’s new doormat.

I feel like I'm reliving the Cheez-it Bowl.

The Fuskies are going to end up winning the mythical national championship.

Why God why?

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:12 pm

d-townmike wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:08 pm All I see is 80% nawgles suited up and most of the time they're just bitchin at each other as if they were back in "da hood."

You are a piece of shit.

You are a miserable cunt.

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 1:03 pm Alabama-31, Michigan-17

Texas-34, Washington-31

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 9:20 pm

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 5:44 pm bammer didn't even score that much against a shitty Auburn team.

Got 27 against Georgia and their D is better than Michigan’s. Look who UM built those gaudy defensive stats against.

If Milroe stays healthy, I see no way the cheaters can beat the Tide.

Bwhahahahahahaha!!!!

Well damn. Odd last call there, Bama. Thought they’d roll Milroe out…give him an option.

Congrats to UM. Better than I thought, although neither team looked good.

Hook ‘em Horns, I guess.

Carson wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 1:00 am You are a miserable cunt.

Douche-town Mike posts something racist. Screwball calls him out. Carped, the board's Roman Polanski, defense Douch-Town Mike. Says a lot.

Kierland was right about you. POS.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 1:55 am
Bwhahahahahahaha!!!!

Says the guy who will never enjoy his school playing a meaningful game.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 2:04 am

Carson wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 1:00 am You are a miserable cunt.

Douche-town Mike posts something racist. Screwball calls him out. Carped, the board's Roman Polanski, defense Douch-Town Mike. Says a lot.

Kierland was right about you. POS.

I just call it as I see it!

https://www.westernjournal.com/words-no ... aSX3SnXekQ

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 2:01 am Well damn. Odd last call there, Bama. Thought they’d roll Milroe out…give him an option.

Congrats to UM. Better than I thought, although neither team looked good.

Hook ‘em Horns, I guess.

Bama didn't belong.

And neither does Texass.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 12:58 am I feel like I'm reliving the Cheez-it Bowl.

The Fuskies are going to end up winning the mythical national championship.

Why God why?

Because it sure as hell will never be Berzerkley.

How 'bout them Dawgs?

Dawgs won in spite of the tremendous effort by the zebras to give the game to Tejas.

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 5:52 am Dawgs won in spite of the tremendous effort by the zebras to give the game to Tejas.

Go away you bandwagoning tard.

I think Washington made it close intentionally. They’re not supposed to win by more than 10 points. They almost fucked themselves in the end though.

Mikey wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 6:27 am I think Washington made it close intentionally. They’re not supposed to win by more than 10 points. They almost fucked themselves in the end though.

That interference call was bullshit.

I had Alabama and Texas.

And that, folks, is exactly why I’m not a gambler!

Congrats to UM and UW.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 2:52 am

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 2:01 am Well damn. Odd last call there, Bama. Thought they’d roll Milroe out…give him an option.

Congrats to UM. Better than I thought, although neither team looked good.

Hook ‘em Horns, I guess.

Bama didn't belong.

And neither does Texass.

I’m sure we’d all love to hear what 2 teams should have been there.

Georgia definitely was a top 4 team. But…oh yeah… Bama beat them.

d-townmike wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 11:08 pm And these teams are the future of the NFL?????

NFL is already full of shitty football as it is. They'll have to water it down even more to make it flag football...and not the yellow ones that are thrown seemingly 50% of the plays.

All I see is 80% nawgles suited up and most of the time they're just bitchin at each other as if they were back in "da hood."

Depending on who you want to believe is correct, the NFL is comprised of
about 55% to 60% black players. The majority of them act like typical
humans most of the time and should not be lumped into your "nawgles,"
category. They are just folks that benefit from the strong genetic lines
that were formed from the breeding of their predecessors.
Nogs, in my unscientific count, only account for about 5% of the
league. With dipshit extraordinaire Jamooley Chase holding the title
of the nogiest of all nogs. He is a complete buffoon. He will likely flame out
sooner than later and join the ranks of his fellow NAPA's (in jail or dead)
before he is 40.

kcdave wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:40 am fellow NAPA's

What's a NAPA?

dave wrote:They are just folks that benefit from the strong genetic lines
that were formed from the breeding of their predecessors.

Sincerely,

Jimmy the Greek

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 1:15 am

dave wrote:They are just folks that benefit from the strong genetic lines
that were formed from the breeding of their predecessors.

Sincerely,

Jimmy the Greek

I believe that there's a certain amount of hard work and dedication involved for most.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:52 am

kcdave wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:40 am fellow NAPA's

What's a NAPA?

Mr. SM,

NAPA would be a term likely never seen here before
but It was quite common to see it mentioned at .net.
Due to your prior history of such topics, I highly doubt you
would appreciate it's true worth of comedic value, therefore
I will not be wasting my time sharing it with you, nor debating
the issue. In fairness though, thin skinned folks such as yourself
may be inclined to automatically assume that the "N," of "NAPA,"
would be that one main trigger flipping "N," word that only
folks of color are allowed to use. That would not be the case.
Those of us from .net would never have disgraced ourselves
with the use of such a classless word. As has been proven to be
fact here, we always chose to use the classier "Nog,' instead.
Don't fool yourself into thinking the that the "N'" is "Nog," either
as that would not be the case.


Sin,
kc


----------------------------------------------------------

Mikey wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:55 am

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 1:15 am

dave wrote:They are just folks that benefit from the strong genetic lines
that were formed from the breeding of their predecessors.

Sincerely,

Jimmy the Greek

I believe that there's a certain amount of hard work and dedication involved for most.

There certainly is and I agree 100%. To deny that would be foolish.
However, to deny that hundreds of years of "breeding," - (the activity of controlling
the mating and production of offspring) by slave owners did not produce
a certain segment of the population that has the opportunity to excel easier at
some our more physical sports, would be foolish as well.
Just because a topic is unpopular or does not fall in line with the new social
justice way of denying facts and the past, does not mean it has not merit.

kcdave wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:47 am Mr. SM,

NAPA would be a term likely never seen here before
but It was quite common to see it mentioned at .net.
Due to your prior history of such topics, I highly doubt you
would appreciate it's true worth of comedic value, therefore
I will not be wasting my time sharing it with you, nor debating
the issue. In fairness though, thin skinned folks such as yourself
may be inclined to automatically assume that the "N," of "NAPA,"
would be that one main trigger flipping "N," word that only
folks of color are allowed to use. That would not be the case.
Those of us from .net would never have disgraced ourselves
with the use of such a classless word. As has been proven to be
fact here, we always chose to use the classier "Nog,' instead.
Don't fool yourself into thinking the that the "N'" is "Nog," either
as that would not be the case.


Sin,
kc

I knew it was a racist slur. Just wanted to see if you had the courage to explain yourself. Which you predictably didn't.

Racist cuck.

Maybe this will help some of the folks here . . .

The Racial Slur Data base, along with the Racial Slur Of The Day

Meat Head wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 3:35 pm Maybe this will help some of the folks here . . .

The Racial Slur Data base, along with the Racial Slur Of The Day

Thanks Meat Head. "Nother American Pavement Apes?" Doesn't even make sense. Racists are fucked up.

I would guess that Nother is supposed to be North.